I. Key Highlights of The Proceedings:
The proceedings of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha commenced at 11:00 AM.
In the Lok Sabha, Shri Om Birla Ji (Speaker, Lok Sabha; BJP, Kota, Rajasthan) commenced the Question Hour.
Shri Hanuman Beniwal (RLP, Nagaur, Rajasthan) raised concerns over the Smart Meter Scheme, terming it a step toward privatisation, and sought details on consumer grievances related to incorrect billing, sudden disconnections and the existence of an independent central monitoring mechanism. In response, Shri Manohar Lal (Union Minister, Ministry of Power; BJP, Karnal, Haryana) clarified that the Government has no reports of forced installations, and noted that power distribution companies, which had accumulated losses of ₹7 lakh crore in 2017, recorded a collective profit of ₹2,600 crore in the most recent fiscal year.
Shri Ram Shiromani Verma (SP, Shrawasti, UP) sought accountability over Jal Shakti Ministry’s pipeline initiatives, highlighting unrepaired roads post-installation and non-operational water tanks. In response, Shri C.R. Patil (Union Minister, Ministry of Jal Shakti; BJP, Navsari, Gujarat) stated that 17,000 out of 18,000 complaints have been addressed under the Jal Jeevan Mission, with payments released only after Sarpanch certification.
In the Lok Sabha, proceedings commenced with the Zero Hour.
Shri Jagdambika Pal (BJP, Domariyaganj, Uttar Pradesh) urged the Government to develop 10 historical reservoirs in the Budhi Gandak circuit as eco-tourism hubs. Noting their 30 lakh cubic feet capacity and 13.5 lakh annual footfall, he emphasized their potential to mitigate flooding and boost local economies through the ‘One District One Product’ (ODOP) initiative.
Smt. Bansuri Swaraj (BJP, New Delhi, NCT of Delhi) raised concerns over the breakdown of law and order in West Bengal, specifically citing the intimidation of female judicial officers by local administration supporters. Referencing Supreme Court observations on constitutional failure, she urged the Union Government to intervene immediately and ensure the safety of the judiciary in the state.
Shri Manish Tewari (INC, Chandigarh, Chandigarh) raised concerns over the alleged embezzlement of ₹125 crore from the Chandigarh Smart City scheme, claiming that funds deposited in an IDFC bank account have disappeared. He demanded a thorough investigation and called for an RBI directive ensuring that Government funds are deposited only in scheduled commercial banks.
In the Lok Sabha, Shri Nityanand Rai (MoS, Ministry of Home Affairs; BJP, Ujiarpur, Bihar), moved the Central Armed Police Forces (General Administration) Bill, 2026, for consideration, and the House initiated discussion.
Shri Dharmendra Yadav (SP, Azamgarh, UP) opposed the Bill, stating that it neglects 10 lakh paramilitary personnel by prioritising IPS deputations over in-service officers, causing rank stagnation for up to 25 years. He demanded restoration of the Old Pension Scheme, martyr status, and referral of the Bill to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC).
Shri Krishna Prasad Tenneti (TDP, Bapatla(SC), Andhra Pradesh) supported the Bill as a vital reform for internal security and the “steel framework” of federal coordination. Drawing on his IPS background, he noted it addresses promotional stagnation and reduces litigation, while urging the Government to fill 90,000 vacancies and strengthen specialized units like the Greyhounds to achieve “Viksit Bharat 2047.”
Smt. Mahua Moitra (AITC, Krishnanagar, West Bengal) opposed the Bill, terming it a legislative workaround to bypass judicial rulings, arguing it preserves senior leadership roles for IPS officers while blocking Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF) cadre progression. She cited alarming rates of suicide and resignation and urged referral of the Bill to a Select Committee.
