Welcome to the latest edition of India Judiciary Watch! Between 19 and 24 January 2026, the Supreme Court, multiple High Courts, and statutory tribunals dealt with a high volume of matters spanning environmental regulation, electoral administration, criminal procedure, religious institution governance, urban safety, media freedom, and regulatory oversight. The period included directions in ongoing constitutional challenges, scrutiny of investigative agencies, and interim protections granted against executive action.
Key developments during the week included the Supreme Court recording a categorical assurance from the Rajasthan Government on a complete prohibition of mining in the Aravalli region; issuing procedural safeguards for the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in West Bengal affecting over 1.25 crore voters; and seeking sealed-cover status reports from the CBI and Enforcement Directorate in relation to alleged bank fraud involving Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group companies. High Courts simultaneously addressed matters involving bail, arrest procedure, urban infrastructure failures, air pollution, temple administration, and the scope of statutory authorities.
This digest compiles interim orders, judicial observations, and final verdicts delivered during the period, organised by court and subject-matter, with each entry setting out the legal development followed by its immediate institutional or administrative effect.
I. Key Legal Developments
Aravalli Hills: Supreme Court Records Rajasthan’s Assurance To Ensure No Illegal Mining; Proposes To Form Expert Committee
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court provisionally accepted the Rajasthan Government's commitment to halt all mining, legal and illegal, in the Aravalli region, while holding its temporary freeze on the revised Aravalli Hills definition. Citing the risk of irreversible ecological damage from persistent illegal mining, the Court mandated strict enforcement against all violations. It also proposed forming a court-supervised expert committee of environmentalists and scientists to advise on the Aravalli definition, regulation, and sustainable mining practices. Further hearings are scheduled in four weeks.
Thirupparankundram Hill : Supreme Court Issues Notice On Hindu Dharma Parishad’s Plea For Daily Lamp Lighting & ASI Take Over
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has issued notice on a writ petition filed by the Hindu Dharma Parishad concerning the Thirupparankundram Hill temple complex. The petition requests that the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) take over the complex and grant permission for the permanent, 24-hour lighting of a deepam atop the hill, with full illumination during Karthigai Deepam. The Supreme Court noted that the Madras High Court has already permitted the lamp lighting, though the Tamil Nadu Government may still challenge that decision. Notices have been served to several parties, including the Union government, the ASI, and State and district officials.
We Were Not Sarcastic About Making Dog Feeders Liable For Stray Dog Attacks: Supreme Court
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court reaffirmed its stance in the stray dog case, particularly the observation that dog feeders could be held accountable for stray dog attacks. The Court clarified that these remarks were made seriously, not sarcastically, in response to claims of harassment against feeders, and refused to withdraw or soften its position, emphasizing the significance of oral remarks made during proceedings. The hearing continued with the Court expressing concern over the inconsistent execution of sterilisation and vaccination programs while considering arguments on municipal liability, rabies control, and public safety.
KDRB Moves SC Against HC Annulment Of Its Power Of Appointment To Guruvayur Devaswom
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala Devaswom Recruitment Board (KDRB) has appealed to the Supreme Court against a Kerala High Court ruling that annulled its authority to conduct appointments for posts within the Guruvayur Devaswom and Government-aided educational institutions. The KDRB argues that its role is strictly limited to recruitment and does not interfere with religious affairs, and has requested a stay on the judgment. The High Court, however, insisted that appointments must comply with the Guruvayur Devaswom Act, 1978, quashing past recruitment notifications, barring KDRB from future selections, and mandating a fresh appointment process overseen by a special supervisory committee, though existing appointments were protected.
Supreme Court Issues Directions To ECI In West Bengal SIR Case To Ensure Transparent Verification Of Persons In ‘Logical Discrepancy’ List
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court issued directives to the Election Commission of India (ECI) regarding the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in West Bengal, specifically for the transparent and non-stressful verification of over 1.25 crore voters with "logical discrepancies" (like minor spelling or age differences). The Court mandated publicizing notice recipients, allowing document submission and objections via authorized agents, requiring hearings with written acknowledgments, instructing the State to provide adequate manpower, and directing the West Bengal DGP to ensure law and order. Additionally, the Court clarified that Class 10 admit cards from the State Board must be accepted as valid enumeration documents.
Sabarimala Gold Theft: Smart Creations CEO Pankaj Bhandari Moves Kerala High Court Alleging His Arrest Was Illegal
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court heard a petition filed by Pankaj Bhandari, CEO of Smart Creations, who is challenging his arrest in the Sabarimala gold theft case. Bhandari argued that his arrest was illegal due to irregularities, including not being properly informed of the grounds for arrest, denial of legal aid, and issues with his late-night remand in a language he didn't understand. The prosecution countered that all legal requirements were met. Justice A. Badharudeen adjourned the matter until January 27th to allow the State to address the applicability of the Supreme Court's precedent in Prabir Purkayastha v. State concerning the proper procedure for arrest and communication of its grounds.
Transferring Judge At Centre's Request Compromises Integrity Of Collegium System : Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
Source: Click Here
Development: Justice Ujjal Bhuyan has expressed serious concerns about the integrity and independence of the Supreme Court Collegium system, specifically criticizing the Central Government's involvement in modifying a High Court judge's transfer proposal. Speaking in Pune, he asserted that the executive has no legitimate role in judicial transfers, which are intended only for the better administration of justice, not as a punitive measure for "inconvenient" orders. Justice Bhuyan cited the case of Justice Atul Sreedharan, whose transfer was altered from the Chhattisgarh High Court to the Allahabad High Court following a government request for reconsideration. He warned that the Collegium's decision to record the Centre's request in its resolution signifies an undue executive intrusion that compromises judicial independence and the collegium system's integrity.
Sabarimala Gold Theft: Kerala High Court Quizzes Thantri Sabha members for Seeking CBI probe
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court will hear a petition seeking to transfer the investigation into the alleged misappropriation of gold from Sabarimala temple idols and door frames from the Special Investigation Team (SIT) to the CBI. The plea was filed by two members of the Akhila Thantri Pracharak Sabha, but the Court expressed initial reservations, suggesting the petition might be an attempt to protect the accused. The SIT was formed in September 2025 following a Special Commissioner's report. The matter is posted for further hearing on February 4, 2026.
Long Ties, Birth Of Child Are Signs Of Relationship In The Nature Of Marriage Under DV Act: Bombay High Court
Source: Click Here
Development: The Bombay High Court's Nagpur Bench ruled that a long-term, intimate relationship with repeated cohabitation and a child can constitute a "relationship in the nature of marriage" under the Domestic Violence (DV) Act. The Court upheld the DV proceedings against the man, stating that his subsequent marriage does not automatically dismiss the woman's claim. However, the proceedings against his parents and current wife were dismissed due to insufficient specific allegations.
Supreme Court Seeks CBI, ED Status Reports On Probe Of Alleged Bank Fraud By Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group Companies
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has directed the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate to submit sealed-cover status reports on their investigation into alleged bank frauds involving Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group companies, stemming from a PIL filed by EAS Sarma. The Court granted a final chance for Anil Ambani and the group entities to appear after they failed to respond to previous notices, ordering a fresh notice to be served via the Registrar General of the Bombay High Court. The investigation began following an SBI forensic audit that uncovered siphoning and diversion of funds, leading to a CBI FIR.
Indore Water Crisis: MP High Court Prioritises Steps For Safe Drinking Water, Defers Demand For Probe By Retired Judge
Source: Click Here
Development: The Madhya Pradesh High Court has prioritized ensuring safe drinking water and medical care in the Indore water contamination case over immediately launching an independent investigation. The Court postponed the request for an inquiry led by a retired High Court judge after the State detailed emergency measures, including employee suspensions, one termination, and a new grievance program. However, due to inconsistencies between official reports and filed complaints, the Court ordered the preservation of all relevant records.
‘Airfares During Kumbh Were Exploitative, We Will Interfere’: Supreme Court Flags Surge In Air Ticket Prices During Festivals
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has expressed serious concern over the significant and allegedly exploitative increases in airfares, especially during festivals and major events like the Maha Kumbh, following a Public Interest Litigation (PIL). The PIL seeks to regulate airline pricing, specifically challenging practices like algorithm-driven dynamic pricing that causes sudden fare surges, reduced free baggage allowance, and a general lack of transparency. The petitioner argues these practices unfairly burden passengers traveling due to emergencies or unavoidable circumstances. The Court's intervention signals a move to control unchecked dynamic pricing and excessive ancillary charges.
NGT Takes Suo Motu Cognizance Of Techie’s Drowning In Noida Ditch, Says “Lapses By Authorities Led To Death”
Source: Click Here
Development: The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has initiated suo motu proceedings following the drowning death of a software engineer, Yuvraj Mehta, in a waterlogged trench in Noida's Sector 150. The NGT registered an application, observing that the incident was prima facie due to lapses by the Noida Authority, including the failure to implement a storm-water management plan, which the Tribunal deemed a violation of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. The Tribunal has issued notices and sought affidavits from the Noida Authority, UP Pollution Control Board, Irrigation Department, Principal Secretary (Environment), and the District Magistrate.
Future Of High Court Depends On Its Ability To Act As Proactive Custodian Of Constitution: CJI Surya Kant
Source: Click Here
Development: Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, speaking at the Fali Nariman Lecture, stated that the future of High Courts depends on their ability to act as vigilant custodians of the Constitution and address governance failures. He called Article 226 the “lifeline of constitutional justice,” emphasizing that the power to grant interim relief, including staying executive action, is often the only substantive protection for citizens. He highlighted that Article 226 allows High Courts to remedy legal injuries, enforce duties, and restrain arbitrary actions, making them the "first constitutional court for citizens." The CJI also cautioned against bypassing High Courts to directly approach the Supreme Court under Article 32, stressing that constitutional remedies should be accessible to all, not just the wealthy.
