The past week has seen a wide spectrum of judicial activity across the Supreme Court of India and multiple High Courts, reflecting the judiciary’s continued engagement with questions of electoral process integrity, administrative accountability, civil liberties, and institutional boundaries.
This edition of India Judiciary Watch captures key legal developments and verdicts between 30th March and 4th April 2026, covering proceedings ranging from challenges to legislative amendments and electoral roll revisions to questions of free speech, environmental governance, and the limits of executive authority. Notable developments include the constitution of a nine-judge bench in the Sabarimala reference, judicial scrutiny of state actions in West Bengal, and evolving jurisprudence around digital regulation and artificial intelligence in court processes.
I. Key Legal Developments
Supreme Court Slams West Bengal Officials Over Attack On Judges During SIR Duty, Directs Use Of Central Forces
Source: Live Law
Development: The Supreme Court condemned the West Bengal administration for a criminal failure to protect judicial officers who were held hostage during a protest in Malda. The officers, performing Special Intensive Revision duties for the electoral process, were trapped until midnight and later faced stone-pelting. The bench, led by the Chief Justice of India, expressed extreme disappointment that top state officials were unreachable during the crisis. Consequently, the court ordered the immediate deployment of Central Forces to protect judicial officers and directed the Election Commission of India to entrust the investigation of the violence to the CBI or NIA.
Sabarimala Reference: Supreme Court Constitutes 9-Judge Bench; Hearing To Commence On 7th April
Source: Live Law
Development: The Supreme Court officially constituted a 9-judge bench to begin hearing the expansive reference stemming from the Sabarimala review petitions. The bench, led by the Chief Justice of India, is scheduled to commence oral arguments on 7th April, 2026. This reference seeks to provide a definitive judicial pronouncement on the interplay between freedom of religion under Article 25 and the right to equality under Article 14. The court will examine broader questions beyond the entry of women into the Sabarimala temple, including practices like female genital mutilation in the Dawoodi Bohra community and the entry of Parsi women into fire temples after marrying outside their faith. The All India Muslim Personal Law Board and certain Jain organisations have also intervened in the matter, giving their written submissions.
CBI, ED Offices In Kolkata Not Safe For Investigation; Evidence Will Be Taken Away: ED To Delhi High Court
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: The Enforcement Directorate informed the Delhi High Court that its offices and those of the CBI in Kolkata are unsafe for conducting investigations due to systemic state interference. During a hearing for petitions filed by I-PAC directors seeking to quash summons in a coal smuggling case, the Additional Solicitor General argued that incriminating evidence could be illegally seized by state authorities. He cited past instances where high-ranking state officials allegedly obstructed probes. While the petitioners requested to appear via video conferencing or at the Kolkata office due to election commitments, the agency insisted on physical presence in Delhi.
Plea In Supreme Court Challenges Transgender Persons Amendment Act 2026, Says Omitting Self-Identification Violates Art 21
Source: Live Law
Development: A petition was filed in the Supreme Court challenging the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026. Filed by activists Laxmi Narayan Tripathi and Zainab Javid Patel, the plea contends that the new law violates Article 21 by replacing the right to self-identification with mandatory medical board examinations and socio-medical classifications. The petitioners argued that the amendment ignores the landmark NALSA judgment and introduces a system of “medical surveillance” that infringes on privacy and personal autonomy. The challenge also highlights the lack of horizontal reservations and the retention of disproportionately low penalties for sexual abuse against transgender individuals compared to other offenses.
Delhi High Court Issues Notice On ED’s Plea Against Arvind Kejriwal's Acquittal In Cases Over Skipping Summons
Source: Live Law
Development: The Delhi High Court issued notice on a plea filed by the Enforcement Directorate challenging the trial court’s acquittal of Arvind Kejriwal in cases alleging non-compliance with summons issued in the liquor policy money laundering investigation. The Court noted that Kejriwal had not appeared despite advance notice, directed issuance of fresh notice, called for the trial court records, and listed the matter for hearing on 29th April. The ED argued that the trial court committed an error in acquitting him despite receipt of multiple summons and alleged wilful non-compliance, while the case background includes Kejriwal having skipped summons issued between November 2023 and January 2024 and earlier being arrested and granted interim relief in connected proceedings.
Asked For Review Of Excessive Disproportionate MeitY Order Blocking 12 X Accounts To Delhi High Court
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: In a petition filed before the Delhi High Court, the social media platform X challenged an order by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology directing the blocking of twelve specific accounts. The platform argued that the Government directive is excessive and disproportionate, asserting that it violates the fundamental right to free speech and expression. X contended that the ministry failed to provide adequate reasons for the blanket ban on these accounts and requested a judicial review of the blocking orders. The Court was informed that such executive actions must be the least restrictive measure possible, and the petitioner sought a stay on the implementation of the order until the legal validity of the censorship is fully adjudicated.
Supreme Court Stays Trial Against TN Minister Durai Murugan In Disproportionate Assets Case
Source: Live Law
Development: The Supreme Court granted an interim stay on trial proceedings against Tamil Nadu Minister Durai Murugan in a disproportionate assets case and issued notice on his plea challenging the Madras High Court judgment, which had set aside his discharge and directed the trial court to frame charges and proceed. The Court stayed further proceedings till the next hearing on 20th April, while considering his delay condonation application, where it was submitted that the delay was due to age and medical reasons. The case relates to allegations of acquiring disproportionate assets during his tenure as Minister for Public Works between 1996 and 2001, under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The matter’s next hearing is on 20th April.
West Bengal SIR: Appellate Tribunals Can Entertain Fresh Documents After Verifying Genuineness: Supreme Court
Source: Live Law
Development: The Supreme Court, in the West Bengal SIR matter concerning revision of electoral rolls, modified its earlier direction and allowed Appellate Tribunals to entertain fresh documents, subject to verification of their genuineness. The Court noted that multiple Appellate Tribunals headed by former High Court judges have been constituted and that a large number of claims and objections have already been processed. It also directed that reasons recorded by adjudicating officers must be made available to parties for effective appeals, and observed that tribunals can correct wrongful inclusion or exclusion of voters, while reiterating that it cannot act on mere oral allegations without material on record.
Breathing Itself A Risk: Plea Before NGT Flags India's Air Pollution Crisis
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: A comprehensive petition was filed before the National Green Tribunal highlighting the severe public health emergency caused by deteriorating air quality across India. The plea characterizes the act of breathing as a life threatening risk for citizens and urges the tribunal to issue mandatory directions to the Central Government and other authorities. The petitioner argued that current mitigation strategies under the National Clean Air Programme have failed to yield measurable results in the most polluted urban clusters. The legal challenge seeks a time bound roadmap for the reduction of particulate matter and nitrogen dioxide levels, asserting that the state has a constitutional obligation to protect the fundamental right to a clean and healthy environment.
West Bengal SIR: Supreme Court Asks INC Candidate Deleted From Electoral Roll To Approach Appellate Tribunal
Source: Live Law
Development: The Supreme Court permitted Motab Shaikh, an Indian National Congress candidate for the West Bengal Assembly Elections, to approach a newly formed appellate tribunal after his name was deleted from the electoral roll. The petitioner sought the restoration of his name to enable him to file nomination papers before the upcoming deadline. A bench led by the Chief Justice of India noted that since 19 appellate tribunals headed by former judges became operational that day, the petitioner should avail himself of this remedy. The court further requested the Election Commission of India to assist in ensuring a swift resolution of the case, highlighting that the candidate possesses a valid passport and was previously a mapped voter.
