India’s legal and constitutional landscape continues to evolve through a series of consequential judicial interventions touching upon national security, institutional accountability, religious autonomy, environmental governance, free speech, and federal power structures. From the Supreme Court reopening the debate on UAPA bail jurisprudence and state control over Hindu temples, to High Courts scrutinising governance failures, ecological damage, policing practices, and administrative excesses, the judiciary remained deeply engaged with questions carrying both legal and political significance.
This edition of India Judiciary Watch tracks the most important developments from courts across the country between 18th May and 23rd May, 2026. The newsletter covers key hearings, interim orders, constitutional observations, politically sensitive litigations, and landmark verdicts that are likely to shape public discourse, governance debates, and institutional dynamics in the months ahead.
Alongside major legal developments, this edition also maps important appointments, collegium recommendations, and judicial transfers across various High Courts and the Supreme Court ecosystem. As always, the objective is to report proceedings and contextualise their wider policy, political, along with institutional implications in a structured and accessible manner.
I. Key Legal Developments
Supreme Court Doubts Its Own Judgment In Umar Khalid Case; Says ‘Bail Is Rule Jail Is Exception’ Even In UAPA Cases
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: A two-judge Bench of the Supreme Court noted that “bail is the rule and jail is the exception” even under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA). While granting bail to a narco-terrorism accused, Syed Iftikhar Andrabi, who was arrested by NIA in June 2020, the Court expressed serious reservations about an earlier judgment in Gulfisha Fatima v. State that had denied bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam. The Court underscored that the ruling in Union of India v. KA Najeeb (2021) cannot be diluted, even by other Benches, unless they form a larger Bench. Highlighting the gravity of indefinite pre-trial detention, the Bench cited National Crime Records Bureau statistics showing an abysmal national UAPA conviction rate of just 1.5% to 6%, dropping below 1% in Jammu and Kashmir and noted that there is 99% possibility of acquittal in such cases.
Supreme Court Refers To Larger Bench 'Perceived Conflict' In Judgments On UAPA Bail When Trial Is Delayed
Source: Live Law
Development: The Supreme Court has referred to a larger Bench the issue concerning conflicting interpretations of the three-judge Bench ruling in Union of India v. KA Najeeb, particularly on whether prolonged incarceration can justify bail under the UAPA. A Bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and PB Varale noted a “perceived conflict” between earlier rulings such as Gulfisha Fatima and the recent Syed Ifthikar Andrabi v. NIA judgment, which held that constitutional courts cannot ignore excessive pre-trial detention merely because UAPA charges are invoked. While making the reference, the Court granted six months’ interim bail to Delhi riots accused Tasleem Ahmed and Khalid Saifi, subject to strict conditions including a prohibition on speaking to the media regarding the case.
Delhi High Court Grants Umar Khalid 3-Day Interim Bail To Visit Ailing Mother
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: The Delhi High Court granted a three-day interim bail to former JNU student and co-accused of 2020 Delhi riots, Umar Khalid from 1st June to 3rd June, allowing him to visit his ailing mother during her medical surgery. Taking an “empathetic view,” the Division Bench imposed strict conditions, directing Khalid to remain within the Delhi-NCR region, use only one mobile number, and restrict his movements strictly between his residence and the hospital. Khalid had approached the High Court to appeal a trial court's 19th May order, which had denied his request for temporary release.
Delhi HC Issues Notices To AAP Leaders In Contempt Case
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: The Delhi High Court has issued notices to Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, and other AAP leaders over a criminal contempt plea. The action follows their allegedly defamatory and vilifying social media remarks against Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma. The leaders had previously boycotted proceedings and demanded her recusal from the Delhi Excise Policy case. Following the backlash, Justice Sharma initiated the contempt case and transferred the main liquor policy matter to another bench. The High Court has now given the politicians four weeks to file their official responses. Additionally, the Delhi High Court has directed the CBI to formally notify AAP leaders that the excise policy case has been transferred to Justice Manoj Jain’s bench.
Supreme Court To Decide Validity Of State Control Over Hindu Temples In These 3 South States
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: The Supreme Court has revived a 13-year-old batch of petitions challenging state control over Hindu temples in Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, and Puducherry. Reversing its previous order directing petitioners to approach individual High Courts, the Bench agreed to hear the case on its merits to prevent further legal delay. The petitioners argue that state management of temple accounts and properties violates fundamental rights to equality and religious autonomy under Articles 14, 25, and 26.
Supreme Court Stays Tree Felling In Hyderabad's KBR National Park Eco-Sensitive Zone.
Source: Live Law
Development: The Supreme Court has stayed the felling of trees in the Eco-Sensitive Zone (ESZ) surrounding Hyderabad’s Kasu Brahmananda Reddy (KBR) National Park. The Court ordered that there should be no tree felling within 25 to 35 metres eco-sensitive zone around the park. Notably, in 2020 the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change fixed the eco-sensitive zone at a width varying between 3 metres and 29.8 metres around the park boundary. The petitioner challenged the reduction of the eco-sensitive zone (ESZ) around KBR National Park to a width ranging from 3 metres to 29.8 metres, contending that such a narrow buffer defeats the very purpose of an ESZ as a “shock absorber” for a protected area. The petition also alleges that the original proposal for an eco-sensitive buffer of 25 to 35 metres was drastically reduced to accommodate road development infrastructure, allegedly bypassing scientific assessments and widespread public objections.
RG Kar Rape-Murder Case: Calcutta High Court Constitutes Three-Member SIT To Probe Cover-Up Allegations
Source: Live Law
Development: On 19th May, 2026, a new Calcutta High Court Division Bench began hearing a plea from the victim’s family in the RG Kar rape-murder case, emphasizing crime scene preservation and keeping sensitive sites sealed. On 21st May, the Court constituted a three-member Special Investigation Team (SIT), led by the CBI’s Joint Director (Eastern Zone). This SIT will probe allegations of a larger conspiracy and institutional cover-up. The bench ordered a thorough investigation into the timeline from the victim’s dinner on 9th August, 2024, until her cremation, demanding a progress report by 25th June, 2026. During the hearing the bench also questioned the progress of the probe, asking what investigation had been carried out by the CBI in the one year and seven months following the filing of the chargesheet on 7th October, 2024.