Replying to the discussion, Shri Nityanand Rai (MoS, Ministry of Home Affairs; BJP, Ujiarpur, Bihar) replied that the Bill provides a unified framework, removing administrative ambiguities and improving cadre management. He noted that 2.1 lakh appointments have been made since 2022, and martyrs’ families receive up to ₹1 crore assistance. Moreover, he mentioned that over 22 lakh Ayushman CAPF health cards have been issued, and recruitment timelines have been reduced to under one year, asserting that the Bill strengthens CAPFs without harming any section.
In the Lok Sabha, the motion to pass the Central Armed Police Forces (General Administration) Bill, 2026, was moved, adopted by the House, and the Bill was declared passed in the Lok Sabha.
In Rajya Sabha, Shri C.P. Radhakrishnan Ji (Chairman, Rajya Sabha) commenced the proceedings of the House by addressing Members on World Autism Awareness Day on 2nd April.
In the Rajya Sabha, Shri C.P. Radhakrishnan Ji (Chairman, Rajya Sabha) then commenced the Question Hour.
Shri Chunnilal Garasiya (BJP, Rajasthan) sought details on Green India Mission implementation in Rajasthan. In response, Shri Kirti Vardhan Singh (MoS, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change; BJP, Gonda, Uttar Pradesh) stated that ₹2.77 crore was allocated under the mission and afforestation was carried out over 61,056 hectares using indigenous species with support from Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority (CAMPA) and National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD), along with initiatives like Nagar Van Yojana.
Shri Digvijaya Singh (INC, Madhya Pradesh) questioned the impact of current sports policies and called for integration of sports with education. Smt. Raksha Nikhil Khadse (MoS, Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports; BJP, Raver, Maharashtra) Government is strengthening a grassroots sports ecosystem through the Khelo India Mission by focusing on early talent identification, aligning with NEP 2020, and working with states to expand sports infrastructure, such as integrated sports schools, Centres of Excellence, and Khelo India Centres, across districts to ensure nationwide access to training.
In the Rajya Sabha, Shri Nityanand Rai (MoS, Ministry of Home Affairs; BJP, Ujiarpur, Bihar) moved a motion for the consideration of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, and the House initiated discussion.
Smt. Renuka Chowdhury (INC, Telangana) expressed dissatisfaction over delays in addressing issues under the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014, calling it a “national shame,” and sought a time-bound roadmap for Amaravati along with a status report on pending commitments, citing unresolved disputes, stalled projects, and regional imbalance.
Shri Kinjarapu Rammohan Naidu (Union Minister, Ministry of Civil Aviation; TDP, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh) emphasized Amaravati’s centrality to Andhra Pradesh’s identity post-bifurcation, highlighting its consensus-based selection, judicial backing, and strong farmer participation. He called for a transparent, time-bound development framework with central support to ensure stability and restore investor confidence.
Shri K. R. Suresh Reddy (BRS, Telangana) supported the Bill while stressing unity between the two states, but raised concerns over unresolved commitments and amendments affecting Telangana, urging the Centre to adopt a balanced approach and fulfil pending assurances.
Responding to the discussion, Shri Nityanand Rai (MoS, Ministry of Home Affairs; BJP, Ujiarpur, Bihar) seeks to grant statutory recognition to Amaravati as the state capital, noting its earlier notification in 2015 and a supporting resolution passed in March 2024. Further, he explained that the Bill amends Section 5(2) of the 2014 Act to designate Amaravati as the capital with retrospective effect from 2 June 2014, ensuring legal clarity after Hyderabad ceased to be a joint capital, and described it as a historic step for the state’s development.
The Bill was then taken up for detailed consideration clause by clause. Following this, the motion to pass the Bill was moved, adopted by the House, and the Bill was passed in the House.
In the Rajya Sabha, Shri Piyush Vedprakash Goyal (Union Minister, Ministry of Commerce and Industry; BJP, Mumbai North, Maharashtra) moved a motion for the consideration of the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Bill, 2026, and the house initiated discussion.