Kerala Court Sends Director Renjith To Police Custody For 3 Days In Sexual Harassment Case
Source: Live Law
Development: A Judicial First Class Magistrate Court in Ernakulam granted three days’ police custody of Malayalam film director Renjith Balakrishnan in a sexual harassment case, allowing interrogation till 6th April. The Court had earlier remanded him to judicial custody following his arrest on 31st March based on a complaint alleging attempted sexual assault at a film shooting location, and noted that his bail application is pending for consideration. While allowing custody, the Court also directed that he be produced before a doctor in view of his medical condition post liver transplant.
Greater Bengaluru Governance Act Renders BBMP A Shell Without Any Powers Petitioners Tell Karnataka High Court In PIL Against 2024 Law
Source: Live Law
Development: The Karnataka High Court heard a public interest litigation challenging the constitutionality of the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act 2024. The petitioners, including prominent cultural figures, argued that the new legislation effectively strips the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike of its essential municipal functions, reducing the elected body to a powerless shell. They contended that the Act creates an over-centralized structure under the Greater Bengaluru Authority, which is led by the Chief Minister rather than local representatives. This hearing occurred against the backdrop of a Supreme Court mandate to conclude long-delayed civic polls by June 2026, as the court examined whether the legislative overhaul violates democratic decentralization.
Karnataka High Court Stays FIR Against YouTuber Sameer MD Over Video On Dharmasthala Mass Burial
Source: Live Law
Development: The Karnataka High Court stayed further investigation in the FIR registered against YouTuber Sameer M.D., who runs the Dootha YouTube channel, over a video on the Dharmasthala mass burial case, and directed the State to file objections after viewing the video. The FIR, registered at Dharmasthala Police Station, alleged offences under provisions relating to false information and public mischief, with the State contending that the video used AI-generated visuals and could create unrest and communal disharmony. The petitioner submitted that he was only presenting findings on an issue already reported by various agencies. Taking note of the submissions and similar earlier proceedings, the Court stayed investigation till the next hearing and orally observed against unnecessarily dragging the matter.
‘Government Must Step In To Ensure Essential Services Not Affected': Kerala High Court On Private Hospital Nurses' Strike
Source: Live Law
Development: The Kerala High Court addressed a strike by the Kerala United Nurses Association affecting private hospitals. Justice P. Gopinath remarked that since healthcare is an essential service, the Government is duty bound to intervene to prevent public suffering and the postponement of surgeries. The judge noted that the state must act while statutory minimum wage fixation is pending. However, because the judge had previously represented some of the involved parties as an advocate, he chose to recuse himself from the matter to maintain judicial transparency. The case was subsequently posted for 1st April 2026 to be heard by a different bench, following the failure of earlier mediation attempts.
Gujarat High Court Bars Judges From Using Artificial Intelligence In Decision Making, Reasoning, Interpretation
Source: Live Law
Development: The Gujarat High Court released its official Policy On Use Of Artificial Intelligence In Judicial and Court Administration, strictly prohibiting judges and judicial officers from using AI for decision-making or preparing judgments. The policy, unveiled by Supreme Court Justice Vikram Nath, mandates that AI must not be used, directly or indirectly, for any aspect of adjudication, weighing arguments, or determining rights and liabilities. While the court permitted AI for administrative tasks, case management, research assistance, and translation, it warned that any violation would be treated as misconduct attracting disciplinary action. This regulation follows an interim order by the court earlier this year which stayed a GST adjudication order that had relied on AI-generated hallucinations and non-existent legal citations. The Gujarat order arose from a GST adjudication that had cited AI-generated, non-existent legal authorities, causing harm to a litigant and requiring judicial intervention to stay the order.
Madras High Court Initiates Suo Motu Contempt Case Against TVK’s Felix Gerald For 2024 Interview With ‘Savukku’ Shankar
Source: The Hindu
Development: The Madras High Court initiated suo motu contempt proceedings against YouTuber and TVK member Felix Gerald over a 2024 interview with ‘Savukku’ Shankar, in which statements were made concerning G-Square Realtors despite an existing court order regulating such disclosures. The Court noted that an earlier interim injunction, as modified in 2023, required prior notice to the company and a 72-hour waiting period before making public statements, and observed that the contents of the interview prima facie violated these directions. Finding that the host also appeared to have facilitated or endorsed such violation, the Court issued notice to Gerald seeking his explanation and directed him to respond by 24th April, 2026.
Vedanta Moves Supreme Court Seeking Stay On Adani's Resolution Plan For Jaiprakash Associates
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: Vedanta Limited approached the Supreme Court challenging the appellate tribunal order that refused to halt the Adani Group’s takeover of Jaiprakash Associates. The petitioner argued that its bid of over ₹16,000 crore was higher than the accepted offer of approximately ₹14,500 crore from Adani Enterprises. Vedanta contended that the insolvency process lacked transparency and failed to prioritize the maximization of asset value for creditors as mandated by law. The court was informed that the appellate tribunal previously declined an interim stay on 24th March, 2026, prompting this urgent appeal to prevent the resolution plan from becoming irreversible through immediate implementation.
Former Minister Antony Raju Moves Supreme Court Seeking Stay on Conviction in Evidence Tampering Case
Source: Reporter Live
Development: Former Kerala Minister and LDF MLA Antony Raju has approached the Supreme Court seeking a stay on his conviction in an evidence tampering case, for which he was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment by the Nedumangad Magistrate Court. The underwear evidence tampering case dates back to 1990, when Antony Raju, was a young practising advocate, appeared as counsel for Australian national Andrew Salvatore Cervelli, who was arrested at Thiruvananthapuram airport for allegedly smuggling 61.5 grams of charas concealed in his underwear. While his sentence had earlier been stayed, the conviction was not suspended, and his plea for such relief was rejected by the High Court, preventing him from contesting elections. The present appeal seeks suspension of the conviction until the Thiruvananthapuram Sessions Court decides his pending appeal against the trial court verdict.
Kerala High Court Summons Law Secretary To Explain Delay In Tabling Anti-Ragging Bill Before State Cabinet
Source: Live Law
Development: The Kerala High Court directed the State Law Secretary to appear and explain the delay in placing the Kerala Prohibition of Ragging (Amendment) Bill, 2025 before the Cabinet while hearing a PIL filed by the Kerala State Legal Services Authority (KSLSA) seeking stronger anti-ragging laws. The Court noted that despite earlier directions to expedite the process, departmental inputs were still pending and questioned why the Bill was not tabled prior to the imposition of the Model Code of Conduct, observing that the process could not be allowed to continue indefinitely and seeking disclosure of the current status of the Bill.
‘Gag Order’: Activist Moves Delhi High Court Against Injunction In Hardeep Puri’s Daughter’s Defamation Suit Over Epstein Files Link Claims
Source: Live Law
Development: A social activist has moved the Delhi High Court challenging a single judge’s ex parte ad-interim injunction directing takedown of posts linking Himayani Puri, daughter of Union Minister Hardeep Puri, to Jeffrey Epstein, terming it a “blanket pre-trial gag order.” The appeal contends that the injunction was granted without notice or hearing, at the threshold stage, and restrains content based on publicly available material, raising issues of public interest. It argues that the order ignores settled principles governing defamation law, including that prior restraint should not be imposed where a plausible defence of truth and fair comment exists, and that the takedown direction has a chilling effect on free speech.
