Welcome to the latest edition of Judgement Junction! Over the past week, Indian courts have delivered a dense set of rulings and interim orders touching several politically and institutionally sensitive areas ranging from electoral processes and investigative agency conduct to environmental governance, digital competition, and the limits of judicial oversight. Between 23 February and 1 March 2026, the Supreme Court and multiple High Courts dealt with issues as varied as electoral roll verification in West Bengal, the discharge of 23 accused in the Delhi Excise Policy case, consent-based data sharing obligations for WhatsApp, regulation of festival-season airfare surges, and environmental protections in the Aravalli and Kottooli wetlands.
The Supreme Court intervened in matters involving NCERT textbook content alleging judicial corruption, investigative procedures of the CBI, the scope of the NOTA mechanism in elections, and the closure of long-running environmental litigation under the MC Mehta line of cases. At the same time, High Courts addressed disputes related to privacy concerns in government messaging systems, preventive detention, political protests, and the functioning of statutory tribunals.
I. Key Legal Developments
Supreme Court Bans NCERT Textbook With Chapter On Judicial Corruption, Issues Contempt Notice To NCERT Director & Ministry Official
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court, in a ruling by a Bench including Chief Justice Surya Kant, has ordered the immediate withdrawal and ban of a Class 8 NCERT textbook chapter. The Court deemed the chapter’s content on judicial corruption to be “unverified and scandalous,” with the potential to “tarnish the image of the judiciary” and erode public trust. The Court also issued a contempt notice to the NCERT Director for authorizing the inclusion of the material.
All Accused Including Arvind Kejriwal And Manish Sisodia Discharged In Liquor Policy Case, Court Calls Probe ‘Pre-Meditated And Choreographed’ and Orders Departmental Action Against IO, CBI moves to Delhi HC
Source: Click Here
Development: The Rouse Avenue Courts, under Special Judge Jitendra Singh, discharged all 23 accused, including Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia, in the CBI’s Delhi Excise Policy corruption case. The court found no evidence of bribe, quid pro quo, or criminal conspiracy, ruling that the liquor policy was a procedurally sound, consultative exercise and mere policy approval without dishonest intent is not a crime. The judge heavily criticized the CBI’s investigation as relying on “surmises and conjectures” and being “pre-meditated and choreographed,” and ordered departmental proceedings against the Investigating Officer for “self-contradictory dual positioning.” The CBI has since challenged this decision in the Delhi High Court.
NEET-PG Cut Off Reduction Won’t Affect Doctors’ Competence As They Already Qualified MBBS : Centre To Supreme Court
Source: Click Here
Development: The Government of India defended its decision to lower the NEET-PG 2025 cut-off before the Supreme Court. The Centre argued that NEET-PG functions merely as a merit-ranking tool for seat allocation, not a measure of clinical competence, which is guaranteed by the MBBS degree. Citing the need to prevent wastage of postgraduate seats due to large-scale seat vacancies and acting in the national interest, the government maintained that reducing the percentile was a proportionate policy decision that does not compromise academic or patient safety standards.
Whatsapp Tells Supreme Court It Will Implement CCI Order On Giving Users Greater Say In Sharing Their Data
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court allowed WhatsApp and Meta to withdraw their interim applications contesting the NCLAT directions after WhatsApp committed to implementing a consent-based framework for data sharing with Meta by March 16, 2026. This commitment, delivered by Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, adheres to the NCLAT-mandated user-choice safeguards. WhatsApp must now file a compliance report with the CCI. The main appeal before the Supreme Court remains active, addressing the validity of WhatsApp’s 2021 privacy policy, the finding of abuse of dominance, the ₹213.14 crore penalty, and the CCI’s appeal to reinstate a five-year ban on data sharing for advertising.
Air pollution: SC asks Centre to consider proposal to shift coal-dependent industries out of Delhi-NCR
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court is actively addressing severe air pollution by requesting responses from the Union Ministries of Environment, Petroleum and Natural Gas, and Power. The Court is considering the relocation of coal-based industries from the Delhi-NCR region. A Bench has directed the states of Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, and Rajasthan to solicit public suggestions and objections regarding the move from affected stakeholders. The directive also references the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) recommendation to restrict new coal-based thermal power plants within a 300 km radius of Delhi. Separately, the Delhi Government has been ordered to submit a long-term pollution mitigation action plan.
West Bengal SIR: Leaves Cancelled For Judges, Urgent Cases To Be Shifted To Other Courts ; Refuses To Entertain Objection To ECI’s Training To Judicial Officers
Source: Click Here
Development: In response to Supreme Court directives for the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in West Bengal, the Calcutta High Court took measures to ensure smooth functioning, including cancelling pre-approved leave for judicial officers, postponing training, and rescheduling urgent cases. The Supreme Court permitted deploying judicial officers from Jharkhand and Odisha and clarified that a Class 10 pass certificate must accompany the admit card for valid identity proof. Separately, the Supreme Court dismissed the Trinamool Congress’s objections regarding the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) training module for deployed officers, emphasizing that the judicial officers must make independent decisions and the ECI cannot override Supreme Court directions.
Sabarimala Gold Theft Case : Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail To Former Devaswom Secretary S Jayasree
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has granted anticipatory bail to S. Jayasree, the former Devaswom Board Secretary and fourth accused in the Sabarimala gold theft case, making her the only accused to receive this protection so far. A Bench of Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma considered the matter on February 20, 2026, noting that Jayasree had complied with previous directions, including joining the investigation and providing specimen signature and handwriting samples. Based on these developments, the Court decided to grant the anticipatory bail and interim protection while the investigation continues.
Supreme Court Stays Criminal Proceedings Against Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Over Alleged Skipping Of ED Summons
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has temporarily halted the criminal proceedings brought by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) against Jharkhand Chief Minister Hemant Soren. The ED’s complaint alleges Soren failed to comply with summonses related to the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The stay was granted while the Supreme Court considers Soren’s petition challenging the Jharkhand High Court’s refusal to dismiss the complaint. The ED must respond within four weeks. The Court also commented that investigative agencies should focus on effective prosecution rather than increasing legal proceedings.
Tirupati Laddu : Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere With AP Govt’s One-Man Committee Inquiry Over Ghee Adulteration
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has allowed the administrative committee of Andhra Pradesh to proceed with its review of the irregularities concerning the procurement of the Tirupati Laddu. The court determined that this administrative review does not interfere with or duplicate the already concluded criminal investigation by the Special Investigation Team (SIT). The bench clarified that since both processes operate in separate domains, they may continue simultaneously and lawfully.
