Welcome to latest edition of Judegement Junction! The period from 15 to 20 December 2025 saw multiple constitutional courts address issues spanning electoral administration, judicial procedure, regulatory compliance, public safety, and institutional functioning. During this week, the Supreme Court and several High Courts issued directions, interim orders, notices, and final judgments in matters including Justice Yashwant Varma v. Union of India, challenges to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, the RG Kar Hospital rape-murder suo motu proceedings, the Goa nightclub fire case, and disputes relating to Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas in Tamil Nadu. Courts also dealt with regulatory and commercial matters such as IndiGo flight disruptions, DGCA implementation of Flight Duty Time Limitation norms, insolvency proceedings against Kaveri Neeravari Nigam Ltd., and trademark, banking, and insolvency disputes.
This edition of Judgement Junction compiles significant legal developments, interim directions, and judgments delivered during the week, along with key proceedings before constitutional courts and tribunals. The digest documents developments across the Supreme Court, High Courts, tribunals, and district courts, as well as collegium recommendations and judicial appointments, providing a consolidated record of contemporaneous legal activity.
I. Key Legal Developments:
Justice Yashwant Varma Moves Supreme Court Challenging Lok Sabha's Inquiry Committee In Impeachment Proceedings
Source: Click Here
Development: Justice Yashwant Varma has challenged the impeachment inquiry committee formed by the Lok Sabha Speaker in the Supreme Court, arguing that it is procedurally illegal under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968. His challenge stems from the fact that impeachment motions were admitted in both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha on the same day. He contends that, in such a scenario, the Act's mandatory scheme requires either no committee to be formed or a joint committee to be constituted by both the Speaker and the Rajya Sabha Chairman, not by the Speaker alone.
Supreme Court Asks ECI To Sympathetically Consider Pleas To Extend Deadlines Of Kerala and UP SIR
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court directed the Election Commission of India (ECI) to favourably consider extending the deadline for submitting enumeration forms for the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Kerala and Uttar Pradesh, following petitions raising concerns about potential large-scale deletions and the timing of the revision. The Court noted the ECI's assurance that necessary extensions are being granted. The Bench also refused to hear an application regarding the risk of personal data leakage due from the use of volunteers in the process.
Supreme Court Allows Ban Of 10-Year-Old Diesel & 15-Year-Old Petrol Vehicles Below BS-IV In Delhi NCR
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has modified its August 2022 directive concerning older vehicles in Delhi-NCR. Authorities are now permitted to ban or take action against diesel vehicles exceeding 10 years in age and petrol vehicles older than 15 years if they do not comply with BS-IV emission standards. Only those older vehicles that meet BS-IV or higher norms will continue to receive temporary protection from coercive measures.
Minority Community Facing Difficulty In Enjoying Their Land: Dargah Tells Madras High Court Over Thiruparankundram Deepam Row
Source: Click Here
Development: The Madras High Court is hearing appeals against a single judge's order for the Thiruparankundram temple to light the Karthigai Deepam lamp at the Deepathoon stone pillar. The primary appellant, representing the Muslim community, argues that the repeated lighting directives infringe on their peaceful use of property and religious practice, as they claim the pillar area is on land granted to their community in 1920. The Advocate General contested the appeals, questioning the factual basis of the pillar's religious significance and arguing that customary issues should be resolved under the HR&CE Act, not through writ petitions. The court has reserved its verdict.
Supreme Court Transfers Suo Motu Proceedings On RG Kar Doctor Rape-Murder Case To Calcutta High Court
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has transferred its suo motu case regarding the rape-murder of a doctor at RG Kar hospital to the Calcutta High Court for monitoring. The High Court will oversee the implementation of the Supreme Court's directives and receive investigation status reports from the CBI, which must also be provided directly to the victim's parents. The original incident, which occurred in August 2024, prompted the Supreme Court to form a ten-member National Task Force, chaired by Surgeon Vice Admiral Arti Sarin, to recommend measures to improve hospital safety and working conditions.
Goa Nightclub Fire: Bombay High Court Initiates Suo Motu Case, Seeks Preventive Mechanism From State
Source: Click Here
Development: The Bombay High Court's Goa Bench has converted a private writ petition concerning the Arpora nightclub fire, an incident that resulted in at least 25 fatalities, into a suo motu public interest litigation (PIL). This move is intended to address broader systemic issues. The Court highlighted serious concerns regarding illegal constructions, unregulated licensing, and lax enforcement, noting that unauthorized structures persist and even obtain commercial licences. Consequently, the Court has instructed the State to propose preventative strategies and designate specific officers or authorities to be held accountable for preventing future tragedies.
Munambam Land Dispute: Kerala High Court Asks Collector Not To 'Overstep' Its Order For Accepting Tax By Allowing Mutations
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court has allowed the Ernakulam District Collector to accept land tax from residents of the disputed Munambam land but has explicitly prohibited any further actions, such as mutation or issuing property records. The land is claimed by both the State Waqf Board and local residents. The dispute centers on land originally transferred in 1950 but declared Waqf property by the Board in 2019. Although the High Court had previously ruled against the Waqf classification, the Supreme Court has stayed that finding, thus maintaining the land's current status quo pending final proceedings.
Kerala High Court Stay And CM’s Petition In KIIFB Masala Bonds FEMA Case
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court has temporarily stayed an Enforcement Directorate (ED) show cause notice to the Kerala Infrastructure Investment Fund Board (KIIFB) concerning alleged Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) violations related to the use of Masala Bond proceeds. KIIFB maintains the funds were legally used for land acquisition, a permitted activity under 2019 external commercial borrowing rules, not "real estate," and that the RBI had monitored the bond issuance. Separately, on December 18, 2025, the Chief Minister (as KIIFB Chairman) and other officials petitioned the High Court, challenging the ED's proceedings as lacking jurisdiction and harmful to KIIFB's finances. The High Court has also reserved judgment on the ED's appeal against a separate interim stay on a similar FEMA notice issued to KIIFB.
Delhi High Court Issues Notice On Plea For Contempt Action Against DGCA, Centre Over FDTL Exemptions For Pilots
Source: Click Here
Development: The Delhi High Court has taken cognizance of a contempt petition filed by the Indian Pilots Guild and has issued notice to the Director General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) and the Union of India. The Guild alleges that the DGCA and Union of India have willfully failed to comply with previous judicial directions regarding the implementation of fatigue management norms for pilots. Specifically, the petition claims they have granted exemptions, relaxations, and airline-specific variations to the Flight Duty Time Limitation (FDTL) rules, which contravene the implementation framework and timelines previously accepted and mandated by the Court.