Kerala High Court Reserves Verdict In Plea To Stall Release Of Movie Allegedly Inspired By Venjaramoodu Murder Case
Source: Live Law
Development: The Kerala High Court reserved its verdict on 30th March, 2026, regarding a petition filed by the father of a murder accused to stop the release of the film Kaalam Paranja Kadha. The petitioner argued the movie could prejudice the ongoing trial of the Venjaramoodu mass murder case. During the hearing, the court noted that the Central Board of Film Certification had already granted the film a certificate after review by a revising committee. While the petitioner claimed the board failed to consider the risk of identifying real individuals, the filmmaker maintained the work is a social contribution against drug abuse.
Telangana HC Issues Contempt Notices To IAS Officer Jayesh Ranjan Over Advertising Policy
Source: The Hindu
Development: The Telangana High Court issued contempt of court notices to IAS officer and Principal Secretary Jayesh Ranjan in a case challenging the State’s Advertising Policy, 2026, directing him to appear and explain the Government’s stand. The Court was informed that despite earlier directions to consider representations of M/s Telangana Outdoor Media Owners Association and others, and grant them a fair hearing, the Government finalised the policy without addressing key concerns, prompting allegations of wilful disobedience of its order. This is why the Telangana Outdoor Media Owners Association is opposing the advertising policy.
Punjab and Haryana High Court Seeks Response Of Centre On Plea Regarding Sikh Articles Seized During Operation Blue Star
Source: The Hindu
Development: The Punjab and Haryana High Court issued notices to the Centre, the Army and the CBI on a petition seeking disclosure and restoration of manuscripts, religious texts and other articles allegedly seized during Operation Blue Star in 1984 from the Golden Temple complex. Taking note of submissions that some items may still be with Government agencies, the Court sought responses on whether such articles are in their possession and on their whereabouts, while the petitioner also sought preparation of inventories of seized and returned items. The petitioner has alleged that items returned to SGPC are now missing from the library and that some rare birs may have been sold by Shiromany Gurudwara Prabandhak Committee (SGPC) officials.
Delhi High Court Grants Partial Relief To Huawei in Income Tax Proceedings
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: The Delhi High Court granted partial relief to Huawei Telecommunications (India) in income tax proceedings arising from a 2022 search and seizure operation. It set aside the reassessment notice and special audit directions for the assessment year 2013–14, holding that the tax department failed to establish jurisdiction and did not show any incriminating material indicating income escapement. However, the Court upheld the reassessment proceedings and special audit orders for 2015–16, observing that there were sufficient grounds to believe income had escaped assessment in the form of assets and that the nature and volume of transactions justified a special audit under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act.
CJI Surya Kant Strengthens Judicial Outreach In Ladakh And Kargil With Court Inauguration And Legal Aid For Defence Families
Development: During his visit to the Union Territory of Ladakh, Chief Justice of India Justice Surya Kant inaugurated the new Munsiff Court Complex at Drass in Kargil, marking a major step in strengthening judicial infrastructure in one of the most remote and climatically challenging regions. Emphasising last-mile access to justice, the CJI highlighted that judicial systems must reach even the most geographically isolated populations. As part of the same visit, he also addressed personnel at the Ladakh Scouts Regimental Centre in Leh, stressing that the law must proactively reach soldiers serving in border areas. He underlined the importance of a dedicated free legal aid scheme for defence families, aimed at resolving civil and property disputes faced by them back home, ensuring that those guarding the nation are not burdened by legal uncertainties.
Kerala High Court Directs KeLSA To Expedite Disbursal Of Victim Compensation, Mediator Fee Authorised By State
Source: Live Law
Development: The Kerala High Court directed the Member Secretary of the Kerala State Legal Services Authority (KeLSA) to ensure expeditious disbursal of victim compensation and mediator fees authorised by the State, noting delays despite funds being sanctioned. The Court took on record that ₹36.50 crore for victim compensation, ₹12.26 crore for mediator fees and additional funds had been approved, and allowed utilisation of unspent amounts in the next financial year. It directed KeLSA to file a report on fund utilisation and future requirements, mandated monthly reporting to concerned departments, and also issued directions to expedite consideration of infrastructure proposals and enhancement of mediator fees.
Kerala High Court Refuses To Dismiss Election Petition Against Union Minister Suresh Gopi
Source: Live Law
Development: Kerala high court held that the petition challenging the election of Union minister Shri Suresh Gopi as a Member of Parliament from Thrissur constituency in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections is maintainable. A bench of Justice Kauser Edappagath passed the order while considering an interlocutory application (IA) filed by Shri Suresh Gopi, who had sought a declaration that the election petition filed by A S Binoy, a voter from the Thrissur constituency, was not maintainable by raising preliminary objections. Justice Kauser Edappagath also ruled that while the specific allegation regarding the distribution of umbrellas in public places is struck off, the minister must still face trial for other alleged corrupt practices under the Representation of the People Act. These include claims of appealing for votes in the name of religion and promising monetary benefits while the model code of conduct was in effect. The court overruled the preliminary objections regarding the maintainability of the petition, ensuring the case proceeds to the evidentiary stage to examine the legality of his election.
PIL Filed Before Kerala High Court To Build Stronger Tetrapod Seawall Along Vypin Coast
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: A public interest litigation was filed before the Kerala High Court seeking the construction of a robust tetrapod seawall to protect the Vypin coastal belt from severe sea erosion and tidal surges. The petitioner argued that existing traditional granite barriers have proven ineffective against the rising sea levels and intensifying monsoon swells that frequently displace local residents and destroy coastal property. The plea highlights that the current state of the coastline poses a direct threat to the lives and livelihoods of the fishing community residing in the area. The court is urged to direct the state Government and the irrigation department to implement modern engineering solutions like tetrapods, which are designed to dissipate the energy of incoming waves more efficiently than conventional rock walls.
Can Women Above 50-Years Of Age Be Permitted To Avail Assisted Reproductive Technology Services? Bombay High Court To Decide
Source: Live Law
Development: The Bombay High Court is examining the validity of Section 21(g) of the Assisted Reproductive Technology Act (ART Act), 2021, which restricts ART services to women aged 21–50 years, in petitions filed by two women aged 53 and 55 seeking to avail such procedures on the basis of medical certificates declaring them fit to carry pregnancy. The Court noted the absence of supporting scientific research on the feasibility of pregnancies at such advanced age, observed that the issue requires medical and analytical assessment, and appointed a Senior Advocate as Amicus Curiae to assist the Court, while permitting the petitioners to amend pleadings and place further material on record before the next hearing.
‘Don’t Go Below The Belt’: Bombay High Court Tells Republic TV To Tone Down Coverage Of Cases On Anil Ambani
Source: Live Law
Development: The Bombay High Court, while hearing a defamation suit filed by Anil Ambani, orally directed Republic TV and its editor-in-chief Arnab Goswami to tone down their coverage and avoid using disparaging or sensational language while reporting on investigations involving Reliance group companies. The Court clarified that it was not restraining reporting but cautioned against “hitting below the belt” through expressions that create a perception of guilt, and warned that failure to exercise restraint may invite interim orders. It recorded submissions that the channel had used terms such as “fraud” and “scamster” in its broadcasts, and listed the matter for further hearing on 16th April after directing the channel to file its reply.
Corruption Complaints Against Judges Fall Within Public Interest, Not ‘Personal Information’ Under RTI Act: Journalist To Delhi High Court
Source: Live Law
Development: The Delhi High Court, while hearing a plea by a journalist seeking RTI information on complaints of corruption or misconduct against a former High Court judge, was told that such information cannot be denied as “personal information” where it relates to public activity and public interest. The Supreme Court administration opposed the plea, stating that judge-specific complaint data is not maintained in the manner sought, may be confidential, and could be exempt under RTI provisions. Taking note of the submissions, the Court asked both sides to suggest a mechanism to address such requests and listed the matter for further hearing.