Shri Shaktisinh Gohil (INC, Gujarat) opposed the Bill, criticizing its rushed introduction and lack of scrutiny, and warned that reduced penalties across laws could weaken deterrence, harm vulnerable groups, and compromise public safety.
Shri Surendra Singh Nagar (BJP, Uttar Pradesh) supported the Bill, describing it as a historic step decriminalising 717 offences across 42 ministries, replacing colonial-era punitive measures with warnings and penalties, and restoring dignity to ordinary citizens from vendors to cattle-rearers.
Replying to the discussion, Shri Piyush VedprakashGoyal (Union Minister, Ministry of Commerce and Industry; BJP, Mumbai North, Maharashtra)concluded the discussion, describing the bill as a historic shift toward trust-based governance, empowering adjudicating officers to levy penalties for over 1,000 provisions. He stated that decriminalisation was pursued only for purely procedural offences, while criminal provisions for deliberate misconduct were retained. Further, he added that key reforms aimed at enhancing penalties for women’s safety and making compliance easier for the people.
In the Rajya Sabha, following this, the motion to pass the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Bill, 2026, was moved, adopted by the House, and the Bill was declared passed.
The proceedings of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha were adjourned at 07:03 PM and 06:33 PM, 2nd April, 2026, respectively, to reconvene at 11:00 A.M on 16th April, 2026, Thursday.
II. Lok Sabha Proceedings:
The proceedings of the Lok Sabha commenced at 11:00 AM.
Shri Om Birla Ji (Speaker, Lok Sabha; BJP, Kota, Rajasthan) presided over the proceedings of the House and made an Obituary Reference regarding the passing of two former members, i.e., Shri Jangbir Singh (10th Lok Sabha, Bhiwani, Haryana) and Shri Narayan Sahu (7th Lok Sabha, Deogarh, Odisha).
Shri Om Birla Ji (Speaker, Lok Sabha; BJP, Kota, Rajasthan) commenced the Question Hour.
Shri Hanuman Beniwal (RLP, Nagaur, Rajasthan) raised concerns over the Smart Meter Scheme, terming it a step toward privatization, and sought details on consumer grievances related to incorrect billing and sudden disconnections. Further, he questioned whether an independent monitoring mechanism existed at the central level.
In response, Shri Manohar Lal (Union Minister, Ministry of Power; BJP, Karnal, Haryana) clarified that the Government has no reports of forced installations. He also noted that power distribution companies, which had accumulated losses of around ₹7 lakh crore in 2017 and again by 2026, recorded a collective profit of ₹2,600 crore in the most recent fiscal year.
Shri Ram Shiromani Verma (SP, Shrawasti, Uttar Pradesh) raised concerns over the Jal Shakti Ministry’s pipeline initiatives and sought accountability regarding infrastructure issues. Further, he highlighted that excavated roads and alleys are not being repaired post-installation and that several water tanks are not operational on time, citing an instance in Balrampur where a water tank collapsed within 15 days of its inauguration.
In response, Shri C.R. Patil (Union Minister, Ministry of Jal Shakti; BJP, Navsari, Gujarat) stated that under the Jal Jeevan Mission, approximately 17,000 out of 18,000 complaints have been addressed. Furthermore, he clarified that payments are released only after certification by the Sarpanch and villagers, after 15 days of operation, with 2% to 4% of the total project cost specifically allocated for road repairs following pipeline installation.
Shri Ramvir Singh Bidhuri (BJP, South Delhi, NCT of Delhi) sought details on the Ministry’s plans to alleviate traffic congestion in Delhi, including project costs and timelines for commencement.
In response, Shri Harsh Malhotra (MoS, Ministry of Road Transport & Highways; BJP, East Delhi, NCT of Delhi) outlined several key projects, including the Ashram-Badarpur stretch being made signal-free through three flyovers, the Mehrauli-Gurugram road aimed at reducing a one-hour journey to 15 minutes, and similar work on the Punjabi Bagh to Tikri stretch. He highlighted a 5-kilometre tunnel project from Shiv Murti to Nelson Mandela Marg, estimated at ₹3,500 crore. Further, he also mentioned that the redevelopment of the Kalindi Kunj sector, an elevated road from DND to Faridabad, is expected to commence within six months, and the inauguration of the Delhi-Dehradun Expressway is expected within the next eight to ten days.