Plea In Supreme Court Against MP High Court Order Declaring Bhojshala-Kamal Maula Complex As Hindu Temple
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: The Muslim side, represented by mosque caretaker Qazi Moinuddin, has approached the Supreme Court to challenge the Madhya Pradesh High Court's 15th May verdict that declared the disputed Bhojshala-Kamal Maula complex in Dhar as a Hindu temple. The High Court had relied on an ASI scientific survey to rule that the structure was originally a temple of Goddess Saraswati, subsequently quashing a 2003 arrangement that permitted Muslims to offer Friday namaz at the site. In the appeal before the Supreme court, the petitioners argue that the High Court's ruling runs contrary to archaeological evidence and directly violates the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, while Hindu parties have already filed a caveat to ensure they are heard before any orders are passed.
Sabarimala Gold Theft: Kerala High Court Grants SIT Two More Weeks To Complete Inquiry, Flags Alleged Misappropriation Of Funds By Devaswom Board Officers In Relation To Sabarimala's Ashtabhishekam
Development: The Kerala High Court granted the Special Investigation Team (SIT) two more weeks to complete the probe into the alleged gold plundering from the gold-cladded Dwarapalakas at Sabarimala Sree Ayyappa Temple. The suo motu proceedings were initiated in 2025 following allegations that gold-cladded copper plates fixed near the Sreekovil had been unlawfully removed and replaced during renovation works. The Division Bench observed that crucial scientific reports from CSIR-National Metallurgical Laboratory are still awaited to determine the quantity of gold involved, possible swapping of copper plates, and the complicity of persons connected with the alleged offence. In a parallel matter, the High Court has ordered a 10-year audit of the “Ashtabhishekam" ritual and puja procurement accounts at the Sabarimala Temple following a preliminary vigilance probe that exposed widespread fund misappropriation. The investigation revealed that temple officials withdrew fixed supply funds without bills and falsely recorded free material "donations" from a single supplier as purchases to siphon off public money.
Criminal Charges Against Gautam Adani And Other Defendants Dropped By The U.S. Department Of Justice.
Source: Bar and Bench, Times of India
Development: The US Department of Justice (DOJ) has moved to New York federal court to dismiss the criminal indictment against Gautam Adani, Sagar Adani, and six others. In the 18th May, 2026 filing, the DOJ stated it chose not to devote further resources to the bribery and fraud case. This development follows a proposed $18 million civil penalty settlement by the Securities and Exchange Commission last week. Separately, Adani Group has reached a settlement with the US Treasury department through a payment of $275 million to resolve US sanctions violations involving Iranian gas, clearing all its major US legal disputes.
Mizoram Cabinet Clears New ILP Guidelines To Monitor Entry Of Non-Residents
Source: Press Trust of India
Development: The Mizoram Cabinet has approved revamped Inner Line Pass (ILP) guidelines to tighten the monitoring of non-residents entering the state. The decision comes amid growing influx concerns and rising tourist numbers following recent railway expansions. Operating under the Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulation, 1873, the ILP is a mandatory document intended to safeguard indigenous identity and local demographics. The updated framework aims to streamline issuance, tracking, and enforcement across entry points. The overhaul follows sustained pressure from local student bodies and civil organizations demanding stricter checks to curb illegal stay.
Satire Not Sedition: Madras High Court Stays Blocking Of VHP’s Posts On X
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: The Madras High Court stayed a Tamil Nadu Police Cyber Crime Wing notice that directed X to block 18 political posts uploaded by a regional leader of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP). The Court observed that a democracy cannot treat criticism as a disorder, satire as sedition, or dissent as danger. The Bench ruled that political critique and robust public debate are fundamentally protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, emphasizing that free speech rights are not a state concession. Criticizing the police's vague, blanket blocking command, the judges noted that the state must provide post-wise reasons instead of using omnibus censorship formulas to silence inconvenient opinions.
Rajasthan High Court Halts Construction, Mining In Jawai To Protect Leopard Habitat; Asks State To Consider Declaring Area As Sanctuary
Source: Live Law
Development: On 18th May, 2026 the Rajasthan High Court directed a halt on mining, construction and fresh tourism activities in the Jawai region of Pali district while hearing a PIL alleging ecological damage to the leopard habitat caused by unregulated tourism and unauthorized construction. The Court also asked the State Government to consider declaring the area a sanctuary under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, observing that protection of the leopard-inhabited ecosystem was part of the constitutional mandate under Articles 21 and 48A.
Delhi HC Notice To Centre Over Illegal Export Of Life-Saving Drugs
Source: Twitter (X), Bar and Bench
Development: The Delhi High Court has issued notices to the Central Government and multiple regulatory bodies, including the CDSCO, regarding a PIL alleging the illegal diversion and unauthorized export of life-saving pharmaceutical drugs. The petition claims that high-value, heavily regulated medicines—specifically vital oncology (cancer) therapies, which were manufactured, imported, and strictly designated "for sale in India only," are instead being illicitly channeled out of the country by merchant exporters, risking domestic shortages and undermining affordable healthcare access.
Delhi High Court Grants Interim Bail To Jailed MP Engineer Rashid
Source: Live Law
Development: The Delhi High Court has granted interim bail to jailed Baramulla MP Abdul Rashid Sheikh, also known as Engineer Rashid, accused of conspiring with Pakistani operatives and separatists to receive and channel funds to fuel unrest, stone-pelting, and terror activities in Jammu and Kashmir, until 2nd June, 2026, following the demise of his father at AIIMS, New Delhi. A division bench allowed the relief so Rashid, an accused in a UAPA terror funding case, can perform funeral rites and customary religious ceremonies. The court mandated that plain-clothed police officials must accompany him, remain restricted to his Srinagar and Kupwara residences, and refrain from contacting witnesses.
