From January 5 to 10, 2026, courts across India addressed stray animal management, water contamination in Indore, impeachment procedures for judges, and multiple bail decisions in high-profile cases
Judgement Junction presents key legal developments from the past week. Supreme Court denied bail to Sharjeel Imam and Umar Khalid in the 2020 Delhi riots case under UAPA while granting bail to five others subject to 12 conditions. Madras High Court stayed release of a book targeting Justice G.R. Swaminathan over his Karthigai Deepam ruling at Thiruparankundram Hills and upheld permission for the ritual despite state law-and-order claims. Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled Article 21 includes clean drinking water, ordering Indore authorities to halt contaminated supply and fix accountability.
I. Key Legal Developments:
‘Why Stray Dogs Needed In Institutions? Can Anyone Identify Which Dog Is In A Mood To Bite?’ Supreme Court Asks
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court conducted a three-day suo moto hearing on stray dogs and cattle, focusing on public safety and law enforcement. The Court clarified its orders were limited to the removal of stray dogs from institutional premises (schools, hospitals, courts, railway stations), while public streets remain under the Capture, Sterilize, Vaccinate, Release (CSVR) model. Dog feeders alleging harassment were directed to lodge FIRs. The Bench raised concerns over State non-compliance, the alignment of the AWBI SOP with ABC Rules, and the impracticality of mass sheltering. It also highlighted the dangers of stray cattle and the ecological impact of feral dogs. Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi urged the Court to engage domain experts. The next hearing is scheduled for January 13, 2026.
Supreme Court Reserves Judgement On Justice Yashwant Varma's Plea Challenging Lok Sabha Inquiry Committee's Formation
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has reserved its judgement on a petition filed by Justice Yashwant Varma. The plea challenges the Lok Sabha Speaker's establishment of an inquiry committee, under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, in connection with impeachment proceedings initiated after unaccounted cash was found at the Justice's residence. A Bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Satish Chandra Sharma examined whether the committee's formation violated Section 3(2) of the Act, which requires joint constitution when impeachment notices are moved in both Houses of Parliament on the same day.
Article 21 Includes Right To Clean Drinking Water: MP High Court Asks State To Stop Supply From Contaminated Sources In Indore
Source: Click Here
Development: The Madhya Pradesh High Court directed the State and the Indore Municipal Corporation to take immediate and long-term action following deaths and illnesses caused by contaminated water in Indore. The court affirmed that the right to life includes the right to clean drinking water under Article 21. Immediate orders included stopping contaminated supply, providing safe tanker water, and offering free medical treatment. Long-term mandates involve water quality testing, pipeline repairs, online monitoring, and preparing a water safety plan. The court also sought replies regarding accountability.
I-PAC Raid Case: West Bengal Govt Moves Supreme Court, Files Caveat Against ED Action
Source: Click Here
Development: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has requested the Calcutta High Court to order a CBI probe against West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee in connection with a 2020 coal smuggling money-laundering case. The ED's request is due to alleged interference by Banerjee, including the removal of documents and electronic devices, during PMLA searches at premises linked to the political consulting firm I-PAC and its co-founder, Pratik Jain. After a disrupted High Court hearing, the West Bengal Government filed a caveat before the Supreme Court to ensure it is heard before any adverse order is passed.
Manipur Violence: Supreme Court Orders Forensic Examination Of Entire Audio Clip & Admitted Voice Recordings Of Ex-CM Biren Singh
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has issued a directive to the Union Government regarding the 48-minute audio recording that allegedly implicates former Manipur Chief Minister N. Biren Singh in the 2023 Manipur ethnic violence. The Court ordered the government to send the complete audio recording, along with the former Chief Minister’s admitted voice samples and other recordings provided by the petitioner, to the National Forensic Sciences University, Gandhinagar, for forensic examination. Furthermore, the Court instructed the University to expedite the process and submit its report in a sealed cover. The petitioner was also required to share the full audio with the Government for its onward transmission to the University.
“Won't Forgive Without Apology”: Madras HC On Authorities Defying Orders To Light Lamp At Thiruparankundram Hill
Source: Click Here
Development: The Madras High Court strongly criticized State authorities for their deliberate non-compliance and inaction regarding orders concerning the Thiruparankundram hill, specifically their failure to fully implement judicial directions on the Karthigai Deepam lighting and the temple's rights. The Court specifically objected to the issuance of prohibitory orders that undermined its directions and the failure to take legal action, including filing a criminal complaint, over the alleged unauthorized hoisting of a dargah flag on temple property. The High Court warned that defiance would not be tolerated and demanded an explanation from the responsible officials.
Citizenship Row : ‘Get ED Authorisation First’: Lucknow Court Returns Sealed Cover In Plea Seeking FIR Against Rahul Gandhi
Source: Click Here
Development: A Special MP/MLA Court in Lucknow rejected the request by BJP member S. Vignesh Shishir to accept sealed confidential documents seeking an FIR against Rahul Gandhi over alleged British citizenship. ACJM Alok Verma refused to open the documents, citing the lack of proper written authorization or an affidavit from the Enforcement Directorate (ED), stating that mere oral claims of permission were insufficient. The court also corrected the petitioner's claim that the Allahabad High Court had accepted the citizenship allegation, clarifying that the High Court had only recorded arguments, not ruled on the merits of the case.
Sonam Wangchuk's Speech Appealing For Peace Suppressed From Detaining Authority : Sibal Tells Supreme Court; Plays Video Of Speech
Source: Click Here
Development: Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal argued in the Supreme Court that Sonam Wangchuk’s National Security Act (NSA) detention was void due to malice, violating Article 22. Representing Wangchuk in a habeas corpus petition, Sibal claimed the detaining authority failed to provide crucial videos it relied upon and deliberately suppressed a video of Wangchuk making a peace appeal. The Court permitted Sibal to play the peace appeal video in open court to support his contention.
Madras High Court Stays Release Of Book Allegedly Targeting Justice GR Swaminathan
Source: Click Here
Development: The Madras High Court, through a Bench led by Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Srivastava and Justice Arul Murugan, has stayed the release, circulation, and sale of a book it found to be highly derogatory towards Justice G.R. Swaminathan. The Court ruled that while judicial pronouncements can be criticized, personal attacks on a sitting judge are not protected under free speech, especially with the book's planned release at the Chennai Book Fair. To protect judicial dignity, the Court ordered the seizure of the books and initiated contempt proceedings against the publisher.
TMC MP Derek O Brien Moves Supreme Court For Extension Of West Bengal SIR Deadline; Alleges Procedural Irregularities By ECI
Source: Click Here
Development: TMC MP Derek O’Brien has petitioned the Supreme Court, seeking an extension for the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of West Bengal's electoral rolls, alleging serious procedural irregularities by the Election Commission of India (ECI). His key accusations against the ECI include: using WhatsApp for instructions to Booth Level Officers (BLOs); restricting Booth Level Agents (BLAs); improperly rejecting valid voter documents; using an undisclosed software reportedly based on 2002 rolls; introducing a "logical discrepancy" category impacting an estimated 1.36 crore voters; flagging the mass deletion of over 58 lakh names; citing technical issues with the AERO App; and hiring a private vendor with a history of problems.