Has NOTA Improved Quality Of Leaders? Supreme Court Asks In Plea Against Declaring Lone Candidate Default Winner
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court recently heard a PIL by the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy seeking to mandate elections even with a single candidate, to allow voters to use the None of the Above (NOTA) option (introduced in 2013). During the hearing, the Court questioned NOTA’s effectiveness in improving leader quality, but noted the problem of a legislative vacuum since NOTA cannot fill a seat. The Attorney General opposed the plea. The Court reiterated that its 2013 NOTA judgment aimed to encourage participation and express dissatisfaction, not to invalidate electoral results. The Court also observed that higher socio-economic strata citizens tend to participate less in elections than those from lower strata.
Examining At Highest Level: Aviation Ministry To Supreme Court On Air Ticket Fare Surge During Festivals
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has expressed serious concern over the exorbitant airfare surges by private airlines, which reached up to three times the normal rate during peak festival seasons and events. Responding to a petition seeking regulatory guidelines, the Court has directed the Government to file a counter-affidavit. The Ministry of Civil Aviation assured the Court the matter is being addressed at the highest level, with a meeting led by the Solicitor General underway, and requested four weeks to formally respond. The Court deferred the matter and chose to leave the consultation process to the Ministry, declining to implement suggestions from the Federation of India Airlines for the time being.
Kerala High Court halts constructions in Kozhikode’s Kottooli wetlands amid Ramsar process
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court has directed the Kozhikode District Collector and Corporation to strictly enforce the Wetlands Rules, 2017, by immediately halting new construction in the forbidden zone of the Kottooli wetlands, in connection with alleged illegal construction near Sarvoram Bio Park. The Court emphasized that permanent structures would jeopardize the wetland rules and the ongoing Ramsar site designation process. Furthermore, the Court ordered the State and Central Governments to finalize the Ramsar site designation, currently awaiting MoEFCC approval, within three months. The legality of existing structures is to be addressed separately.
Delhi Court Remands Youth Congress Chief Udai Bhanu Chib To Police Custody, Grants FIR Copy, Extends Custody Of Workers In India AI Impact Summit Protest Case, Udai Bhanu Chib gets Bail
Source: Click Here
Development: On 23rd February, 2026, JMFC Ravi of Patiala House Courts remanded Udai Bhanu Chib, National President of the Indian Youth Congress, to four days’ police custody in connection with the shirtless protest at the India AI Impact Summit, granting less than the seven days sought by Delhi Police. The prosecution alleged conspiracy and coordination of the protest, while the defence opposed extended custody. On 24th February, 2026, the court ordered that Chib was entitled to a copy of the FIR, directing supply of the document in accordance with law. Later, on 25th February, 2026, the court extended police custody of certain Youth Congress workers by four days, noting that investigation into the incident was ongoing and required further custodial interrogation of the accused persons. Further on 26th February, 2026, CJM Mridul Gupta remanded three more Youth Congress workers to three days’ police custody after they were arrested from Himachal Pradesh. On 28th February, 2026, Duty Magistrate at the Patiala House Court granted bail to Uday Bhanu Chib.
Supreme Court To Hear Plea Seeking OBC Reservation For Pasmanda Muslims
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court is reviewing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Mohd Waseem Saifi, which seeks a 10% reservation for ‘Pasmanda Muslims’ within the Other Backward Classes (OBC) category, citing the Ranganath Misra Commission report. A Bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi questioned why the PIL excluded other Muslim OBCs and stressed that OBC status requires both economic and social backwardness. The Court adjourned the matter for four weeks, asking the petitioner to address these points and requesting the PIL be tagged with a similar pending case on OBC Muslim reservation in Andhra Pradesh.
No More IAs In MC Mehta: Supreme Court To Close 1985 Case To Avoid Pendency Impression
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court is taking steps to clear its substantial backlog by separately addressing the long-running MC Mehta environmental cases, which include the Taj Trapezium pollution matter. The Court noted that the core 1984-85 MC Mehta cases were being kept “artificially alive” by the routine filing of Interlocutory Applications (IAs), with the 1985 matter alone having 85 pending IAs. To resolve this, the Court ordered that the three main components (the 1984 matter, the 1985 matter, and the Taj Trapezium case) be listed and heard on separate dates to clear all pending IAs. Crucially, the Court explicitly stated that no further IAs will be accepted in the 1985 matter as part of its determination to finally resolve the issue.
Tell Central Government, Not Court: Supreme Court On Claims Of Aadhaar Misuse For Rohingyas In WB
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court declined to hear a plea by Ashwini Upadhyay alleging widespread fraudulent issuance of Aadhaar cards to Rohingyas in West Bengal, stating the court was not the proper forum for such a “deeper probe.” Justice Bagchi instead directed the petitioner to approach the Union of India for statutory amendments, particularly to the Representation of Peoples Act, to regulate the fraudulent procurement of Aadhaar. The Court clarified that while Aadhaar is a valid identity proof, it is not proof of citizenship, and legislative action is necessary to address the issue of fraudulent procurement.
Kerala HC seeks State’s response to Antony Raju plea to suspend conviction in underwear evidence tampering case
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court has issued notice to the State of Kerala on a plea by former Minister and sitting LDF MLA, Antony Raju, seeking the suspension of his conviction in a three-decade-old underwear evidence tampering case. Raju was convicted under various IPC sections by a Magistrate Court related to the 1990 arrest of an Australian national for charas smuggling. While a sessions court suspended his jail sentence, it refused to suspend the conviction. Raju argues that the refusal causes “irreversible injury” and immediate electoral disqualification under the Representation of the People Act, 1951, which impacts his ability to contest the upcoming Kerala assembly elections. The High Court has posted the matter for a later date.
Supreme Court stays Kerala High Court order quashing State’s ‘Nava Kerala – Citizen Response Program’
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has temporarily stayed the Kerala High Court’s ruling that had struck down the State’s ‘Nava Kerala-Citizen Response Program.’ This program, intended to collect public feedback on government welfare schemes through a volunteer and committee network, was set aside by the High Court over concerns it resembled a political campaign ahead of the 2026 assembly elections and lacked proper budgetary sanction for its ₹20 crore allocation. The Left Government challenged this restraint, arguing the project was for evaluating schemes. The Supreme Court has issued notice on the appeal and mandated the State to submit a report detailing the program’s expenditure.