BJP MLA Accused of Buying Government Land As Private Property: Complaint Over Mahakal Parking Plot Reaches MP High Court
Source: Bhaskar English
Development: A PIL has been filed before the Indore Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, alongside complaints to the Lokayukta and Economic Offences Wing (EOW), alleging a major land scam near Ujjain's Mahakal Temple. Leader of Opposition Umang Singhar and complainant Rajendra Kuwal accused the Government of illegally selling around 45,000 square feet of temple parking land for ₹3.82 crore to a private firm directed by BJP MLA Chintamani Malviya. The petitioners allege the prime commercial plot was fraudulently registered as agricultural land to evade ₹3.40 crore in stamp duty ahead of a luxury hotel construction for the Ujjain Simhastha. While the Opposition slammed the ruling party for allegedly commercializing religious property, MLA Malviya has vehemently denied the charges as politically motivated.
Can't Second-Guess State Policy, Will Try To Clear Apprehensions' : Supreme Court On Challenge To SHANTI Act Limiting Nuclear Liability
Source: Live Law
Development: The Supreme Court expressed strong reluctance to review the constitutional validity of the SHANTI Act, 2025, calling it a sensitive legislative policy matter. The PIL challenged the Act for capping nuclear operator liability and exempting suppliers from mishap claims. The petitioners argued that a liability cap compromises the fundamental right to life, as major disasters often cause damages far exceeding the limit. While the Bench noted that courts cannot second-guess state policy, it assured petitioners it would clear their apprehensions regarding judicial powers to award compensation. The Court clarified that the statutory cap may not limit the judiciary from fixing higher payouts in the event of an accident.
Patna High Court Restores Y-Plus Security Cover For MP Pappu Yadav
Source: Deccan Herald
Development: The Patna High Court has set aside the Bihar Government's decision to downgrade the security cover of Independent Lok Sabha MP Rajesh Ranjan, popularly known as Pappu Yadav, from 'Y+' to 'Y' category. Terming the state’s downgrade as "arbitrary," the Bench observed that the move violated natural justice since officials failed to seek inputs from the Purnia MP or communicate the decision to him. Pappu Yadav had approached the court citing active threat perceptions to his life from local gangs and the Lawrence Bishnoi cartel. Consequently, the Court ordered the state to restore his previous cover and review his plea for a higher upgrade based on fresh threat assessments.
“Nurses Have No Right To Strike”: Kerala High Court Questions Why Nursing Services Aren't Declared 'Essential Service
Source: Live Law
Development: The Kerala High Court questioned why nursing services have not been declared an "essential service" under the law, noting that vital professionals like doctors, nurses, and lawyers cannot simply strike. Hearing a petition by the Kerala State United Nurses' Association against private hospitals using unqualified replacements during strikes for fair wages, the Court emphasized that public healthcare must not be disrupted. While not justifying the hiring of unqualified staff, the Court suggested that nursing protests be confined to non-working hours and requested the state Government's official stance on classifying the profession as an essential service.
India Tightens Citizenship Rules For CAA Applicants From Pakistan, Afghanistan And Bangladesh
Source: Economic Times
Development: The Union Home Ministry has amended the Citizenship Rules, making it mandatory for nationality seekers from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan to declare their native passport status. Under the updated framework, applicants must explicitly state whether they hold any valid or expired passports issued by these Governments. If they possess an active passport, full details, including the document number and expiry date, must be submitted. Furthermore, applicants are now required to sign a declaration promising to surrender their native passports to postal authorities within 15 days of receiving Indian citizenship. These strict disclosure norms were introduced after authorities discovered that several individuals were still holding active foreign passports.
Supreme Court Recalls Blacklist Order Against Class 8 NCERT Textbook Authors Over Judiciary Chapter
Source: The Telegraph Online
Development: The Supreme Court modified its previous directive regarding a Class 8 NCERT textbook chapter on "corruption in the judiciary" by recalling its adverse remarks and blacklisting order against the chapter's three academic authors. A Bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant expunged its earlier observations that the academics had "deliberately and knowingly" misrepresented facts, accepting that textbook creation is a collective drafting process rather than an individual's malicious act. While the blanket ban on the controversial chapter remains intact, the Court explicitly withdrew its restrictions on public institutions associating with the authors, leaving any future academic engagement entirely to the independent discretion of educational bodies.
Shots fired At Former Secretary of Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association
Source: Bar and Bench, Indian Express
Development: Unidentified assailants opened fire at Advocate Gagandeep Jammu, the former secretary of the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association. While travelling in Punjab, the lawyer miraculously escaped unhurt, though multiple gunshots struck his vehicle. The Bar Association strongly condemned the incident as a direct attempt on his life. It stated that such attacks threaten the legal fraternity's independence and fearless functioning. Consequently, the bar body demanded immediate police action to arrest the culprits and provide adequate security for its members.
Twisha Sharma Death: Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognisance Amid Bias Allegations
Source: Bar and Bench, Bar and Bench, Live Law, Bar and Bench
Development: Following the suspicious death of 33-year-old Twisha Sharma in Bhopal, the Supreme Court of India has taken suo motu cognisance to examine alleged institutional bias and procedural lapses in the investigation. The Supreme Court's intervention follows concerns that the victim's mother-in-law, a retired judge, could influence the local probe. Concurrently, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has ordered a fresh, videographed autopsy by an AIIMS New Delhi team due to initial cover-up allegations and issued notice on pleas challenging the mother-in-law's anticipatory bail. Additionally, the Bar Council of India has suspended the license of Sharma's husband, advocate Samarth Singh, who surrendered to police custody and withdrew his bail plea as multiple charges, including dowry death, are framed against him.
TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee Moves Calcutta High Court To Quash FIR Over Allegedly Objectionable Remarks At Poll Rally
Source: Live Law
Development: TMC MP and National General Secretary Abhishek Banerjee has approached the Calcutta High Court seeking to quash an FIR filed against him. The FIR stems from allegedly defamatory and provocative remarks made against Union Home Minister Shri Amit Shah during a West Bengal assembly election rally. Banerjee faces charges under various BNS sections, including promotion of enmity, criminal intimidation, and circulating false information, alongside violations of the Representation of the People Act. The plea is expected to be heard by Justice Saugata Bhattacharya this week.