CCI Takes Cognisance Of Complaint Against IndiGo Over Mass Flight Disruptions
Source: Click Here
Development: The Competition Commission of India (CCI) initiated an investigation against IndiGo on December 18, 2025, following extensive flight disruptions earlier that month. The CCI will proceed under the Competition Act, 2002, to examine potential issues, including the possibility of the airline abusing its dominant market position. The disruptions, attributed by IndiGo to technical issues, crew shortages, and air traffic congestion, have raised concerns about the airline's operational reliability given its market dominance. The CCI has not yet disclosed specific allegations or made any finding of contravention.
Supreme Court Refuses To Entertain PIL On Indigo Crisis, Allows Petitioner To Join Delhi High Court Proceedings
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court refused to hear a Public Interest Litigation regarding the Indigo flight cancellation crisis, as the Delhi High Court is already managing a similar case. To avoid parallel proceedings, the Supreme Court permitted the petitioner, Narendra Mishra, to join the existing Delhi High Court case, acknowledging the High Court's capability to handle the matter.
Registrar’s Complaint, Sikkim ex-CJ Letter Unravelled HC Crisis
Source: Click Here
Development: Acting Chief Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai of the Sikkim High Court, on December 15, 2025, ordered the withdrawal of facilities from retired Chief Justice Biswanath Somadder. This action came after Registrar General Prajwal Khatiwada complained on December 12, 2025, that Justice Rai had humiliated and shouted at him in her chambers. Justice Somadder then forwarded this complaint, along with a reference to his previous confidential letters regarding Justice Rai's alleged misconduct (including interference in judicial appointments), to CJI Surya Kant. Coincidentally, on the same day Justice Rai took acting charge (December 15), Khatiwada was transferred. The series of events and subsequent administrative changes initiated by Justice Rai prompted Supreme Court intervention and ultimately led to the Supreme Court Collegium bypassing Justice Rai for the permanent Chief Justice position on December 18, 2025, recommending Justice A. Muhamed Mustaque instead.
MBBS Seat Row: Delhi High Court Quashes Executing Court's Order Compelling Jamia Hamdard University To Grant Consent Of Affiliation
Source: Click Here
Development: The Delhi High Court has reversed an Executing Court's order that would have forced Jamia Hamdard Deemed to be University to grant a Consent of Affiliation (CoA) for 150 MBBS seats to the Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences & Research (HIMSR). The High Court determined that the Executing Court had exceeded its authority, thus validating the university's withdrawal of the CoA, which was based on objections from regulatory bodies like the UGC and the NMC. The ongoing disputes related to the seat withdrawal and renewal are still subject to separate arbitral and regulatory proceedings.
Supreme Court Refuses To Seek ECI's Response On Newspaper Report Claiming Centralised Sending Of Mass Notices During Bihar SIR
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court refused to demand an explanation from the Election Commission regarding a media report. The report alleged that a large number of pre-filled notices for voter name deletion were centrally generated during the Special Intensive Revision of Bihar's electoral rolls, contrary to the law which mandates that only local electoral officers can issue such notices. The Court justified its refusal by stating it would not act or seek clarification based solely on media reports, requiring the allegations to be formally placed on record through affidavits or other evidence.
Supreme Court Notice On Banke Bihari Plea; CJI Criticises Paid “Special Pujas” During Deity’s Rest
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, recently criticized the commercial exploitation of temple rituals, specifically paid "special pujas" during the deity's resting hours, emphasizing the sacrosanct nature of the deity's rest time. The Court also issued notice to the Uttar Pradesh Government and a High Powered Committee following a petition from the Banke Bihari Ji Maharaj Temple Management Committee. The Committee challenged new darshan timings and the stoppage of Dehri Pooja, arguing these actions interfere with long-standing and essential religious practices.
Supreme Court Asks Tamil Nadu Govt To Ascertain Land Needed To Establish Navodaya Vidyalayas, Directs Consultations With Centre
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has directed the Union Government and the State of Tamil Nadu to hold joint consultations regarding the feasibility and land requirements for establishing Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas (JNVs) in every district of Tamil Nadu. The Court emphasized the need for a "federal discussion," urging the State to avoid a "my State attitude" and not to frame it as a language issue. This directive follows a Madras High Court judgment which had previously found the State's wholesale refusal to establish JNVs inconsistent with students' rights under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, noting that JNVs in Tamil regions use Tamil as a medium up to Class VIII and the Centre bears the financial burden.
Court Seeks Information From Youtube About Rahul Gandhi’s Alleged Defamatory Speech On Savarkar
Source: Click Here
Development: A special MP/MLA court in Pune has directed YouTube to provide the original video and information related to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's alleged defamatory remarks about Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, made during a London speech on March 5, 2023. The order is part of criminal defamation proceedings filed by Savarkar's grandnephew, Satyaki Savarkar, and was issued because a CD submitted as evidence was blank, making the verification of the speech's content crucial.
Karnataka High Court Reserves Verdict On Rahul Gandhi's Plea To Quash Defamation Case By State BJP
Source: Click Here
Development: The Karnataka High Court has reserved its judgment on Rahul Gandhi's plea to dismiss a criminal defamation case. The case was filed by the State BJP over a "Corruption Rate Card" advertisement and social media posts published during an election campaign, which the BJP alleges damaged its reputation. Rahul Gandhi's counsel argued that there is no direct evidence linking him to the publication and that the advertisement was a critique of the government's actions, not the party itself.
Delhi Schools Holding Sports Activities Amid Air Pollution Bypassing Court Order: Amicus Curiae Tells Supreme Court
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court addressed the ongoing non-compliance by many Delhi-NCR schools regarding the prohibition on open sports activities in November-December. Senior Advocate Aparajita Singh, the amicus curiae, informed the Court that these schools are conducting such activities despite prior Court directions and a CAQM notification that forbid them during periods of high pollution. The bench acknowledged the issue and stated its intention to focus only on issuing practical and enforceable directions, particularly for air-pollution control measures.
Kerala HC Extends Interim Protection From Arrest To Expelled Cong MLA Mamkootathil
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court has extended the interim protection from arrest, initially granted to expelled Congress MLA Rahul Mamkootathil, until January 7, 2026. This protection stems from his anticipatory bail plea in a case alleging rape and forced abortion of a woman, which was denied by the Thiruvananthapuram Principal District and Sessions Court. The bench has continued the bar on his arrest and has scheduled the matter for a subsequent hearing.