‘Is This Rule Of Law In Maharashtra?’: Bombay High Court Questions Police Failure To Arrest Minister’s Son For A Month
Source: Click Here
Development: The Bombay High Court heavily criticized the Maharashtra Government and police for failing to arrest Vikas Gogawale, the son of Cabinet Minister Bharat Gogawale, more than a month after an FIR was filed against him for rioting and assault, and despite the rejection of his anticipatory bail. The Court noted that Vikas Gogawale was reportedly in contact with his father and actively participating in municipal affairs. Justice Madhav Jamdar demanded an explanation as to why the Minister's statement hadn't been recorded and questioned whether the "rule of law" was being upheld when the Minister's son remained unarrested.
Supreme Court Grants Interim Relief To ‘Punjab Kesari’ Newspaper, Bars Punjab State Action Against Printing Press
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has granted interim protection to the 'Punjab Kesari' newspaper's printing press, directing the Punjab Government not to take any coercive action and ensuring the continuation of printing operations while the matter is pending before the Punjab and Haryana High Court. This followed allegations that the State government took coercive steps, such as power disconnection, after the newspaper published critical articles. Separately, the High Court has directed the newspaper proprietors to approach the National Green Tribunal (NGT) regarding grievances against the Punjab Pollution Control Board's coercive actions, including the closure and electricity disconnection to their presses and associated hotels.
Calcutta High Court Initiates Suo Moto PIL Over ‘Hazardous’ AQI In Kolkata, Issues Notice To State
Source: Click Here
Development: The Calcutta High Court has taken suo moto cognizance of the "hazardous" air quality in Kolkata, citing data that showed AQI levels ranging from "very poor to hazardous." The Division Bench directed the West Bengal Government to submit its response by February 28, 2026. This matter has been consolidated with an existing Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that seeks the urgent enforcement of environmental laws and remedial measures to address the deteriorating air quality in the Kolkata–Howrah metropolitan region.
Delhi High Court Seeks Centre, State Replies To Plea Challenging New Waqf Act Provisions On Rented Properties
Source: Click Here
Development: The Delhi High Court is reviewing petitions challenging key provisions of the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development (UMEED) Act, 2025 and the Waqf Properties Lease Rules, 2014. The core of the challenge, brought by tenants of waqf properties, is the Act's expanded definition of "encroacher" to include tenants with expired or terminated leases, which effectively overrides the protection they previously held under the Delhi Rent Control Act. The High Court has sought responses from the Union and Delhi Governments, the Central Waqf Council, and the Delhi Waqf Board within six weeks. However, since the Act is already being challenged in the Supreme Court, the Bench has decided to await that outcome before proceeding. The court's eventual interpretation of "encroacher" and "tenant" will be critical, significantly impacting the rights of tenants regarding eviction, lease terms, and rent fixation under the new Act.
Adina Mosque-Adinath Temple Dispute Lands In Calcutta High Court, Plea Claims Site Is ‘Full Of Hindu Deities’
Source: Click Here
Development: The Calcutta High Court is hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) requesting the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to reassess the religious nature of the protected Adina monument in Malda. The Court stated that any decision on allowing worship or changing the monument's name depends on this initial determination. The bench also questioned the ASI's authority to re-determine a character already officially gazetted. The petitioner was granted time to submit a supplementary affidavit, and the next hearing is scheduled for February 10, 2026.
Supreme Court Seeks Justice Gita Mittal Committee Report On Manipur Relief Camp Conditions
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has mandated a three-member committee, led by Justice Gita Mittal, to investigate and report on inadequate facilities at 14 relief camps in Manipur established for internally displaced persons due to ethnic violence. This directive was issued during the hearing of a challenge to a Manipur High Court decision that had dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) concerning relief camp conditions, citing the Supreme Court's existing jurisdiction over the matter. Following submissions that highlighted shortages of food, medical care, and essential amenities, the Apex Court has requested the committee to present its findings within a period of two months.
Panchayat Polls 2026 | PIL In Allahabad High Court Seeks Direction To CM Adityanath To Constitute OBC Commission
Source: Click Here
Development: The Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) is hearing a PIL compelling Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath to establish a dedicated OBC Commission before the 2026 Panchayat elections. The petitioner argues that the five-month delay in approving the commission prevents the State from meeting the Supreme Court's "triple test" requirement (Vikas Kishanrao Gawali v. State of Maharashtra), which is mandatory for granting OBC reservation in local body elections and finalizing seat reservations for the upcoming polls.
NEET-PG 2025 | PIL In Allahabad High Court Against Allowing Counselling For SC/ST/OBC Candidates With 'Minus 40' Marks
Source: Click Here
Development: A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Allahabad High Court challenging the National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences (NBEMS) decision to significantly lower the NEET-PG 2025 counselling cut-off for SC/ST/OBC candidates to –40 (out of 800). The petitioner argues that this drastic reduction, implemented after many seats remained unfilled, violates Article 16(4) of the Constitution, is unconstitutional, and compromises the integrity of the merit-based selection process. The plea highlights the disproportionate nature of the reduction, especially the cut-off dropping from 235 to –40 for the SC/ST/OBC categories.
Kerala High Court Orders Safety Inspection Of Temporary Bridges For Thirunavaya Maha Magha Festival
Source: Click Here
Development: Following safety concerns about the capacity of temporary bridges over the Bharathapuzha river to manage crowds that could exceed 10 lakh devotees, the Kerala High Court mandated an urgent safety inspection. These temporary structures were erected for the Thirunavaya Maha Magha Mahotsava. The Court, while specifically stating it was not prohibiting the religious festival, ordered a joint inspection by the Public Works Department (PWD) and police authorities. It further directed that any immediate remedial measures recommended by the inspection team must be implemented without delay.
AKG Centre Row: Kerala High Court Seeks State’s Stand On Kerala University Ex-Registrar’s Plea Alleging CPI(M)’s Encroachment Of Varsity Land
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court has directed the State Government to file a counter-affidavit within three weeks concerning a Public Interest Litigation (PIL). The PIL alleges that the CPI(M) and the AKG Centre are illegally occupying over 55 cents of university and Government land, a much larger area than the 15 cents reportedly assigned in a 1977 Government order. The State requested time to verify the actual land extent and establish its official position. The Court, noting the lack of official records for the alleged land transfer, observed that the State must provide justification and documentation for the assignment. No interim order was issued.
Bhoj Shala-Kamal Maula Mosque Dispute: Supreme Court Passes Orders For Peaceful Conduct Of Basant Panchami Puja & Friday Namaz
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court intervened in the dispute over the Bhoj Shala–Kamal Maula complex in Dhar, issuing directions to ensure the peaceful conduct of both Basant Panchami puja and Friday Juma Namaz. The Court approved an arrangement where Namaz would occur between 1 pm and 3 pm in a separate enclosed area with distinct routes, and the Hindu community would use a separate space for their day-long rituals. The Court also directed the mosque committee and both communities to cooperate with the district administration for crowd management and law and order. Crucially, the Court mandated the Archaeological Survey of India to conduct a scientific survey to determine the real character of the disputed site.
2000 Red Fort Attack: Supreme Court Seeks Govt’s Response On Curative Plea By LeT Terrorist Against Death Sentence
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has issued notice to the Delhi Government regarding a curative petition filed by Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorist Mohd Arif, who is challenging the death sentence he received for his role in the 2000 Red Fort attack, which killed three Army jawans. Arif claims his death penalty was flawed due to procedural and evidentiary errors, including issues with call data records and mitigation assessment. The Supreme Court had previously dismissed his review petition and upheld the death sentence in 2022.
NSA Detainee MP Amritpal Singh Moves Punjab & Haryana High Court Seeking Parole To Attend Budget Session Of Parliament
Source: Click Here
Development: Sitting Member of Parliament (MP) Amritpal Singh, currently detained under the National Security Act (NSA) at Dibrugarh Central Jail, has petitioned the Punjab & Haryana High Court for parole. Singh is requesting the temporary release to facilitate his personal attendance at the upcoming Budget Session of Parliament (January–April 2026). He argues that his participation is necessary to address critical constituency issues, specifically drug abuse and infrastructure gaps. It is noted that a similar plea he filed for the previous Winter Session could not be adjudicated in time, rendering it ineffective.
Bengal LoP Suvendu Adhikari Approaches Calcutta High Court Over Convoy Attack, Seeks Protection From Arrest In Cross-FIR
Source: Click Here
Development: West Bengal Leader of Opposition, Suvendu Adhikari, has petitioned the Calcutta High Court for protection from arrest (coercive action) in a cross-FIR case following an alleged attack on his convoy in Chandrakona. Adhikari claims his vehicle was targeted with kerosene in an attempt to set it on fire and that the police initially refused his complaint. He alleges a "selective and malafide" application of law, noting that his eventually-registered complaint only invoked bailable sections, while the cross-FIR against him includes the grave charge of "attempt to murder." The State's Advocate General has given an oral assurance to the court that no coercive steps will be taken against Adhikari, provided he cooperates with the investigation.
Supreme Court Seeks BCI’s Response On Challenge To Three-Year Moratorium On New Law Colleges
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has requested a response from the Bar Council of India (BCI) regarding a new petition filed by the Vocation Education Foundation. The petition challenges the BCI's August 2025 three-year moratorium on establishing new law colleges, arguing the ban is illegal, disproportionate, and lacks a statutory basis. The Foundation also claims the BCI's prior inaction prevented them from applying before the ban. The case is scheduled for a hearing on January 30th.