Kerala HC Flags Privacy Concerns In CMO’s Bulk Messages To Government Employees Before Polls; Government Assures High Court No Further Messages Till Monday
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court, on February 24, 2026, expressed serious concern over the alleged use of Government employees’ personal data by the Chief Minister’s Office (CMO) to send mass WhatsApp messages publicizing State achievements before the 2026 assembly elections. The court viewed the forced receipt of unwanted messages as a “prima facie intrusion into privacy” and questioned the CMO’s access to official databases like SPARK. While issuing no formal order, the court recorded the Government pleader’s undertaking to halt the message circulation until the next hearing. The State was also directed to explain why its actions do not violate privacy rights. Subsequently, on February 27, the Kerala Government informed the High Court that this undertaking could be extended until March 2, 2026.
Kerala High Court stays release of Kerala Story 2, asks CBFC to examine challenge to film, Division Bench lifts the Stay
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court reviewed the film Kerala Story 2 – Goes Beyond concerning its implications for communal harmony and the CBFC’s U/A certification. Initially, the Court questioned the CBFC’s approval on February 24, 2026, and on February 26, 2026, Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas issued an interim stay on the release, citing a prima facie non-application of mind and directing the CBFC to re-examine the certification against guidelines for public order. However, a subsequent Division Bench vacated the stay. The Bench reasoned that the CBFC’s full review implied a comprehensive analysis and that non-compliance could not be solely based on trailers. The Court also affirmed that the State’s law and order machinery is strictly responsible for managing any communal tension following the film’s release.
Haldwani eviction: Supreme Court says land belongs to Railway, encroachers cannot dictate terms
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has clarified that families facing eviction from Indian Railways land in Haldwani’s Banbhoolpura area do not have the right to demand rehabilitation on the exact same site, emphasizing that the state owns the land and determines its best use. Following its stay of the previous eviction order, the Court is now focusing on practical rehabilitation. It has directed the Collector of Nainital and the State Legal Services Authority to organize camps with experts to help the affected marginalized families apply for housing under the PM Awas Yojna, ensuring a solution that allows for the railway expansion to proceed.
Be Careful 100 Times, CJI Surya Kant Rebukes Lawyer For Comparing Ambani-Adani Case Listings To NJAC Petition Delay
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, issued a stern warning to advocate Mathews J. Nedumpara after he attempted to compare the swift listing of “Ambani-Adani cases” with the alleged delay in his own petition regarding the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC). The Chief Justice cautioned the lawyer to “be careful 100 times” and the Bench stated that criticizing court processes by drawing parallels to unrelated high-profile matters was inappropriate and advised against introducing unnecessary issues.
‘You May Be Ranveer Singh But You Can’t Hurt Religious Sentiments’: Karnataka High Court On ‘Kantara’ Movie Mimicry; Stays Coercive Steps
Source: Click Here
Development: The Karnataka High Court declined a petition seeking to mandate police action, including filing an FIR and taking coercive steps, against actor Ranveer Singh. The petition alleged that his mimicry related to the film Kantara had offended religious sentiments and constituted a cognisable offence. The Court ruled that the existing material did not justify judicial intervention, emphasizing the balance between freedom of expression and public order. It clarified that courts cannot order police action without specific evidence, though an investigating officer is free to proceed if a detailed complaint prima facie disclosing an offence is filed.
Bombay High Court Reserves Verdict On Rahul Gandhi’s Plea To Quash Defamation Case Over Remarks About PM Modi
Source: Click Here
Development: The Bombay High Court has reserved its verdict on Rahul Gandhi’s petition, filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking to quash a defamation complaint against him for remarks made about Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Gandhi argues his statements were part of political discourse and protected by his fundamental right to freedom of speech (Article 19(1)(a)), lacking defamatory intent. The state opposed the plea, maintaining that defamation is a cognizable offense and the trial should proceed. The Court’s order will determine if the proceedings against him will continue or be quashed.
‘Mushroom Growth Of PILs Concerning, Some Read Newspaper, File Petition By Evening’: CJI Surya Kant
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, has expressed concern over the rising number of Public Interest Litigations (PILs), particularly those filed based solely on newspaper reports. The Chief Justice stated that this practice burdens the judicial system and deviates from the original purpose of PILs. The Bench called for advocates to exercise restraint and responsibility, demanding that PILs focus on issues of genuine public importance, be supported by substantial evidence, and not simply react to media reports. The Court also warned against filing on trivial matters, which can lead to inefficiency, and encouraged litigants to use existing grievance redressal mechanisms first.
Bhojshala Temple - Kamal Maula Dispute: MP High Court Asks Parties To File Objections To ASI Survey Report In Two Weeks
Source: Click Here
Development: The Madhya Pradesh High Court has directed all parties in the Bhojshala temple-Kamal Maula mosque dispute to file their objections and evidence. Recognizing the case’s significant historical, religious, and archaeological nature, the Court set a schedule for submitting these documents. Once all submissions are received, the Division Bench will frame the issues and evaluate the merits of the conflicting claims regarding the title and worship rights, emphasizing the need for strict procedural compliance.
Some Compulsory Mechanism Needed To Make People Vote, Says SC
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court recently suggested that compulsory voting should be considered as a measure for electoral reform. While hearing a petition on the matter, the Bench observed that mandatory participation in elections could boost democratic legitimacy and combat voter apathy. The Court acknowledged that voluntary voting is currently the established norm, but expressed the view that citizens have a fundamental democratic duty to vote. These remarks convey the Bench’s sentiments on the issue of electoral participation and do not represent a final order. The matter is still under consideration, with further submissions anticipated.
‘Wholly Unacceptable’: Kerala High Court Raps Devaswom Board Over Poor Sanitation At Chottanikkara Temple Despite ₹2–4 Crore Monthly Income
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court has ordered the Cochin Devaswom Board, local municipal authorities, and the police to immediately rectify the poor sanitation and unhygienic conditions, including garbage accumulation and inadequate toilet facilities, at the Chottanikkara Bhagavathy Temple. The directive, prompted by concerns for public health and devotee safety, emphasizes the need for a major pilgrimage site to meet basic civic and sanitation standards. The Court also mandated the submission of periodic compliance reports to ensure the directives are executed.
Supreme Court Says Tribunals Have Become Liability, Calls Them Governments’ Headache
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has heavily criticized the statutory tribunal system, calling it a “liability and a headache” because it has failed to deliver speedy justice and has become an additional burden rather than easing the regular courts’ workload. The Court noted that systemic problems, including persistent delays in appointments, numerous vacancies, and infrastructural gaps, severely impact the tribunals’ performance and urged the government to address these issues promptly.