Violence At Lionel Messi Event: BJP's Suvendu Adhikari Moves Calcutta High Court For SIT Probe
Source: Click Here
Development: The Calcutta High Court's Division Bench has listed for hearing petitions demanding a court-monitored investigation into the public disorder and violence that occurred during the Lionel Messi event. Leader of Opposition Suvendu Adhikari, who filed the petitions, has alleged a grave administrative failure and State complicity. This alleged complicity involved using public resources and giving preferential access to dignitaries, which he claims was to the detriment of ticket-holding spectators. Adhikari is seeking the constitution of a Special Investigation Team (SIT) under the High Court's supervision, in addition to refunds and compensation for those affected.
Karnataka High Court Stays Insolvency Order Against State-Owned Cauvery Neeravari Nigam
Source: Click Here
Development: The Karnataka High Court stayed the NCLT's order that had admitted Cauvery Neeravari Nigam Limited (CNNL), a State-owned irrigation company, into corporate insolvency. The High Court ruled that the NCLT lacked the authority to initiate insolvency against CNNL because the company performs sovereign functions as a government-funded entity implementing irrigation projects. The Court consequently stayed the NCLT's admission order and all subsequent proceedings.
Kerala High Court Stays Proceedings Against Hindu Aikya Vedi Leader KP Sasikala In Alleged Provocative Speech Case
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court has granted interim protection to Hindu Aikya Vedi leader K.P. Sasikala by staying all further proceedings for three months in a case stemming from an alleged provocative speech. The case relates to a speech Sasikala delivered on August 31, 2022, at Kunnumpuram in Malappuram. A complaint alleged the address was intended to incite a riot, leading the police, based on legal advice, to register an FIR under Section 153 of the Indian Penal Code for wantonly giving provocation with intent to cause a riot.
Delhi High Court Asks Union Bank Whether It Heard Anil Ambani's Son Before Declaring His Company Account Fraud
Source: Click Here
Development: The Delhi High Court has directed the Union Bank of India to clarify if it adhered to the principles of natural justice by issuing a show-cause notice or granting a hearing to Jai Anmol Ambani. This inquiry follows the bank's classification of his company's account as fraudulent, involving an alleged loss of approximately ₹ 228 Crore, which subsequently led to the CBI initiating criminal proceedings. The court emphasized that a borrower must be given an opportunity to respond before such a fraud classification is made. Consequently, the bank has been instructed to submit a short affidavit addressing this issue, with the matter scheduled for a future hearing.
Delhi High Court Orders Removal Of 'Objectionable Content' Against Jammu & Kashmir Deputy CM On Social Media
Source: Click Here
Development: The Delhi High Court granted interim relief in a defamation case filed by Surinder Kumar Chaudhary, the Deputy Chief Minister of Jammu & Kashmir. The court ordered the immediate removal of allegedly defamatory content, specifically a social media post using his image as a thumbnail and containing an audio recording of a telephonic conversation with sexual overtones, from platforms like Facebook and YouTube. The Single Bench found that the continued circulation was causing prima facie reputational and irreparable harm, necessitating the interim takedown pending final judgment.
Can't Interfere In Policy: Gauhati High Court Rejects PIL Claiming Non-Implementation Of 'Kavachh' System By Railways, Lack Of Amenities
Source: Click Here
Development: The Gauhati High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the non-implementation of the "Kavach" train protection system and poor passenger amenities. The Court found the petition lacked specific evidence of accidents or statutory violations, relying instead on vague and general allegations. It held that matters of rail safety protocols, technology deployment, and resource allocation are technical policy issues for expert authorities and not the courts to decide based on non-evidentiary PILs. However, the petitioner was allowed to submit a detailed representation with concrete examples to the Railways.
'Mere Apprehension': Gujarat High Court Refuses To Entertain Mosque's Anticipatory Plea Against Possible Action By Authorities
Source: Click Here
Development: The Gujarat High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by a mosque, which was based solely on the fear that municipal authorities might demolish its waqf property during future lake-development work. The Court ruled that no present cause of action existed because there was no concrete action or demonstrable legal injury, only a "mere apprehension." It emphasized that statutory authorities are presumed to follow due process and must issue proper notice before any demolition, thereby disposing of the petition but affirming that any future action must still comply with the law.
'Happy Ending To This Saga' : Supreme Court Appreciates Consensus Between Kerala CM & Governor On University VC Appointments
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has resolved the dispute between the Kerala Chief Minister and the Governor regarding the appointment of Vice Chancellors, finalizing the appointments of Dr. Saji Gopinathan and Dr. Ciza Thomas. Justice J.B. Pardiwala emphasized the finality of the appointments and the importance of students' interests. The Court commended the consensus reached and praised Justice (Retd.) Sudhanshu Dhulia's mediation. The case has been disposed of, though the underlying legal questions remain open.
‘Try In The Next Session’: Punjab & Haryana High Court Tells Jailed MP Amritpal Singh As His Plea To Attend Parliament Becomes ‘Infructuous’
Source: Click Here
Development: The Punjab and Haryana High Court's Division Bench noted that the petition filed by detained Member of Parliament Amritpal Singh, who sought parole from Dibrugarh Central Jail to attend the current Winter Session of Parliament, was "virtually infructuous." This was due to the session concluding the following day. The Bench cited practical issues preventing immediate attendance, specifically mentioning the time needed for travel from Dibrugarh to Delhi. The Court granted the petitioner the freedom to approach the relevant authority if a new cause of action arises.
Sabarimala Chemical Kumkum Issue: Kerala High Court Impleads Environmental Engineer & Chief Govt Analyst, Orders Strict Vigilance
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court has initiated suo motu proceedings concerning the supply of chemical kumkum at the Sabarimala Temple. In this matter, the Court has joined the Environmental Engineer and the Chief Government Analyst as parties. Furthermore, the Court has instructed the Drug Inspector and the inspection team to maintain strict vigilance and conduct regular, periodic checks to locate shops distributing the product and enforce adherence to statutory quality standards. The ongoing case requires continuous monitoring, inspections, and quality analysis of kumkum, as well as the implementation of previous prohibitions on the sale of unlabeled and synthetic kumkum, all aimed at safeguarding public health and the environment.
Liquor Licence Cannot Be Granted Like This: Bombay High Court To Maha Govt Over Permitting Open Sale Of Liquor At Sunburn Festival
Source: Click Here
Development: The Bombay High Court addressed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the Maharashtra Government's decision to permit the open sale of liquor at the Sunburn Festival in Mumbai. The court questioned the policy of issuing liquor licenses for such a large open-air event, citing concerns about public safety and law and order. The court did not issue a final verdict or stop the festival but kept the petition pending and advised the government to reconsider its policy on liquor licenses for large-scale events.