‘Producers Tried To Put Pressure’: Madras High Court Stays Order Directing CBFC To Grant U/A Certificate To Vijay's ‘Jana Nayagan’ Film
Source: Click Here
Development: The Madras High Court's Division Bench stayed a single judge's order that had directed the CBFC to immediately issue a U/A certificate for the Tamil film Jana Nayagan. The Bench ruled that the Union of India and the CBFC were not given adequate time to respond and criticized the producers for creating "artificial urgency" by setting a release date before obtaining proper certification. The Court noted that the CBFC Chairperson's letter was not specifically challenged in the petition and listed the appeal for further hearing on 21st January.
Supreme Court Allows West Bengal Part-Time Teachers Seeking Equal Pay As Full-Time Teachers To Make Fresh Representation
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court addressed a contempt petition by allowing part-time teachers in West Bengal to submit new representations to the Secretary, School Education Department, concerning their request for pay parity with full-time teachers. The Court mandated the competent authority to provide a hearing, review relevant service records, and issue a comprehensive, reasoned order within four months. It was further clarified that any adverse decision remains subject to legal challenge.
Delhi-NCR Air Pollution: Supreme Court Slams CAQM For Lax Approach, Seeks Report On Causes & Long Term Solutions
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court, led by CJI Surya Kant, heavily criticized the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) for its "unserious" approach to tackling Delhi-NCR air pollution and the lack of a clear assessment of pollution sources. The Court has directed the CAQM to immediately convene domain experts to reconcile conflicting data on emission sources and submit a comprehensive, public report detailing the causes of Air Quality Index (AQI) deterioration and proposing long-term remedial measures. Additionally, the Court criticized civic bodies like the Municipal Corporation of Delhi for focusing on revenue, such as from toll plazas, rather than constructive pollution solutions.
IRCTC Scam: Delhi High Court Issues Notice On Lalu Prasad Yadav's Plea Against Framing Of Charges
Source: Click Here
Development: The Delhi High Court has sought a response from the CBI regarding a petition filed by Lalu Prasad Yadav. His petition challenges the trial court's decision to frame charges against him in the alleged IRCTC scam. This "land-for-contracts" case involves allegations that the contracts for the operation and maintenance of IRCTC hotels were manipulated to favor specific private entities. In return for these favors, land and/or company shares were allegedly transferred to individuals and entities connected to Yadav's family at undervalued rates. The High Court has ordered the CBI to file its reply before the next hearing.
Supreme Court Asks Haryana Government If Case Against Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad Can Be Closed
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has given the Haryana Government six weeks to decide on a one-time act of leniency in the criminal case against Ashoka University Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad, which relates to his social media posts on Operation Sindoor. A Bench noted that although a chargesheet was filed in August 2025, sanction to prosecute is still pending. The Court suggested that if the State agrees to deny the sanction and close the case, the merits of the case would not need to be examined, but the professor is expected to act responsibly going forward.
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Challenging Practice Of Prime Minister Offering Chadar At Ajmer Sharif Dargah
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the Prime Minister’s practice of offering a chadar and providing State-sponsored ceremonial honour at the Ajmer Sharif Dargah, ruling that the reliefs sought were not justiciable. This decision, which followed Union Minister Kiren Rijiju offering the chadar for the Prime Minister during the 814th Urs in December 2025, does not affect a separate, pending civil suit regarding site claims.
Kerala High Court Satisfied With SIT Probe Into Sabarimala Gold Theft, Grants Six-Week Extension
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court reviewed the status report on the Sabarimala gold theft case investigation, commending the Special Investigation Team's (SIT) progress, which includes out-of-state inquiries, recovery of documentary evidence, the arrest of 9 accused, and examination of 181 witnesses. The Division Bench granted the SIT an additional six weeks to conclude the probe, authorized the continuation of scientific testing, and suggested a potential willingness to reinforce the SIT if required.
Abu Salem Moves Bombay High Court Seeking 14-Days Emergency Parole Leave To Mourn Brother's Death
Source: Click Here
Development: The Bombay High Court has requested a response from the Maharashtra Government concerning a plea for 14 days’ emergency parole filed by Abu Salem, a convict in the 1993 Mumbai bomb blasts case, following the death of his elder brother. A bench of Justices Ajay Gadkari and Shyam Chandak adjourned the matter for a week for the State’s reply, despite questioning the delay in filing the petition. Salem’s petition claims jail authorities improperly delayed and rejected both his emergency and regular parole applications, despite his eligibility.
Delhi Court Pulls BJP MLA Karnail Singh For 'Exaggerated' Claims About Recoveries From AAP’s Satyendar Jain During ED Raid
Source: Click Here
Development: A Delhi court has taken cognizance of a criminal defamation complaint filed by AAP leader Satyendar Jain against BJP MLA Karnail Singh. The complaint is based on statements Singh made during the 2025 Delhi Assembly election campaign. The court found Singh's claims of recovering "37 kg gold and 1100 acres of property" from Jain during a 2022 ED raid appeared "exaggerated and unsupported by public records." The court observed that Singh failed to verify the facts and directed the issuance of process against him, stating that any defenses can be considered during the trial.
Delhi Court Frames Charges Against Lalu Yadav, Rabri, Tejashwi, Tej Pratap, Others In Railways Land-For-Jobs Case
Source: Click Here
Development: The Rouse Avenue Court has framed charges of corruption and criminal conspiracy against RJD chief Lalu Prasad Yadav, his wife Rabri Devi, and children Tejashwi Yadav, Tej Pratap Yadav, and Misa Bharti, along with others, in the Railways land-for-jobs case. The Court rejected discharge pleas, asserting that public employment in the Railways was allegedly offered as a quid pro quo for acquiring land parcels for the Lalu Yadav family.
“Take It Seriously”: Delhi High Court Raps Centre Over Lax Attitude In New Delhi Railway Station Stampede Case
Source: Click Here
Development: The Delhi High Court has severely criticized the Centre and Indian Railways for their negligent delay in responding to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed after the deadly New Delhi Railway Station stampede in February 2025. A Bench led by Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya noted that the Railways failed to submit a required affidavit for nearly a year. The Court has now strongly directed the Railways to file a detailed response within four weeks, outlining specific steps to prevent overcrowding and stampedes.
CJI Surya Kant Inaugurates First Fully Paperless District Judiciary At Kerala's Wayanad, Says It 'Democratises' Access To Justice
Source: Click Here
Development: India's first fully paperless district judiciary was virtually inaugurated in Kalpetta, Wayanad, by Chief Justice of India, Shri Surya Kant. The initiative transitioned the entire judicial district to end-to-end digital functioning, utilizing the in-house developed District Court Case Management System (DCMS) for electronic filing, scrutiny, and record access. The Chief Justice praised the move for promoting "green jurisprudence" and enhancing transparency, accountability, and access to justice, stating that courts now function as a pervasive public service beyond physical spaces.