Supreme Court seeks response of ECI, Centre to plea for checks on money power by political parties during polls
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has requested responses from the Election Commission of India (ECI) and the Union of India regarding a petition demanding legally enforceable limits on the use of money by political parties in elections. The petition argues that the unregulated use of funds distorts the electoral process and undermines the integrity of free and fair elections. The Court noted the matter raises critical issues about electoral integrity and campaign finance, and will examine if the current legal frameworks are adequate to control the “excessive influence of money in polls.”
Pune Porsche Case: Supreme Court Issues Notice On Bail Plea Of Father Of Minor Accused Of Driving
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has acknowledged and issued notice on the bail application of the minor accused’s father in the Pune Porsche crash case. The father is appealing the Maharashtra High Court’s denial of his bail concerning allegations of manipulating the blood samples related to the incident. The Supreme Court highlighted that the case involves questions about the appropriate length of custody during the current stage of the investigation. A further hearing is scheduled after the State of Maharashtra and investigating agencies submit their responses.
Supreme Court Asks HC To Decide Bail Plea Of Sukesh Chandrashekhar’s Wife
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has ordered the Delhi High Court to quickly decide on the bail application of Leena Paulose, the wife of alleged conman Sukesh Chandrashekhar, who is accused in the Rs 200 crore extortion case. Noting that her plea had been pending for over a year, a Bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and N. Kotiswar Singh directed the high court to take up and decide the matter within three weeks, emphasizing the need for an expedited hearing while observing all necessary legal safeguards.
HC reserves order on AAP MLA Mehraj Malik’s PSA detention
Source: Click Here
Development: The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has reserved its judgment on a habeas corpus petition filed by Doda East AAP MLA Mehraj Malik, who is challenging his detention under the J&K Public Safety Act, 1978. Malik was detained on September 8, 2025, for allegedly disturbing public order and is currently in Kathua jail. He is seeking the quashing of the detention order and ₹5 crore in compensation. The court, following a hearing, reserved its order and granted both sides one week to submit written synopses.
Karnataka High Court Asks Trial Court To Continue Proceedings In Kidnapping Case Allegedly Involving JD(S) Leader HD Revanna
Source: Click Here
Development: The Karnataka High Court has refused to dismiss a criminal petition by JDS leader H.D. Revanna to quash an FIR and proceedings in a Mysuru kidnapping case. The Court ruled that the allegations, if taken as true, constitute cognizable offenses, justifying the continuation of the trial. The Bench stated that quashing a case is reserved only for clearly unfounded or malicious complaints, a standard the current case did not meet, affirming the accused’s right to challenge the allegations during the trial itself.
‘What Is The Judicially Manageable Standard?’: Delhi High Court Questions PIL Challenging Rajya Sabha Nomination Of C Sadanandan Master
Source: Click Here
Development: The Delhi High Court, through a bench of Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia, questioned the scope of judicial review over Rajya Sabha nominations while hearing a PIL challenging the appointment of BJP leader C Sadanandan Master. The petitioner argued that Master lacked the “special knowledge or practical experience” in fields like literature, science, art, or social service, as required by Article 80(3). The High Court raised fundamental doubts about the “justiciability” of the PIL, asking what “judicially manageable standard” a court could use to assess a nominee’s competence, suggesting this assessment is better left to domain experts. The petitioner, however, is seeking both the quashing of Master’s nomination and the formulation of future guidelines for transparent, merit-based nominations.
‘Fissiparous Tendency’: Gauhati High Court Issues Notice To CM Himanta Biswa Sarma On Plea Against Hate Speeches
Source: Click Here
Development: The Guwahati High Court’s Division Bench has issued notice to Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma, the Union Government, and the State Government following a batch of petitions. These petitions, filed by the Congress, scholar Hiren Gohain, CPI(M), and others, allege that the Chief Minister has repeatedly made hate speeches targeting the Muslim community, citing specific remarks about “Miya voters” and a video that showed him firing at animated images of Muslim men. The Court, remarking on the “fissiparous tendency” of the speeches, listed the matter for an April hearing. This action follows a previous directive from the Supreme Court for the petitioners to approach the High Court first.
MP High Court Expedites Bangladeshi Woman’s Trial But Declines Release Over Security Concerns Amid Current International Scenario
Source: Click Here
Development: The MP High Court, through a Division Bench of Justices Vijay Kumar Shukla and Alok Awasthi, addressed a habeas corpus petition filed by a Bangladeshi national detained in an Indore centre for over six years. Although she had been granted bail on charges including kidnapping, wrongful confinement, and forging documents, her detention continued under the Foreigners Act. The Court acknowledged her prolonged six years of incarceration with a pending trial but ultimately declined her immediate release, citing the “international scenario” and safety concerns. However, the Court directed the State prosecuting agency to conclude the trial within a strict six-month deadline, granting the petitioner the liberty to seek expedited proceedings if the deadline is missed.
Aravalli Hills: Supreme Court Seeks Expert Panel To Determine Scope Of Permissible Mining Activity, Maintains Halt On Mining
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has imposed a temporary status quo on all licensed mining activities across the Aravalli region in a suo motu case. The Court is seeking clarification from the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change on the definition, total area, forest cover, and developed zones of the Aravalli Hills. Furthermore, the Court has requested suggestions for forming a panel of domain experts to advise on the extent to which mining can be permitted. All involved parties must submit their notes by March 10, 2026, after which the expert committee will be constituted.
Maharashtra Govt Flags Security Risk In Allowing Muslim Cab Drivers To Offer Namaz Near Airport; Bombay High Court Calls For Alternate Arrangement
Source: Click Here
Development: The Bombay High Court heard a petition from the Auto-Taxi, Ola-Uber Men’s Union for the restoration of a temporary Namaz shed near CSMIA Gate 9, which was demolished by the MMRDA in April 2025. The Maharashtra Government and Adani Airport Holdings opposed the restoration due to serious security concerns, citing high foot traffic and proximity to a VIP area. The Court, treating the matter as non-adversarial, directed the State and MMRDA to identify an alternative site near the airport specifically for the upcoming Ramadan period. The case was adjourned to March 5, 2026.
‘Mushrooming’ Political Parties Only For Tax And Legal Benefits: Madras High Court Remarks
Source: Click Here
Development: The Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK), founded by actor Vijay, has challenged the State’s Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for political meetings in court. The party argues that the SOPs are unconstitutional under Article 14 because they give preferential treatment to ECI-recognised parties over other registered parties. TVK is advocating for a “first-come-first-served” system for meeting permissions. The State informed the court that it is developing an online application system and was directed to file a counter-affidavit, leading to a three-week adjournment. The Court also orally remarked that many political parties are “mushrooming” primarily to secure tax exemptions rather than genuinely contesting elections.