Supreme Court Orders FSL Examination Of Mobile Device Containing Alleged Hate Speech Voice Clip Of UP Police Officer
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has ordered the forensic examination of a mobile phone belonging to then-SP, Bijnor, Sanjeev Tyagi (now DIG, Uttar Pradesh), which allegedly contains an audio clip of him making anti-Muslim remarks. The device will be sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory, Hyderabad. The case stems from a 2020 incident where petitioner Islamuddin Ansari, who first forwarded the clip for verification, was instead charged and prosecuted. The Supreme Court has since quashed the criminal case against Ansari and is now focused on verifying the audio clip's authenticity through forensic examination of the seized device.
Supreme Court Issues Notice On Private Hospitals' Plea Against Kerala Clinical Establishments Act; Grants Interim Protection
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court is currently hearing a petition filed by the Kerala Private Hospitals Association. The petition challenges key sections of the Kerala Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2018, and its Rules. The two main points of contention are the mandatory public display of service charges (like “fee rates” and “package rates”) despite a lack of formal definitions for these terms, and the requirement for all hospitals to provide standardized emergency treatment.
Madras High Court Refuses To Accept DGP's Report On Orderly System Being Completely Abolished In State, Asks State For Explanation
Source: Click Here
Development: The Madras High Court challenged the police's assertion that the orderly system in the Tamil Nadu police has been completely abolished, citing media and other information suggesting the practice persists. Taking suo motu cognizance, the court impleaded the state's Chief Secretary and Home Secretary, directing them to provide an explanation regarding the system's continued existence and the monitoring of compliance with prior abolition orders. The matter is scheduled for further hearing on 7th January, 2026.
Intersex Persons Should Not Be Under Transgender Category: Plea In Supreme Court
Source: Click Here
Development: An intersex petitioner, Gopi Shankar M, has filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court requesting that intersex individuals be legally recognized as a distinct category separate from "transgender." The petition seeks a clear legal distinction between "sex" and "gender," a reconsideration of the 2014 NALSA ruling's provisions on "third gender," and the removal of intersex persons from the definition of a "transgender person" in the 2019 Transgender Act to ensure their specific needs are met.
Supreme Court Suggests Compensation For Victims Of Digital Arrest Scams, Asks Centre To Discuss With Stakeholders
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court is considering a system to compensate victims of “digital arrest” scams, which it took up suo motu. The Court examined suggestions from amicus NS Nappinai, which included a UK-style model where banks reimburse scam victims and automatic alerts flag suspicious transfers. The Court directed the Union Government and other stakeholders, under the Attorney General's guidance, to meet, evaluate these proposals, and report back. This effort will specifically continue to focus on digital arrest scams involving the use of forged court documents.
Supreme Court Seeks Response Of MP, Union On Alleged Discriminatory Prison & Police Provisions
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has taken suo motu action on prison discrimination, ordering the governments of Madhya Pradesh and the Union to respond to a challenge filed by the Criminal Justice and Police Accountability Project (CPA Project). The CPA Project is challenging specific provisions in MP's prison law and police rules that allegedly designate denotified tribes as "habitual offenders." They argue that these ambiguous rules allow authorities to unfairly label individuals, resulting in their segregation, heightened surveillance, and denial of temporary release within the prison system.
Delhi High Court Asks BJP Leader Sanju Verma To Consider Removing Tweet Calling Former IPS 'Blot On Uniform'
Source: Click Here
Development: The Delhi High Court has taken action in a defamation suit filed by former IPS officer Yashovardhan Azad against BJP national spokesperson Sanju Verma. Justice Amit Bansal issued summons to Verma and suggested she consider deleting the alleged defamatory remark on 'X' (formerly Twitter), which referred to Azad as a "blot on the uniform." The Court noted that while public debate is allowed, casting aspersions on the career of a retired public servant goes beyond acceptable criticism, and also issued notice on Azad's application for an interim injunction.
“Will You Act After More Terror Attacks?” Delhi HC Pulls Up State Over Unregulated Used Car Market
Source: Click Here
Development: The Delhi High Court, through a division bench, sharply criticized the Delhi Government for its failure to effectively implement the new Rules (55A–55H) of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989, which govern the sale and transfer of used vehicles. The Court emphasized that this lapse poses serious public safety risks, a concern highlighted by the recent Red Fort terror blast allegedly involving a second-hand car with untraced ownership. As a result, the Court has ordered the Delhi Government to submit a detailed counter-affidavit explaining its plan to strengthen the regulatory framework.
Delhi High Court Asks Centre To Issue Guidelines For Engagement Of Govt Counsel Within Three Months
Source: Click Here
Development: The Delhi High Court has mandated the Union of India to develop and issue comprehensive guidelines within a three-month timeframe. This directive, delivered in a public interest litigation, addresses the process of engagement and empanelment of Government counsel for representing various Central Government departments in the High Court and subordinate courts. The Court's order stems from concerns raised regarding the recent empanelment process and emphasizes the necessity for a structured and transparent mechanism. Consequently, the Bench has granted the Union Government three months to finalize and officially notify the appropriate norms for counsel engagement.
Kerala Judicial Officers' Association Seeks High Court's Action Against Cyber Attack Of Judge Who Decided Actor Rape Case
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala Judicial Officers’ Association (KJOA) has formally requested the Kerala High Court to initiate contempt proceedings against a "false and scandalous" cyber campaign targeting Principal District and Sessions Judge Honey M. Varghese over her verdict in the actress rape case. The KJOA argues the campaign, which includes claims that the judge consulted the accused, undermines judicial confidence and constitutes criminal contempt, and they have asked the High Court to order the content's removal and protect judicial independence. Separately, two convicts in the same case have appealed their 20-year sentences to the Kerala High Court, challenging their conviction based on insufficient evidence.
Supreme Court Grants Six Weeks To Centre To Finalise Scheme For Rehabilitation Of Disabled Officer Cadets
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court has ordered the Union Government to finalize a comprehensive rehabilitation scheme within six weeks for officer cadets who are disabled and discharged during military training. The Court emphasized the need to provide these cadets with proper recognition, medical, financial, and resettlement support, noting that the three armed services have given positive recommendations and these cadets currently receive fewer benefits than injured soldier recruits.
Supreme Court Issues Notice On Bail Plea Of Former Punjab Minister Bikram Singh Majithia In Disproportionate Assets Case
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court declined to grant interim bail to former Minister Bikram Singh Majithia in a disproportionate assets case, but issued notice to the State of Punjab. Majithia argued that the FIR under the Prevention of Corruption Act was a misuse of the legal process because the transactions had already been examined in a prior NDPS case, where he had been granted bail.