Supreme Court Asks MP Govt To Decide On Sanction To Prosecute Minister Vijay Shah Over Remarks Against Colonel Sofiya Qureshi
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court is hearing Minister Kunwar Vijay Shah's challenge to a Madhya Pradesh High Court's suo motu order to register an FIR over his alleged objectionable remarks against Colonel Sofiya Qureshi following Operation Sindoor. A Special Investigation Team (SIT) has concluded its probe and submitted a final report. The State Government has been directed to decide within two weeks whether to grant the necessary sanction under Section 196 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita to prosecute the Minister. The SIT has also been instructed to propose a course of action regarding other similar alleged remarks made by the Minister.
Bikram Singh Majithia Seeks Interim Bail Citing Threat To Life; Supreme Court Seeks Punjab Govt’s Response
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court is currently considering a plea by Bikram Singh Majithia for interim bail in a corruption case filed by the Punjab Vigilance Bureau, which he sought citing a threat to his life. The Court suggested moving Majithia from Nabha jail to a jail in Chandigarh as an alternative safety measure and deferred the decision on interim bail until the Punjab Government submits its response. The corruption case is based on a Special Investigation Team (SIT) probe connected to an NDPS case, alleging Majithia accumulated assets exceeding ₹540 crore while serving as an MLA and Minister.
Reconstitution Of State Waqf Board Is In Final Stage: Kerala Government Informs High Court
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala State Government informed the Kerala High Court that the reconstitution of the Kerala State Waqf Board is in its final stages, with a plan expected within two weeks. This assurance came during the hearing of a PIL filed by the Kerala Waqf Samrakshana Vedhi, which demands the immediate reconstitution of the Board, arguing that the continued functioning of the old Board, whose term expired on December 14, 2024, is illegal under the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, which mandates reconstitution through government nomination.
Karnataka High Court Asks Centre To Submit Notification Governing Online Applications To Seek Indian Citizenship
Source: Click Here
Development: The Karnataka High Court has ordered the Union Government to present the official notification detailing the online citizenship application process, which the Centre states must be submitted through the jurisdictional Deputy Commissioner. The order was issued while hearing a plea by a woman seeking Indian citizenship for her son born in Canada. The petitioner is also challenging the constitutionality of Section 14 of the Citizenship Act, which she argues prevents her son from acquiring citizenship.
Supreme Court Questions Delhi Govt Move To Enforce Private School Fee Law Mid Academic Year
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court is hearing challenges from private unaided schools against the Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees) Act, 2025. The Court questioned the Delhi government's decision to implement the fee regulation law mid-academic year, calling the timeline "confused and potentially unworkable" due to the retrospective complications for fees already collected. Although the Court did not stay the law, it emphasized that any enforcement must strictly follow the statutory scheme and practical timelines.
Supreme Court Stays Rajasthan High Court Order To Remove Liquor Vends Within 500 Meters Of Highways
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has temporarily suspended a Rajasthan High Court order that mandated the closure or relocation of all liquor shops situated within 500 meters of National and State Highways. The High Court's directive was in response to a Public Interest Litigation citing increased drunk-driving accidents. The State of Rajasthan appealed the order, arguing it went beyond the Supreme Court's own precedent set in State of Tamil Nadu v. K. Balu, which allows licensed liquor shops in municipal areas.
Keeping People Behind Bars For Years Before Trial Amounts To Punishment, Turns Law On Its Head : Ex-CJI DY Chandrachud
Source: Click Here
Development: Former Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud, criticized the misuse of criminal law and national security legislation like the UAPA, stating that prolonged undertrial detention, which he calls "essentially punishment," reverses the presumption of innocence. Speaking at The Hindu’s Lit for Life festival, he stressed that the fundamental rights to a speedy trial and life necessitate bail if a trial cannot be concluded reasonably quickly. He also questioned whether speech alone should suffice for a terrorism charge, calling for rigorous judicial scrutiny, particularly referencing the recent denial of bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam, who have been undertrial for five years.
Can the Enforcement Directorate Invoke Article 226? Supreme Court To Examine In Kerala, Tamil Nadu Petitions Against ED
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court is reviewing petitions from Kerala and Tamil Nadu challenging a Kerala High Court decision that upheld the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) right to file writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution. Kerala argues the ED, as a Union Government department, lacks the necessary locus standi, while the High Court ruled that the ED is a statutory authority under the PMLA and is therefore entitled to invoke Article 226. The original dispute arose from an ED writ against a state judicial commission investigating the 2020 Kerala gold smuggling case, which implicated a senior official in the Chief Minister's office.
Kaleswaram Probe: Telangana High Court Extends Interim Protection To KCR, Harish Rao
Source: Click Here
Development: The Telangana High Court extended interim protection to key figures, including former Chief Minister K. Chandrasekhar Rao, former minister T. Harish Rao, former bureaucrat S.K. Joshi, and IAS officer Smita Sabharwal, in relation to their challenge against the P.C. Ghose Commission's report on alleged irregularities in the Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Project (KLIP). The court ordered that no adverse action be taken against them based on the commission's findings and adjourned the matter to February 25, 2026, requiring written submissions beforehand.
‘Destitute To The Extreme’: Supreme Court Raps Centre Over Delay In SOPs For Homeless With Mental Illness; Grants Last Opportunity
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court, expressing strong criticism, gave the Union Government a final chance to present the draft Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for the rehabilitation of homeless persons with mental illness. The Court highlighted the extreme vulnerability of this group, calling them "destitute to the extreme" and one of the most susceptible sections of society. The government's repeated failure to finalize a concrete framework, despite previous assurances, was noted as the reason for the criticism. The matter, which the Court stressed was of a humanitarian nature and mandated by the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, was adjourned to February 9th, with a clear warning against any further delay.
'Anything In Name Of Comedy?': Karnataka High Court Slams Zee, Comedy Khiladigalu Makers Over Inappropriate Depiction Of Hindu Gods
Source: Click Here
Development: The Karnataka High Court, in response to an offensive depiction of Hindu gods and figures, including Lord Krishna and Draupadi, criticized Zee Enterprises and the producers of Comedy Khiladigalu. While hearing a petition to dismiss a complaint under Section 299 BNS, the Court affirmed that comedy does not justify offending religious sentiments, even if the scene was presented as a rehearsal. The Court instructed the petitioners to cooperate with the ongoing investigation but granted them interim protection from coercive action until the subsequent hearing.
Calcutta High Court Expresses Concern Over Recurring Violence At Murshidabad
Source: Click Here
Development: The Calcutta High Court has voiced serious concern over repeated violence in Murshidabad's Beldanga area. This response came following two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed last week, one by Opposition Leader Suvendu Adhikari and the other by a local resident. The Court has mandated the State government and police to restore peace, calling for the proper deployment of five companies of BSF and the implementation of all necessary measures to prevent further clashes. The unrest, which began on January 16th after the death of a migrant worker, has resulted in 12 injuries and 30 arrests. Furthermore, the Court indicated that an NIA probe into the violence will be considered once the State government submits its official report.
Tiger Deaths In 2025: Madhya Pradesh High Court Issues Notice On PIL Seeking Directions To Prevent Poaching
Source: Click Here
Development: The Madhya Pradesh High Court has issued notice to the Union Government, the State, and the National Tiger Conservation Authority on a PIL concerning 54 tiger deaths in 2025 out of a population of 785. The petition notes that 57% of these fatalities were due to unnatural causes like poaching, electrocution, and accidents, specifically citing ongoing tiger deaths on the Budni–Midghat railway stretch and alleging administrative failure to mitigate known risks.
Delhi Court Grants First Bail In Turkman Gate Violence Case
Source: Click Here
Development: A Delhi court granted bail to Md Ubedullah, the first accused to receive relief in the Turkman Gate violence case. The case involves charges of rioting, stone-pelting, and attempted murder under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, following clashes near the Faiz-e-Ilahi mosque during an MCD demolition drive earlier this month. The court granted bail on a personal bond of ₹25,000 and one surety, noting that Ubedullah's police custody was no longer necessary, days after five other accused were denied bail. The incident resulted in injuries to police personnel and multiple arrests.
Navy Afforestation Report Filed: Centre Informs Telangana High Court
Source: Click Here
Development: The Telangana High Court granted a four-week extension to the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change to submit an update on compliance with Stage-II forest clearance conditions. This occurred during the hearing of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the land allocation for a proposed VLF/ELF radar station in Damagundam, Vikarabad, due to concerns about its impact on biodiversity. The Union Government also informed the Court that the Indian Navy has filed a compliance report on the mandated compensatory afforestation. The case is scheduled for the next hearing on February 18th.
Plea In Karnataka High Court Seeks Separate Ballots For Women Candidates In Bar Council Elections
Source: Click Here
Development: The Karnataka High Court has sought responses from the Karnataka State Bar Council and the Bar Council of India on a petition requesting separate ballot papers for women candidates in Bar Council elections to ensure the effective implementation of the mandatory 30% reservation for women advocates. The court, however, did not halt the ongoing election process. Justice B.M. Shyam Prasad advised the petitioner to first formally address her grievance with the relevant authorities, directing that a copy of the petition be served on the Returning Officer. The next hearing is scheduled for February 6th.