SC Collegium Adopts New Policy To Ensure Incoming HC Chief Justices Are Available Before Incumbent’s Retirement
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court Collegium adopted a new policy on February 26, 2026, to ensure a seamless transition of leadership in High Courts. The policy involves transferring a recommended Chief Justice to their new High Court approximately two months before the vacancy occurs to allow them to become familiar with the court’s administration. The first application of this policy is Justice Lisa Gill’s recommended transfer from the Punjab and Haryana High Court to the Andhra Pradesh High Court, where she is expected to take charge as Chief Justice on April 25, 2026, pending Central Government approval.
Delhi HC seeks CBI’s stance on plea to re-investigate death of former Railway Minister LN Mishra in 1975 blasts
Source: Click Here
Development: The Delhi High Court has instructed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to submit a formal, written status report by a Joint Director-rank officer regarding a plea for a re-investigation into the 1975 assassination of former Railway Minister Lalit Narayan Mishra in the Samastipur Railway Station bomb blast. Both the victim’s family and two convicted ‘Anand Margis’ members are seeking a fresh probe, claiming the real conspirators were let off. Although the CBI’s lawyer verbally supported the 2014 conviction of five individuals, the court requires a written official stance and has stressed the need for an expeditious hearing.
‘A Form Of Oppression’: Chhattisgarh High Court Seeks Education Secretary’s Personal Affidavit Over Lack Of Girls’ Toilets In Government Schools
Source: Click Here
Development: The Chhattisgarh High Court’s Division Bench is overseeing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that addresses a severe infrastructure deficit in the state’s schools, particularly regarding girls’ toilets. A report revealed over 5,000 schools lack girls’ toilets, and more than 8,000 have facilities in poor condition. The U-DISE Report 2024-25 also confirms over 1,000 schools still lack separate facilities. Expressing dissatisfaction with the lack of progress since the PIL began in January 2025, the Court has directed the Secretary of the School Education Department to file a personal affidavit before the next hearing on March 23, 2026.
Centre’s Undertaking To Reconsider Sedition Law Not Binding On Parliament, Says Supreme Court On BNS Challenge
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court bench, comprising CJI Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, dismissed challenges against two new laws: Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which re-enacts the sedition offense, and Section 173 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), which permits a preliminary inquiry before filing an FIR. The Court upheld BNS Section 152, stating that a 2022 executive undertaking to withdraw the previous sedition law (IPC Section 124A) does not limit Parliament’s “absolute prerogative to legislate.” The challenge to BNSS Section 173 was also rejected, with the bench stressing the need to allow new laws to function before judicial review and noting the misuse of the Lalita Kumari judgment.
Madras HC Issues Notice On Plea Seeking Action Against Tamil Nadu Minister Mano Thangaraj For Posting Video Linking PM Modi With 'Epstein Files'
Source: Click Here
Development: The Madras High Court's Madurai Bench, through Justice S Srimathy, admitted a petition seeking action against Tamil Nadu Milk and Dairy Development Minister Mano Thangaraj over a Facebook post. The post contained a video that allegedly made the false and defamatory claim that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was named in the Epstein Files, a claim already debunked by fact-checkers. The petitioner argues this constitutes offences under Sections 356 and 356(2)(3) of the BNS and Section 67 of the IT Act. The key issue highlighted was the police's failure to register an FIR despite a formal complaint, which the petitioner contends violates Section 173(1) BNSS. Consequently, the Court issued notices to the Chief Secretary, the Superintendent of Police, and the Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti West Police Station.
Farmers' Protest: Supreme Court Asks High-Powered Committee To Submit Final Recommendations In Sealed Cover, Signals Closure Of Proceedings
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court, through a bench of CJI Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, has ordered the High-Powered Committee, led by Justice Nawab Singh (Retd.) and established in September 2024, to submit its final report and recommendations on the protesting farmers' demand for Minimum Support Price (MSP) in a sealed cover. The Court noted that the initial dispute over Haryana restricting the farmers' march to Delhi is resolved, with blockades at the Shambhu and Khanauri borders lifted. The Court intends to close the proceedings after the committee's findings are submitted and forwarded to the appropriate Governments for consideration.
Allahabad High Court protects Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati from arrest in POCSO case
Source: Click Here
Development: The Allahabad High Court has granted interim protection from arrest to Swami Avimukteshwaranand and his disciple, Swami Mukundanand Giri, in connection with an FIR filed under the POCSO Act (and Section 351(3) BNS) at Police Station Jhoonsi, Prayagraj. The case stems from a Special POCSO Court’s direction based on allegations by Shankuri Peethadheshwar Ashutosh Maharaj that Avimukteshwaranand sexually abused two minor boys at a camp. The Court mandated that the investigation must continue and the accused must cooperate, while reserving the final order.
UP SIR : Supreme Court Asks Lucknow DEO To Examine Grievances Of Relocated Akbar Nagar Residents
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court refused to hear a writ petition filed by former residents of Akbar Nagar concerning their alleged exclusion from the Uttar Pradesh Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process. Instead, the Court instructed the District Election Officer, Lucknow, to investigate their complaints. The Supreme Court specified that if the DEO does not resolve the matters related to enumeration forms and voter registration, the petitioners have the right to petition the Allahabad High Court, without the Supreme Court offering any opinion on the substance of the claims.
Supreme Court Asks MHA Committee To Meet Once In 3 Months To Address Issues Faced By People From North East
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has mandated the Monitoring Committee on issues faced by the North-Eastern community to convene at least once every three months. This committee is required to consider all complaints, including those published in newspapers, and the Court has specifically ordered a meeting for March 15, 2026. The Court is seeking a status report and reaffirmed that the Centre, through the Ministry of Home Affairs, has a fundamental duty to address racial discrimination and violence against people from the Northeast throughout the nation.
Kerala High Court Says It Cannot Decide Validity Of ‘Dr.’ Prefix Use By Physiotherapists, Calls For Government/Legislature Decision
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court declined to rule on the use of the "Dr." prefix by physiotherapists, stating that it is a matter for the Government or legislature to decide, as the court lacks the authority to legislate on the title's use. A Division Bench, comprising Justices Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and P.V. Balakrishnan, advised the Indian Medical Association and the Indian Association of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (IAPMR) to direct their representations to the Government due to the absence of a statutory provision.