Shri Parshottambhai Rupala (BJP, Rajkot, Gujarat) raised concerns over passenger safety during flights, particularly regarding disruptions caused by air turbulence on shorter routes attributed to global warming, and inquired whether the Government is developing updated safety protocols in light of changing environmental conditions.
In response, Shri Kinjarapu Rammohan Naidu (Union Minister, Ministry of Civil Aviation; TDP, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh) assured the House that India adheres to top international standards set by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), with the India Meteorological Department (IMD) providing critical weather data using sophisticated ground-based instruments to predict turbulence and storms. Further, he also affirmed the Government’s commitment to adopting new technologies to further strengthen civil aviation safety.
Following this, Papers, reports, and statements were laid on the Table.
Shri Om Birla Ji (Speaker, Lok Sabha; BJP, Kota, Rajasthan) cautioned Members against engaging in private conversations during proceedings and warned that continued misconduct would necessitate naming the Members and Ministers involved. He thereafter commenced the Zero Hour discussion.
Smt. Ruchi Vira (SP, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh) raised urgent concerns over leopard attacks in Moradabad and Bijnor since 2023, resulting in over 30 deaths and 100 injuries across 80 high-risk villages. She urged the Government to deploy a special task force, cages, drones, and camera traps, and demanded ₹25 lakh compensation for the victims’ families.
Smt. Roopkumari Choudhary (BJP, Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh) urged the Railway Minister to construct a new railway line connecting Arang to Bargarh-Sambalpur via Pithora, Basna, and Saraipali, advocating for over 35 years. She argued it would provide farmers with direct market access, boost agricultural income, and fulfill the long-standing aspirations of the region.
Smt. Harsimrat Kaur Badal (SAD, Bathinda, Punjab) criticised the lack of justice in sacrilege cases, noting approximately 600 incidents since 2015 with only a 7% conviction rate. She urged the Government to approve the Anti-Sacrilege Bill of 2016 and called for the commutation of Shri Bhai Rajoaana’s death sentence to life imprisonment.
Shri Jagdambika Pal (BJP, Domariyaganj, Uttar Pradesh) urged the Government to develop 10 historical reservoirs in the Budhi Gandak circuit as eco-tourism hubs. He noted their collective capacity exceeds 30 lakh cubic feet and attracts nearly 13.5 lakh tourists annually, with potential to boost local products under the ‘One District One Product’ scheme and mitigate flooding.
Shri Manish Tewari (INC, Chandigarh, Chandigarh) raised concerns over the alleged embezzlement of ₹125 crore from the Chandigarh Smart City scheme, claiming that funds deposited in an IDFC bank account have disappeared. He demanded a thorough investigation and called for an RBI directive ensuring that Government funds are deposited only in scheduled commercial banks.
Smt. Bansuri Swaraj (BJP, New Delhi, NCT of Delhi) raised concerns over the breakdown of law and order in West Bengal, citing intimidation of judicial officers, particularly women, by supporters of the local administration. Referencing Supreme Court observations on constitutional failure in the state, she urged the Central Government to ensure the safety of judicial officers.
Shri Nityanand Rai (MoS, Ministry of Home Affairs; BJP, Ujiarpur, Bihar) moved the Central Armed Police Forces (General Administration) Bill, 2026, for consideration and passing on behalf of the Home Minister. Following which, Shri Om Birla Ji called upon the House to take it into consideration and discussion.
Smt. Mahua Moitra (AITC, Krishnanagar, West Bengal) moved an amendment proposing that the Central Armed Police Forces (General Administration) Bill, 2026, be referred to a 15-member Select Committee, with its report to be submitted by the last day of the first week of the next Lok Sabha session.