PIL In Calcutta High Court Flags 'Hazardous' AQI In Kolkata; Seek GRAP, Urgent State Action To Protect Right To Clean Air
Source: Click Here
Development: A Public Interest Litigation has been filed before the Calcutta High Court flagging very poor to hazardous AQI levels in the Kolkata–Howrah region and seeking urgent State intervention. The plea highlights the absence of a Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP) despite prior representations, and seeks recognition of recurring high AQI as a public health emergency, along with enforceable measures to protect the right to clean air under Articles 21 and 47. The matter is likely to be listed next week.
Gujarat High Court Asks State Government To Submit Current Policy On Remission & Premature Release Of Convicts
Source: Click Here
Development: The Gujarat High Court has requested the State Government to submit the current policy regarding the remission and premature release of convicts. This action is part of a mandate where the Court's Bench was formed to monitor and supervise compliance with directions previously issued by the Supreme Court on this matter. The Court specifically sought copies of the existing remission policy and a compliance report to ascertain whether Gujarat has adhered to the Supreme Court’s mandates. The case has been listed for further hearing.
Setback For Sharad Pawar’s Grandson, Bombay High Court Stays Elections Of Maharashtra Cricket Association Amid ‘Nepotism’ Allegations
Source: Click Here
Development: The Bombay High Court has temporarily stayed the Maharashtra Cricket Association (MCA) elections, originally scheduled for January 6th, 2026, following a petition by former cricketer Kedar Jadhav. The stay is due to allegations of nepotism, favouritism, the sudden addition of 400 members to the voter list, and non-adherence to Supreme Court and Lodha Committee recommendations. The next hearing is set for February 4th, with all parties required to file affidavits by February 3rd.
‘You Took 23 Years To Wake Up?’: Supreme Court Slams Uttarakhand Over Forest Land Encroachments
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has strongly criticized the Uttarakhand Government for the extensive, systematic encroachment of forest land since the state's formation in 2000, questioning the two-decade delay in action. A Bench led by CJI Surya Kant held all executive officers accountable, suggesting possible collusion and connivance in the "systematic grabbing." The Court has maintained its ban on construction and sale of the disputed land and ordered the State to submit a comprehensive affidavit within two weeks detailing the extent of encroachment, the nature of constructions, and site plans.
Sand Mining Under Guise Of Flood Control? Kerala High Court Constitutes Committee For Thottappally Spillway
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court has ruled that flood control measures cannot be a pretext for routine sand mining, directing the State Government to implement an ecology-focused system for regulating the removal of sand and soil at the Thottappally Spillway. A Division Bench, led by Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar, highlighted coastal erosion and damage to turtle nesting habitats. To address this, the Court ordered the formation of a multi-departmental expert committee, headed by the Alappuzha District Collector, to assess the ecological impact, determine permissible quantities, and monitor all future removal activities.
Supreme Court Questions Maintainability Of Telangana’s Writ Petition Challenging Andhra’s Polavaram Irrigation Project
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court is hearing a petition filed by Telangana against Andhra Pradesh concerning the Polavaram irrigation project. Telangana alleges Andhra Pradesh is proceeding with the project's expansion and linking works without mandatory approvals. The Court questioned the suitability of a writ petition for this inter-state water dispute, suggesting an original suit or mediation might be better. Given the project's national status, the Court directed that objections must be raised with the competent committee and the Union Government. The Court declined to grant interim relief and scheduled the next hearing for the following week.
Slain BSP Leader Armstrong's Wife Seeks Transfer Of Her CBI Probe Plea From Madras High Court To Supreme Court
Source: Click Here
Development: Mrs. Porkodi, the widow of slain Dalit activist and BSP leader K. Armstrong, has petitioned the Supreme Court to transfer her plea from the Madras High Court to the Supreme Court. Her petition requests a CBI inquiry into her husband's murder, citing significant lapses in the State police investigation. She seeks the transfer so that her plea can be heard alongside the State of Tamil Nadu's challenge to a High Court order that already directed a CBI transfer, thereby preventing parallel proceedings and inconsistent judicial orders.
Andhra Pradesh High Court Pulls Up Education Department Officials For Not Implementing Its Orders
Source: Click Here
Development: The Andhra Pradesh High Court has initiated suo motu contempt proceedings against B. Srinivas Rao, Project Director of the Sarva Siksha Abhiyan, for failing to implement court orders regarding part-time PGTs in Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalayas (KGBVs). A Bench of Justices Battu Devanand and Hari Haranatha Sharma criticized education department officials for showing "scant respect" to court orders, noting that teachers were transferred and switched to hourly pay despite clear judicial directions. The Project Director has been summoned to appear before the Court to explain the failure to implement the orders "in true letter and spirit."
Supreme Court Hearing On SIR: Article 324 Grants ECI Control Over Preparing Electoral Rolls, Argues Rakesh Dwivedi
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court recently heard arguments regarding the challenges to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. Senior Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, representing the Election Commission of India (ECI), defended the ECI’s authority, citing Articles 324 and 327 of the Constitution as conferring exclusive control over electoral roll preparation and revision. Dwivedi refuted the petitioners’ claim that the Central Government should address such issues. He also rejected any comparison between the SIR and the NRC, emphasizing that citizenship verification is fundamental to electoral integrity. The case is scheduled to be heard again on 7th January, 2025.
OBC Youth Forced To Wash Another's Feet : Supreme Court Orders Release Of Accused Detained Under National Security Act
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has ordered the immediate release of an individual detained under the National Security Act (NSA) in connection with an incident where an OBC youth was allegedly forced to wash another person's feet. A Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta stayed the Madhya Pradesh High Court's suo motu direction that had led to the preventive detention. The Supreme Court observed that the essential elements of Section 3 of the NSA were prima facie not met and expressed concerns about the "hasty invocation of the NSA," noting the detention may have been ordered before the High Court's directions were officially uploaded.
Delhi High Court Stays NHAI Termination Notice, Protecting Roadway Solutions ₹ 104 crore Bonds In Delhi-Mumbai Expressway Dispute
Source: Click Here
Development: The Delhi High Court has granted interim relief to Roadway Solutions India Infra Limited (RSIL) against the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The Court stayed NHAI's Notice of Intent to Terminate (NITT) a package of the Delhi–Mumbai Expressway and restrained NHAI from invoking insurance surety bonds worth approximately ₹104 crore until the next hearing. RSIL successfully argued that NHAI had not fully met its land availability obligations and that premature termination would cause irreversible financial harm.
Andhra Pradesh High Court Seeks Details On Backward Caste (BC) Census Commission For Local Body Elections
Source: Click Here
Development: The Andhra Pradesh High Court has instructed the State Government to provide details regarding the establishment of a dedicated commission for conducting a BC caste census specifically in the context of local body elections. Justice Ravi Cheemalapati limited the scope of the hearing to local body elections, addressing a petition that initially sought to link the completion of the BC census to both local body polls and reservations in education and employment. The court has requested information on the commission's constitution and scheduled the matter for a further hearing on 19th January.
Telangana High Court Pulls Up State Govt Over Delay In Filing Counter To Plea On Shifting Of Osmania General Hospital
Source: Click Here
Development: The Telangana High Court, through Chief Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh and Justice G.M. Mohiuddin, strongly criticized the State Government for failing to file counter-affidavits in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the relocation of Osmania General Hospital (OGH) to Goshamahal. The Court warned that costs would be imposed for continued delay. Additionally, the Court permitted a challenge to GO Ms. No. 115, which sanctioned the allotment of 31.39 acres of Government land for the new hospital construction. The case has been adjourned for three weeks.