Supreme Court Directs AIIMS Jammu To Constitute Medical Team To Assess Jailed Ex-Bar President Mian Qayoom
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has directed the Director of AIIMS Jammu to form a special medical team to evaluate the health of Mian Abdul Qayoom, former president of the Kashmir High Court Bar Association, who is imprisoned under the UAPA and seeking medical bail in the Babar Qadri murder case. While not interfering with the merits of the High Court's decision, the Supreme Court specifically mandated an assessment of the 77-year-old's need for palliative care, considering he has a single kidney and a heart pacemaker. The Court instructed the AIIMS team to submit a report within three weeks detailing local facilities and determining if a transfer to Delhi for treatment is necessary, despite the Union's argument that he is already receiving adequate care in Jammu.
Delhi High Court Seeks MHA’s Response On Plea Against Law Allowing Police To Collect DNA, Biometrics Of Accused
Source: Click Here
Development: The Delhi High Court has sought responses from the Ministry of Home Affairs, the NCRB, and the Delhi Government regarding a petition challenging the constitutionality of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, and its Rules. The petition, filed by two students from Jamia Millia Islamia who claim they were coerced into providing biometric samples, argues that the Act's provisions allowing police to collect, store, and analyze a wide range of physical and biological samples (including DNA, retina scans, and behavioural attributes) from convicts, arrested persons, and others are disproportionate, intrusive, and a violation of the right to privacy. The plea seeks to have the Act and Rules declared unconstitutional and all collected data deleted.
How Flood-Prepared Is Delhi? Government Shares Its Plan With NGT
Source: Click Here
Development: The Delhi Irrigation and Flood Control Department (I&FCD) reported its progress to the NGT, committing to complete the desilting of 77 drains, removing over 20 lakh metric tonnes of silt, by June 15, 2026. This action stems from recommendations by the Joint Flood Management Committee following the July 2023 floods. The I&FCD also presented a study on the Yamuna's discharge capacity, though its outputs were deemed erratic due to insufficient data from Haryana. Further assessments, including a scientific hybrid model by CWPRS, Pune, and a floodplain demarcation map, are slated for completion by August 31, 2026. An Inter-Departmental Monitoring Committee, led by the Chief Secretary, has been formed to improve inter-agency coordination.
II. Details of Important Cases
A. Supreme Court
Is Hindu girl marrying Muslim boy destroying national fabric? Supreme Court rejects plea to ban movie Yadav Ji ki Love Story
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court dismissed a petition seeking a ban on the film, Yadav Ji Ki Love Story, which allegedly depicts a marriage between a Hindu girl and a Muslim boy. The Court upheld freedom of expression, rejecting the idea of judicial censorship based on subjective objections. It found no evidence that the film's release would cause public disorder and cautioned against imposing blanket bans on artistic works due to speculative fears, thus allowing the film to be released.
Supreme Court Decides Century Old Hereditary Pujari Right Dispute In Karnataka Temple
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court resolved a dispute concerning a Karnataka temple, upholding the hereditary rights of specific families to perform daily rituals and services. The decision was based on an analysis of long-standing custom, historical records, and uninterrupted enjoyment of these rights across generations. The Court rejected all competing claims, emphasizing the legal significance of established religious customs that are recognized by the community and are not illegal or contrary to public policy.
Supreme Court closes suo motu case on polluted rivers; says matter should have been left to NGT
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court has closed its 2021 suo motu proceedings concerning polluted rivers, stating that the matter should have been handled by the National Green Tribunal (NGT) to avoid confusion from overlapping cases. The Court directed the NGT to reopen the case, specifically mentioning the Yamuna river pollution, and ensure continuous compliance monitoring with regular status reports. While affirming the right to a clean environment under Article 21, the Supreme Court returned the primary responsibility for examining polluted rivers to the NGT, though appellate judicial review remains available.
Supreme Court Stays Karnataka HC Judgment Nullifying Election Of Congress MLA SN Subbareddy
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court, through a bench of CJI Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, has stayed the Karnataka High Court's decision that had invalidated the 2023 Assembly election of Congress MLA S.N. Subbareddy. The High Court had cancelled Subbareddy's election based on a "corrupt practice" charge for non-disclosure of assets, specifically a liquor business, following a petition by his BJP rival, C. Muniraju. While staying the decision and issuing notice to Muniraju, the Supreme Court directed that Subbareddy be considered a sitting MLA pending the final hearing in September 2026. The bench also questioned the scope of disclosure requirements, specifically whether the "nature of business" must be disclosed under existing legal precedents.
Supreme Court Issues Nationwide Directions To Expand And Reform Open Prisons
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court, through Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, issued comprehensive directives in a Public Interest Litigation concerning prison overcrowding and the underutilization of Open Correctional Institutions (OCIs). Key orders include mandating seven states without functional OCIs to assess their feasibility, ensuring non-discriminatory access for women prisoners, and rationalizing eligibility criteria and disciplinary mechanisms for reform. A High-Powered Committee was formed to establish minimum standards. The Court cited Rajasthan data to highlight the significant cost-effectiveness of OCIs (₹50 vs. ₹3,000 per prisoner per month in closed prisons). Finally, High Courts were instructed to register suo motu writ petitions to monitor compliance with these directions.
Landowners Not Liable For Construction Delay By Developer : Supreme Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court ruled that landowners are not automatically liable for a developer's construction delays. Liability only arises if the landowner has assumed a specific contractual obligation for timely completion. The Court established that mere land ownership does not create vicarious liability for the developer's actions, absent express terms in the development agreement. Delay claims should be settled between the developer and the contracting parties or homebuyers, as extending liability without a contractual basis undermines contract law.
2G Case : Supreme Court Asks Telecom Operator To Pay Spectrum Usage Charges From Date Of Judgment Quashing License
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court, ruling in the 2G spectrum case, has mandated that a telecom operator must pay Spectrum Usage Charges (SUC) starting from the date its license was revoked. This decision aims to compensate for the revenue loss to the exchequer caused by the illegal spectrum grant, asserting that the SUC liability remains due from the annulment date, separate from any penalties, to safeguard state revenue.
UGC Appropriate Authority To Consider Consequences Of Its Orders For Annulment Of Illegal Degrees : Supreme Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court has ruled that the University Grants Commission (UGC), while authorized to annul illegal degrees, must not do so mechanically. Instead, the competent UGC authority is required to independently assess the potential serious ramifications of the annulment on students' academic careers and affiliated institutions. The court stressed that the authority must record reasons, balance regulatory objectivity with procedural fairness, and fully account for the academic stake of the affected students before issuing any annulment orders.