PIL In Supreme Court Seeks Action Against Persons Spreading Defamatory Remarks Against Justice GR Swaminathan
Source: Click Here
Development: A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Supreme Court regarding alleged defamatory remarks and illegal protests targeting Madras High Court Justice G.R. Swaminathan. The PIL claims the actions, which include protests outside the High Court, are linked to a specific order by Justice Swaminathan concerning the lighting of the Karthigai Deepam at the Thiruparankundram Temple. The petition alleges that the protests were carried out by individuals affiliated with DMK-supported parties and certain lawyers, and that the State and police failed to take action against these illegal demonstrations.
‘Show Us A Plan’: MP High Court Asks State To Inform On Nature, Age and Girth of Trees Proposed For Compensatory Plantation
Source: Click Here
Development: The Madhya Pradesh High Court, acting suo motu in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) concerning unauthorised tree removal, has demanded a detailed affidavit from the State. The court specifically requested information on the species, age, girth, and location of the trees proposed for compensatory afforestation. The Bench was critical of the State, finding that severely pruned trees were falsely labeled as "transplanted" and questioned the suitability and survival rate of the trees at the proposed plantation site. The High Court stressed that all tree cutting and pruning must strictly adhere to prior permissions mandated by the National Green Tribunal (NGT) and directed all separate grievances on tree cutting to the NGT.
At Least 45 Days Needed To Finalise Anti-Ragging Amendment Bill, State Tells Kerala High Court
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court is overseeing a public interest petition initiated by the Kerala State Legal Services Authority concerning the need for stronger legal measures to curb ragging in educational institutions. The State government recently informed the court that the proposed amendment to the Kerala Prohibition of Ragging law is still undergoing internal government approvals after being vetted by the Law Department, thus requiring additional time for finalisation. Acknowledging the delay, the High Court has postponed further review of the matter until the next hearing.
Stray Dog Case | 'We'll Play A Video & Ask What Is Humanity' : Supreme Court On Claim That MCD's Treatment Of Dogs Was 'Inhuman'
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court is currently hearing a suo motu case regarding the management of stray dogs in Delhi, initiated due to rising dog bite and rabies concerns. The case also involves a challenge to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi's rules, which a petitioner claims allow for "inhuman treatment" of the animals. The Court has postponed an immediate decision, stating it will screen a video at the next hearing to examine the concept of "humanity" in this context. The next hearing is scheduled for January 7, 2026.
Periyar Pollution: Centre Nod For Temporary Effluent Treatment Plant But Kerala High Court Flags Continued Contamination Of River
Source: Click Here
Development: The Kerala High Court has directed authorities to commence the construction of a temporary effluent treatment plant (ETP) at Udyogamandal. This decision follows the Central government's approval for the ETP, which aims to address the pollution of Kuzhikandam thodu, a tributary of the Periyar River. Emphasizing that the Periyar River's contamination stems from multiple, interconnected factors, the Court stressed the necessity for coordinated action by competent authorities and the high-level committee. Furthermore, the Court urged comprehensive remediation efforts for the river's pollution, mandating periodic progress reports.
Bombay High Court, Magistrate Courts In Mumbai Vacated Following Bomb Scare
Source: Click Here
Development: Court proceedings at the Bombay High Court and various Mumbai magistrate courts were temporarily suspended on December 18, 2025, due to a coordinated bomb threat that led to evacuations as a precautionary measure. Thorough searches by Bomb Detection and Disposal Squads found no explosives, and the threats were ultimately declared hoaxes. High Court proceedings resumed after lunch. Police are currently investigating the source of the malicious emails.
SCBA, Union To Submit Joint Suggestions To Supreme Court On Preventing Attacks On Judges
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court Bar Association informed the Supreme Court that, together with the Union Government, it will submit joint proposals for guidelines to prevent physical attacks on judges in court and to regulate media content that praises such incidents. This comes in a contempt case arising from an advocate throwing a shoe at a then Chief Justice, where the Court has indicated it prefers to focus on forward‑looking preventive measures rather than pursuing criminal contempt, including possible norms under IT or Supreme Court rules to ensure responsible reporting by mainstream and digital media.
Karnataka High Court Asks ED To Consider Bank Guarantee For De-Freezing Winzo's ₹ 505 Crore Account Amid Money Laundering Case
Source: Click Here
Development: The Karnataka High Court is hearing a petition from Winzo challenging the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) action of freezing its bank accounts, which contain about ₹505 crore, as part of a money-laundering probe. Winzo argues the freeze is excessive and proposed a bank guarantee as an alternative. The court directed the ED to respond on whether it would accept a bank guarantee and instructed Winzo to submit detailed financial information regarding user deposits, winnings, and overseas entities. The ED will file its formal response after receiving these details, and the hearing is ongoing.
Plea before Telangana HC Over Appointment Of State Police Chief In Violation Of Supreme Court Directions, Govt Asked To Respond
Source: Click Here
Development: The Telangana High Court has issued a notice to the State government regarding a public interest writ petition challenging the appointment of B. Shivdhar Reddy as the acting Director General of Police (Head of Police Force). The petitioner argues the appointment violates Supreme Court mandates requiring the State to propose vacancies to the UPSC three months prior to the incumbent's retirement for a permanent appointment. The petition notes the State's failure to meet these timelines and the lack of an empanelment committee meeting, seeking the acting DGP's disqualification and a permanent appointment from a UPSC-approved panel. The next hearing is scheduled for December 22, 2025.Supreme Court Directs Passport Authority To Re-Issue Passport to UAPA Accused, Says Procedural Safeguards Shouldn’t Become Barriers
Source: Click Here
Development: The Supreme Court overruled the Calcutta High Court and ordered the Regional Passport Officer, Kolkata, to re-issue a ten-year ordinary passport to an accused person, despite pending UAPA and other criminal cases. The Court found the indefinite refusal of the passport "disproportionate," especially since the criminal courts had already imposed conditions on travel and passport deposit, which were sufficient to ensure the accused remained subject to the court's jurisdiction. The ruling emphasized that any restrictions on an accused must be necessary, proportionate, and legally justified.
II. Details of Important Decisions:
A. Supreme Court
Politically Motivated': Supreme Court Quashes Land Allotment Corruption Case Against Karnataka BJP Leader R Ashoka
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court dismissed corruption charges against Karnataka BJP leader and Leader of Opposition, Shri R. Ashoka, which alleged he illegally allocated government land. The Court's decision was based on three reasons: the lack of prior sanction from the State government to begin the investigation, the Karnataka Lokayukta's repeated dismissal of similar complaints due to insufficient evidence, and the Court's finding that the new FIR was a "politically motivated and malicious prosecution" based on a "repackaging of old accusations.