BMC To Bombay High Court: Requisitioned Court Staff For Election Duty Due To ‘inadvertent Misreading’ Of SEC Order
Source: Click Here
Development: The Bombay High Court addressed the requisition of subordinate court staff for civic poll duty by the BMC. The BMC Commissioner explained that the action was an "inadvertent misreading" of the State Election Commission (SEC) order, admitting a failure to distinguish between Government and court staff due to increased manpower needs for the 2026 local body polls. The SEC clarified that staffing for local body elections is governed by state laws and SEC guidelines, not the Representation of the People Act.
Supreme Court Seeks Report From HCs On Formation Of Committees Across Courts/ Tribunals & Bar Bodies To Address Sexual Harassment
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, has taken action to enforce the proper handling of sexual harassment complaints against women and transgender persons within the judicial system. The Court has requested status reports from all High Courts on the establishment of mandatory Gender Sensitisation Committees and Internal Complaints Committees (ICCs). This directive stems from a writ petition on the implementation of the Vishaka Guidelines, following reports of significant non-compliance, particularly the absence of ICCs in several High Courts, District Courts, tribunals, and Bar Associations.
Delhi Riots Larger Conspiracy Case: Court Asks Police To Verify Sureties Of Four Accused Granted Bail, Release Likely Today
Source: Click Here
Development: In the ongoing proceedings related to the alleged “larger conspiracy” behind the 2020 North-East Delhi riots, two parallel developments unfolded before Delhi courts. Activist Sharjeel Imam told the trial court that claims of Umar Khalid being his mentor or of any conspiracy or coordination between them during the CAA protests are false, with his counsel arguing that there is no material showing planning, instructions, or advocacy of violence despite the invocation of UAPA. Separately, following a Supreme Court order, a Delhi court directed the police to verify sureties for four accused, Gulfisha Fatima, Meeran Haider, Shifa Ur Rehman and Mohd Saleem Khan, granted bail in the same larger conspiracy case, with their release expected upon completion of verification. Their bail is subject to strict conditions, including restrictions on public meetings and political activity, while some key accused continue to remain in custody.
HC Plea Alleges Speaker Rahul Narwekar Interfered In BMC Election Nominations
Source: Click Here
Development: Independent candidates challenging the BMC election results have filed a petition with the Bombay High Court. They claim the returning officer improperly rejected their nomination forms, allegedly under the direct influence of Maharashtra Assembly Speaker Rahul Narwekar. The candidates assert they completed all formalities before the December 30th deadline but were deliberately delayed and then forced out. They are requesting the court order the acceptance of their nominations, an inquiry into the incident, and criminal and departmental action against the returning officer. The High Court has agreed to hear the matter within four working days, before the January 15th polls.
Pune Porsche Hit & Run Case : Supreme Court Issues Notice On Bail Pleas Of Two Businessmen Accused Of Replacing Blood Samples
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has sought a response regarding the bail applications of businessmen Ashish Mittal and Aditya Sood, who are accused of evidence tampering, specifically, swapping the minor driver's blood samples in the 2024 Pune Porsche hit-and-run case. The Bombay High Court had previously denied their bail, citing a strong initial case suggesting criminal conspiracy, forgery, and bribery.Have Demarcated Areas For Relocation Of Demolition-Affected Residents Of Kogilu Layout: State Tells Karnataka High Court
Source: Click Here
Development: The Karnataka Government informed the High Court that it has designated three temporary relocation sites for approximately 300 families (3,000 people) displaced by the December 20th demolition of homes in Wasim Colony and Fakir Colony, Kogilu Layout. The state assured the court it would provide temporary shelter, food, and basic amenities. While the State claimed the structures were on Government property, the petitioners argued the demolition was a violation of due process as it occurred without notice.
Form District-Level Panels To End ‘Orderly’ System In Police Dept: Madras HC To T.N. Home Secretary
Source: Click Here
Development: The Madras High Court has ordered the Home Secretary to form district-level committees, led by Collectors, within two weeks to enforce the ban on the "orderly system." This colonial-era practice forces uniformed police officers to perform personal chores for senior officers, despite an official 1979 government order abolishing it. The new committees will inspect, collect complaints, and ensure the ban's implementation, reinforcing the High Court's repeated condemnations of the practice as unconstitutional and detrimental to police integrity.
Supreme Court Grants Interim Protection To Singer Neha Rathore In Case Over Posts On PM Narendra Modi, Pahalgam Terror Attack
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court provided folk singer Neha Singh Rathore interim protection from arrest and issued a notice on her plea challenging the Allahabad High Court's refusal of anticipatory bail. The case is related to an FIR filed over her social media posts concerning Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Pahalgam terror attack. The court directed that no coercive steps be taken against her, contingent on her cooperating with the investigation and appearing before the Investigating Officer, starting from January 19th.
Karnataka High Court Asks Winzo To Appear Before Police & Record Statement After Woman Alleges Misuse Of PAN Card On Gaming App
Source: Click Here
Development: The Karnataka High Court has directed the online gaming company, Winzo Games Private Limited, to appear before the police and record a statement regarding a criminal case. The case involves allegations that PAN card details were misused on the company's gaming platform. While allowing a limited investigation solely for taking the company's statement, the Court maintained its interim order protecting the company from any other coercive action. This limited permission was granted due to the prosecution's argument that the case might involve broader issues of identity theft and misuse.
Delhi High Court Orders State To Formulate Welfare Scheme For Advocates' Clerks In 6 Weeks
Source: Click Here
Development: The Delhi High Court has ordered both the Delhi and Union Governments to decide on a welfare scheme for advocates' clerks within six weeks. The Court rejected the Delhi Government's argument that lawyers should support their clerks, asserting that bar clerks perform essential functions tied to the dispensation of justice and are distinct from clerks in other professions. The Delhi Government was specifically directed to formulate a scheme within the timeframe, considering schemes from other states, while the Court also noted the Union Government's continued inaction.
Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Government Order To Constitute Panels To Regulate Private School Fees
Source: Click Here
Development: The Delhi High Court, with a bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia, refused to stay the Delhi Government's notification requiring private schools to form school-level fee regulation committees under the Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees) Act, 2025. However, the Court extended the compliance deadlines: the new date for forming the committees is January 20th (extended from January 10th), and the deadline for submitting proposed fees is now February 5th.
Plea before Kerala High Court Alleges Encroachment Of Kerala University's Land By CPI(M)
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by a retired Kerala University official regarding the alleged encroachment of university land in Thiruvananthapuram by the CPI(M) and the AKG Memorial Research Centre. Justice C. Jayachandran ruled that the petitioner lacked a legally recognisable private interest in the assignment of university property. Consequently, the Court held that such an issue could only be examined as a public interest litigation (PIL) and directed the Registry to refer the matter to the appropriate PIL Bench.