Karnataka High Court Questions State Over Delay In Appointing Nodal Officer To Coordinate Aid For Child Beggars
Source: Live Law
Development: The Karnataka High Court, while hearing a PIL on child beggary, questioned the State Government for failing to comply with its 22nd January direction to appoint a nodal officer to coordinate action among departments addressing the issue. The Court noted that although a 12-member committee had been constituted and meetings held, no nodal officer had been appointed, and directed the State to comply with its earlier order and file an explanation. It also sought details on utilisation of funds collected as ‘beggary cess’ and asked the High Court Registry to explain the delay in uploading its earlier order, which the State cited as a reason for non-compliance.
Supreme Court Flags Objection Mechanism As Remedy For Bulk Form 6 Submissions In West Bengal Electoral Roll Revision
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: The Supreme Court observed that bulk submission of Form 6 applications for inclusion of voters is not unprecedented and can be addressed through objections. The Court declined to act on what it termed premature and hypothetical concerns, and noted that objections to electoral roll changes are being processed expeditiously, with a large number already decided and the remaining to be completed by 7th April. It also recorded that appellate tribunals have been constituted, will have access to reasons for inclusion or exclusion, and may verify fresh documents before considering them, while reiterating that inclusion after the qualifying date does not confer the right to vote in the ongoing election.
Post-Facto EC Not Automatic, Impermissible Projects Can Be Demolished, Says Centre; Supreme Court Reserves Judgment
Source: Live Law
Development: The Supreme Court on 1st April 2026 reserved judgment in a plea filed by Vanashakti challenging the legal framework permitting post-facto environmental clearances, after hearing detailed submissions from the Union of India defending the regime. The Centre placed a structured “waterfall mechanism” before the Court, stating that violations are addressed through a three-step process involving stoppage of operations, initiation of legal proceedings, and subsequent environmental appraisal to assess impact and impose safeguards. The Government argued that an absolute prohibition on retrospective clearances would lead to practical and environmental complications, including wastage from demolition of completed projects, and maintained that the framework ensures both accountability and environmental protection. The matter arises after the Court recalled its earlier order that had imposed a complete bar on post-facto environmental approvals.
Delhi HC Remarks City Has Become Mandi For Child Trafficking, Seeks Police’s Response On PIL
Source: The Hindu
Development: On 1st April, 2026, the Delhi High Court observed that the national capital has turned into a marketplace or mandi for child trafficking, noting that the menace remains unabated despite previous judicial orders. While hearing a public interest litigation filed by Just Rights for Children Alliance, a bench of Chief Justice D.K. Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia issued notices to the Delhi Police, the Railways, the state Government, and the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights. The court highlighted a systemic failure in implementing existing rescue and rehabilitation protocols at railway stations, specifically citing a troubling instance where a rescued child was allegedly handed back to traffickers by authorities.
Allahabad High Court Directs UP Police To Investigate Honey-Trap Extortion Racket, Maintain Strict Vigil
Source: Live Law
Development: On 2nd April, 2026, the Allahabad High Court ordered a high-level investigation into an organized honey-trap and blackmailing syndicate operating in Uttar Pradesh. A bench of Justice JJ Munir and Justice Tarun Saxena directed the Inspector General of Police, Meerut Zone, to lead the probe after dismissing a plea by five accused seeking to quash an extortion case. The court noted that the racket allegedly involved women luring victims into hotels to film intimate acts, followed by blackmail in collusion with local police officers. Calling it a pernicious state of affairs, the court mandated a strict vigil across the zone and directed the State’s top administrative and police officials to ensure systemic compliance.
Delhi High Court Issues Notice To CBI, CAG, Centre On Plea By Lieutenant Colonel Alleging Corruption In Indian Army
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: The Delhi High Court issued notices to the CBI, CAG, and the Central Government regarding a petition by a serving Lieutenant Colonel alleging systemic corruption within the Indian Army. The officer claimed to have uncovered significant financial irregularities involving the manipulation of procurement under the Annual Contingent Grant, including falsified records and the diversion of Government property. The petitioner alleged that his complaints were suppressed by the command structure and that he faced retaliatory actions, such as adverse performance reports and a transfer, after reporting the matter. Justice Prateek Jalan directed the authorities to file their responses within four weeks and scheduled the next hearing for 19th May, 2026.
Possible To Reform Murderer, But Cyber Criminal Must Not Be Spared: CJI Surya Kant
Source: Live Law
Development: During a bail hearing on 2nd April, 2026, Chief Justice of India Surya Kant remarked that while it may be possible to reform and release a murderer, cyber criminals should not be spared. The bench, which included Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice Vipul Pancholi, was hearing a petition by Suraj Srivastav, accused of cheating an individual of over six lakh rupees through a fraudulent job offer. The court noted the petitioner’s criminal history and the growing threat of digital scams, which the High Court had previously described as a silent virus. The Chief Justice suggested that such offenders should be held in single-occupancy cells without access to mobile phones to prevent further criminal activity.
Delhi High Court Grants Last Opportunity To Arvind Kejriwal, Others To Respond To ED's Plea Against ‘Adverse Remarks’
Source: Live Law
Development: The Delhi High Court granted a last opportunity to AAP leaders Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and others to file responses to the Enforcement Directorate’s plea seeking expunging of adverse remarks made by a Special Court while discharging them in the excise policy case. The Court noted that despite earlier opportunity, most respondents had not filed replies, and directed that responses be filed within one week, failing which their right would be closed, while also calling for trial court records and listing the matter for 22nd April. The ED has contended that the Special Court made adverse observations on its PMLA investigation without hearing it and beyond the scope of the CBI case, alleging violation of natural justice and judicial overreach.
Bombay High Court Seeks Maharashtra Govt Response To Plea Against Scrapping Of 5% Muslim Quota In Education
Source: Live Law
Development: The Bombay High Court directed the Maharashtra Government to file a response to a petition challenging the withdrawal of a five percent reservation for the Muslim community in educational institutions. A division bench issued the order after hearing a writ petition that contends the state’s February Government Resolution (GR) scrapping the quota is unconstitutional. The petitioner argued that the reservation was originally introduced through a 2014 ordinance by the then Congress-NCP Government, granting a 5% quota to approximately 50 identified Muslim sub-castes under the Special Backward Category in both Government jobs and education. While the previous administration had granted the quota for both jobs and education, the court in 2014 upheld only the educational aspect, which the current state Government has now withdrawn. The court has scheduled the matter for further consideration on 4th May, 2026.
MP High Court To Begin Hearing Pleas Challenging Increase In OBC Reservation Quota From 27th April
Source: Live Law
Development: The Madhya Pradesh High Court directed its registry to list all petitions challenging the state’s 2019 ordinance, which increased OBC reservation from 14% to 27%, for final hearings starting 27th April, 2026. The bench of Chief Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva and Justice Vinay Saraf is acting on a Supreme Court remand that requires an expeditious decision within three months. The legal dispute centers on whether the hike, which pushes total reservations beyond the 50% ceiling established in the Indra Sawhney case, is constitutionally valid. While most matters will be heard by the High Court, two specific petitions were excluded from the batch as the apex court recalled their transfer and will hear them independently.