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Challenging Election Of DMK MP Dayanidhi Maran In 2024 Lok Sabha Elections
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court upheld the 2024 Lok Sabha election of DMK MP Dayanidhi Maran from Chennai Central, rejecting M.L. Ravi's petition. The Court ruled that alleged corrupt practices, mainly related to party advertisements and pamphlets during the silent period, were the responsibility of the DMK party, not Maran personally. It was clarified that pre-certified party advertisements are not automatically illegal, and other claims regarding stickers, booth agent costs, and rallies were dismissed due to insufficient evidence directly linking the expenditure to Maran.
Supreme Court’s Directions Against Dowry And Its Impact On Muslim Marriages
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Ajmal Beg for the dowry death and cruelty of his wife, citing the documented history of dowry demands as activating the legal assumption of dowry death. The Court also issued a broader condemnation of dowry as a social evil, noting its unfortunate prevalence in many Muslim marriages where it undermines the financial security intended by mehr. To combat this, the Court issued directives for enhanced education, stricter enforcement, and public awareness campaigns.
‘Union Cannot Have Its Own Limitation Period' : Supreme Court Flags Delay In Govt Appeals
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court, through a bench of Justices Manoj Misra and Ujjal Bhuyan, dismissed multiple Special Leave Petitions filed by the Union of India, citing an inordinate and unexcused delay. The Court emphasized that the State must strictly adhere to statutory timelines and cannot claim a separate or relaxed limitation period. Arguments concerning bureaucratic procedures were rejected as insufficient cause for the delay, and the appeals were dismissed due to the government's consistent negligence.
'Brazenly Abused Freedom Of Speech' : Supreme Court Refuses Plea To Quash FIR Over Post Against Prime Minister
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court dismissed a writ petition filed by BJP worker Gurudath Shetty, who sought to quash an FIR registered by Gujarat Police. Shetty was booked for allegedly reposting offensive content targeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi on X. The Bench refused to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 32, finding that the petitioner had “brazenly abused” the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression and shown no remorse. Consequently, the Court declined to grant even temporary protection for the petitioner to approach the High Court.
‘Not Sustainable In The Eyes Of Law’: SC Says Forest Land Can’t Be Leased Or Used Even For Agriculture Without Centre’s Prior Approval
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court of India overturned a 2009 Karnataka High Court order, ruling in favor of the State of Karnataka. The decision canceled the agricultural lease of forest land in Dharwad granted to the Gandhi Jeevan Collective Farming Co-operative Society. The Court held that the original lease was unlawful as it resulted in deforestation, violating the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, which prohibits using forest land for non-forestry activities like agriculture without Central Government approval. The Court directed that the repossessed land must be restored by planting indigenous species.
Corporate Social Responsibility Must Include Environmental Responsibility, Says Supreme Court In Great Indian Bustard Case
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court, in a ruling on the conservation of the Great Indian Bustard, established that Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) under the Companies Act, 2013, includes a fundamental Corporate Environmental Responsibility. This means companies have a constitutional obligation (Article 51A(g)) to protect wildlife and ecosystems impacted by their operations. The Court emphasized that CSR is not just voluntary charity but the fulfillment of both fiduciary and constitutional duties. As a result, power generators in Rajasthan and Gujarat were mandatorily directed to allocate their CSR funds for the conservation of the Great Indian Bustard.
Rajasthan Municipal Elections Will Be Completed By April 2026, State Assures Supreme Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court’s order allowing municipal elections to be completed by April 2026. The Court accepted the State’s assurance that delimitation and elections for urban local bodies would be finished by April 30, 2026. The Bench considered the ongoing delimitation process, dismissing a petition by Congress leader Sanyam Lodha who had argued for immediate polls.
B. Bombay High Court
Bombay High Court Bars Sale Of Cough Syrup Under 'CEFDON' Mark, Citing Similarity With 'CEDON'
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Bombay High Court has issued an injunction preventing the sale of the cough syrup CEFDON. This decision was based on the court's finding that the name is too similar to the pre-existing, registered trademark CEDON for related pharmaceutical goods. The court determined that the similarity in the trademarks and the overlapping market for cough syrups would create a likelihood of confusion among consumers, thus justifying the injunction until the trademark dispute is resolved.
Bombay High Court Refuses To Stay Conviction Of Sports Minister Manikrao Kokate In 1995 Cheating Case, Suspends Sentence
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Bombay High Court has suspended the two-year prison sentence and granted bail to Maharashtra Sports Minister Manikrao Kokate in a 1995 cheating and forgery case, allowing his appeal (criminal revision) to proceed. Although the High Court refused to stay the conviction, which therefore still stands, it is notable that the minister has already resigned from his post.
C. Madras High Court
Centre Has Constitutional Duty To Aid Indians Working Abroad; Must Frame Policy For Legal Assistance Overseas: Madras High Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Madras High Court ruled that the Union Government has a constitutional obligation, rooted in the Preamble and Articles 38, 39, and 39A of the Indian Constitution, to provide legal assistance to all Indian citizens, including those overseas. Citing principles like Rajadharma and parens patriae, the Court mandated the Centre to formulate a clear policy for overseas legal aid, specifically to help migrant workers involved in disputes or seeking compensation after a death abroad.
New Criminal Laws Mark Constitutional Transformation, Made Process Victim-Centric, Citizen-Responsive & Justice-Oriented: Madras High Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Madras High Court has praised India’s new criminal laws (BNS, BNSS, and BSA) as a “constitutional transformation,” asserting they replace the colonial criminal justice system with a framework that is more victim-centric, citizen-responsive, and justice-oriented. The court highlighted that the new statutes prioritize timeliness, transparency, accountability, and proportionality, and it mandated strict adherence to statutory deadlines for filing final reports to ensure efficient and fair justice delivery.
Madras High Court Directs State To Form Standard Operating Procedure For Political Meetings By January 5
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Madras High Court's Division Bench has directed the State of Tamil Nadu to finalize the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for granting permissions for political public meetings. The State is mandated to consider suggestions and objections from concerned political parties before finalizing the SOP. The Court acknowledged the extensive submissions and consultations on the draft SOP and recorded the State's assurance that no permissions would be granted until the SOP is finalized. Aggrieved parties were granted the liberty to challenge the finalized SOP separately.
D. Calcutta High Court
Calcutta High Court Quashes Regularisation Of 313 Volunteer Teachers Under Gorkhaland Territorial Administration, Calls Appointments Illegal
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Calcutta High Court nullified the appointments and state approval for 313 volunteer teachers under the Gorkhaland Territorial Administration (GTA). The Court deemed the appointments illegal because they lacked a formal recruitment process, violated government directives, and many appointees did not have the required qualifications. The judgment stressed that appointments made without legal sanction cannot be validated by later administrative approval, especially given an existing ban on such recruitments.