Shri Dharmendra Yadav (SP, Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh) opposed the Bill, asserting it neglects the welfare and service conditions of 10 lakh paramilitary personnel despite their immense sacrifices. He criticized the legislation for prioritizing IPS deputations over the career progression of in-service officers, leading to rank stagnation for up to 25 years.
Further, he highlighted the Government’s failure to implement judicial rulings on pensions and demanded the restoration of the Old Pension Scheme alongside official “martyr status” for those killed in action. Alleging that the Bill dilutes personnel rights while favoring corporate interests, he urged its referral to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) to ensure a more consultative and sensitive approach to internal security.
Smt. Mahua Moitra (AITC, Krishnanagar, West Bengal) opposed the Bill, framing it as a legislative “workaround“ to bypass judicial rulings and institutionalize inequity. She criticized the Government for denying personnel official “martyr status” and argued that the Bill unfairly preserves senior leadership roles for IPS officers, blocking the career progression of experienced CAPF cadre.
Citing alarming rates of suicide and resignation, she warned that ignoring the welfare and dignity of 10 lakh personnel undermines national security. Further, she accused the Government of using the Bill to override the Supreme Court’s 2025 mandate for cadre reforms and urged that it be referred to a Select Committee to protect the autonomy and morale of the forces.
Shri Krishna Prasad Tenneti (TDP, Bapatla (SC), Andhra Pradesh) supported the Bill, framing it as a vital reform to strengthen India’s federal structure and internal security. Drawing on his experience as a former IPS officer, he described the All India Services as the nation's "steel framework" and argued that the legislation ensures necessary coordination between the CAPFs, civil administration, and the military.
Further, he noted that the Bill addresses long-standing structural issues, such as promotional stagnation where constables often retire without a single advancement, while also standardizing rules to reduce internal litigation. Linking security to the “Viksit Bharat 2047” vision, he emphasized that uniform recruitment and training are essential for stability. He concluded by urging the Government to quickly fill 90,000 vacancies and enhance support for specialized units like the Greyhounds.
Shri Mohite Patil Dhairyasheel Rajsinh (NCP-SP, Madha, Maharashtra) opposed the Bill, asserting it institutionalizes systemic injustice against the personnel guarding India’s borders. He highlighted a severe leadership disparity where up to 100% of top-level CAPF posts are reserved for IPS officers, blocking the career progression of experienced cadre.
Citing 750 suicides and 46,000 resignations between 2021 and 2025, he argued that the Bill ignores institutional distress and lacks essential welfare provisions. Criticizing the “zero financial cost” as evidence of neglect, he accused the Government of bypassing Supreme Court mandates and demanded a referral to a Joint Parliamentary Committee to ensure fairness for the forces.
Shri Imran Masood (INC, Saharanpur, UP) opposed the Bill, arguing it circumvents a Supreme Court judgment. He invoked General Manekshaw, noting even decorated officers would be adversely affected. He highlighted alarming suicide rates within CAPFs, 143 suicides in the CRPF alone in 2025, along with 93,000 vacant posts in CAPF and rising voluntary retirements, urging referral of the bill to a Joint Parliamentary Committee for detailed deliberation.
Shri Awadhesh Prasad (SP, Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh) opposed the CAPF General Administration Bill, 2026, arguing that it directly violates the Supreme Court’s May 2025 judgment recognising CAPFs as Organised Group ‘A’ Services. He highlighted that reserving IG, ADG, and DG posts for IPS officers denies CAPF personnel fair promotions, with officers waiting 15–18 years for their first promotion. He warned that declining morale, rising suicides, and premature retirements weaken a force of over 11 lakh personnel deployed across India’s borders.