MP High Court Initiates Suo Motu Criminal Contempt Against BJP MLA For Attempting To Influence Judge In Illegal Mining Case
Source: Live Law
Development: The Madhya Pradesh High Court initiated suo motu criminal contempt proceedings against BJP MLA Sanjay Pathak for allegedly attempting to improperly contact and influence a sitting judge in connection with an illegal mining case. The Court took note of a petition referring to a September 2025 incident where the MLA reportedly contacted the judge, following which the judge recused himself and held that the conduct prima facie amounted to criminal contempt. Accordingly, it directed the Registry to register a criminal contempt case and list it for hearing.
Journalist Moves High Court Against AAP’s Copyright Strikes On His Facebook Page For Using Punjab CM’s Photos
Source: Live Law
Developments: The Punjab and Haryana High Court issued notices to the Union Government, Meta Platforms (Facebook), and the Punjab Government regarding a petition filed by a local journalist. The petitioner challenged the permanent removal of his Facebook news page following a "copyright strike" triggered by the use of Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann's photograph in a news report. Justice Harkesh Manuja sought a response on the journalist’s contention that using a public official's image for news reporting falls under "fair dealing" and that the platform's automated takedown system was being weaponized to suppress independent media and free speech. This builds on the October 2025 deepfake controversy. An on-duty civil judge had passed an order, within a day and without any proof, to take down content featuring Bhagwant Mann's drunk video with a woman, terming it as deepfake when independent observers noted that it was not deepfake material at all. The present case, where a journalist's news pages were reportedly removed after AAP filed IPR complaints over photographs of the Chief Minister, fits squarely within that pattern.
Israel-Iran War: Plea Before Bombay HC To Bring Back Mortal Remains Of Indian Seafarer Killed Off Oman Coast
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: A petition has been filed before the Bombay High Court by the family of an Indian seafarer, Dixit Amratlal Solanki, who reportedly died in an Iranian missile strike on a vessel off the Oman coast during the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict, alleging administrative inaction in repatriating his mortal remains. The plea states that despite recovery of skeletal remains believed to be his and their handover to Sharjah Police, there has been no confirmation on identification or timeline for return, and authorities including the Directorate General of Shipping, Indian Embassy and shipping agency have failed to act despite repeated representations. The petition invokes Article 21 and statutory obligations under maritime law, seeking directions to ensure immediate identification and repatriation.
Supreme Court Stays Rajasthan Govt Decision To Denotify Areas In Chambal Sanctuary, Raises Concerns Over Illegal Sand Mining
Source: Live Law
Development: The Supreme Court stayed the Rajasthan Government’s notification denotifying 732 hectares of the National Chambal Sanctuary, observing that the State could not have undertaken such action without prior approval of the Court. The division bench, hearing a suo motu matter on illegal sand mining and its impact on endangered species like gharials, took strong exception to the move and noted that the denotification appeared to facilitate mining in ecologically fragile areas. The Court flagged continued illegal sand mining across Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh, referred to reports identifying specific mining sites since 2022, and highlighted lack of effective action by States, including failure to notify eco-sensitive zones in Rajasthan. It also noted the role of mining mafia and instances of violence against officials, suggested use of preventive detention laws, stayed the impugned notification issued under the Wildlife Protection Act, and sought responses from the States while listing the matter for further hearing.
Himachal BJP Demands Probe By Sitting High Court Judge Into Chester Hills Housing ‘Scam’ In Solan
Source: The Hindu
Developments: The Himachal Pradesh BJP has demanded a probe by a sitting High Court judge into alleged irregularities in the Chester Hills housing project in Solan, following claims of land law violations raised by CPI(M). The demand comes after Chief Secretary Sanjay Gupta publicly dismissed the allegations as baseless and stated that the truth would emerge after investigation, even as political parties questioned the propriety of such a defence and the fairness of any ongoing inquiry.
Rajasthan HC Issues Contempt Notices to SEC, Election Commissioner For Delay in Holding Panchayat, Civic Polls
Source: The Wire
Development: The Rajasthan High Court issued contempt notices to the State Election Commissioner and other officials over delay in conducting panchayat and municipal elections, observing that its earlier directions to hold the polls within a stipulated timeline had not been complied with. The Court took note of continued postponement of local body elections despite expiry of terms and sought explanation from the authorities for non-compliance with its orders.
From Feudal Flexing To Social Media Display: Allahabad High Court Takes Aim At UP’s Gun Culture, Summons Arms Licence Database
Source: Live Law
Development: The Allahabad High Court took serious note of the growing “gun culture” in Uttar Pradesh and sought comprehensive data on arms licences across the State. The Court directed the Additional Chief Secretary (Home) to clarify whether a centralised arms licence database and a formal arms policy exist, and sought details on compliance with the Arms Rules, including updates on the NDAL system. It also directed all District Magistrates and senior police officials to file district-wise data on licence holders, including cases of multiple licences within families and those with criminal antecedents, and called for details of pending applications and appeals. The Court flagged misuse of licensed firearms for social media display and intimidation, cautioned against unchecked discretionary powers under the Arms Act, and sought explanations from authorities for delays and lack of reasoned orders in the present case.
Institutions like ECI Must Function Independently; Centre Should Not View States As Subordinates: Supreme Court Justice BV Nagarathna
Source: Bar and Bench
Development: Supreme Court Justice B.V. Nagarathna, delivering a memorial lecture, emphasised that constitutional bodies such as the Election Commission of India, Comptroller and Auditor General and Finance Commission must function independently and remain insulated from political influence to preserve constitutional governance. She observed that these institutions are structurally designed to ensure neutrality in areas where ordinary political processes may be inadequate and cautioned that constitutional breakdown can occur even within legality through gradual erosion of institutional checks. She also highlighted the importance of cooperative federalism, stating that States are not subordinate to the Union except as provided in the Constitution, and warned against increasing Centre-State conflicts and adversarial litigation.
CJI Surya Kant Completes Self-Enumeration For Census 2027 At Residence
Source: Live Law
Development: The Chief Justice of India, Surya Kant, participated in the digital self-enumeration process for the upcoming Census 2027 at his official residence in New Delhi. Accompanied by the Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India, the CJI used the official mobile application to record his family’s details, marking the ceremonial commencement of the digital phase of the national survey. During the event, the Chief Justice emphasized that accurate data collection is the cornerstone of effective judicial planning and the equitable distribution of socio-economic benefits. He urged all citizens to utilize the self-enumeration facility to ensure a high-quality, error-free database for future policy interventions.
Are CPCB Guidelines On Petrol Pump Establishment Mandatory? Supreme Court Refers To Larger Bench
Source: Live Law
Development: The Supreme Court referred the question of whether Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) siting criteria for petrol pumps are mandatory to a larger bench. The Division Bench noted a conflict between CPCB guidelines, which mandate a 50-metre distance from residential areas, and local zoning regulations that permit such outlets in those zones. While a previous 2020 judgment in Indian Oil Corporation Limited v. V.B.R. Menon insisted on strict adherence; the present bench observed that the absence of exceptions in the guidelines makes it difficult to treat them as more than advisory. The court directed the matter to the Chief Justice of India for conclusive adjudication.
II. Details of Important Cases
A. Supreme Court
States Can Withdraw Tax Exemptions From Industries In Public Interest: Supreme Court
Source: Bar and Bench
Verdict: The Supreme Court allowed appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra, setting aside a Bombay High Court judgment that had invalidated the withdrawal of electricity duty exemptions for captive power plants. A bench of Justices P.S. Narasimha and Alok Aradhe ruled that tax exemptions are statutory concessions rather than vested rights, meaning the Government retains the inherent authority to modify or rescind them when deemed necessary for public interest or fiscal stability. The court held that the doctrines of promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation cannot restrict the state's power to recalibrate economic policy. However, to ensure fairness and prevent sudden financial shocks, the court mandated that such withdrawals must include a reasonable notice period, specifically determining that a one year period was necessary for the affected industries to reorganize their affairs.