Gujarat High Court Asks State Authority To Grant Personal Hearing Over Removal Of Religious Structure Allegedly Encroaching Water Body
Source: Click Here
Development: The Gujarat High Court, through Justice Mauna M Bhatt, mandated the concerned municipal authority to grant the petitioners a personal hearing and consider their objections before proceeding with any action based on a notice for the removal of an alleged encroachment. The alleged structure was claimed to be an ancient Dargah built over a water body. Justice Bhatt observed that despite the petitioners submitting detailed objections, they had not been given a hearing. The Court further clarified that the petitioners could present additional grounds and documents during the hearing, and the authority must then issue a reasoned decision after thorough consideration.
PIL In Delhi High Court Flags Speeding E-Rickshaws; Seeks Cap On Registrations, Adherence To Traffic Rules
Source: Click Here
Development: The Delhi High Court recently took cognizance of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) concerning e-rickshaws in the national capital, specifically highlighting alleged regulatory lapses and safety risks. The petition sought several key measures: enforcement of existing regulations, a cap on new registrations, and stricter adherence to traffic rules. In response, the Court issued notice to the Delhi Government, Transport Department, Delhi Traffic Police, and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, directing them to submit their responses within eight weeks. The case has been scheduled for the next hearing in March.
Orissa High Court & District Courts Campuses Vacated Following Bomb Threat
Source: Click Here
Development: Judicial proceedings were halted and the Orissa High Court and Cuttack District and Sessions Court campuses were evacuated following a bomb threat email. The Registry promptly notified authorities, leading to the suspension of all judicial work and the precautionary moving out of advocates, litigants, and staff. Police and anti-bomb squads were immediately deployed to secure and inspect the premises. The source of the threat has not yet been identified.Kerala High Court Flags Delay In Enactment Of Anti-Superstition Law, Suggests Setting Up Special Cell As Interim Measure
Source: Click Here
Development: Expressing concern over the prolonged delay (nearly four years since the petition was filed), the Kerala High Court heard a public interest litigation regarding the State Government's failure to finalise legislation to curb black magic, witchcraft and other inhuman practices. The Court noted the lack of a specific anti-superstition law and suggested that the State consider setting up a dedicated special cell as an interim measure to handle complaints related to such practices. The matter is posted for further consideration.
Voluntary Partition Deed Can Confer Property Rights On Female Heir Even Prior To Hindu Succession Act, 1956: Kerala High Court
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court, while allowing a second appeal, ruled that a female heir can acquire valid property rights through a voluntary and registered partition deed, even if the succession occurred before the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. This is significant because, under Mitakshara law prevalent at that time, daughters lacked coparcenary rights. The Court emphasized that a conscious and deliberate conferment of a share on a female heir through such a deed cannot be disregarded simply because she lacked an antecedent right of inheritance, especially when the property was self-acquired and the arrangement had been acted upon for decades.
Judiciary Fixing GST Rate On Air Purifiers Would Disrupt Constitutional Framework: Centre Tells Delhi High Court
Source: Click Here
Development: The Centre has informed the Delhi High Court that directing a change in GST rates for air purifiers would undermine the constitutional framework. It maintained that the GST Council, established under Article 279A, is the only body authorized to recommend such adjustments. The Centre contended that any judicial order to classify air purifiers as medical devices or to lower the current 18% GST would be a violation of the separation of powers and the principles of federal balance.
Karnataka High Court Refuses To Stay Probe Against Sri Sri Ravishankar Booked In FIR Over Encroachment Of Public Lands
Source: Click Here
Development: The Karnataka High Court, through Justice M. Nagaprasanna, declined to intervene to stay the investigation or grant protection to Sri Sri Ravishankar concerning an FIR. The FIR alleges the encroachment of public land in Bengaluru, filed under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. The court reasoned that halting the probe would contradict earlier Division Bench directives that mandated action against encroachers, thus refusing to intercede at this juncture.
Received Letters From Across The Country On Issues With Private Universities: Supreme Court
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court, addressing a case where a private university allegedly harassed a student for legally changing her name post-marriage, broadened its focus to the governance of private universities nationwide. The Court noted numerous similar grievances and expressed displeasure over non-compliance with its directions requiring affidavits from top administrative authorities, specifically criticizing the Centre for filing its response through a lower-ranking official.
Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Stop Open Sewer Leakage At Shaheen Bagh
Source: Click Here
Development: The Delhi High Court, taking suo motu cognizance, has ordered the Delhi Jal Board (DJB) to immediately stop a dangerous open sewer leakage in the Shaheen Bagh area, citing serious safety and health risks. The DJB must coordinate with the MCD, PWD, or other civic bodies for assistance and file a status report after inspection. Additionally, the Court addressed the broader issue of waterlogging in Delhi, directing relevant authorities to meet and resolve pending concerns.
Minority Schools Move Delhi High Court Against Law Mandating Govt Approval For Fee Hike
Source: Click Here
Development: The Delhi High Court is hearing a challenge by minority schools against the Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees) Act, 2025, which requires prior government approval for fee hikes. A Division Bench, led by Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, has issued a notice to the Delhi Government and the LG, and granted an extension for deadlines related to fee committee formation and proposal submissions. The schools argue the Act violates Article 30 of the Constitution, while the Government defends it as a necessary regulatory measure.
Supreme Court Restrains Declaration Of Result For J&K Cricket Association Elections Over Alleged Fraud, Electoral Roll Manipulation By BCCI Sub-Committee
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has issued an order preventing the declaration of results for the Jammu & Kashmir Cricket Association (JKCA) elections. The Court's decision comes in the wake of allegations of fraud and manipulation of the electoral roll, reportedly involving a BCCI Sub-Committee. A Bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and N.V. Anjaria permitted the elections, scheduled for January 16th, to go forward, but mandated that the results must be withheld until the Court issues further directions. This action followed the issuance of notice on a petition filed by 19 cricket clubs challenging the electoral process.
Supreme Court Flags 23-Year Delay In Dowry Death Case; Asks HCs To Prioritise Stayed Trials
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court, addressing a 23-year delay in a dowry death trial, dismissed the accused's appeal. The delay was attributed to an interim stay on a criminal revision pending before the Rajasthan High Court. A Bench comprising Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan labeled this lengthy deferment "disturbing." Consequently, the Court mandated all High Courts to prioritise cases where criminal trials are stayed, particularly those involving serious offences such as dowry death, murder, and rape.
Delhi High Court Orders MCD To Conduct Survey, Remove Encroachments In And Around Jama Masjid
Source: Click Here
Development: The Delhi High Court has directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) to carry out a comprehensive survey within two months of all constructions, including any illegal encroachments, buildings, or stalls, in and around the Jama Masjid. The order comes from a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) and requires the MCD to take legal action against any illegal structures and independently verify the claims of encroachment on public land. The Court explicitly stated it would not form an opinion based only on the photographs submitted as evidence.
‘Shocking’ That Minor Girls Missing For 10+ Years, Yet Police Have No Whereabouts: MP High Court
Source: Click Here
Development: The Madhya Pradesh High Court has expressed "shocking" concern over the long-term disappearance of several minor girls, some missing for over a decade. Responding to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a flesh trade survivor, the Court ordered police authorities to submit comprehensive, decade-wise data on missing and recovered minor girls. The court, suspecting possible human trafficking, specifically requested details on how many girls were traced by police, returned voluntarily, and how many cases led to the arrest of accused individuals.