Replying to the discussion, Shri Nityanand Rai (MoS, Ministry of Home Affairs; BJP, Ujiarpur, Bihar) stated that the Central Armed Police Forces (General Administration) Bill, 2026, aims to remove administrative ambiguities in CAPF service conditions and provides an umbrella framework to ensure clarity and improved cadre management, enhancing both efficiency and morale of the forces.
He stated that ‘Group A’ officers generally receive four promotions, with delays attributed to court cases or disciplinary issues rather than policy failure. He rejected claims of neglect in recruitment, noting that since 2022, approximately 2.10 lakh appointments have been made, with exams now conducted in 13 regional languages.
He highlighted significant welfare measures, including financial assistance of up to ₹1 crore for families of martyrs and over 22 lakh Ayushman CAPF health cards issued, with thousands of crores spent on healthcare. He noted that recruitment timelines have been reduced from two years to under one year, new battalions have been formed, and housing satisfaction has crossed 50%, reflecting the Government’s commitment to the welfare and modernisation of CAPF personnel
He concluded by stating that the Bill would bring greater administrative clarity and strength to CAPFs without harming any section.
The proceedings of the Lok Sabha were adjourned at 07:03 PM to reconvene at 11:00 A.M on 16th April, 2026, Thursday.
III. Rajya Sabha Proceedings:
The proceedings of the Rajya Sabha commenced at 11:00 AM.
Shri C.P. Radhakrishnan Ji (Chairman, Rajya Sabha) commenced the proceedings of the House by addressing Members on World Autism Awareness Day, observed globally on 2nd April. He reaffirmed the House’s commitment to the rights and welfare of persons with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), stressing the need for early diagnosis, inclusive education, and community awareness to empower them fully.
Shri P.C. Mody (Secretary General, Rajya Sabha) informed the House that the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Bill, 2023, was passed in the Lok Sabha and laid on the Table of the House for consideration.
Papers and Reports were laid on the table of the house. Following this, matters raised with permission were taken up. (Refer to Annexure VII for further details)
Amidst the discussion of Matters Raised with Permission, Shri C.P. Radhakrishnan Ji (Chairman, Rajya Sabha) asked permission to skip lunch to discuss the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2026. Shri Jairam Ramesh (INC, Karnataka) questioned the uncertainty regarding the House proceedings, asking whether the Rajya Sabha would continue the next day or be adjourned sine die. In response, Shri J.P. Nadda (BJP, Gujarat) stated that he would inform the House accordingly.
Following this, Shri C.P. Radhakrishnan Ji (Chairman, Rajya Sabha) proceeded to continue discussing Matters Raised with Permission, the details of which can be found under Annexure IX.
Shri C.P. Radhakrishnan Ji (Chairman, Rajya Sabha) then commenced the Question Hour.
Shri Chunnilal Garasiya (BJP, Rajasthan) sought details on the implementation of the National Mission for a Green India (GIM) in Rajasthan. He inquired about land brought under forest cover, restoration of degraded forest land, and steps to accelerate afforestation despite the state’s arid climate.
In response, Shri Kirti Vardhan Singh (MoS, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change; BJP, Gonda, Uttar Pradesh) responded that afforestation efforts focus on indigenous species to improve sapling survival rates. He informed that Rajasthan received ₹2.77 crore under the mission. He added that, through convergence of funds from Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority (CAMPA) and National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD), afforestation was carried out across 61,056 hectares in ecologically sensitive zones, including the Aravalli range. He also noted that initiatives like the Nagar Van Yojana (2021–2024) were launched to further enhance green cover.
Shri Chunnilal Garasiya (BJP, Rajasthan) raised supplementary questions on ecological funding, low forest cover in desert districts, and degradation of the Aravalli Range due to mining. Shri Kirtivardhan Singh (MoS, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change; BJP, Gonda, Uttar Pradesh), responded that the Government is shifting towards a performance-based framework linking financial incentives to measurable forest conservation, and assured that mining activities in the Aravalli range are being actively monitored for their restoration and ecological protection.