‘Govt Biggest Litigant Adding To Pendency’: Supreme Court Pulls Up Union For Unnecessarily Challenging Relief To CISF Constable
Source: Live Law
Verdict: The Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition filed by the Union of India against a Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment that had set aside the dismissal of a CISF constable and granted him 25% back wages, and imposed costs of ₹25,000 on the Union. The Court observed that dismissal for 11 days of absence was disproportionate, noted that the High Court had already found no misconduct warranting removal, and criticised the Union for unnecessarily pursuing the matter despite such findings. It also remarked that the Government, being the largest litigant, contributes to pendency and emphasised that law officers should exercise discretion before escalating such cases to the Supreme Court.
Racial Discrimination: Supreme Court Urges Delhi HC CJ To Consider Policy Decision For Expeditious Trials In Sensitive Cases
Source: Live Law
Verdict: The Supreme Court, while hearing a PIL highlighting racial discrimination and violence against people from the Northeast, observed that such cases require expeditious and out-of-turn trials. The petitioner pointed out delays of several years in trial despite completion of investigation and filing of chargesheets, particularly affecting students who relocate for education and may not be able to pursue prolonged proceedings. Taking note of these concerns, the Bench disposed of the petition without examining the merits, and requested the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court to consider, on the administrative side, a holistic policy decision to ensure time-bound adjudication of such sensitive cases, including issuance of appropriate administrative directions to trial courts.
Bhojshala-Kamal Maula Dispute: MP High Court Will Consider Objections Recorded During ASI Survey Videography, Says Supreme Court
Verdict: On 1st April, 2026, the Supreme Court disposed of a plea by the Maulana Kamaluddin Welfare Society, observing that it expects the Madhya Pradesh High Court to consider the mosque management’s objections recorded during the ASI survey's videography. The Bench, led by CJI Surya Kant, emphasized that principles of natural justice must be followed while examining these objections during the final hearing, although it declined to interfere with the High Court’s decision to defer the specific application for video production until the final stage. Subsequently, on 2nd April, 2026, the Madhya Pradesh High Court scheduled the commencement of regular hearings in the dispute for 6th April, 2026. The Division Bench of Justice Vijay Kumar Shukla and Justice Alok Awasthi fixed the matter for 2:30 PM after a brief session, ensuring all pending objections regarding the scientific survey will be addressed.
Dowry Harassment & Domestic Abuse Continue Despite Legal Reforms & Progress, Patriarchy Still Prevails: Supreme Court
Source: Live Law
Verdict: The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal and upheld the conviction of a man for burning his wife to death based on her dying declaration. The court observed that dowry harassment and domestic violence continue to persist despite decades of legal reforms and welfare measures. A division bench noted that the coexistence of legal progress and continuing violence against women reflects a deeply entrenched patriarchal social order, particularly in rural and semi-urban areas. Referring to NCRB data indicating over 4.48 lakh crimes against women and more than 6,000 dowry-related deaths annually, the Court termed this a “paradox” and observed that while laws exist, social legitimacy sustaining such practices remains. It further held that credible dying declarations can form the sole basis of conviction even if other witnesses turn hostile.
Air India Plane Crash: Supreme Court Rejects Engineer's PIL Seeking Details On Fuel Cut-Off In AAIB Preliminary Report
Source: Live Law
Verdict: The Supreme Court rejected a PIL filed by an engineer seeking modification of the preliminary report of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on the 2025 Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad, which had claimed 270 lives. The petitioner sought inclusion of detailed time charts on fuel cut-off, engine flameout and switch transitions, and a “reading down” of the report. The Court declined to entertain the plea, questioning the petitioner’s locus and intent, noting that affected families had not approached the Court, and refused to direct the AAIB to consider the representation. The petition had earlier been dismissed by the Delhi High Court on similar grounds.
Toll On National Highways Exclusively In Union List, States Can Levy Toll Only On Other Roads: Supreme Court
Source: Live Law
Verdict: The Supreme Court ruled that the power to levy tolls on National Highways rests exclusively with the Union Government under Entry 23 of the Union List. A bench comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice K.V. Viswanathan set aside a state legislation that attempted to collect additional tolls on vehicles using national road networks within its borders. The court clarified that Entry 59 of the State List, which allows states to levy tolls, is strictly limited to roads other than those declared as National Highways by Parliament. The judgment emphasized that the National Highways Act, 1956, provides a comprehensive federal framework that cannot be encroached upon by regional legislative actions.
B. Punjab and Haryana High Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court Acquits Punjab AAP MLA, Seven Others In 2013 Molestation Case
Source: The Hindu
Verdict: The Punjab and Haryana High Court acquitted AAP MLA Manjinder Singh Lalpura and seven others in a 2013 molestation and assault case. The Court set aside their conviction and four-year sentence and quashed the FIR, on the basis of a compromise between the parties. The Court held that the dispute was predominantly private in nature, noted the absence of criminal antecedents and the passage of time, and relied on Supreme Court precedents to exercise its inherent powers to secure the ends of justice.
C. Rajasthan High Court
Transgender Bill May Turn Right To Gender Identity Into State-Dependent Entitlement: Rajasthan High Court
Source: Bar and Bench, Live Law
Verdict: The Rajasthan High Court held that the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill, 2026 risks diluting the fundamental right to self-perceived gender identity by making its legal recognition contingent upon State certification, thereby potentially converting an intrinsic aspect of personhood into a State-mediated entitlement. Reaffirming the principles laid down in NALSA v. Union of India, the Court held that gender identity is an intrinsic facet of dignity and personal liberty, and directed the State of Rajasthan to undertake a comprehensive study to frame an appropriate reservation policy. Subsequently, the Court issued a clarificatory order deleting its earlier critical observations on the Transgender Amendment Bill, 2026 and replacing them with a limited direction that the original judgment be implemented in accordance with the prevailing legal framework as on the date of the decision.
D. Madhya Pradesh
Matter Of Grave Concern': MP High Court Flags Rise Of Illegal Sand Transport In Overloaded Vehicles Threatening Public Safety
Source: Live Law
Verdict: The Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissed a petition seeking interim custody of a truck seized for illegal sand transportation. Justice Himanshu Joshi observed that illegal mining and the rise of the sand mafia have become systemic dangers. It emphasized that such unauthorized activities involve overloaded, poorly maintained vehicles driven recklessly to evade authorities, which leads to frequent road accidents and significant environmental degradation, necessitating a strict judicial approach to maintain public safety and the rule of law.
E. Delhi High Court
Ministry Of Home Affairs Competent To Initiate Disciplinary Proceedings Against AGMUT IAS Officers: Delhi High Court
Source: Live Law
Verdict: The Delhi High Court held that the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), acting as a delegate of the Joint Cadre Authority (JCA), is legally competent to initiate disciplinary proceedings and impose penalties on IAS officers of the AGMUT cadre. The Court set aside the Central Administrative Tribunal’s order which had quashed such proceedings on the ground that only the State Government where the officer was posted could act as the disciplinary authority. It held that the Tribunal’s view was based on a fragmented reading of the All India Services (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1969, and clarified that in the case of a Joint Cadre, disciplinary powers are channelised through the JCA under the Cadre Rules. The Court further observed that the MHA, being the administrative ministry for Union Territories, is a valid nodal authority for vigilance and disciplinary matters, and that there was no statutory prohibition against such exercise of power.