Calcutta High Court Orders CBI Probe Into Killing Of TMC Worker In 2010 Police Firing, Flags Attempts To ‘Shield’ Erring Cop
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Calcutta High Court has mandated an immediate takeover of the 2010 Jangipara police firing investigation in Hooghly by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). This decision follows the court's finding of "serious shortcomings" and apparent efforts "to protect" the then officer-in-charge in previous probes conducted by the Criminal Investigation Department (CID). In this incident, Trinamool Congress supporter Rabin Ghose was killed. The CID has been ordered to promptly hand over all case records and materials to the CBI to commence the fresh investigation.
E. Delhi High Court:
Delhi High Court Declines PIL Seeking "Four Times" Compensation For Tickets Recently Cancelled By IndiGo, Judicial Inquiry Against DGCA
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Delhi High Court refused to hear a public interest litigation (PIL) regarding IndiGo Airlines' recent flight cancellations. The PIL had demanded "four times" compensation for affected passengers and sought a judicial inquiry into alleged regulatory failures by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA). The Court dismissed the petition, observing that the same aviation crisis issues were already under consideration in an existing PIL, and therefore, there was no justification for having multiple proceedings on the same matter.
Delhi High Court Sets Aside Lokpal Sanction For CBI Chargesheet Against Mahua Moitra
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Delhi High Court quashed the Lokpal's order that had sanctioned the CBI to file a chargesheet against TMC MP Mahua Moitra in the 'cash-for-query' case. The Court found that the Lokpal had improperly granted the prosecution sanction under Section 20(7)(a) of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, by failing to adequately consider Moitra's submissions, thereby violating natural justice. The High Court has directed the Lokpal to re-examine the matter and issue a fresh order within one month.
F. Kerala High Court
Bank Not 'Assessee In Default' For Not Deducting TDS On Interest After Accepting Form 15H From Senior Citizens: Kerala High Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Kerala High Court has ruled that a bank is not an "assessee in default" for failing to deduct TDS on interest paid to senior citizens who submitted valid Form 15H declarations. The court held that expecting banks to recalculate each depositor's total taxable income and deductions before accepting Form 15H would defeat the beneficial TDS compliance scheme intended for senior citizens.
Sabarimala Gold Theft: Kerala High Court Denies Bail To Ex-Devaswom Board Officials
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Kerala High Court, through a Single Bench, rejected the bail applications submitted by former Travancore Devaswom Board officials implicated in the Sabarimala gold misappropriation cases. The Court sustained the denial of bail, emphasizing the gravity of the charges concerning public trust and temple assets. This decision followed the prior rejection of their bail pleas by the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge.
Elappully Brewery Case: Kerala High Court Quashes Govt Order Granting Preliminary Sanction To Private Company To Set Up Ethanol Plant
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Kerala High Court, acting on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) by Elappully residents, invalidated the government order that had provisionally permitted Oasis Commercial Pvt Ltd to establish a brewery and associated ethanol/liquor production units in Elappully village, Palakkad district. The court determined that the basis for the sanction was factually incorrect, citing errors regarding the project's location and proposed water source, which rendered the government's decision flawed. Consequently, the court revoked the approval but specified that the government retains the option to reconsider the application anew, provided it uses accurate information.
G. Karnataka High Court
Public Interest Needed In Politics: Karnataka High Court Pulls Up State For Closure Of Janaushadhi Kendras
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Karnataka High Court's Single Bench overturned the State Government's May 2025 order to evict Janaushadhi Kendras from government hospitals, directing that their operations continue without interference. The Court ruled that the sudden closure, after seven years of continuous operation, violated the licensees' legitimate expectations. Furthermore, the Court criticised the government's action as antithetical to public interest, suggesting it may have been motivated by political or arbitrary reasons, and emphasised that governance must be guided by public interest, not abrupt policy changes.
H. Gujarat High Court
Waqf Institutions Not Exempt From Paying Court Fees For Raising Dispute Before State Tribunal: Gujarat High Court
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Gujarat High Court has ruled that waqf institutions are not exempt from paying court fees when initiating eviction or other property disputes before the State Waqf Tribunal under Section 83(3) of the Waqf Act. The Court reasoned that these "applications" are fundamentally civil suits, and the Tribunal operates as a deemed civil court. Therefore, in the absence of a specific statutory or notified waiver, these proceedings are governed by the Gujarat Court Fees Act and the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), meaning suits can be rejected for undervaluation or non-payment of the required court fees.
J. Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
Migrant Status Cannot Dilute Career Progression Once Eligibility Is Met: J&K&L High Court Upholds Retrospective CAS Promotions
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court upheld a lower court's decision, mandating that migrant teachers be granted retrospective promotions under the Career Advancement Scheme (CAS). The Court ruled that a teacher's migrant status cannot block their career progression, reinforcing the principle of equal treatment under Article 14. This decision overrode the University's argument that the teachers were ineligible due to not being in "active service" during their migrant period or lacking completed training, as the teachers had already been deemed eligible for promotion by the relevant bodies.
J. Allahabad High Court
'Larger Conspiracy Not Ruled Out': Allahabad High Court Refuses To Quash 2017 Rioting FIRs Against MP Chandrashekhar Ravan
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Allahabad High Court declined to dismiss four FIRs filed against sitting MP and Bhim Army chief Chandrashekhar Ravan concerning the 2017 Saharanpur rioting incident. The court justified the separate proceedings, ruling that the FIRs relate to distinct events occurring at different locations and times, and that the possibility of a "larger conspiracy" cannot be dismissed. This approach validated multiple FIRs rather than treating subsequent ones as impermissible second FIRs or merely supplementary to the first.
‘Bareilly Violence’, Sar Tan Se Juda' Slogan Against India's Sovereignty, Incites Armed Rebellion; No Quranic Basis: Allahabad HC Denies Bail
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Allahabad High Court denied bail to an accused in the September 2025 Bareilly violence, ruling that the slogan "sar tan se juda" is a direct offense against the rule of law and India's sovereignty. The Court classified it under Section 152 BNS for inciting armed rebellion. The Court observed that the slogan is without basis in Islamic scripture, contradicts Islamic principles, has origins linked to political developments in Pakistan where it was misused, and that calls for beheading cannot be protected as religious expression.
Allahabad High Court Rejects PIL To Adopt ECI's 'SIR' Guidelines For UP Three-Tier Panchayat Roll Revision
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Allahabad High Court's Division Bench dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that sought to enforce the Election Commission of India's Special Intensive Revision guidelines for the upcoming Three-Tier Panchayat Elections in Uttar Pradesh. The Court refused to interfere, noting that the State Election Commission's electoral roll revision procedure, which began on July 18, 2025, was already at an advanced stage. Furthermore, the provisional voter list was scheduled for publication on December 23, 2025.