Kerala Village With 30 Mosques Denied Permission For 31st, Awaits SC Order
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has taken up a significant case from Amarambalam village in Nilambur, Malappuram district, after local authorities and the Kerala High Court blocked the conversion of a commercial building into a mosque. The District Collector originally denied the application, citing a high density of existing mosques (nearly 30 within a five-kilometre radius), along with local objections and potential law-and-order issues. However, the Supreme Court, upon issuing notice, commented that permission for a mosque cannot be refused solely on the basis that other mosques are located nearby
Archbishop Pamplany Moves Kerala High Court Alleging Trespass And Obstruction Of Religious Activities At St Mary’s Basilica In Kochi
Source: Click Here
Development: Archbishop Mar Joseph Pamplany has filed a petition in the Kerala High Court requesting immediate police intervention to remove alleged trespassers from St. Mary’s Cathedral Basilica, Ernakulam. The Archbishop claims that since December 10, 2025, a group opposing the uniform mode of Holy Qurbana has illegally occupied the church, disrupting services and causing damage. He argues that the police's failure to act on complaints violates their statutory duties and infringes upon the constitutional rights of the parishioners to practice their religion. This action comes after a previous incident in January 2025 where police forcibly removed protesting priests from the Bishop's house.
Delhi Air Pollution | Supreme Court Directs NCR States To Act On CAQM's Recommendation For Long Term Measures
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has directed the Delhi Government, municipal bodies, and NCR States to submit time-bound action taken reports on the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM)'s long-term recommendations for air pollution control. These recommendations include phasing out polluting vehicles, strengthening the PUC regime, expanding public transport (rail and metro), revising the EV policy, and incentivising vehicle scrappage. The Court made it clear that no objections to the CAQM's suggestions would be entertained and also required a new plan for utilizing the Environment Compensation Charge (ECC) funds.
Air Pollution: Bombay High Court Moots Stopping Salaries Of BMC, NMMC Officials For Inaction
Source: Click Here
Development: The Bombay High Court strongly reprimanded the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) and Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation (NMMC) for their persistent failure to follow air-pollution mitigation directives in a suo motu PIL. The Court, citing "belligerent disregard," proposed considering coercive measures like withholding the Municipal Commissioners' salaries, specifically targeting the NMMC for its failure to inspect construction sites flouting dust-control regulations. The Court clarified that the salary stoppage is currently a proposal but warned that similar action could be taken against BMC officials, and it requested updates on the progress of installing air-quality monitoring systems.
Right To Dignity Doesn’t Vanish With Arrest: Rajasthan HC Raps Police For Shaming Arrestees, Publishing Their Photos
Source: Click Here
Development: The Rajasthan High Court severely criticized the Jaisalmer police for violating the dignity of arrestees by publicly shaming them. The police forced them to sit at station gates, photographed them, even in their undergarments, and circulated the images on social media and in newspapers. In the case of Islam Khan & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors., the Court ordered the immediate removal of all photographs, affirming that the right to dignity is not lost upon arrest. Senior police officials were ordered to report on the safeguards implemented to prevent recurrence, and an amicus curiae was appointed.
Supreme Court Defers Surendra Gadling’s Bail Plea In Surajgarh Arson Case Again
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court postponed the bail hearing for lawyer-activist Surendra Gadling in the 2016 Surajgarh arson case by one month, but ordered the trial to be expedited. A Bench of Justices JK Maheshwari and Vijay Bishnoi established timelines for the inspection of records, the framing of charges, and the scheduling of arguments to prevent further delays. Gadling’s lawyer pointed out that his client has been incarcerated for seven years awaiting trial, prompting the Court to stress the need for available trial judges to complete the proceedings.
Delhi High Court Orders Vacancy, Workload Audit After Suicide Of Staffer Due To Work Pressure
Source: Click Here
Development: In response to the alleged suicide of a court staffer attributed to excessive work pressure, the Delhi High Court has directed an audit of both staff vacancies and workload distribution within the Delhi Courts system. The Court has already begun internal administrative steps, including assessing staff shortages, rationalizing the cadre structure, and redistributing workloads. The Court also provided permissible relief to the family of the deceased staffer. These assurances were officially recorded by the Court, leading to the disposal of the petition.
ACB Court’s Refusal To Provide Verdict Copies Pertaining To Naidu Challenged In High Court
Source: Click Here
Development: The Andhra Pradesh High Court addressed petitions contesting the Vijayawada ACB Court's refusal to release copies of verdicts and case records pertaining to Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu. The petitioner sought closure orders in cases related to alleged irregularities in the FiberNet and liquor policies. The High Court, however, observed that third parties are typically not entitled to these records and consequently instructed the CID to submit a comprehensive report. The hearing has been postponed until February 3rd.
AIBE Will Be Held Twice A Year; Rules Framed To Allow Final Semester Students To Take Exam : BCI Tells Supreme Court
Source: Click Here
Development: The Bar Council of India (BCI) has notified the Supreme Court that it has established rules to permit final semester law students to sit for the All India Bar Exam (AIBE). Furthermore, the BCI stated that the AIBE will now be administered at least biannually, facilitating greater opportunity for students awaiting their final examination results. The Supreme Court acknowledged that the objectives of the 2024 writ petition, Nilay Rai & Ors v BCI, have been met through the implementation of these new rules.
West Bengal SSC : Supreme Court Stays Calcutta HC Order Allowing Age Relaxation For Unappointed Candidate Of 2016 Selection Process
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has temporarily halted a Calcutta High Court order that had granted age relaxation, allowing an unsuccessful candidate from the 2016 West Bengal SSC recruitment to participate in the 2025 selection for Assistant Teachers. The West Bengal Central School Service Commission appealed, arguing that the High Court’s directive contradicted the 2025 Rules and a previous Supreme Court judgment (State of West Bengal v. Baisakhi Bhattacharyya) which restricted age relaxation solely to appointed, untainted candidates, specifically excluding waitlisted or unsuccessful ones.
Does ED Have Power For Further Investigation? Supreme Court To Examine In IAS Officer Saumya Chaurasia’s Plea
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court, through a Bench including CJI Surya Kant, has issued notice on a writ petition filed by IAS officer Saumya Chaurasia, who is challenging her arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in the Chhattisgarh liquor scam case. Chaurasia's petition contests the ED's broad interpretation of "further investigation" under the PMLA, 2002, arguing that the Act does not grant the ED substantive power for it without court permission. She seeks the quashing of her December 2025 arrest, which she claims was unnecessary and constitutes "evergreen custody," and a declaration that the ED's further investigation and any resulting supplementary complaints are illegal.
Madras High Court Reserves Verdict On CBFC Appeal Against Direction To Certify Vijay Starrer ‘Jana Nayagan’ Film
Source: Click Here
Development: The Madras High Court has reserved its judgment on the Central Board of Film Certification's (CBFC) appeal against a single judge's order to grant a 'UA' certificate to the film Jana Nayagan. The CBFC argues it lacked sufficient time to file a response and that referring the film to a Revising Committee was within its authority, despite a regional office's recommendation. The film's producers countered that the Examining Committee's unanimous recommendation should not have been subject to further review. The Division Bench noted its concern over the single judge's swift decision without giving the CBFC adequate time to respond.
Plea In Kerala HC Seeks CBI Probe Into Viswadeepthi Co-Op Scam
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court has sought a response from the Central Government and issued notice to the CBI regarding a plea filed by 47 depositors. These depositors are seeking a CBI investigation or a court-monitored probe into the alleged multi-crore scam involving the Viswadeepthi Multi-State Agri Co-operative Society in Kozhikode. The petitioners’ allegations include large-scale fraudulent mobilization of deposits, diversion of funds, the closure of offices, and the absconding of directors. They have requested the application of both the Depositors Protection Act, 2019, and the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019. Justice P. Gopinath has adjourned the matter to January 30th.
Telangana High Court Directs State To Reconstitute Animal Welfare Board
Source: Click Here
Development: The Telangana High Court has directed the State Government to immediately reconstitute the State Animal Welfare Board and file a counter-affidavit within six weeks. The order came during the hearing of a petition by Humane Society International (India), which sought the enforcement of animal welfare laws, inspection of pet shops and dog breeding centers, and the revival of the Board, whose term expired in 2022. The petitioner pointed out that the Board was never constituted despite applications being invited for non-official members in January 2025. The State, while requesting time, mentioned that district societies for the prevention of cruelty to animals are currently functional and conducting inspections.
Is ECI’s Power To Hold SIR Untrammelled, Beyond Judicial Review? Supreme Court Asks
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has questioned the Election Commission of India's (ECI) power to conduct a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, suggesting this authority is not absolute and is subject to judicial review. The Court stressed that revising voter lists has "civil consequences" and must comply with the procedural requirements of Section 21(2) of the Representation of the People Act, even while hearing challenges to the ECI's decision to extend SIR beyond Bihar.
Rape & Miscarriage Case: Victim Files Objections In Kerala High Court Opposing MLA Rahul Mamkootathil’s Bail
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court extended interim protection from arrest for Palakkad MLA Rahul Mamkootathil while scheduling a hearing for his anticipatory bail plea on January 28th. The decision followed the inclusion of the victim's objections, who alleged repeated sexual assault, forced miscarriage, threats, and fear of evidence tampering and witness intimidation. The State is also seeking to cancel his pre-arrest bail in a second rape case, and the MLA's counsel sought to address his arrest in a third case during the hearing.
Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment On Pre-Arrest Bail Plea Of Ex-Arpora Sarpanch
Source: Click Here
Development: The Bombay High Court at Goa has reserved its decision on the anticipatory bail application filed by Roshan Redkar, the dismissed Sarpanch of Arpora-Nagoa. This plea relates to the Birch by Romeo Lane nightclub fire case that tragically resulted in the deaths of 25 people on December 6, 2025. Redkar is challenging the Mapusa court's prior rejection of his pre-arrest bail. Separately, the dismissed Panchayat Secretary, Raghuvir Bagkar, has also submitted his own anticipatory bail plea.