Supreme Court Urges Union To Bring 'Romeo-Juliet' Clause In POCSO Act To Shield Consensual Adolescent Relationships From Prosecution
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has urged the Union Government to introduce a "Romeo-Juliet" clause to the POCSO Act. This proposed clause would exempt consensual adolescent relationships with a small age difference from criminal charges, as the Court observed the misuse of the POCSO Act in non-exploitative romantic scenarios. The Court also emphasized that the Juvenile Justice Act's procedure must be used for age determination in these cases.
PIL In Orissa High Court Against Toll Collection At Jharpokharia Toll Citing Incomplete, Potholed Highway
Source: Click Here
Development: A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Orissa High Court challenging the toll collection at the Jharpokharia Toll Plaza on NH-49. The petition argues that the adjacent Dwarsuni Ghat section of the highway is incomplete, dangerous, and severely damaged, with construction not expected to finish until 2027. The unsafe conditions are linked to over 500 accidents and more than 100 fatalities. The PIL contends that continuing to collect the toll violates the 'user fee' principle and the constitutional 'right to life' (Article 21) due to the absence of a safe and motorable road.
Kerala High Court To Hear Defacto Complainant In MLA Rahul Mamkootathil’s Plea For Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court has allowed the de facto complainant to be heard in the anticipatory bail plea filed by Palakkad MLA Rahul Mamkootathil regarding a case of rape and miscarriage. Justice A. Badharudeen permitted the complainant's impleading petition, which led to the court extending the MLA's interim protection from arrest. The matter is scheduled for further consideration on January 21st.
TN Police Move Madras High Court To Quash Interim Bail Granted To Savukku Shankar In Extortion Case, Argue That He Misused Liberty
Source: Click Here
Development: The Tamil Nadu Police has approached the Madras High Court seeking to cancel the interim bail granted to Savukku Shankar in an alleged extortion case. The State's contention is that Shankar abused the temporary release he received on medical grounds. The police submitted evidence that Shankar received minimal medical care, created numerous YouTube videos, and obstructed the ongoing investigation, including intimidating witnesses and breaching his bail conditions. The High Court has ordered Shankar to submit his reply and has scheduled the matter for a hearing on 19th January, following the Pongal holidays.
Chhattisgarh Congress MLA Arrested In Cheating Case, Party Calls It BJP ‘Conspiracy’
Source: Click Here
Development: Baleshwar Sahu, a Congress MLA from Chhattisgarh's Jaijaipur constituency, was arrested on January 9th for cheating and forgery involving ₹42.78 lakh. He has been remanded to judicial custody until January 22nd after a court denied his bail. The charges allege he misused loan documents and forged signatures. The Congress party called the arrest a "BJP conspiracy" but stated their confidence in the judiciary and Sahu's eventual acquittal.
III. Details of Important Decisions:
A. Supreme Court
Supreme Court Denies Bail To Umar Khalid & Sharjeel Imam; Grants Bail To 5 Others In Delhi Riots Larger Conspiracy Case
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court denied bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in the Delhi riots “larger conspiracy” case, ruling that the prosecution’s material established a prima facie case under the stringent bail restrictions of Section 43D(5) of the UAPA, which applies when allegations appear prima facie true. The Court found they had a “central role in planning and mobilisation.” However, they were given the liberty to re-apply after the examination of protected witnesses or after one year. Concurrently, the Court granted bail to other accused, stressing the necessity of an “accused-by-accused assessment” focusing on “specific roles” in UAPA cases. The Court also clarified that trial delay does not automatically override the stricter UAPA bail standard and directed the trial court to expedite proceedings.
States Cannot Back Out Of Promised Incentives After Industries Invest Money: Supreme Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court has ruled that State Governments cannot revoke or withhold industrial incentives from companies that have invested in reliance on those incentives, based on the doctrines of legitimate expectation and promissory estoppel. In the case of IFGL Refractories Ltd., the Court set aside the 2018 Orissa High Court judgment, directed the disbursement of sanctioned subsidies under the Odisha Industrial Policy, 1989, and held that the company’s MM Plant qualified as a “new industrial unit.” The Court found the State’s refusal to release subsidies to be arbitrary and a violation of Article 14.
Supreme Court Grants Customs Duty Exemption to Adani Power, Reaffirms Stare Decisis
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court allowed Adani Power Ltd.'s appeal, ruling that customs duty could not be charged on electricity supplied from its Special Economic Zone (SEZ) unit to the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) due to the absence of a valid charging authority. The Court overturned the 2019 Gujarat High Court decision, stressing that subsequent notifications only altered duty rates and did not establish the levy. It also cited the principle of stare decisis, noting the High Court ignored a binding 2015 ruling. The Commissioner of Customs was ordered to verify the claim and complete the refund process within eight weeks.
Supreme Court Issues Directions To Curb False And Frivolous Complaints Against Judicial Officers
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court has issued comprehensive directions to High Courts for managing complaints against district judiciary officers. Key directives include: mandating strict action, such as contempt or disciplinary proceedings via the Bar Council, against individuals filing false or frivolous complaints; enforcing a zero-tolerance policy with prompt disciplinary action and possible criminal prosecution for genuine misconduct by judicial officers; and cautioning High Courts against initiating unjustified action based merely on suspicion or erroneous judicial orders, reserving disciplinary action for prima facie credible complaints. This framework distinguishes between malicious/false grievances and genuine misconduct.
Supreme Court Grants Bail To Amtek Group Promoter Arvind Dham In Money Laundering Case
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court has granted bail to Arvind Dham, the Amtek Group promoter. This decision, made by a bench comprising Justice Sanjay Kumar and Justice Alok Aradhe, overturns the earlier ruling of the Delhi High Court which had denied him bail, citing the seriousness of the offence that involves a substantial amount of ₹ 27,000 crore.
Supreme Court Rejects Plea For Court-Monitored Probe Into CLAT 2026 Paper Leak Allegations
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court, citing a belated filing after the examination, dismissed a plea for a court-monitored investigation into the alleged CLAT 2026 question paper leak. The Bench, comprising Justices PS Narasimha and Alok Aradhe, declined to proceed with the matter, despite claims that the paper was circulated on platforms like Telegram and WhatsApp before the exam, observing that the issue would have been taken more seriously before the declaration of results.
SC/ST/OBC Can Take ‘General Seats In Govt Jobs If They Clear CUT-OFF; Supreme Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court, through a Bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine G. Masih, ruled that reserved category candidates (SC/ST/OBC/EWS) who score higher than the General category cut-off must be appointed against unreserved (open) seats based purely on merit. This decision struck down a contrary Rajasthan High Court rule and rejected the "double benefit" argument, reaffirming the principle from the Indra Sawhney (1992) case that open seats are accessible to all candidates regardless of their category.