Delhi High Court Protects Personality Rights Of Preacher Aniruddhacharya Against AI Deepfakes, Meme Content
Source: Live Law
Development: The Delhi High Court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favour of spiritual preacher Aniruddhacharya, restraining unauthorised use of his name, voice, likeness and persona through AI-generated content, deepfakes and meme-based material. Justice Tushar Rao Gedela passed a John Doe order against known and unknown entities, observing that the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case and that continued circulation of such content could cause irreparable harm to his reputation. The Court further held that the impugned content appeared disparaging and not merely parody, and directed intermediaries such as Meta, X and Google to take down infringing material, while permitting the plaintiff to notify additional links for removal.
F. Kerala High Court
Kerala High Court Upholds 2024 Kerala Lok Ayukta Act Amendments
Source: Bar and Bench
Verdict: The High court dismissed several petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the 2024 amendments to the Kerala Lok Ayukta Act. The bench ruled that the state legislature has the competence to modify the law to provide an appellate or reviewing authority over the declarations made by the anti corruption ombudsman. The petitioners argued that the changes diluted the power of the Lok Ayukta by allowing the executive or the assembly to reject its findings, but the court held that no statutory body can be given the power to unseat a democratically elected public servant without a review process. This verdict confirms that the Governor, Chief Minister, or the State Government now holds the final authority to accept or reject the reports issued by the Lok Ayukta.
Protect Entrepreneurs From Baseless Protests; Industrial Growth Need Of The Hour In The State: Kerala High Court
Source: Bar and Bench
Verdict: The Kerala High Court held that once an industrial unit has obtained all statutory clearances, it cannot be denied permission or forced to shut down merely on the basis of public protests lacking substantive grounds. Justice P.V. Kunhikrishnan observed that denial of licences due to such protests undermines the rule of law and discourages investment, especially in the context of upcoming State elections, and urged political parties to assure voters that lawful businesses will not be arbitrarily shut down. The Court noted that the petitioners had secured necessary approvals and were entitled to deemed permission under the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, and rejected the Panchayat’s refusal to grant approval, holding that post the 2018 amendment, local authorities cannot reject such applications but may only impose conditions. It accordingly directed the Panchayat to reconsider the application in accordance with law.
G. Madras High Court
“Publicity Litigation”: Madras High Court Dismisses Plea Against Distribution Of Cash & Gifts During Election, Says ECI Already Taking Steps
Source: Live Law
Verdict: The Madras High Court dismissed a plea seeking directions to curb distribution of cash, gifts and other inducements to voters during elections, terming it a “publicity litigation” and noting that the Election Commission of India (ECI) and the State Government were already taking necessary measures. The petitioner had alleged that “vote for cash” practices were widespread in Tamil Nadu elections and referred to instances from past elections, including seizures of cash and postponement of polls in certain constituencies, while also suggesting measures such as compulsory voting. The Court took on record submissions by the ECI that extensive mechanisms, including flying squads and surveillance teams, had been deployed to address such issues, and held that no further judicial intervention was warranted in the absence of specific violations.
Governor Bound By Cabinet Advice In Remission Decisions Whether He Likes It Or Not: Madras High Court
Source: Bar and Bench
Verdict: On 2nd April, 2026, a full bench of the Madras High Court ruled that the Governor is constitutionally mandated to follow the aid and advice of the State Cabinet regarding the remission and premature release of convicts. The court, comprising Justices AD Jagadish Chandira, GK Ilanthiraiyan, and Sunder Mohan, clarified that under Article 161, the Governor holds no independent discretion to reject such recommendations, regardless of personal opinion. This judgment addressed a batch of petitions from life convicts whose release was stalled despite favorable Cabinet decisions. The bench emphasized that the Governor acts as a constitutional head, not an independent authority, and must adhere to the decisions of the elected Government.
Only Hindu, Sikh Or Buddhist Candidates Permitted To Contest From Scheduled Caste Reserved Constituency: Madras High Court
Source: Live Law
Verdict: On 2nd April, 2026, the Madras High Court dismissed a petition challenging the rejection of nomination papers for a Scheduled Caste reserved constituency. The court ruled that only individuals professing the Hindu, Sikh, or Buddhist religions are eligible to contest from seats reserved for Scheduled Castes under the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950. The bench observed that the petitioner, who had converted to Christianity, lost the status of a Scheduled Caste member for the purpose of electoral reservation. The court emphasized that the legal framework specifically excludes converts to other religions from claiming these benefits, as the reservation is intended to address historical disabilities within specific religious folds.
Madras High Court Quashes Case Against BJP Minister L Murugan For Violating Election Norms During 2024 Election
Source: Live Law
Verdict: The Madras High Court quashed two criminal cases against Union Minister L. Murugan arising from allegations of election-related misconduct during the 2024 Parliamentary elections, holding that the ingredients of the alleged offences were not made out. The cases, based on a complaint by revenue authorities, alleged unlawful assembly and illegal expenditure during campaign visits, with charges under Sections 143 and 171H IPC. The Court noted that there was no material to show unlawful assembly or any inducement or unauthorised payment, and that the cognisance taken by the magistrate lacked proper application of mind. It also took note of the absence of necessary procedural compliance, including sanction requirements, and held that continuation of proceedings would amount to abuse of process.
Ensure Toll Plazas Are Maintained Hassle-Free: Madras High Court
Source: The Hindu
Verdict: The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a petition seeking directions to prohibit political and other events near the Kappalur-Uthangudi ring road, holding that no specific violations were substantiated beyond general allegations. While declining relief, the Court directed authorities to ensure hassle-free maintenance of toll plazas and clarified that no exemptions should be granted to any individual or political party in violation of law, reiterating that adjudication must be confined to pleadings and evidence on record.
Madras High Court: Won’t Interfere In Benami Case Involving Sasikala
Source: The Times Of India
Development: The Madras High Court refused to interfere with the Appellate Tribunal’s order condoning a delay of 763 days in filing an appeal under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act in a case involving V.K. Sasikala and V.S.J. Dinakaran relating to a 2017 share transaction of Spectrum Mall, Perambur. The case arose after a show cause notice and provisional attachment were issued alleging Dinakaran was a benamidar, which the adjudicating authority later declined to confirm. When the appeal was filed with delay, it was condoned by the Tribunal. The High Court held that once the Tribunal, upon being satisfied with the reasons, exercised its discretion to condone the delay in the interest of substantial justice, such exercise cannot be interfered with unless it is arbitrary, perverse or based on untenable grounds.
H. Chhattisgarh High Court
Chhattisgarh High Court Denies Bail To Ex Congress Treasurers Aide In ₹540 Crore Coal Levy Case
Source: Bar and Bench
Verdict: The court dismissed the bail application of an associate linked to the former treasurer of the Chhattisgarh Congress party in connection with a multi crore coal extortion scam. The bench observed that the allegations involve a sophisticated criminal conspiracy to collect illegal levies of twenty five rupees per tonne of coal transported in the state. The court found prima facie evidence suggesting the petitioner played a role in the movement of proceeds of crime amounting to over five hundred and forty crore rupees. Given the economic magnitude of the offense and the potential influence of the accused over witnesses, the judiciary ruled that granting liberty at this stage would prejudice the ongoing investigation into the money laundering trail.