Supreme Court Issues Notice To Union & States On Plea Against Sale Of Alcohol In Tetra Packs, Sachets Resembling Fruit Juice Packs
Source: Live Law
Development: The Supreme Court has issued notices to the Center and state excise departments regarding a PIL challenging the sale of alcohol in portable tetra packs and sachets. The petitioner argued that this packaging lacks prominent health warnings and deceptively resembles ordinary fruit juice containers, complete with fruit imagery. The plea warned that such cheap, inconspicuous packaging fuels underage drinking and public consumption. Orally remarking that the packaging is "very deceptive," the Bench sought responses on framing a uniform policy to restrict liquor sales strictly to visibly distinct glass bottles.
Calcutta High Court Permits TMC's Jahangir Khan To Contest Falta Re-Poll
Source: Live Law, Hindustan Times
Development: On 18th May, 2026, the Calcutta High Court blocked coercive action against Trinamool Congress leader Jahangir Khan regarding pending FIRs until 26th May. Justice Saugata Bhattacharya granted this interim relief to ensure Khan could contest the Falta assembly re-poll scheduled for 21st May, noting a sudden surge of criminal cases. However, when the re-poll commenced across 285 stations, Khan unexpectedly withdrew his name, citing a development package promised by Chief Minister Suvendu Adhikari.
Noida Workers Protest: Supreme Court Allows Accused To Remain In Judicial Custody After They Allege Torture By Police
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: The Supreme Court ordered that two accused men, Aditya Anand and Rupesh Roy, will continue to remain in judicial custody following allegations of custodial torture by the Uttar Pradesh police. The case stems from protests by factory workers in Noida who were demanding higher wages, which ultimately escalated into violence involving property vandalism, stone-pelting, and vehicle arson. The Court passed the order after directly interacting with the accused. The petitioner alleged severe ill-treatment and high-handedness during police custody, prompting the court to maintain judicial custody while keeping the matter pending.
DU-St. Stephen's row: Fresh Exam Roster Includes Newly Recruited Teachers Despite HC Stay Order
Source: Economic Times
Development: Despite a Delhi High Court stay order, St. Stephen’s College has included newly recruited teachers in its fresh examination invigilation roster, intensifying its ongoing administrative tussle with Delhi University. The High Court’s 13th May order had halted the college's recruitment process and granted interim protection to four ad-hoc assistant professors seeking regularisation, explicitly directing that their services not be discontinued. While the college issued a new roster containing the names of additional new recruits whose appointment letters were sent on 11th May, a college official noted that significant ambiguity remains regarding their official joining due to the court's intervention.
After Delhi High Court Rebuke, Delhi Police Initiates Probe Into Detention, Torture Of Student Activists
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: Following a stern warning from the Delhi High Court regarding a potential CBI probe, the Delhi Police have initiated an inquiry, led by the Joint Commissioner of Police (Southern Range), into the alleged illegal detention and torture of student activists in March 2026. A Bench of Justices Navin Chawla and Ravinder Dudeja maintained oversight to ensure the probe isn't a mere eyewash. While the police claimed the students voluntarily joined an investigation regarding a missing girl and Maoist ideologies, they forcefully denied the activists' allegations of abduction, wrongful confinement, torture, sexual harassment, and illegal seizure, labeling them as false and fabricated.
Gurugram Court Sends Punjab Minister Sanjeev Arora To Judicial Custody In ED Case.
Source: Live Law
Development: A Gurugram Court has remanded sitting Punjab Minister and AAP leader Sanjeev Arora to judicial custody until 1st June,2026, following the expiration of his Enforcement Directorate (ED) custody. Arora faces money laundering charges linked to an alleged Rs 100-crore GST fraud involving a company he previously headed. While the ED cited apprehensions of evidence tampering, Arora's counsel secured court directives allowing him access to essential medicines and a continuous glucose monitoring device to manage his grade-II diabetes while in custody.
Hyderabad Police Launch AI-Powered Social Media Surveillance Platform ‘Soceye’
Source: The Hindu
Development: The Hyderabad Police have introduced "SOCEYE," an AI-powered platform designed to automate the tracking of online troublemakers and harmful social media trends. Officials stated that the AI-driven system reduces the massive manual workload and response time previously required for digital surveillance. It automatically flags sensitive content like cyberbullying and misinformation, before routing it for human review. While police emphasize that the platform improves real-time threat management and public safety, critics raise concerns that automated sentiment tracking could accidentally flag legitimate criticism.
RIL-Led Consortium Stole ONGC Share Of Gas, Government Tells Supreme Court
Source: Indian Express
Development: The Centre has accused a Reliance Industries Limited (RIL)-led consortium of virtually stealing natural gas from the state-run Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) in the Krishna Godavari (KG) basin. Representing the Government before the Supreme Court, Attorney General R Venkataramani demanded accountability for the migrated gas. Countering the "gas theft" allegation, RIL’s counsel, A M Singhvi, argued that the migration was an entirely natural phenomenon driven by underground pressure differences rather than a deliberate act. The Supreme Court is currently hearing RIL’s appeal against a Delhi High Court order that overturned an earlier arbitral award favoring the consortium.
Anurag Kashyap Faces Non-Bailable Warrant After Surat Court Rules On Controversial 'Anti-Brahmin' Post On Twitter
Source: Times of India
Development: A Surat court has ordered a criminal case against filmmaker Anurag Kashyap over controversial social media comments targeted at the Brahmin community. The court observed that his viral posts on X carried clear intent to promote communal enmity and defame a specific group. Action was taken following a complaint from a right-wing activist over Kashyap's derogatory reactions to protests against the movie trailer of Phule. Because Kashyap failed to respond to multiple legal summons, the magistrate issued a non-bailable warrant against him. Charges have now been officially framed for circulating false information and provoking a breach of peace.
Supreme Court Seeks TN Govt Response On Plea Challenging Eviction For Madurai Airport Expansion
Source: Live Law
Development: The Supreme Court of India issued a notice to the Tamil Nadu Government regarding a plea challenging eviction proceedings for the Madurai International Airport expansion. Filed by Scheduled Caste residents of Chinna Udaippu Village, the petition claims they are being forcefully evicted without fair compensation or proper rehabilitation, violating Articles 21 and 300(A). While the petitioners demand packages under the 2013 Act, the High Court previously ruled the state acted reasonably, offering alternative housing and ex-gratia compensation, noting the 2009 land acquisition predated the Act.