‘Foundation Has Vanished’: Karnataka High Court Stays ED Probe Against Gameskraft Citing Closure Report In Predicate FIR
Source: Click Here
Development: The Karnataka High Court has temporarily halted the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) investigation into Gameskraft Technologies. The ED's case stemmed from a November 2025 ECIR (Enforcement Case Information Report). Justice M. Nagaprasanna, in his interim order, noted that the investigation's foundation had "vanished" because the predicate FIR (First Information Report) upon which the ECIR was based had been closed by the police through an accepted 'B-report'. However, the court allowed the ED the opportunity to submit objections, introduce any other relevant FIRs, and provide the legal justification for updating the ECIR.
UK Doctor Sangram Patil Moves Plea In Bombay High Court To Quash FIR Over Posts Against BJP Leaders
Source: Click Here
Development: The Bombay High Court has issued notice regarding a petition filed by Sangram Patil, a UK-based doctor and YouTuber. Patil is seeking to quash an FIR registered against him by Mumbai Police for allegedly posting objectionable content about BJP leaders on social media, and is also challenging a Look Out Circular issued against him. A single-judge bench requested a response from the State, with the Advocate General assuring a reply within one week. The matter has been posted for further hearing on February 4, 2026.
Plea Challenging Stalin’s 2011 Election: Supreme Court To Consider Extent Of Proof Of Video Evidence Authenticated By S. 65B Certificate
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court is reviewing an appeal related to the dismissal of an election petition challenging M.K. Stalin's 2011 election victory, focusing on the standard of proof required for electronic evidence, particularly when a Section 65B certificate is available. The key question for the Bench is whether official witnesses only need to attest to the authenticity and production of the electronic evidence (like CDs), or if their testimony must also confirm the truth of the events recorded. The Court's ultimate goal is to clarify the level of proof necessary to substantiate corrupt practice allegations based on such electronic material.
Karnataka High Court Directs State To Appoint Nodal Officer For Coordinating Departmental Action To Aid Child Beggars
Source: Click Here
Development: The Karnataka High Court has ordered the State Government to designate a nodal officer. This officer will be responsible for coordinating the efforts of various departments and agencies in implementing the measures recommended by the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority (KSLSA) to aid child beggars. The Court instructed the State to review the KSLSA report, which outlines six categories of child begging and proposes solutions such as makeshift schools, anganwadis, and police investigations into potential trafficking and abuse. Furthermore, the State was directed to submit an action plan, complete with timelines, within six weeks.
Karnataka High Court To Hear Next Month Sri Sri Ravishankar’s Plea To Quash FIR Over Alleged Land Encroachment
Source: Click Here
Development: The Karnataka High Court is scheduled to hear a plea on February 5th by Sri Sri Ravishankar, who is seeking to quash an FIR filed by the Bangalore Metropolitan Task Force Police. The FIR, registered under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, alleges encroachment on public land and a storm water drain in Kaggalipura village, a finding that arose from a High Court-directed PIL probe. Justice M. Nagaprasanna has extended the interim stay on the police investigation until the next hearing.
Madras High Court To Hear Cash-For-Jobs Case Against Minister K.N. Nehru
Source: Click Here
Development: A writ petition has been filed in the Madras High Court by an AIADMK MP, seeking a directive for the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) to register an FIR in the alleged cash-for-jobs scam involving Tamil Nadu Minister K.N. Nehru. The petition is based on evidence seized by the Enforcement Directorate (ED), which reportedly includes selection lists and proof of illegal payments related to the recruitment of over 2,500 vacancies, alleging systematic irregularities in the process.
SIR Notification Doesn’t Cite Illegal Cross-Border Migration As A Reason : Supreme Court Tells ECI
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court challenged the Election Commission of India (ECI) on the true purpose of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. The Court noted that while the ECI's notification cited only "migration," the ECI was reportedly using the SIR to detect illegal cross-border migrants, a reason not explicitly mentioned in the notification. The Court pressed the ECI to clarify if it was investigating illegal transborder migration under the guise of voter revision. The ECI, in response, argued that the SIR's purpose is to verify citizenship, particularly for voters born after 2003, in line with the 2003 amendments to the Citizenship Act.
Judge Who Ordered Mosque Survey Won't Be New CJM; Sent Back To Original Post Within 48 Hours
Source: Click Here
Development: The Allahabad High Court reversed a transfer order within 48 hours, reinstating Civil Judge (Senior Division) Aditya Singh to his original post in Sambhal and revoking his appointment as Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM). This decision followed public and legal scrutiny related to Judge Singh's earlier action: the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to survey the Jama Masjid, an exercise connected to the November 2024 Sambhal violence. Deepak Kumar Jaiswal, formerly the CJM of Kaushambi, has now been transferred to Sambhal to assume the CJM position.
‘We Will Stop Interacting’: Delhi High Court Slams Media For Sensationalizing Its Oral Comments On Newslaundry Journalist
Source: Click Here
Development: The Delhi High Court criticized media outlets for sensationalizing its oral comments regarding Newslaundry journalist Manisha Pande, emphasizing that it has no intention of taking action against her. The Court clarified its earlier strong oral remarks were misconstrued and sensationalized. Justice C Hari Shankar noted the comments were taken out of context during a hearing related to TV Today's defamation and copyright dispute with Newslaundry. The remarks, when circulated on social media, had led to hate messages directed at Pande. The Court stated that its initial comments were merely intended to convey that more dignified language was expected.
Delhi High Court Judge Recuses From Hearing Karti Chidambaram's Plea Against Charges In Chinese Visa Scam
Source: Click Here
Development: In the ongoing Chinese visa scam case, a Delhi High Court judge has recused himself on personal grounds from hearing Congress MP Karti Chidambaram's plea challenging the trial court's order to frame charges. This marks the third judge to step aside from the matter. The senior counsel representing Chidambaram argued that the charges framed lack correspondence with the allegations and that no material exists to suggest even grave suspicion against the MP. Consequently, the Court has directed the matter to be listed before another bench on January 28th.
Cash For Query Row: Delhi High Court Grants Two Months' Time To Lokpal For Deciding Sanction Against Mahua Moitra
Source: Click Here
Development: The Delhi High Court has given the Lokpal a final two-month deadline to decide on the Central Bureau of Investigation's (CBI) request for sanction to file a chargesheet against Mahua Moitra in the cash-for-query case. The court explicitly stated that no additional extensions would be granted. This directive comes after the Court had previously set aside the Lokpal's initial sanction order and instructed a fresh decision in compliance with the Lokpal Act.
Renukaswamy Murder Case: Karnataka High Court Stays Order Directing Home-Cooked Food For Pavithra Gowda & Two Others In Jail
Source: Click Here
Development: The Karnataka High Court has temporarily halted a trial court's decision that had permitted actress Pavithra Gowda and two co-accused in the Renukaswamy murder case to receive home-cooked food in jail. This stay was granted after the State filed a plea. The High Court emphasized that the trial court's order for special food contradicted Supreme Court directives, which caution against offering preferential or special treatment to undertrial prisoners, especially based on their status or influence. Furthermore, the High Court noted that the strict procedure for granting home food under prison rules was not adhered to in this specific instance.
‘System Failing’: Kerala High Court Expresses Shock Over Continued Installation Of Unauthorized Boards And Flags Despite Orders
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court voiced strong disapproval and surprise regarding the persistent placement of illegal boards, banners, and flags in public areas, despite unambiguous court orders banning them. The Court highlighted the obstruction of footpaths and pedestrian access, pointed to deficiencies in enforcement, and cautioned that promises from officials are inadequate without concrete, visible compliance on the ground. Consequently, Corporations were ordered to submit comprehensive reports detailing the count of illegal installations and the specific steps taken for their removal.
Calcutta High Court Permits Ex-TMC Leader & MLA Humayun Kabir To Approach Ministry Of Home Affairs For Z+ Security
Source: Click Here
Development: The Calcutta High Court has permitted Humayun Kabir, the MLA for Bharatpur and founder of a new political party (and former Trinamool Congress member), to apply to the Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) for Z+ security, citing fears for his life and property. The court directed the MHA to review his request within two weeks, noting that Kabir already receives police protection from the Murshidabad district police and that the court was not evaluating the merits of his claim.
Kerala High Court, For Now, Directs Central Government Not To Levy Tax On Group Health Insurance Of Retired Union Bank Staff
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court has issued an interim order restraining the Central Government, GST Council, and Union Bank of India from levying GST on the group health insurance premium for the 2025–26 policy year. This relief applies specifically to retired Union Bank employees and similarly placed retirees. The order was made while admitting appeals that challenge a previous ruling which had limited GST exemption only to individual health insurance policies, excluding group policies. The retirees have agreed to pay the GST if the final decision goes against them.
Supreme Court Declines To Order Reduction Of NEET UG Cutoff For BAMS Admissions 2025–26
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court refused to order a further reduction in the NEET-UG qualifying cutoff for BAMS admissions for the 2025-26 academic year, despite requests from ayurvedic colleges to fill vacant seats. The Court cited the nearing end of the academic session, the National Commission of Indian System of Medicine's objection regarding compromised education quality, multiple prior extensions of the cutoff date, and concerns about late admissions delaying internships and postgraduate eligibility. The decision was also influenced by the fact that only about 3.1% of seats remained vacant nationwide. The petitions were ordered to be listed with similar pending cases.
Calcutta High Court Orders Creche Facility In Court Premises To Become Functional Within 30 Days
Source: Click Here
Development: The Calcutta High Court issued several directives for the operationalization of a creche facility on the court premises and mandated a report on the district-wise status of such facilities across West Bengal. Key orders include: making the creche operational within 30 days, publishing approved operational guidelines within three weeks, installing aluminium grills on the windows, and deploying two doctors and one nurse a day before the opening. The High Court Administration must file an affidavit detailing the creche status in courts across the state within three weeks.