Chhattisgarh High Court Convicts Amit Jogi In 2003 NCP Leader Murder Case
Source: The Hindu
Verdict: The Chhattisgarh High Court convicted Amit Jogi in the 2003 murder case of businessman-politician and NCP leader Ramavatar Jaggi, overturning his earlier acquittal by a special CBI court in 2007, and granted him three weeks to surrender. The case, relating to the killing in Raipur ahead of Assembly elections, had seen 28 persons convicted earlier, while Jogi was acquitted on benefit of doubt. The CBI’s appeal against acquittal was initially rejected by the High Court on grounds of delay, but the Supreme Court later revived the matter and remitted it back for consideration, following which the High Court allowed the appeal and recorded conviction after multiple hearings.
I. Andhra Pradesh High Court
Andhra Pradesh High Court Ruling On Exploitation In Long Term Engagement Of Temporary Workers On Meagre Salary, Regularisation Denied By State Practice
Source: Live Law
Verdict: The court addressed three petitions from workers who served as work inspectors and typists for over thirty years on a nominal muster roll basis since the late eighties. In the judgment dated 21st February, 2024, the bench ruled that the state cannot indefinitely deny regularisation by citing technical cut off dates or the absence of sanctioned posts when a perennial need for work exists. The justices set aside previous tribunal orders, holding that keeping qualified individuals in temporary status on low pay constitutes exploitation. The state is now directed to regularize these employees, as their long service proves the necessity of their roles within the Government department.
J. Calcutta High Court
West Bengal elections: Calcutta HC dismisses PIL challenging transfer of IAS-IPS officers ordered by ECI
Source: Bar and Bench
Verdict: The Calcutta High Court dismissed two PILs filed by TMC member Kalyan Banerjee challenging the Election Commission of India’s large-scale transfer of senior IAS and IPS officers in West Bengal ahead of Assembly elections. He held that the transfers did not create any administrative vacuum or paralysis and were aimed at ensuring free and fair elections. The Court observed that replacement officers had already been posted, found no evidence of arbitrariness or mala fide intent, and declined to examine allegations relating to impeachment proceedings against the Chief Election Commissioner due to lack of nexus, while clarifying that individual officers remain free to challenge their transfers separately.
K. Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
Pre-Arrest Bail Not Barred Under SC/ST Act Unless Prima Facie Ingredients Of Offence Are Disclosed: Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
Source: Live Law
Development: The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that the bar on anticipatory bail under Sections 18 and 18A of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act is not absolute and would not apply where a prima facie reading of the FIR does not disclose the essential ingredients of the offence. Applying this test, the Court found that the allegations, including video evidence and statements, did not prima facie establish use of caste-based abuse in public view, and therefore the statutory bar was not attracted. Accordingly, the Court allowed the petition and granted pre-arrest bail to the accused, subject to conditions.
L. Tribunals and Other Courts
Delhi Court Dismisses Criminal Defamation Case By Somnath Bharti's Wife Against FM Nirmala Sitharaman
Source: Bar and Bench
Verdict: A Delhi court dismissed a criminal defamation complaint filed by Lipika Mitra, wife of AAP leader Somnath Bharti, against Union Finance Minister Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman, observing that there was no sufficient ground to proceed with the case. The complaint alleged that she made defamatory remarks during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections regarding alleged marital discord between Mitra and Bharti to gain political advantage. The Court, which had earlier issued notice in 2025, rejected the plea at the threshold, with detailed reasons to follow.
Delhi Court Denies Anticipatory Bail In LPG Cylinders Black Marketing Case, Cites Rising Prices And Increased Public Dependence
Source: Live Law
Development: A Delhi Court refused anticipatory bail to an accused in a case involving alleged illegal procurement, transportation and black marketing of LPG cylinders under the Essential Commodities Act and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The Court noted that the accused was allegedly a key conspirator and owner of the vehicle used in the offence, had not joined the investigation, and that custodial interrogation was necessary to trace the supply chain and analyse electronic evidence. It rejected arguments on parity and absence of antecedents, observing that the accused’s role was distinct, and held that such offences assume greater seriousness in times of rising prices and increased public dependence on essential commodities.
Delhi Court Convicts Madhya Pradesh Congress MLA Rajendra Bharti In Cooperative Bank Fraud Case
Source: Bar and Bench
Verdict: A Delhi court convicted Madhya Pradesh Congress MLA Rajendra Bharti for criminal conspiracy in a long-standing bank fraud case. The court found that Bharti, as both a trustee of a beneficiary organization and former chairperson of a cooperative bank, conspired to forge bank records to extend a fixed deposit's tenure. This allowed the illegal withdrawal of interest for over a decade, resulting in significant financial losses to the bank. While Bharti claimed the prosecution was politically motivated, the judge rejected these arguments, noting the evidence clearly established the forgery of valuable securities. Both Bharti and a bank employee were taken into judicial custody following the conviction.
Ganga Boat Iftar: Varanasi Sessions Court Denies Bail To All 14 Accused
Source: Live Law
Verdict: The Varanasi sessions court rejected the bail applications of fourteen individuals arrested for organizing an Iftar gathering on a boat in the Ganga. The judge observed that uploading videos of the event to social media suggested a prima facie intent to disturb social harmony and incite religious sentiments during a sensitive festive period. The accused face charges including promoting enmity and outraging religious feelings, with additional allegations of extortion added later following claims by boat owners that the vessel was taken forcibly. This order follows a prior refusal of bail by a magistrate who also deemed the nature of the alleged offences to be serious.
‘Witnesses Deposed Falsely, Unsafe To Rely’: Court Acquits Tahir Hussain's Brother Shah Alam, 8 Others In Delhi Riots Case
Source: Live Law
Development: A Delhi Court acquitted nine accused, including Shah Alam, brother of AAP Councillor Tahir Hussain, in a case arising out of the 2020 North-East Delhi riots, holding that the prosecution failed to establish charges due to unreliable and inconsistent witness testimonies. The Court found that key witnesses gave general and false statements regarding the place and timing of incidents, including the attack on an Innova vehicle and arson at Royal Motors, leading it to conclude that it would be unsafe to rely on such evidence, and extended the benefit of doubt to all accused.
National Green Tribunal Rejects BRS Leader's Plea Challenging Musi Riverfront Development Project
Source: Live Law
Development: The National Green Tribunal (Southern Bench) dismissed a plea filed by BRS leader Patlola Kartik Reddy challenging the Musi Riverfront Development Project, holding the application to be premature as the issues raised were already covered under the Terms of Reference for environmental assessment. The petitioner had alleged that construction was being carried out without valid environmental clearance and sought a halt on the project, while the State of Telangana submitted that environmental clearance had already been applied for and activities were in compliance with the ToR. Accepting the State’s submissions, the Tribunal declined to interfere at the admission stage.
Delhi Court Grants Bail To Man Accused Of Posting Morphed Photo Of Prime Minister Bowing Before Shahrukh Khan
Source: Live Law
Development: A Delhi Court granted bail to a man accused of posting an AI-generated morphed image on X depicting the Prime Minister bowing before a film actor, observing that investigation qua him was complete and no recovery was effected despite police custody remand. The Court noted that the accused had no prior criminal antecedents, had deactivated his account during investigation, and there was no likelihood of absconding or tampering with evidence, while relying on settled principles laid down in Arnesh Kumar, Satender Kumar Antil and Dataram Singh. The Court also directed the Deputy Commissioner of Police to conduct a preliminary inquiry into a “grounds of arrest” document alleged to be forged, without expressing any final opinion on its authenticity.