Supreme Court Flags Reluctance Of Trial Judges To Grant Bail Due To Fear Of Disciplinary Action
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court noted that trial court judges are increasingly hesitant to grant bail due to the fear of disciplinary action, which is often initiated based on mere suspicion or perceived errors in judicial discretion. This fear undermines judicial independence and has resulted in an increased number of bail petitions reaching the High Courts and the Supreme Court. To remedy this, the Supreme Court clarified that an incorrect order or exercise of discretion in granting bail is not, by itself, grounds for disciplinary action, and directed High Courts to stop initiating inquiries against judicial officers merely because their orders are deemed erroneous.
Limitation Act Not Applicable To Tribunals Unless Expressly Provided In Law: Supreme Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court recently ruled that the Limitation Act, 1963, does not automatically apply to tribunals. Quasi-judicial bodies, such as the former Company Law Board (CLB), can only condone delay if their parent statute explicitly grants that authority. The Court stressed that statutory timelines are mandatory, even without specific limiting phrases, and confirmed the CLB was not authorized to condone the delay in an appeal under Section 58(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The ruling was delivered by Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan.
“Travesty Of Justice”: Supreme Court On AP High Court Closing Corruption Cases On Hyper-Technical Grounds
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court overturned the Andhra Pradesh High Court's decision to quash several corruption FIRs filed by the ACB between 2016 and 2020. The High Court's ruling, based on the argument that the Vijayawada unit (post-2014 bifurcation) was not a properly notified "police station," was deemed "hyper-technical reasoning" and a "travesty of justice" by the apex court. The Supreme Court clarified that the Vijayawada unit remained a valid police station under existing laws, a fact confirmed by a 2022 Government Order, and consequently restored all FIRs, mandating the continuation of investigations.
State Must Abandon Colonial Mindset : Supreme Court Criticises Governments Retracting Assurances To Industries
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court recently ruled against State Governments that withdrew assurances made under industrial incentive policies, stating these policies must be interpreted liberally and purposefully. The Court held that once an industrial unit is established based on a State's representation, the State cannot retract promised subsidies. The Court criticized bureaucratic inaction and shifting stands for undermining industrial policies, and consequently directed the release of the sanctioned subsidies with interest.
EPF Wage Ceiling Limit Revision Requires Active Consideration : Supreme Court Asks Union To Decide In 4 Months
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court has directed a PIL petitioner to submit a representation to the Union Government within two weeks regarding the revision of the ₹15,000 EPF wage ceiling, which has been unchanged for over 11 years. This stagnant ceiling has led to many workers being excluded from EPF coverage and benefits due to rising minimum wages. The Government is required to issue a reasoned decision on the matter within four months. This action comes after a 2022 EPFO sub-committee recommendation to raise the ceiling, which is still awaiting Union approval.
Mining, Construction Vehicles Not Liable For Motor Vehicle Tax If Not Used On Public Roads: Supreme Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court has ruled that heavy earth-moving and construction equipment, including dumpers, excavators, loaders, and dozers, are exempt from registration and motor vehicle tax under State laws, provided they are used solely within a factory or enclosed industrial premises. The Court clarified that only vehicles suitable for use on public roads fall under the scope of taxation defined in Entry 57, List II. However, the ruling carries a strong caution: if this machinery is found operating on public roads, it will forfeit the exemption and become subject to both tax and penalties.
B. Delhi High Court
Date Of Appointment, Not Selection, Decides BSF Seniority: Delhi High Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Delhi High Court ruled that seniority in Border Security Force (BSF) appointments is based solely on the date of continuous regular appointment (formal appointment and actual joining), not the date of selection or medical clearance. The Court denied claims for retrospective seniority from candidates whose joining was delayed by medical re-examination, even if the delay was not their fault. Merit-based inter se ranking applies only when appointments are simultaneous.
Blue Jays' Global Reputation Alone Not Enough To Cancel Indian 'BLUE-JAY' Trademark: Delhi High Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Delhi High Court's Division Bench overturned a ruling, holding that a registered Indian trademark cannot be cancelled based solely on a foreign mark's global reputation unless there is tangible proof of its goodwill spilling over into India. The Court found that the Canadian "BLUE JAYS" mark had not been "used" in India under the Trade Marks Act, clarifying that website accessibility or merchandise availability alone is insufficient to establish trans-border goodwill. Additionally, the Court found no adequate basis to infer bad faith in the adoption of the "BLUE-JAY" mark by the Indian firm.
Making Minor Touch Private Part With Sexual Intent Amounts To Aggravated Sexual Assault Under POCSO Act: Delhi High Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Delhi High Court ruled that compelling a minor to touch a private part with sexual intent constitutes aggravated sexual assault under Section 10 of the POCSO Act. The Court upheld the conviction and seven-year sentence of the accused, who assaulted a child under four years old. Challenges concerning the delay in filing the FIR and the alleged failure to assess the child's competency were dismissed. However, the Court set aside the convictions under IPC Sections 354, 354A, and 354B, clarifying that the offense is fully covered by the special POCSO legislative framework.
Delhi High Court Orders Congress, AAP & Others To Take Down Defamatory Posts Linking BJP’s Dushyant Gautam To Ankita Bhandari Murder Case
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Delhi High Court ordered the Congress, the Aam Aadmi Party, and other political parties to immediately remove all posts and videos linking BJP leader Dushyant Kumar Gautam to the Ankita Bhandari murder case and prohibited them from referring to him as the "VIP" in connection with the case. The court found a prima facie case of potential irreparable harm and mandated compliance within 24 hours. If the parties fail to comply, social media platforms (X, Meta, and Google) were directed to take down the defamatory content.
NCLT Can Adjudicate Fraud, Debt Disputes Under IBC: Delhi High Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Delhi High Court, through Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, upheld the National Company Law Tribunal's (NCLT) "exclusive and expansive jurisdiction" under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. The ruling affirms that the NCLT is the sole authority for complex insolvency disputes, including those involving fraud, forgery, debt existence, and assignment validity. The court explicitly barred civil courts from interfering, citing IBC Sections 60(5), 63, 65, 75, and 231. This decision came while dismissing a challenge to a Section 7 IBC petition by Roseland Buildtech, deeming it "luxury litigation" and imposing a ₹2 lakh cost on the petitioner.
Delhi High Court Upholds Validity Of Election Symbols Order, Rejects Plea By Hind Samrajya Party
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Delhi High Court rejected a challenge by the Hind Samrajya Party against the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968. The party had sought to prevent the Election Commission of India (ECI) from enforcing the Order. The Court dismissed the petition, affirming that the ECI possesses the necessary jurisdiction to frame the Symbols Order. Furthermore, the Court rejected the argument that the Order violates Article 14, noting that Supreme Court precedents have already established the Order's validity and importance for the conduct of free and fair elections.
C. Jharkhand High Court
Jharkhand High Court Scraps ‘Net Charges’ Formula For Electricity Duty Levy, Flags Excessive Delegation
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Jharkhand High Court recently invalidated a key provision of the Jharkhand Electricity Duty (Amendment) Act, 2021, and its corresponding Rules. This provision allowed the electricity duty to be levied as a percentage of consumers' "net charges" (a value-based levy), instead of the previous unit-based levy. The Court declared the shift ultra vires the Bihar Electricity Duty Act, 1948, on the grounds of excessive delegation of legislative power due to the lack of guiding policy. Consequently, the Court struck down the impugned proviso and quashed all electricity bills raised under it, though it upheld the validity of the Jharkhand Electricity Duty (Amendment) Act, 2022.