Rahul Gandhi Citizenship Row | High Court Transfers Case To Lucknow As BJP Worker Alleges 'Death Threats' By Advocates In Raebareli
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Allahabad High Court, on December 18, 2025, ordered the immediate transfer of a criminal case against Raebareli MP Rahul Gandhi from the Raebareli court to the Special MP/MLA Court in Lucknow. The transfer was requested by the complainant, BJP worker S. Vignesh Shishir, who alleged he faced intimidation, verbal abuse, and death threats from local advocates inside the Raebareli courtroom, forcing the presiding judge to also require police protection. The Court granted the transfer to ensure fairness, noting that the complaint alleges the MP holds British citizenship.
K. Uttarakhand High Court
Judicial Exams: Uttarakhand HC Flags Errors Creeping In Question Papers Every Year, Orders Course Correction
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Division Bench directed the Uttarakhand Public Service Commission (UKPSC) to revise the merit list for the Uttarakhand Judicial Service Civil Judge (Junior Division) Preliminary Examination (August 2025) due to errors in the answer key. The revision involves correcting two answers and deleting two questions. The Bench heavily criticized the UKPSC's "persistent errors," noting the emotional distress and loss of confidence caused to candidates. To prevent future issues, the court issued "detailed directions," including forming an expert committee, providing reasoned correction reports, implementing uniform re-evaluation, and promptly publishing revised merit lists.
L. Other Tribunal and District Court Orders
National Herald Case: Delhi Court Refuses To Take Cognizance Of ED's Complaint Against Rahul Gandhi, Sonia Gandhi
Source: Click Here
Verdict: A Special Judge at Rouse Avenue Courts, Delhi, dismissed the Enforcement Directorate's prosecution complaint against Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi in the National Herald case, refusing to take cognizance of the money laundering allegations. The Court ruled the complaint was not maintainable because it was based on a private complaint filed by Subramanian Swamy under Section 200 CrPC, and not on an FIR registering a scheduled offence, as mandated by the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
WhatsApp Privacy Policy Case: NCLAT Clarifies CCI's Safeguards For Non-Advertising Data Apply To Advertising Data Too
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Delhi bench, clarified its earlier ruling on WhatsApp's data sharing practices following a plea from the Competition Commission of India (CCI). The NCLAT mandated that the same privacy and consent safeguards applied to WhatsApp's non-advertising data shared with Meta must also be applied when that data is used for advertising purposes. This clarification means the CCI's directions of November 18, 2024, now govern all aspects of WhatsApp's user data collection and sharing, including for advertising. WhatsApp has been given three months to implement changes requiring clear disclosure and the user's express, revocable consent for any non-essential data use, such as advertisements.
Delhi Court Rejects Plea By Rabri Devi To Transfer Cases Against Lalu Yadav And Family From Judge Vishal Gogne
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Rouse Avenue Courts rejected Rabri Devi's applications to transfer four criminal cases involving Lalu Prasad Yadav, Tejashwi Yadav, and other family members away from Special Judge Vishal Gogne. The applicant alleged bias and undue haste by Judge Gogne, but the CBI opposed the move, calling the applications defamatory. The Court ultimately found no grounds to transfer the cases, despite Judge Gogne stating he adhered to legal procedure and had no objection to directions.
Delhi Court Frames Charges Against Congress' Alka Lamba for Assault on Police During Women's Reservation Protest
Source: Click Here
Verdict: A Delhi court recently framed charges against Congress leader Alka Lamba following a protest in July 2024 at Jantar Mantar, which called for women's reservation in Parliament. The charges include assault/criminal force on public servants, obstruction of officials, disobedience of lawful orders, and obstructing a public way. The Court rejected Lamba's application for discharge, citing prima facie evidence from video footage. This evidence reportedly shows her instigating protesters, pushing police personnel, breaching barricades, and leading the group beyond the permitted area, in violation of prohibitory orders under Section 163 BNSS.
Kashmir Court Says Hizbul Mujahideen Chief ‘Evading Arrest’, Issues Non-Bailable Warrant
Source: Click Here
Verdict: A Special NIA Court in Budgam has issued a non-bailable warrant against Syed Salahuddin, the Pakistan-based chief of Hizbul Mujahideen, in connection with a 2012 terror case under the UAPA. The Court found prima facie evidence linking Salahuddin, who was designated a terrorist by India and the US, to UAPA and RPC offences, noting he is evading arrest. A chargesheet is prepared, but a trial in absentia is pending official sanction. Salahuddin left for Pakistan in 1990 after contesting the 1987 J&K assembly elections.
Remove ‘Defamatory’ Deepfake Videos From Social Media: Ahmedabad Court Orders Cong, 4 of its Leaders
Source: Click Here
Verdict: The Civil Court at Ahmedabad granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in a commercial defamation suit filed by Adani Enterprises Limited. The court ordered the Indian National Congress leaders (Jairam Ramesh, Supriya Shrinate, Pawan Khera, and Uday Bhanu Chib) to remove allegedly defamatory deepfake videos, which targeted Gautam Adani and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, from all social media platforms within 48 hours. Social media intermediaries (X and YouTube) were also instructed to take down the videos within 72 hours. The court's decision was based on the finding that the content falsely accused the Adani Group of serious misconduct, causing "irreparable harm to reputation under Article 21" of the Constitution.
IV. Appointments, Collegium Recommendations and Transfer Section:
The legal developments recorded during this week reflect a wide range of judicial engagement with matters involving statutory interpretation, procedural compliance, and jurisdictional limits. Proceedings such as Supreme Court v. Election Commission of India (SIR petitions), Banke Bihari Temple Management Committee v. State of Uttar Pradesh, CCI proceedings concerning IndiGo, and Delhi High Court proceedings in the DGCA contempt petition remained at different procedural stages, including notices, interim protection, and reservation of orders. At the High Court level, cases relating to land disputes (Munambam land matter), religious practices (Thiruparankundram Deepam case), insolvency (Cauvery Neeravari Nigam Ltd.), and criminal law (Bareilly violence bail order) continued to progress through judicial scrutiny.
Alongside substantive adjudication, the week also included developments in judicial administration, including collegium recommendations, transfers, and internal court proceedings, as reflected in matters concerning the Sikkim High Court administrative dispute. Collectively, the cases documented in this digest provide a contemporaneous snapshot of legal proceedings and judicial activity across courts and institutions during the specified period, without presuming outcomes in matters that remain pending.