Supreme Court Pulls Up Lawyer For Seeking FIR Against PM And Home Minister Over CAA; Keeps ₹50,000 Costs On Hold
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court, with a bench including CJI Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, severely criticized an advocate for appealing a Rajasthan High Court order. The original petition sought an FIR against the Prime Minister, Home Minister, and others regarding the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019. The Rajasthan High Court had dismissed the plea as "frivolous and an abuse of process," imposing ₹50,000 in costs, with Justice Bagchi stating that "ideological disagreement with a law" is not a basis for a "criminal offence." The Supreme Court held the cost in abeyance indefinitely after the petitioner expressed "regret" and promised to stop such proceedings, noting the cost would be revived upon breach of the undertaking.
'Filed Out Of Vendetta': Supreme Court Dismisses Ex-Judicial Officer's Plea For FIR Against HC Judges Over Compulsory Retirement
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court bench, consisting of CJI Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, dismissed a writ petition filed by former Telangana judicial officer P. Ranjan Kumar. Kumar, who was compulsorily retired, had unsuccessfully challenged the order and later filed a curative petition. Subsequently, he began filing "wide, vague, baseless, frivolous and mysterious allegations" in criminal complaints against former High Court judges regarding his retirement. When police did not register an FIR, he approached the Supreme Court invoking the Lalita Kumari judgment. The Court found "no merit whatsoever in the challenge," dismissing the petition as one filed out of "frustration and personal vendetta."
B. Delhi High Court
Gravity Of Offence Alone Can’t Justify Denial Of Premature Release: Delhi High Court Orders Release Of Bangladeshi Life Convict
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Delhi High Court has ordered the immediate premature release of a Bangladeshi national serving a life sentence, ruling that the gravity of the offence alone cannot justify denying release. The court emphasized that rehabilitation prospects, conduct in custody, and completion of the minimum sentence period must be weighed alongside deterrence and public interest. The denial of release based solely on the nature of the crime was deemed unsustainable.
Delhi High Court Rejects PIL To Reveal Details Of Air India Ahmedabad Crash
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Delhi High Court, comprising Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia, dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) by Suresh Chand Shrivastava. The PIL sought a court order to disclose the exact timeline of the fuel switch and engine flame-out during the Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad last June. The Bench refused to "read down" the preliminary investigation report by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) from July 2025, asserting that the court lacked the expertise to challenge an ongoing aviation investigation. The Court suggested the petitioner could have used the Right to Information (RTI) Act to seek the details.
Delhi High Court Upholds Disaffiliation Of UP Kho Kho Association Over Fictitious Order In Election Process
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Delhi High Court upheld the disaffiliation of the Uttar Pradesh Kho Kho Association (UPKKA) from the Kho Kho Federation of India, declaring its October 2021 elections invalid. The Court ruled that the elections violated the National Sports Code because the returning officer was misled by a fabricated Odisha High Court order into believing the Code did not apply to state associations. This error vitiated the entire process, including procedural steps and eligibility requirements, as members failed to meet tenure norms and lacked necessary No Objection Certificates (NOCs).
Delhi High Court Refuses To Entertain Appeal Over Manish Sisodia's 2020 Election Win Citing Lack Of Maintainability
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Delhi High Court's Division Bench upheld Manish Sisodia's 2020 Delhi Assembly election victory by dismissing an appeal against a Single Judge's judgment. The court ruled that the appeal, filed under Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, was not maintainable because this section does not allow an appeal against an election petition dismissal on merits unless a substantial question of law is involved. As no such question was raised, the original judgment validating Sisodia's election was affirmed.
C. Gujarat High Court
Unmarried Woman Can’t Be Denied Public Employment Over Fear That She May Relocate After Marriage: Gujarat High Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Gujarat High Court ruled that denying a single woman public employment based on the speculative premise of future marriage and relocation is discriminatory and violates equality principles. The court emphasized that meritorious candidates cannot be dismissed due to such personal considerations. The authorities were ordered to verify the original petitioner's degree certificate and, if genuine, appoint her; otherwise, the post should be offered to the next eligible candidate within one month.
D. Manipur High Court
Right To Effective Representation Cannot Be Time-Barred Under National Security Act: Manipur High Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Manipur High Court quashed a preventive detention order under the National Security Act, 1980, on multiple grounds. The Court ruled that imposing a three-week deadline for a detenu to file a representation to the Central Government violates Article 22(5) of the Constitution, as the right to effective representation lasts for the entire detention period. It also emphasized that Section 10 of the Act requires the State Government to place any detenu's representation before the Advisory Board. Finally, the Court found the detaining authority's recorded 'satisfaction' lacked necessary supporting material.
E. Calcutta High Court
Deity's Title Cannot Be Defeated By Adverse Possession Claims Against ‘Sebait’/Manager: Calcutta High Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Calcutta High Court recently ruled that a deity's title to property cannot be defeated by a claim of adverse possession. The court stated that, under Hindu religious law, a deity's rights and title are immune from extinguishment by adverse possession because the deity cannot physically possess or exclude others, rendering the doctrine inapplicable. This ruling protects the de jure rights of the deity regardless of how long the temple's manager (sebait) or any other party has occupied the property.
F. Kerala High Court
Kerala High Court Grants Bail To Alleged LTTE Operative In NIA Terror Funding Case After Four Years in Custody
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Kerala High Court granted bail to a Sri Lankan refugee, despite serious charges under the IPC, UAPA, Arms Act, and NDPS Act related to an alleged conspiracy to revive the LTTE through narco-arms trafficking. The Court's Division Bench allowed the appeal, noting that the complex trial was highly unlikely to conclude before December 2027, even though the accused had been in custody since October 2021. The ruling, while imposing stringent conditions, affirmed that the fundamental "right to a speedy trial under Article 21" is paramount, overriding relevant UAPA sections (43-D(5) and (7)), and crucially, that this right extends to non-citizens.
G. Karnataka High Court
Karnataka High Court closes suo motu PIL on Chinnaswamy Stadium Stampede
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Karnataka High Court has closed a suo motu PIL initiated after the fatal stampede outside Chinnaswamy Stadium in June 2025. The Court's decision was based on the State Government introducing the Karnataka Crowd Control Bill, 2025, and a Standard Operating Protocol (SOP) for crowd management. The Court mandated the immediate implementation of the SOP until the Bill is officially enacted by the State Assembly, and reserved the right to reopen the case if issues persist after the Bill becomes law.