Ballots Introduced Due To Non-Availability Of EVMs
Source: Hindustan Times
Development: The Punjab State Election Commission (SEC) told the High Court that upcoming civic polls are using ballot papers because the Election Commission of India failed to provide EVMs on schedule. The submission came during a PIL challenging the SEC's decision to drop electronic voting for the 26th May municipal elections. The petitioner argued that abandoning EVMs is like returning to a bygone era and ignores Supreme Court rulings warning against a paper system prone to malpractices. The High Court has deferred the matter, directing the SEC to produce its official correspondence.
Supreme Court Issues Notice On PIL Seeking Minimum 30% Reservation For Women Lawyers In Govt Legal Panels
Source: Live Law
Development: The Supreme Court of India issued a notice to the Center and all States regarding a PIL filed by the Ladli Foundation Trust. The petition seeks at least 30% reservation for women lawyers in Government legal panels, High Court panels, and PSU empanelments to address severe gender imbalance. Represented by Senior Advocate Vikas Singh, the plea highlights that women make up only 15.31% of enrolled advocates, and emphasizes that no woman has ever served as Attorney General or Solicitor General since independence.
Not In Favour Of Permitting New Hydroelectric Projects In Upper Ganga, Centre Tells Supreme Court
Source:
Development: In a major policy shift, the Centre submitted a joint affidavit to the Supreme Court stating it opposes any new hydroelectric projects in Uttarakhand's upper Ganga River basin, specifically the Alaknanda and Bhagirathi basins. Citing the region’s extreme geological fragility, seismic vulnerability, and the need to preserve ecological integrity, the Government will only permit seven existing projects that are already commissioned or advanced in construction. This decision reverses previous expert recommendations that suggested allowing up to 28 projects, prioritizing environmental safety over further aggressive hydropower expansion.
Allahabad HC Slams NHRC Over Custodial Death Closure
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: The Allahabad High Court strongly criticized the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) for blindly accepting the police version “as gospel truth” to close a 2009 custodial death case. The case involves a disabled man who was found dead in a police lockup, which the NHRC ruled a suicide in 2011 without checking independent evidence. The Bench observed that the state administration and police are the most interested parties in hushing up such crimes. It noted that the commission's failure to examine neutral family witnesses calls into question its very existence.
Delhi HC Seeks Action Taken Against Fake Universities
Source: Live Law
Development: The Delhi High Court has directed the Centre, Delhi Government, UGC, and AICTE to file detailed responses to a PIL seeking a CBI probe into fake universities operating across India. Terming the issue as “serious,” a Division Bench observed that unauthorized institutions heavily exploit students, leading to a severe waste of time, energy, and resources on unrecognised qualifications that do not make them employable. The petitioner argued that despite routine public notices warning against these "fake universities," many continue to advertise and operate openly due to a lack of enforcement and penal action. The Court ordered the authorities to submit affidavits outlining specific steps taken to shut down these rogue entities.
Delhi High Court Allows Vinesh Phogat to Participate in Asian Games Trials And Terms WFI Action Vindictive
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: The Delhi High Court has permitted wrestler Vinesh Phogat to compete in the 2026 Asian Games trials, ruling that her absence due to maternity leave cannot be used to exclude her. The Court strongly condemned the Wrestling Federation of India's selection policy as “exclusionary” and its show-cause notice as “vindictive” and malicious. To ensure fairness, the Bench ordered that her trials be video-recorded and monitored by independent observers from the Sports Authority of India and the Indian Olympic Association.
NBFCs, Hire Purchase Firms Move Madras High Court Challenging TN Law Curbing Coercive Loan Recovery
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: The Madras High Court has issued notices to the Union and Tamil Nadu Governments regarding a petition challenging the validity of the Tamil Nadu Money Lending Entities (Prevention of Coercive Actions) Act, 2025. Filed by the Madras Hire Purchase Association, the plea argues that the law unfairly penalizes legitimate financial institutions, including RBI-regulated NBFCs, despite its intent to target unauthorized lenders. The petitioners claim the act violates their constitutional right to carry out business and overlaps with existing Central banking laws. A Division Bench has directed the authorities to file their responses to the challenge.
Did TVK Use Children To Seek Votes? Madras High Court Seeks ECI Response
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: The Madras High Court has requested a response from the Election Commission of India regarding a public interest litigation petition against the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) party, led by Chief Minister Joseph Vijay. The plea alleges that TVK used children to influence voters during the 2026 Tamil Nadu Assembly elections, violating ECI directives. Justices GR Swaminathan and V Lakshminarayanan questioned if an entire political party could be disqualified. The petition also targets DMK and AIADMK over cash-for-votes allegations.
BJP Leader Challenges Rahul Gandhi's Order To Reject Voice Sample Matching In Defamation Case In Sultanpur
Source: Jagran
Development: A revision petition has been filed by a BJP leader in the defamation case related to Congress MP and Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, in the Sultanpur court. The petition challenges an earlier order issued by the MP-MLA court on 2nd May 2026 which dismissed a plea to match voice samples of Rahul Gandhi. The defamation case stems from a 2018 complaint filed against Rahul Gandhi for allegedly making objectionable remarks against Home Minister Amit Shah at a press conference.
Criticism Of Political Decision Not Violation Of Personality Rights, File Defamation Case: Delhi High Court To Raghav Chadha
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: The Delhi High Court reserved its order on a plea by MP Raghav Chadha seeking the removal of social media posts, AI deepfakes, and videos targeting his recent political switch from AAP to the BJP. The Court observed that the content constitutes public criticism of a political decision rather than a personality rights violation, emphasizing that Raghav Chadha can only sue for defamation when it comes to such criticism. While Raghav Chadha's counsel argued that claims like he “sold himself” crossed into defamation, the court reminded the petitioner that political satire is an established part of democratic discourse.