Supreme Court Reserves Orders On Plea Seeking Alternatives To Hanging For Death Penalty Execution
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has reserved judgment on a public interest litigation challenging death by hanging and suggesting alternatives such as lethal injection. During the hearing, a Division Bench considered arguments from the Attorney General, the petitioner, and Project 39A, focusing on the pain of hanging and the unreliability of lethal injection abroad. The Attorney General informed the Court that the Union Government is studying the issue at the highest level through committees. The Court allowed the parties to submit concise notes and left open the option for the Union Government to approach it again.
III. Details of Important Cases
A. Supreme Court
Supreme Court Junks PIL On Judicial Reforms, Terms It ‘Publicity Interest Litigation’
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL seeking a direction that every court in the country decide cases within one year, terming it a “publicity interest litigation” and declining to entertain what it described as sweeping and impractical demands for judicial reform. The Bench questioned the feasibility of such a mandate, and criticised the use of PILs for publicity. The bench further observed that suggestions on judicial reforms could instead be submitted to the Chief Justice on the administrative side, while rejecting the plea.
Supreme Court Criticises Allahabad HC’s Casual Order Granting Bail To Child Trafficking Accused; Questions UP Govt For Not Challenging It
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court cancelled bail granted to a child trafficking accused, holding that the Allahabad High Court had passed a mechanical and casual bail order without considering the gravity and seriousness of the offence. The Bench criticised the use of template-style bail orders, especially in cases involving trafficking of minor girls, and expressed surprise that the Uttar Pradesh Government had not proactively sought cancellation. The accused, facing multiple prior trafficking cases, was directed to surrender within one week.
Supreme Court Rejects Privacy Plea, Allows ED To Access I-PAC Man's Phone
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court rejected a privacy plea and allowed the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to access the mobile phone data of an I-PAC functionary, Jitendra Mehta, seized during a 8th January search at the political consultancy’s Delhi office. Mehta had argued that extracting information from his phone would violate his fundamental right to privacy under Article 21 and protections against self-incrimination, but the Bench refused interim restraint, asking why he was “so afraid” of the ED accessing the device. The Court clubbed similar matters involving restraints on ED access to phones and scheduled further hearings.
Digitize Land Records Using Tamper-Proof Technology Like Blockchain : Supreme Court Suggests To Govts
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court, in restoring a sale deed, emphasized that registered sale deeds carry a strong presumption of validity and require cogent evidence to be declared "sham." Recognizing that weak land record systems contribute to extensive litigation over document authenticity, the Court urged both Union and State Governments to immediately digitize land records and registered documents. It specifically recommended using secure, tamper-proof technologies like blockchain to create immutable and cryptographically secure records, thereby reducing forgery, strengthening property title confidence, and enhancing the ease of doing business.
Supreme Court Refuses To Entertain Tamil YouTuber Savukku Shankar’s Plea To Unseal Office, Asks Him To Approach Magistrate
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court refused to entertain Tamil YouTuber Savukku Shankar’s plea seeking unsealing of his Chennai office and return of seized devices, asking him to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate instead. The Court noted that the Madras High Court had already granted liberty to seek relief under BNSS provisions on seized property and declined to exercise writ jurisdiction for such grievances.
State Agency Can Investigate Corruption Cases Against Central Govt Officers: Supreme Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court held that State police and Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) agencies are competent to investigate and file charge-sheets in corruption cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, even when the accused is a Central Government employee. The Court clarified that prior approval or consent of the CBI is not mandatory, and a charge-sheet filed by a State agency cannot be invalidated solely on that ground. Upholding a High Court ruling, the Court rejected the argument that only the CBI has exclusive jurisdiction in such cases, relying on settled precedent that the DSPE Act is enabling, not exclusionary.
AICTE Regulations Don’t Apply To Direct Recruitment Of Engineering Professors Conducted By State PSCs: Supreme Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court held that AICTE Regulations do not govern direct recruitment of Engineering Professors conducted by State Public Service Commissions, and such appointments must be made strictly under the State recruitment rules. Setting aside the Gujarat High Court’s ruling, the Bench clarified that AICTE Regulations are career advancement and promotion norms, applicable only to incumbent faculty within the academic system, and not to candidates seeking entry through direct recruitment. The Court also reiterated that a candidate who participates in a selection process without protest cannot challenge the rules after being unsuccessful.
Supreme Court Rejects Union’s Plea To Modify Direction To Fill 50% JAG Posts From Women
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court rejected the Union Government’s plea to modify last year’s judgment directing 50% of Judge Advocate General (JAG) vacancies in the Indian Army be reserved for women. The Court clarified that merit applies only above this 50% threshold, and that streams where women are not recruited remain under government policy. The bench emphasized that the order is meant to correct past under-representation and uphold gender equality in JAG recruitment.
Subordinate Legislation Becomes Effective Only From Date Of Publication In Official Gazette : Supreme Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court held that subordinate legislation becomes legally enforceable only from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette and not from the date of its issuance or upload on a website. The Division Bench set aside the Delhi High Court’s judgment and ruled in favour of steel importers who had opened irrevocable letters of credit before the notification imposing Minimum Import Price was published in the Gazette. The Court rejected the government’s contention that the notification was effective from the date it was uploaded on the DGFT website, and held that the expression “date of this notification” must mean the date of Gazette publication. It observed that unpublished delegated legislation cannot impose obligations or curtail rights, and that publication is a mandatory condition for enforceability.
Supreme Court Dismisses PIL Against BCCI Representing Indian Cricket Team
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL challenging the projection of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) as the representative of the Indian national cricket team, declining to interfere with the Delhi High Court’s refusal to entertain the plea. The Bench held that there must be clarity on who represents India in international cricket, noting that the Ministry of Sports has supported and endorsed the BCCI and that the Court itself has issued several regulatory directions governing it. The Court termed the petition frivolous and a wastage of judicial time, initially dictating costs of ₹10 lakh but later dropping the direction on the petitioner’s request.
NGT Cannot Decide Disputes Relating To Building Plan Violations : Supreme Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court held that the National Green Tribunal (NGT) has no jurisdiction to decide disputes essentially relating to land use, zoning regulations, and building plan or town-planning compliance, even if such issues are projected as environmental concerns. The Bench ruled that the dispute arising from alleged commercial construction in Gurugram’s Ambience Lagoon Island project was not a “substantial question relating to the environment” under Section 14 of the NGT Act, 2010, but concerned the legality of de-licensing and permissible land use under town-planning laws, which is already pending before the Punjab and Haryana High Court. The Court kept the NGT proceedings in abeyance and directed that its orders imposing environmental compensation, recommending heavy penalties, profit withholding and possible demolition should not be acted upon for now.
Supreme Court Rejects Taekwondo Federation Of India’s Plea Against Delhi HC Bar On Acting As National Sports Federation
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the Delhi High Court’s order directing that, until the Union Government decides on recognition, neither the Taekwondo Federation of India nor Taekwondo India shall act as the National Sports Federation for taekwondo. The Bench rejected the Federation’s plea seeking interim permission to function, with Justice Narasimha observing that excessive court interference in sports administration was undesirable. Senior counsel for the Federation argued that the order had created a vacuum affecting players and sought continuation of its role till the Government’s decision, but later withdrew the special leave petition, which the Court permitted.
“Socialism In Its Extreme”: Supreme Court On Giving Kerala Land Reforms Act Protection To Commercial Establishment
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court held that Indian Oil Corporation Limited was not entitled to eviction protection under Section 106 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 while deciding IOCL’s appeal arising from a 1994 suit for recovery of possession of leased land in Ernakulam. The Division Bench agreed with the Kerala High Court that IOCL had failed to prove construction of the building before 20th May, 1967 and therefore could not claim the statutory protection meant for lessees. The Court criticised extending land reform benefits to large commercial and industrial entities, describing such application as “socialism in its extreme”, and directed IOCL to hand over vacant possession of the land within six months to the heirs of the landowner.
Can NCLT Decide Trademark Ownership Of Companies Under CIRP? Supreme Court Answers
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court held that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) cannot adjudicate or declare ownership of a trademark merely because the issue arises during a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), unless the dispute has a direct and intrinsic nexus with insolvency. The Court clarified that Section 60(5) of the IBC does not confer blanket jurisdiction on insolvency fora to decide disputes that do not arise solely from insolvency proceedings, and set aside findings of the NCLT and NCLAT relating to the ownership of the “Gloster” trademark.
Supreme Court Imposes ₹25,000 Costs On Central Government For Providing Incorrect Information
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court imposed costs of ₹25,000 on the Central Government for furnishing incorrect information during proceedings related to an ongoing criminal investigation, noting that the error could have led to a wrong judicial order. The incorrect submission concerned whether a list of officers travelling abroad for investigation purposes had been shared by the State, which the Centre later conceded was already provided.
‘Difficult For Court To Frame Pan-India SOP For Rallies’: Supreme Court Asks Petitioner To Approach MHA & ECI
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court disposed of a PIL seeking pan-India Standard Operating Procedures for political rallies and public gatherings to prevent stampedes, holding that it would be difficult to frame blanket nationwide guidelines. A Bench observed that formulation of such policy falls within the domain of the Union and law-enforcement agencies. The Court permitted the petitioner to pursue his representation before the Ministry of Home Affairs and granted liberty to also approach the Election Commission of India for guidelines specific to political rallies and roadshows, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the plea.
Registered Sale Deed Cannot Be Branded As ‘Sham’ Casually: Supreme Court Calls For Digitisation Of Documents
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court held that registered sale deeds cannot be casually termed “sham”, stressing that registration carries a strong presumption of validity. It ruled that challenges must be backed by clear and specific pleadings, and that mere allegations of fraud or sham are insufficient to rebut the statutory presumption under the Evidence Act. The Court also flagged the systemic risks of undermining registered documents and urged digitisation of land and registration records using secure technologies.