H. Allahabad High Court
Interfaith Marriage, Live-in Relationship Not Prohibited By UP’s Anti-Conversion Law: Allahabad High Court
Source: Click Here
Development: The Allahabad High Court recently clarified that the Uttar Pradesh anti-conversion law (Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act) is directed exclusively at forced or fraudulent conversions and does not prohibit consensual adult interfaith marriages or live-in relationships. The Court emphasized that marriage between adults is a matter of personal liberty protected by the Constitution, ensuring the law does not unduly restrict civil liberties.
‘Don't Post Against Country’s Reputation’: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To Man Who Posted ‘Pakistan Zindabad’ After Pahalgam Attack
Source: Click Here
Development: Justice Arun Singh Deshwal granted bail to Faizan, arrested by Etah police in May 2025 for allegedly posting 'Pakistan Zindabad' on Instagram following the Pahalgam attack, booked under provisions of the BNS including the erstwhile sedition offence under Section 152. The accused's counsel argued that merely supporting an enemy country does not attract Section 152 BNS, as the post was not derogatory to India. Granting bail after nine months in custody, the Court imposed a condition restraining him from uploading any content against the reputation of the country or any community, warning that breach would lead to cancellation of bail.
I. Punjab and Haryana High Court
P&H High Court Gives Clean Chit To Ex-CM Bhupinder Hooda, Sonia Gandhi's AJIL Company In Panchkula Land Allotment Case
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed the criminal proceedings in the Panchkula land allotment case, quashing the charges against former Haryana Chief Minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda, AJIL Pharma, and other co-accused. The Court found that the prosecution lacked sufficient evidence, stating the allegations of criminal misconduct and conspiracy were "wholly unsupported by material on record." The High Court specifically noted the prosecution's failure to establish mens rea (corrupt intent), concluding that any procedural violations did not constitute "cognisable offences." As a result, the FIRs and charge-sheets were quashed, and the case was closed.
J. Bombay High Court
Bombay High Court Lifts Stay On RBI Circular On Fraud, Permits Banks To Resume Action Against Anil Ambani
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Bombay High Court's Division Bench, in the case of Bank of Baroda v. Anil Ambani & Ors., overturned a single-judge order by Justice Milind Jadhav, branding it "perverse and illegal." This ruling lifted the stay that had prevented a consortium of lenders (Bank of Baroda, IDBI Bank, and Indian Overseas Bank) and BDO India LLP from acting against Anil Ambani under the RBI's 2024 Master Directions on fraud classification. The original stay was based on the alleged invalidity of the October 2020 forensic audit report due to the signatory not being registered with the ICAI. The Division Bench denied Ambani's request for a four-week stay on its judgment, stating it would be "perpetuating the illegality."
Bombay High Court Quashes PMLA Case Against Lawyer In Anil Deshmukh Corruption Row
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Bombay High Court quashed a money laundering case filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) against lawyer Kishore Pessulal Dewani, which was linked to the corruption allegations against former Maharashtra Home Minister Anil Deshmukh. The Court ruled that the ED failed to establish a connection (nexus) between Dewani’s property transactions (2005-2007) and the alleged proceeds of crime generated much later (2020-2021). It set aside the special PMLA court’s order, noting that properties purchased between 2004 and 2008 could not be “ex facie linked to alleged tainted funds.”.
Can A Student Be Expelled From School For Non-Payment Of Fees During Elementary Education? Bombay High Court Answers
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court, comprising Justice Anil Kilor and Justice Raj Wakode, ordered the immediate reinstatement of a 13-year-old girl who had been illegally expelled from school for failing to pay fees. The Division Bench deemed the school's action "arbitrary and illegal," referencing the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, which specifically forbids the expulsion of students at the elementary level over fee non-payment. The court underscored the paramount importance of education while disposing of the petition with these directives.
K. Madras High Court
Generating Tatkal Tickets For Out-Of-Turn Passengers Without Collecting Fare Is Misconduct: Madras High Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Madras High Court, through a Bench of Justice C.V. Karthikeyan and Justice K. Kumaresh Babu, has ruled that a railway employee committed serious misconduct by generating Tatkal tickets for out-of-turn passengers without collecting the required Tatkal fare. The Court determined this action violated both railway ticketing regulations and the Railway Service (Conduct) Rules, thus warranting disciplinary punishment.
L. Patna High Court
Disqualification Clauses Must Be Strictly Construed, Cannot Be Expanded Beyond Advertisement: Patna HC Upholds Grant Of IOCL Dealership
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Patna High Court recently clarified that a pending criminal case, before charges are framed, does not automatically disqualify a candidate from a petroleum dealership allotment, such as one advertised by Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. The Court stressed that the advertisement's terms are the definitive guide for disqualification and cannot be expanded by the application form. Ultimately, the Court refused to intervene due to principles of non-interference, the delay in the challenge, and the substantial investments already made.
M. Jammu and Kashmir High Court
‘PSA Invoked Like A Traffic Challan’': Jammu & Kashmir High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh has ordered the immediate release of Shabir Ahmad, quashing his preventive detention order as "illegal from inception" due to a "complete non-application of mind" by the District Magistrate, Anantnag. The court found that the DM's April 2024 order under the J&K Public Safety Act was a "mechanical reproduction" of the police dossier, lacking independent review. Despite being detained for alleged links to a UAPA accused, Ahmad was neither an accused nor an undertrial in the related FIR and had been previously released due to insufficient evidence. He was ordered to be freed after nearly two years in custody.
'No Sense Of Responsibility': J&K High Court Slams Srinagar DM For 'Absurd' Preventive Detention Order, Quashes PSA Detention
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Jammu and Kashmir High Court, through Justice Rahul Bharti, quashed the preventive detention of Kashmir resident Muzaffar Farooq Mir, who had been held since May 2025 under the J&K Public Safety Act. The Court found the detention order, issued by the District Magistrate (DM) Srinagar, to suffer from a complete "absence of application of mind." Specific flaws included the DM incorrectly stating a prior detention date as '2024' instead of '2022' and an "absurd" contradiction in ordering detention on grounds of State security while alleging activities adverse to public order. The Court also noted that the counter-affidavit simply copied the original grounds of detention.
IV. Appointments, Collegium Recommendations, And Transfers Section
Taken together, these developments highlight how several policy and governance questions increasingly reach the courts even when they originate in the executive or legislative domain. Issues relating to electoral administration, regulatory frameworks, environmental compliance, and investigative procedures continue to draw judicial scrutiny, often influencing the pace and direction of government decision-making. The week’s proceedings therefore illustrate the complex interaction between judicial oversight and executive governance, where legal challenges can shape how public policy is implemented and contested.