Allahabad HC Slams Up Gun Culture; Says Police Concealed Info On Arms Licenses Granted To Brij Bhushan Singh, Other MPs, MLAs
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: The Allahabad High Court strongly criticized Uttar Pradesh's “gun culture” stating that public displays of weapons create an illusion of dominance and generate fear rather than genuine safety. While hearing a firearm-related plea, Justice Vinod Diwakar reprimanded state authorities for failing to follow the Arms Act and hiding details regarding arms licenses given to 19 politically influential figures, including Brij Bhushan Singh and Raja Bhaiya. Consequently, the Court directed the state to submit a transparent affidavit detailing these licenses and the level of Government security provided to these individuals.
Allahabad HC Suspends Lucknow Mayor’s Powers Over 5-Month Delay In Administering SP Corporator's Oath
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court suspended the administrative and financial powers of Lucknow Mayor Sushma Kharkwal for delaying the oath of office to a newly elected Samajwadi Party corporator for nearly five months. Rejecting the Mayor's excuse that an appeal was pending, a Division Bench of Justices Alok Mathur and Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi noted that no judicial stay existed to justify the delay. The High Court clarified that the suspension is a coercive measure to ensure the rule of law and will remain in effect until the oath is formally administered.
Supreme Court To Hear Next Week Plea Challenging CBSE’s Three-Language Mandate In Class 9
Source: Deccan Herald
Development: The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a public interest litigation (PIL) next week challenging a recent CBSE circular that mandates a three-language formula for Class 9 students starting 1st July, 2026. Aligned with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, the new rule requires students to learn three languages, at least two of which must be native Indian languages. Mentioning the matter urgently before a Bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, the petitioners argued that forcing students to suddenly adopt a new language curriculum mid-stream would create "academic chaos" and an unfair burden just as they begin preparing for their Class 10 Board examinations.
Jharkhand High Court Seeks Report On Alleged Sexual Assault Of Woman Inmate In Ranchi Jail
Source: The Hindu
Development: The Jharkhand High Court has taken suo motu cognizance of the alleged sexual assault and exploitation of a female inmate at Ranchi's Birsa Munda Central Jail, converting it into a PIL. A Division Bench directed the State Government and the DGP to submit a detailed report within two weeks, expressing deep concern over a suspected cover-up by prison authorities. The case, triggered by media reports and a letter from opposition leader Babulal Marandi alleging that the abuse resulted in the inmate's pregnancy, is scheduled for hearing on 8th June, 2026.
Uttarakhand HC Questions Scope Of 1950 India-Nepal Treaty On Property Rights And Settlement
Source: The Times of India
Development: The Uttarakhand High Court has questioned whether the India-Nepal Treaty of Peace and Friendship, 1950, grants Nepalese citizens an unrestricted right to settle and buy property in India. Hearing a PIL alleging that around 25 Nepalese families had unlawfully occupied Government land in Nainital and illegally procured Indian identity documents, the Division Bench directed the Centre to clarify whether Indian nationals receive the exact same reciprocal privileges in Nepal in practice. Criticizing the state’s vague response, the Court ordered a comprehensive affidavit within three weeks to outline the precise legal framework under which these land purchases and settlements are being permitted.
Karnataka High Court Seeks State's Response On Alleged Non-Disbursal Of ₹2,000 Monthly Assistance Under 'Griha Lakshmi' Scheme
Source: Live Law
Development: The Karnataka High Court issued notices to the state Government on a PIL challenging the non-disbursal of ₹5,000 crore in arrears under the 'Gruha Lakshmi' scheme. The petition, filed on behalf of 1.26 crore women beneficiaries, highlighted that the ₹2,000 monthly allowance went unpaid for two months. The State had earlier cited 'administrative transition' of routing the payments through Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) routes. The Court directed the concerned departments to file their responses ahead of the next hearing in the second week of June.
Centre Agrees In Supreme Court To Bring Back Some Persons Deported To Bangladesh & To Verify Citizenship Claim
Source: Live Law
Development: The Union Government has agreed before the Supreme Court to repatriate several Bengali-speaking individuals deported to Bangladesh to verify their Indian citizenship claims. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta stated they would be brought back within 8 to 10 days, with their continued stay dependent entirely on the verification outcome. The Court recorded the submission during a challenge to a Calcutta High Court order, clarifying this specific case will not serve as a legal precedent.
Calcutta High Court Asks Police For SOP Against Social Media Posts Targeting Judges
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: The Calcutta High Court has directed the West Bengal Director General of Police (DGP) to formulate a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) to take action against social media posts that maliciously target and defame judges. The Court issued the order after being alerted to "very disturbing" and contumacious YouTube videos casting wanton aspersions on the judiciary. The Court passed the direction in a petition moved by Hindu monk Swami Pradiptananda alias Kartik Maharaj seeking quashing of a rape case against him. The court has directed the authorities to present the structured action plan before the next hearing scheduled for 22nd June, 2026.
'Hardcore Naxalite, Can't Be Welcomed With Bouquet' : Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Seeking Probe Into Maoist's Death In Encounter
Source: Live Law
Development: The Supreme Court has dismissed an appeal seeking a re-postmortem and an SIT probe into the death of Maoist commander Katha Ramchandra Reddy, who was killed in a September 2025 encounter with the Chhattisgarh Police. Rejecting allegations of custodial torture raised by the leader's son, the bench ruled that the injuries likely resulted from a physical scuffle during intense jungle warfare. Emphasizing that security forces operate under high-risk conditions and noting that sophisticated weapons were recovered from the deceased, the bench remarked that a “hardcore Naxalite” cannot be welcomed with a bouquet.
III. Details of Important Cases
A. Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Challenges To Animal Birth Control Framework In Stray Dogs Verdict
Source: Bar and Bench, Live Law, Live Law
Verdict: The Supreme Court delivered its final verdict on the national stray dogs case, ruling that the right to life includes the right to walk freely without the fear of dog bites. The Bench observed that state inaction on animal birth control has caused attacks to reach alarming proportions. Dismissing all challenges against established procedures, the Court heavily criticized Governments for failing to build proper infrastructure. Ultimately, the court ruled that aggressive stray dogs can be euthanized if necessary, while protecting acting officials from FIRs and criminal complaints. The Court also mandated that States/UTs shall set up at least one Animal Birth Control (ABC) centre in one district. Additionally, the Court ruled that stray dogs can be maintained on university campuses only if student bodies accept liability for any harm caused, while granting a conditional exemption to NALSAR.