B. Delhi High Court
Delhi High Court Quashes Income Tax Notices Against NDTV Founders Prannoy Roy And Radhika Roy
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Delhi High Court quashed income tax reassessment notices issued to NDTV founders Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy in connection with transactions involving promoter group entity RRPR Holding Pvt. Ltd., holding that the Department could not reopen the case on the same issues already examined in an earlier assessment. The Court found the reassessment to be an impermissible “change of opinion” under the Income Tax Act, set aside the notices, and imposed costs of ₹2 lakh on the tax authorities, directing ₹1 lakh each to be paid to the petitioners.
Delhi High Court Rejects AAP Leader Somnath Bharti's Plea Challenging Election Of BJP MLA Satish Upadhyay From Malviya Nagar
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Delhi High Court dismissed the election petition filed by AAP leader Somnath Bharti challenging the election of BJP MLA Satish Upadhyay from the Malviya Nagar Assembly constituency, on the ground of non-joinder of a necessary party. The Court held that since Bharti had alleged corrupt practices involving Congress candidate Jitender Kumar Kochar, his failure to implead Kochar as a respondent was an incurable defect under Sections 82(b) and 86(1) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. Relying on settled Supreme Court precedent, the Court ruled that such a defect goes to the root of maintainability and cannot be cured after the limitation period.
Delhi High Court Rejects Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s Plea For Suspension Of Sentence In Case Of Unnao Rape Victim Father's Death
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Delhi High Court rejected Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s plea seeking suspension of his 10-year sentence in the case relating to the custodial death of the Unnao rape victim’s father. The Court observed that there was no new subsequent development warranting relief and noting his criminal antecedents and repeated attempts to seek suspension of sentence. The Court recalled that Sengar was convicted in 2020 for conspiring in the victim’s father’s death, after the trials were transferred from Uttar Pradesh to Delhi by the Supreme Court, and held that his appeal should be heard on merits expeditiously rather than granting interim relief.
‘Do Some Constructive Work’: Delhi High Court Raps Law Student Seeking To Ban Bangladesh From Cricket Citing Violence Against Hindus
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL filed by a law student seeking to ban Bangladesh from international cricket, including the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2026, citing alleged violence against Hindus. The Court held that the plea sought policy decisions in the domain of foreign affairs and international sports bodies, which are beyond writ jurisdiction. Terming the petition misconceived and a waste of judicial time, the Court strongly cautioned against filing such PILs and dismissed it as withdrawn after advising the petitioner to pursue more constructive causes.
Merely Labelling Hypertension A ‘Lifestyle Disorder’ Not Enough To Deny Disability Pension To Air Force Personnel: Delhi High Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India’s challenge to an Armed Forces Tribunal order granting disability pension to a former Indian Air Force personnel suffering from primary hypertension. The Division Bench held that merely labelling hypertension as a “lifestyle disorder” is not sufficient to deny disability pension without cogent reasons from the Medical Board. The Court noted that the personnel had no disability at the time of recruitment and that the authorities failed to explain how the condition was unrelated to or not aggravated by military service, and reiterated that disability pension is a beneficial provision to be interpreted liberally in favour of service personnel.
C. Bombay High Court
Bhima Koregaon Case: Bombay High Court Grants Bail To Ramesh Gaichor & Sagar Gorkhe After 5 Yrs In Jail
Source: Click Here
Development: The Bombay High Court granted bail to Ramesh Gaichor and Sagar Gorkhe in the Bhima Koregaon–Elgar Parishad case on the grounds of long incarceration and the possibility of the trial in the case not commencing in the near future. Both accused, arrested in 2020 under the UAPA, were alleged by the NIA to have propagated Maoist ideology and incited violence through speeches and cultural performances. The Bench relied solely on prolonged custody as the ground for bail.
Ambernath Municipal Council: Bombay High Court Orders Collector To Decide Afresh On Alliances Of BJP-Congress, Shinde Sena-NCP
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Bombay High Court has directed the Thane Collector to decide afresh on the recognition of rival political alliances in the Ambernath Municipal Council, amid competing claims by the BJP–Congress grouping and the Shiv Sena (Eknath Shinde faction)–NCP (Ajit Pawar faction). A Bench of Justices Ravindra Ghuge and Abhay Mantri, acting on the consent of all parties, kept in abeyance the Collector’s orders dated 7th January and 9th January, 2026, which had alternately recognised and de-recognised the two alliances. The Court remitted the matter back to the Collector with directions to hear all sides on 28th January, and to pass a reasoned order within 21 days, while maintaining status quo and decorum.
Bombay High Court Refuses Urgent Hearing Of Dhangar Quota Protest Plea, Recalls Maratha Protestors Who 'Overstayed, Littered Mumbai'
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Bombay High Court has refused to grant urgent hearing to a plea seeking permission for a Dhangar community protest demanding reservation, while sharply recalling the September 2025 Maratha community agitation that brought Mumbai to a standstill. A Division Bench of Justices Ravindra Ghuge and Abhay Mantri criticised the Maratha protestors for overstaying beyond permitted limits and littering city roads despite specific court directions to clean up before dispersing. Making oral remarks, the Bench held that there is no urgency in petitions seeking permission to protest, observing that demonstrations can be held on any day and cannot be treated as time-bound emergencies warranting immediate judicial intervention.
‘Meant To Strike Terror’: Bombay High Court Denies Bail To Vet Accused In Amravati Murder Over Nupur Sharma Post
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Bombay High Court denied bail to Yusuf Khan in the 2022 murder of Amravati pharmacist Umesh Kolhe, who was killed for supporting remarks made by former BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma. The Division Bench held that the offence was grave and heinous and struck at the conscience of society. The Court noted that Khan had circulated an instigative post calling for action against the deceased and that material on record indicated his role in a criminal conspiracy, observing that the act was meant to strike terror among the public.
Bombay High Court Warns Against Over‑Emphasis On Accused’s Rights, Upholds Life Term Of POCSO Convict
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Bombay High Court has upheld the life sentence of a POCSO convict and warned courts against over-emphasising the rights of the accused at the cost of victims’ rights. A Division Bench observed that an excessive focus on fair-trial claims can leave survivors of sexual assault “bewildered and voiceless”, stressing that the victim triggers the criminal justice system. The Court rejected challenges to evidence and procedure, holding that the 13-year-old survivor’s testimony was credible and corroborated, and that a technical error in framing the charge caused no prejudice to the accused.
D. Kerala High Court
Sabarimala Gold Theft: Kerala High Court Denies Bail To Jeweller Roddam & Former Devaswom Board Officials
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Kerala High Court has denied bail to jeweller Roddam Govardhanan and former Travancore Devaswom Board officials A. Padmakumar and B. Murari Babu in the Sabarimala gold theft case, which concerns the alleged misappropriation of gold from Dwarapalaka idols and doorframes of the Sreekovil. The Court declined to grant relief noting the seriousness of allegations, which include criminal breach of trust, forgery, corruption, and misuse of official position, and the ongoing Crime Branch–SIT investigation. Appointments and procedures allegedly bypassed established Devaswom manuals and Maramath norms.
Kerala High Court Closes Law Aspirant’s Plea For Transgender Reservation In Law Colleges After She Secures Admission
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Kerala High Court closed the writ petition filed by a law aspirant seeking admission under the transgender reservation category to the Integrated Five-Year LL.B course in Government Law College, Kozhikode, after being informed that she has secured admission. Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas recorded the development and disposed of the matter. Earlier, the Court had sought the stand of the Bar Council of India after the State proposed creation of two supernumerary seats for transgender candidates in the three-year and five-year LL.B programmes, to which the BCI had granted interim approval for all law colleges in Kerala.
E. Punjab and Haryana High Court
P&H High Court Refuses To Entertain PIL Against Aaj Tak, Anjana Om Kashyap For Calling Valmiki A Dacoit
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Punjab and Haryana High Court declined to entertain a public interest litigation seeking an apology from Aaj Tak and its senior anchor Anjana Om Kashyap for allegedly hurting the sentiments of the Valmiki community by referring to Valmiki as a dacoit in a television broadcast. The Division Bench held that the issue is related to mythology and not verifiable history and that no legal ground for judicial intervention was made out. The Court made adverse observations on the maintainability of the plea, following which the petitioner withdrew the petition and it was dismissed as withdrawn.
Failure To Put Crucial DNA Evidence To Accused Vitiates Trial: P&H High Court Sets Aside Death Penalty, Orders Fresh Trial From S. 313 Stage
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Punjab and Haryana High Court set aside the conviction and death sentence awarded to Vinod @ Munna in a case involving the abduction, rape and murder of a five-year-old girl. The Court held that the trial was vitiated due to serious procedural lapses under Section 313 CrPC (now Section 351 BNSS, 2023). The Court found that crucial incriminating evidence, including DNA, forensic and toxicology reports, as well as Section 164 CrPC statements of key witnesses, were not specifically put to the accused for explanation. Terming this a violation of the right to a fair trial, the High Court quashed the judgment and remanded the case to the Sessions Court to recommence proceedings from the Section 313 stage, with directions to frame clear and specific questions and permit defence evidence.
F. Allahabad High Court
Right To Appear In Exams Akin To Right To Life : Allahabad High Court Orders Special Exam For Student Left Out Over Portal Glitch
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Allahabad High Court held that the right to appear in examinations is integral to the right to life with dignity under Article 21, and directed a university to conduct a special examination for a B.Sc. student who was denied an admit card due to a technical glitch in the university’s online portal. The Court found that the student had paid fees and attended classes, and that her exclusion was solely due to administrative and technical lapses, for which she could not be penalised.