D. Calcutta High Court
Uttering Caste Names Like ‘Adivasi’, ‘Santhal’ To Humiliate Person In Public Can Constitute Offence Under SC/ST Act: Calcutta High Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Calcutta High Court recently ruled that intentionally humiliating a person by calling them caste names like “Adivasi” or “Santhal” in a public place constitutes an offence under Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The Court declined to dismiss the case, determining that the First Information Report (FIR) and witness statements contained the necessary elements of the alleged offences, thereby requiring a full trial.
E. Madras High Court
Law & Order Issue Imaginary Ghost Created By State: Madras High Court Upholds Order For Lamp Lighting Atop Thiruparankundram Hills
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) upheld a ruling permitting the lighting of the Karthigai Deepam at the stone lamp pillar (Deepathoon) atop Thiruparankundram Hills, dismissing the State's objection regarding potential law and order issues as "imaginary." The court established that the pillar is a ritual lamp pillar, not a survey stone, and found no religious prohibition against the act. However, the court mandated that the lighting must be carried out in consultation with the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), respecting the site's protected status and subject to necessary ASI safeguards.
No Takedown Of Social Media Posts Without Establishing Commercial Exploitation Of Personality Rights: Madras High Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Madras High Court, in a ruling by Justice N Senthilkumar, has held that the interim removal of social media content is not permissible based solely on personality rights; it requires prima facie evidence of commercial exploitation. This decision was made while dismissing celebrity chef T Rangaraj's requests for an interim injunction against costume designer Joy Crizildaa over her Instagram posts and interviews. The court emphasized that issuing blanket gag orders would violate the freedom of speech (Article 19(1)(a)) and that the truthfulness of the posts must be resolved during a full trial. Rangaraj had argued that Crizildaa's content falsely suggested a marital relationship and damaged his personal, professional, and commercial standing.
Madras High Court Rejects Minister I. Periyasamy’s Plea Against ED Probe, Tells Him To Approach PMLA Adjudicating Authority First
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Madras High Court rejected the petition filed by Tamil Nadu Minister I Periyasamy and his family, which challenged the Enforcement Directorate's Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) registered under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The Court ruled that the petitioners had bypassed the required statutory process by not first approaching the PMLA adjudicating authority. Consequently, the Bench directed the parties to utilize the adjudicating authority as per the law. The Court clarified that the petitioners would retain the right to seek judicial remedies if they were dissatisfied with the adjudicating authority's subsequent orders.
F. Himachal Pradesh High Court
Postal Dept Cannot Deny Pension To Temporary Employee After Decades Of Service For Want Of Formal Regularisation: HP High Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Himachal Pradesh High Court ruled that the Postal Department cannot deny pensionary benefits to a temporary employee with over twenty years of continuous service just because a formal regularisation order was missing before retirement. Citing Supreme Court precedent, the Court held that the Union of India cannot use its own delay ("inaction") to deny benefits. The deceased employee was therefore deemed entitled to both regularisation and pension from the date of superannuation.
Elections To Panchayati Raj Institutions Can’t Be Deferred Beyond Five-Year Term: HP High Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Himachal Pradesh High Court has ruled that the constitutional mandate under Article 243E requires elections to Panchayati Raj Institutions to be completed before the expiration of their five-year term. The Court emphasized that orders issued under the Disaster Management Act, 2005 cannot supersede the authority of the State Election Commission. Consequently, the Court held that administrative difficulties, disaster-related directives, or issues like delimitation do not constitute a valid justification for a State-wide delay in holding elections. The judgment clarified that the continuation of a Panchayat beyond its term is unconstitutional, and its reconstitution after dissolution should be treated only as an exception, not an inherent right.
G. Madhya Pradesh High Court
Forced Unnatural Sex By Husband Is Cruelty U/S 498A IPC, But Not Rape Due To Marital Exception: MP High Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Madhya Pradesh High Court recently addressed a petition by a husband to quash an FIR filed by his wife, who alleged physical abuse and non-consensual unnatural sexual acts. The Court ruled that due to the marital exception under Section 375 of the IPC, a husband cannot be prosecuted for rape (Section 376 IPC), even for forced unnatural sexual acts upon his adult wife. However, the Court clarified that such conduct still constitutes cruelty to a wife under Section 498A IPC.
Long Possession Of Public Land Without Title Doesn’t Confer Right To Seek Injunction: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Madhya Pradesh High Court rejected a petition from a Public Health Engineering Department official who sought to claim possession of public land. The Court’s ruling emphasized that long possession alone, without lawful authority, does not establish legal rights. The petitioner had occupied departmental premises for decades, even following retirement, basing his claim on prolonged occupation and prior permission to build structures. The Court determined that a person lacking legal title is an unauthorised occupant and, consequently, is ineligible to request a temporary injunction. The petition was therefore dismissed.
H. Rajasthan High Court
Poverty Can’t Be Bar To Parole: Rajasthan High Court Waives Surety Condition For Indigent Life Convict, Frames Guidelines
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Rajasthan High Court has established that poverty cannot be a basis for denying parole, asserting that requiring surety bonds from indigent prisoners constitutes a violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. A Division Bench comprising Justices Arun Monga and Farjand Ali ruled that Rule 4 of the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 2021 is directory rather than mandatory. Consequently, the Court waived the surety requirement for a life convict and simultaneously framed guidelines to prevent the automatic denial of parole in such cases.
I. Kerala High Court
Kerala High Court Strikes Down Devaswom Recruitment Board’s Power Over Guruvayoor Appointments
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Kerala High Court struck down Section 9 of the Kerala Devaswom Recruitment Board Act, 2015, as it applied to the Guruvayoor Devaswom, ruling that the power to appoint staff must remain with the Guruvayoor Devaswom Managing Committee. The court reasoned that the specific Guruvayoor Devaswom Act, 1978, which received Presidential assent, overrides the later, general KDRB Act. Transferring the appointment authority was deemed a violation of the Devaswom's autonomy, protected under Article 26 of the Constitution.
J. Other Tribunal & District Court Orders
Referring NHAI Case In Bhopal To Delhi Bench, NGT Calls For Nation-Wide Tree Felling Policy
Source: Click Here
Development: The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has referred the case of the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) felling over 8,700 trees for the Ayodhya Bypass expansion to a larger bench in Delhi, simultaneously calling for a nation-wide policy on large-scale tree felling. Despite the NHAI's justification of highway development, the NGT emphasized environmental concerns, calling the trees the city's "lungs," and issued a directive to halt any further tree cutting or alteration without prior permission from the appointed committee.
IV. Appointments, Collegium Recommendations And Transfers Section
Proceedings this past week noted Justice Yashwant Varma's challenge to the Lok Sabha Speaker's inquiry committee under Judges Inquiry Act 1968, alongside orders for forensic analysis of Manipur violence audio implicating ex-CM N. Biren Singh. Courts flagged CAQM lapses on Delhi-NCR air pollution and state delays in Uttarakhand forest encroachments. Notifications included Justice Soumen Sen as Kerala High Court Chief Justice and new judges to Allahabad, Uttarakhand, and Patna High Courts