Supreme Court Refuses PIL On Minimum Wages For Priests In State Temples.
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: The Supreme Court of India declined to entertain a PIL seeking minimum wages and a judicial commission to review service conditions for priests and staff at state-controlled temples. A bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta declined to hear the matter under Article 32, observing that aggrieved individuals should approach appropriate forums individually rather than through a PIL. The court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the petition. Consequently, petitioner Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay withdrew the plea to pursue alternative remedies before appropriate authorities.
Supreme Court Declines To Interfere With Forest Clearances For Adani’s Madhya Pradesh Coal Block Project
Source: The Hindu
Development: The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the environmental and forest clearances granted to an Adani Group company for its coal block project in Madhya Pradesh, citing filing delays. Upholding a National Green Tribunal order, the court allowed the environmental activist petitioner to withdraw his plea and pursue other legal remedies. Although the petitioner argued that the project threatens a dense "no-go" forest zone and an elephant corridor involving the felling of over six lakh trees, the court questioned the delay in filing and ultimately allowed the petitioner to withdraw the plea to pursue other legal remedies.
Supreme Court Rejects PIL To Exclude Caste Enumeration From Population Census
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL seeking to exclude caste enumeration from the upcoming national census. The Court ruled that determining whether a census should be caste-based falls strictly within the domain of Government policy. The petitioner argued that gathering such data lacks justification and could be misused by politicians and corporate entities. Rejecting these claims, the Bench emphasized that any governing body must know the exact numbers of backward classes to design and implement effective welfare measures. Consequently, the apex court declined to interfere with the executive's legislative decisions and dismissed the plea.
'Everyone Has Right To Protest Peacefully, But Not To Come On Streets & Cause Problems For Others': CJI Surya Kant
Source: Live Law
Development: The Supreme Court of India disposed of a petition seeking a time-bound decision on renaming the Navi Mumbai International Airport after 'Loknete DB Patil'. A bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant emphasised that naming airports falls under the policy domain rather than judicial function. Addressing protests over the matter, the CJI stated that while everyone has a right to peaceful and lawful protest in a democracy, demonstrators must not block streets or create law and order problems for the common man.
Supreme Court Acquits Sri Lankan National In UAPA Case As He Was Wrongly Identified As Absconding Accused Linked To LTTE
Source: Live Law
Verdict: The Supreme Court of India on 20th May 2026 acquitted a Sri Lankan national, Ranjan, who had been wrongly convicted under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. A three-judge bench set aside the Madras High Court's decision, ruling that the prosecution mistaken his identity for an absconding prime accused named "Sri." The Court criticized the lower courts for relying on delayed, inconsistent witness testimonies and highlighted the investigating agency's critical failure to conduct a Test Identification Parade (TIP), rendering the conviction unsafe.
B. Madhya Pradesh High Court
MP High Court: State Has No Role in Managing Private Temples, Collector Cannot Be Named Manager in Revenue Records
Source: Legal Republic
Verdict: The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that the State has no authority to manage private temples. Justice Deepak Khot quashed a Collector’s order that established a five-member committee to oversee a private Shiv temple and recommended auctioning its land. The Court clarified that a Collector or Pujari cannot be listed as a manager in revenue records for private temples. Furthermore, the Chief Secretary was directed to issue statewide instructions enforcing Supreme Court guidelines regarding temple management across all districts.
C. Calcutta High Court
Sacrificing Cow Not Part Of Eid: Calcutta High Court Rejects Plea Against Cattle Slaughter Restrictions
Source: Bar and Bench, Live Law, Live Law, Live Law
Verdict: The Calcutta High Court has dismissed a batch of petitions challenging the West Bengal Government's Notification dated 13th May 2026 ahead of Eid al-Adha. The notification allowed slaughter only of cattle above 14 years of age or those permanently disabled. Rejecting pleas that argued the rules financially impact marginalized rearers and interfere with religious practices, the Court ruled that sacrificing a cow is not a religious requirement in Islam. It upheld the mandate requiring fitness certificates for animal slaughter, emphasizing that the guidelines comply with previous judicial orders from the High Court in 2018. As a result, cattle traders belonging to the Hindu community are protesting because the Muslim community is actively boycotting cattle purchase. The traders have also claimed that the notification is spreading chaos and confusion as there is no mechanism to determine the age of the animal and no clear process exists to get certificates.
D. Allahabad High Court
No Constitutional Embargo: Allahabad HC Upholds Validity Of UP Law Providing Allowances, Benefits To Sitting & Ex-MLAs/MLCs.
Source: Live Law
Verdict: The Allahabad High Court has upheld the validity of the Uttar Pradesh State Legislature (Members' Emoluments and Pension) Act, 1980, confirming that the State Legislature is constitutionally competent to provide allowances, benefits, and pensions to both sitting and former MLAs and MLCs. Dismissing a PIL filed by the NGO Lok Prahari, the Court ruled that no constitutional embargo restricts the state from enacting such social security measures. The court emphasised that the quantum and nature of these legislative benefits fall strictly within policy discretion and do not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.
E. Delhi High Court
Robert Vadra Withdraws Plea Before Delhi High Court Against Summons In Shikohpur Land Deal Case.
Source: Bar and Bench
Verdict: Robert Vadra has unconditionally withdrawn his petition from the Delhi High Court, which challenged a trial court's summons in an Enforcement Directorate (ED) money laundering case involving the Shikohpur land deal. The withdrawal followed objections from the ED, which accused Vadra of making false statements regarding the inclusion of specific offences under the PMLA schedule. Justice Manoj Jain permitted the withdrawal while allowing Vadra to present his arguments before the trial court, where he was recently granted bail. The main hearings would continue in the Trial Court.
'Highly Misconceived': Delhi High Court Dismisses PIL To De-Register AAP, Disqualify Arvind Kejriwal From Contesting Polls
Source: Live Law
Verdict: The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking to de-register the AAP and disqualify leaders Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, and Durgesh Pathak from contesting elections. Terming the plea "highly misconceived," the bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia ruled that a criminal contempt order against the leaders does not prove non-allegiance to the Constitution. The court emphasized that the Election Commission of India lacks the statutory power to review or cancel a political party's registration outside of specific, exceptional legal criteria.