‘UP Reorganisation Act’ Challenge: High Court Refuses To Implead President Of India; Rejects Prayer Against First Uttarakhand CM
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) refused to implead the President of India, while hearing a 26-year-old writ petition challenging the Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000, holding that any challenge to the legislation must be directed against the concerned Union department and not the Head of State. The bench also rejected the prayer seeking a writ of quo warranto against the first Chief Minister of Uttarakhand and other leaders, citing the long delay and uncertainty about their present status, but allowed the impleadment of the State of Uttarakhand, the Union Ministries of Law and Justice and Home Affairs and the State of Uttar Pradesh.
‘No Effective Hearing Taking Place’: Allahabad High Court Asks UP Govt To Fill Waqf Tribunal Vacancy
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) noted that no effective hearings are taking place before the Waqf Tribunal in Uttar Pradesh due to existing vacancies, while disposing of a writ petition relating to a dispute over appointment of a Mutawalli. The Division Bench declined to entertain the second writ petition in view of the liberty already granted to the petitioner to file an appeal, but requested the State Government to expeditiously fill the vacancy in the Tribunal in accordance with law. The Court also directed the Senior Registrar to communicate the order to the State Government to ensure compliance.
G. Telangana High Court
No Stay On Kothagudem Corporation, HC Seeks Proof Of Scheduled Area Status
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Telangana High Court declined to grant an interim stay on the notification forming the Kothagudem Municipal Corporation. The court noted that the petitioners had not produced prima facie documentary evidence to establish that the areas included in the corporation fall within a Scheduled Area under the Constitution. The Court sought clear proof on the Scheduled Area status and kept the matter pending for further consideration.
Telangana High Court Orders Cops To Allow Dharma Raksha Meet In Balapur, But With Riders
Source: Click Here
Development: The Telangana High Court directed the Hyderabad Police Commissioner to grant permission to Bhagyanagar Ganesh Utsav Samithi to hold the “Dharma Raksha Sabha” at Balapur on 24th January, subject to conditions. The Court limited the meeting from 3 PM to 6 PM with a maximum of 3,000 participants, barred political speeches, and required traffic management and peaceful conduct, with police bandobast and supervision. The order was passed after the organisers said their application had not been decided despite submission and assurances of a peaceful event, while the State opposed permission citing Balapur’s communally sensitive nature, the presence of Rohingya camps nearby, proximity to vital installations, and potential law and order concerns.
H. Karnataka High Court
Business To Ply Bike Taxis Protected Under Article 19(1)(g), State Can Impose Reasonable Restrictions But No Blanket-Ban: Karnataka High Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Karnataka High Court’s Division Bench overturned a ban on bike taxi services, ruling that they are a legitimate business protected under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. The Court declared the State’s blanket prohibition unconstitutional, stating that motorcycles qualify as “transport vehicles” and “contract carriages” for hire. While affirming the State’s power to impose reasonable regulations under Article 19(6) and the Motor Vehicles Act, the Court clarified this power does not extend to an outright ban. Consequently, the Court mandated the State to review and consider fresh applications for registration and permits from both owners and aggregators, explicitly barring rejection solely based on the mode of transport.
‘Lawmaker Must Be Circumspect In Speech’: Karnataka High Court Refuses To Quash FIR Against Congress Leader For Abusing Woman Official
Source: Click Here
Development: The Karnataka High Court refused to quash the FIR against Congress leader Rajeev Gowda BV over alleged abusive and threatening remarks made to a woman municipal commissioner after removal of unauthorised banners. The Court held that the allegations disclose cognizable offences and that investigation should not be stalled at an early stage. It observed that a former lawmaker is expected to be restrained and circumspect in speech, especially when addressing a woman public servant discharging official duties, and noted that abuse intended to deter a public servant attracts penal consequences.
Karnataka High Court Grants Bail To Man Booked For Mob Attack, Murder Of Man Who Yelled 'Pakistan Zindabad'
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Karnataka High Court granted bail to an accused in the mob lynching case involving the death of a ragpicker who allegedly shouted “Pakistan Zindabad” at a cricket match. The Court noted long incarceration since April 2025, filing of the chargesheet, absence of criminal antecedents, and the fact that co-accused alleged to have committed graver acts were already on bail. Bail was granted subject to strict conditions, including execution of a ₹1 lakh personal bond, non-tampering of witnesses, and regular appearance during trial.
I. Madras High Court
‘Clear Attack On Hinduism By Dravida Kazhagam’: Madras High Court Quashes FIR Against Amit Malviya For Post Against Udhayanidhi Stalin
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Madras High Court quashed the FIR registered against BJP leader Amit Malviya over his social media posts criticising Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin’s remarks on “Sanatana Dharma.” Justice S. Srimathy held that Malviya had merely reacted to the Minister’s 2023 speech and that continuing criminal proceedings against him would amount to abuse of process. The Court noted that no case had been registered against the Minister for the speech, which it characterised as falling within the scope of hate speech and implying “genocide,” and concluded that Malviya’s posts did not attract offences under Sections 153, 153A or 505(1)(b) IPC.
Madras High Court Refuses To Cancel Interim Bail Of YouTuber Savukku Shankar, But Imposes Extra Conditions
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Madras High Court refused to cancel the interim bail granted to YouTuber Savukku Shankar in an extortion case but imposed additional conditions, including a bar on making public statements related to the case or against police officers, restrictions on movement except for medical or legal purposes, and a prohibition on contacting co-accused or witnesses. The Court also directed a Medical Board at Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital to assess his health and submit a sealed report, while cautioning that any breach of conditions would invite strict action.
J. Other Tribunals & District Court Orders
CAT Sets Aside Disciplinary Charge Against Sameer Wankhede; Slams CBIC For Malice, Vendetta
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Central Administrative Tribunal set aside the disciplinary charge against IRS officer Sameer Wankhede and restrained the authorities from proceeding further, while hearing his challenge to the charge memorandum issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) in August 2025. The Tribunal held that the charge was founded on material from a preliminary enquiry and a pending criminal case earlier held to be unusable for disciplinary action. It also noted Wankhede’s background as former Mumbai Zonal Director of the NCB during the Cordelia cruise drug case which involves arrest of Aryan Khan, the SET report of 2022, and earlier CAT and High Court orders restricting use of that material, and observed that the proceedings appeared to be driven by malice, personal vendetta and an attempt to stall his promotion. Furthermore, on 23rd January, 2026, the Central Government approached the Delhi High Court challenging the CAT’s order and asserted that the tribunal’s order was erroneous and unsustainable in law, contending that the tribunal grossly exceeded its jurisdiction by interfering at the stage of issuance of the chargesheet.
Kerala Govt Loses Legal Battle Over Ownership Of Cheruvally Estate Proposed For Sabarimala Airport
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Pala Sub Court ruled against the Kerala Government in the long-running ownership dispute over the 2,263-acre Cheruvally estate, upholding the 2005 sale by Harrisons Malayalam Limited to Ayana Charitable Trust as valid. The State’s claim that the land was government-owned Pandaravaka Pattom land was rejected, with the court accepting documentary records and long possession relied upon by the Trust. The verdict assumes significance as the estate has been identified as the proposed site for the Sabarimala International Greenfield Airport.
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots: Delhi Court Acquits Former Congress MP Sajjan Kumar In Janakpuri Violence Case
Source: Click Here
Development: A Delhi court has acquitted former Congress MP Sajjan Kumar in the case relating to alleged instigation of violence in the Janakpuri and Vikaspuri areas during the 1984 anti-Sikh riots. The Rouse Avenue Court held that the prosecution failed to prove his presence or involvement beyond reasonable doubt, noting that most witnesses were hearsay and had not named him for decades. The court said there was no reliable evidence of instigation, conspiracy or participation in the unlawful assembly, and that his past political position or involvement in other cases could not dilute the standard of proof required in a criminal trial.
Excise Policy: Court Acquits Former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal In Cases Over Skipping ED Summons
Source: Click Here
Development: The Rouse Avenue Courts acquitted former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in two criminal complaints filed by the Enforcement Directorate alleging wilful non-compliance with summons issued in the excise policy money laundering case. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Paras Dalal of the Rouse Avenue Courts pronounced the verdict, holding that the cases relating to Kejriwal skipping summons in November and December 2023 and January 2024 did not warrant conviction, while a detailed order is awaited.
Mumbai Special Court Discharges Former State PWD Minister Chhagan Bhujbal In ED’s Maharashtra Sadan Scam Case
Source: Click Here
Development: A Mumbai PMLA special court discharged former Maharashtra PWD Minister Chhagan Bhujbal, his son Pankaj and nephew Sameer in the ED’s Maharashtra Sadan money-laundering case. The court accepted the defence that once the accused had already been discharged in the predicate ACB corruption case, the PMLA proceedings could not independently survive. The detailed reasoning is awaited.
IV. Appointments, Collegium Recommendations, And Transfers Section
The week’s proceedings included directions on a complete prohibition of mining activity in the Aravalli region, judicial monitoring of air quality in Kolkata and NCR, and urgent safety inspections of temporary infrastructure erected for large religious gatherings. Courts issued detailed procedural directions in the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in West Bengal, covering publication of notice lists, acceptance of Class X admit cards, authorised representation, and maintenance of law and order during verification affecting over 1.25 crore voters.
Judicial scrutiny also extended to arrest procedures and investigation standards in the Sabarimala gold theft case, sealed-cover monitoring of CBI and Enforcement Directorate probes into alleged large-scale bank fraud, and ongoing oversight of relief camp facilities in Manipur through a court-appointed committee. Additional matters involved regulation of airfares during peak events, interim protection to a newspaper against coercive state action, examination of statutory powers under the Waqf and Devaswom frameworks, and enforcement of time-bound compliance obligations on State and Union authorities.