Violence Unacceptable: Delhi HC Denies Relief To Persons Who Threw Burning Effigies at JP Nadda's Residence
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: The Delhi High Court refused to close a criminal case against nine individuals accused of throwing burning effigies at Shri JP Nadda's residence in 2022. The Bench noted that the protestors hurled burning objects onto the gate and security rooftop where personnel were actively stationed. The Court strongly remarked that violence in the name of protest cannot be accepted as a legitimate democratic right. Rejecting the petitioners' argument that the act was merely negligent since no one was hurt, the judge deemed their conduct highly intentional and dangerous. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the plea as frivolous and imposed a fine of ₹25,000 on them.
Delhi High Court Declines To Stay Yamuna Bazar Demolitions Affecting Over 310 Families
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: The Delhi High Court dismissed a plea challenging eviction notices issued to over 300 families in the Yamuna Bazar area. The residents' association argued that the imminent demolition drive ignored the area's historical identity and cultural significance. However, the Court refused to stop the action, noting that the petition lacked proper legal authorization from individual members. Officials maintained that evictions are necessary due to severe, recurring flood risks in the area. Consequently, the Bench ruled the plea unmaintainable but allowed residents the liberty to refile properly.
F. Kerala High Court
Transgender Persons Must Be Made Aware Of Fertility Preservation Options Before Gender Reassignment Surgery: Kerala High Court
Source: Live Law
Development: The Kerala High Court ruled that Governments have a duty to raise awareness among transgender individuals about fertility preservation options, such as freezing eggs or sperm, before they start gender reassignment treatments. The Court criticised the Government's delay in issuing a specialised Health Manual despite a six-year gap since the Transgender Act took effect. The ruling came during a petition by a trans man seeking to cryopreserve his oocytes, ultimately permitting him to use an assisted reproductive technology bank for future reproduction.
Kerala High Court Closes Suo Motu Case On Unauthorized Helicopter Movement Over Sabarimala Temple After Explanation From Coast Guard
Source: Live Law
Development: The Kerala High Court has closed a suo motu case initiated after reports of an unauthorized helicopter flying over the ecologically sensitive and high-security Sabarimala temple zone. A Division Bench wrapped up proceedings following a clarification from the Indian Coast Guard, which explained that the helicopter unintentionally deviated from its route toward the temple due to adverse weather conditions. Noting that a formal case has already been registered at the Pamba Police Station and that the ongoing investigation is being actively supervised by the Chief Police Coordinator at Sabarimala, the Court deemed it fit to close the matter.
H. Madras High Court
Madras High Court Refuses To Stop State From Closing Tasmac Liquor Shops
Source: Bar and Bench
Verdict: The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court refused to halt the closure of 717 TASMAC liquor shops located near schools, shrines, and bus stops, dismissing pleas by landlords and vendors claiming livelihood violations. The Court ruled that liquor trade is res extra commercium (outside ordinary commerce) and private parties cannot force the State to continue operations. While fully upholding the Government's policy, the Court directed authorities to provide affected vendors with proportionate refunds of license fees and security deposits for the remaining lease periods.
Free Country, People Can Say What They Want": Madras High Court Rejects Plea To Ban Karuppu Movie For Allegedly Showing Judiciary In Bad Light
Source: Live Law
Verdict: The Madras High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking to ban or regulate the Tamil film Karuppu, which the petitioner argued portrayed the Indian judiciary in a negative light by depicting corruption, bribery, and drug use among judges. A vacation bench rejected the plea, ruling that the film did not cross the constitutional limits of freedom of expression in a free country. The court further remarked that instead of enforcing censorship, the legal community should use such cinematic portrayals as an opportunity for internal introspection regarding systemic issues and unethical practices within the profession.
I. Meghalaya High Court
Meghalaya High Court Disposes Petition On Niam Khasi rituals
Source: Shillong Times, Shillong Times, Highland Post
Verdict: Having earlier stayed the traditional indigenous religious ceremony "Ka Leh Niam Raid Mylliem" scheduled for 19th May 2026, at Mawnarian, the High Court of Meghalaya directed that only members of the ‘5 Kur 11 Kur of Hima Mylliem’ who have not converted to Christianity or other faiths should perform the traditional rituals of “Ka Leh Niam Raid Mylliem”. The decision followed a petition arguing that a "Myntri" representing the clans is a practicing Christian and therefore ineligible to participate in rituals exclusive to the Niam Khasi faith. Citing the sensitive nature of customary practices and potential law and order concerns, the Court ordered the stay, with further hearings scheduled to address the dispute.
J. Patna High Court
Patna HC Quashes FIR Against Prashant Kishor
Source: Bar and Bench
Verdict: The Patna High Court has quashed a criminal case against political strategist Prashant Kishor over alleged data and campaign theft. A complainant claimed Kishor stole materials for his “Baat Bihar Ki” campaign from a similar, pre-existing concept. Dismissing the charges, the Court noted that there is no copyright in a political idea, subject matter, or theme. It emphasised that a citizen cannot use intellectual property as a tool to invoke strict criminal law over civil matters. Ultimately, the Court ruled that continuing the prosecution would abuse the judicial process, since the allegations failed to prove any actual forgery or cheating.
This week’s legal developments reflected the judiciary’s growing role in shaping debates around civil liberties, governance, environmental protection, institutional accountability, and religious autonomy. From significant Supreme Court observations on UAPA bail jurisprudence to politically sensitive High Court interventions across states, courts continued to remain central to India’s evolving constitutional and political landscape. This edition of India Judiciary Watch captures the most important judicial developments, verdicts, and appointments from 18th May to 23rd May, 2026, along with their broader legal and political implications.
IV. Appointments, Collegium Recommendations, And Transfers Section
Also, please consider subscribing to NFPRC Foundation’s focused centres covering latest economic, policy and administrative developments -
Centre for Law, Policy and Governance - Link
Centre for Accelerating India’s Growth - Link
Centre for Studies in Indian Social Systems - Link
NFPRC Foundation - Link