Shri Digvijay Singh (INC, Madhya Pradesh) raised concerns over the effectiveness of existing sports policies, noting that despite the launch of the Target Olympic Podium Scheme (TOPS) in 2014, India’s medal tally at major international events remains limited. Further, he suggested that India draw lessons from countries like China, where sports schools integrate academics with high-performance training centers, in contrast to the Sports Authority of India (SAI) centers, which often operate outside the mainstream educational system.
In response, Smt. Raksha Nikhil Khadse (MoS, Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports; BJP, Raver, Maharashtra) stated that the Government is building a grassroots-oriented sports ecosystem through the Khelo India Mission, focusing on early talent identification and aligning sports development with the National Education Policy 2020, with collaboration with state Governments to establish integrated sports schools, State Centres of Excellence, and Khelo India Centres across districts to make sports training accessible nationwide.
Dr. Sasmit Patra (BJD, Odisha) raised concerns over the declining safety of Olive Ridley turtle populations along the Odisha coast, citing deaths due to fishing net entanglement, trawler collisions, and poaching. Further, he sought details on concrete measures taken for their protection.
In response, Dr. Jitendra Singh (MoS, Ministry of Earth Science; BJP, Udhampur, Jammu and Kashmir) highlighted the Government’s commitment to marine conservation through the Deep Ocean Mission, with a budget of ₹4,027 crore allocated for 2023–25. He informed that a dedicated institution, Centre for Marine Living Resources and Ecology (CMLRE) has been established in Kochi, undertakes marine biodiversity surveys, conservation research, and maintains a digital database. Further, he added that the launch of “Amrut Sagar” as a biodiversity reference framework further strengthens the protection of marine species along India’s 11,000 km coastline.
Shri Mallikarjun Kharge (Leader of Opposition, INC, Karnataka) called for an All-Party meeting to deliberate on the modalities and roadmap for implementing the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam, 2023, informing the House that he had formally written to the government in this regard. He requested that the meeting be convened after the conclusion of the ongoing Assembly elections.
Shri Sanjay Singh (AAP, NCT of Delhi) raised similar concerns amid disruptions in the House. In response, Shri Kiren Rijiju (Union Minister, Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs; BJP, Arunachal West, Arunachal Pradesh) and Shri J.P. Nadda (Leader of the House; BJP, Gujarat) emphasized that the government had already held consultations with nearly 80 per cent of political parties, and urged that proceedings move forward in an orderly manner without politicising the issue.
Shri Nityanand Rai (MoS, Ministry of Home Affairs; BJP, Ujiarpur, Bihar) moved a motion for the consideration of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, and the House initiated discussion.
Smt. Renuka Chowdhury (INC, Telangana) expressed strong dissatisfaction over the prolonged delay in addressing issues arising from the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014, calling it a “national shame.” She demanded a time-bound roadmap for Amaravati’s development and a comprehensive status report on pending commitments, highlighting unresolved disputes, stalled projects, and regional imbalances, while urging the Government to move beyond assurances and ensure concrete, accountable implementation.
Shri Kinjarapu Rammohan Naidu (Union Minister, Ministry of Civil Aviation; TDP, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh) underscored Amaravati’s democratic legitimacy, stating it was chosen through a consensus-driven process. However, he also expressed concern over policy reversals and inconsistent positions by the previous state Government, which created uncertainty and hindered development. Further, he pointed to strong grassroots participation, especially by nearly 29,000 farmers who pooled 34,000 acres of land and the resilience of women protesters, while calling for a transparent, time-bound development framework with central support to restore investor confidence.
Shri Mohammed Nadimul Haque (AITC, West Bengal) extended his congratulations to the people of Amaravati and Andhra Pradesh, recalling past solidarity with TDP members during the bifurcation period. While conveying his good wishes, he cautioned against shifting political alliances, citing examples of changing alignments in national politics, and briefly alluded to future political developments before concluding with his remarks.
In response, Shri Kiren Rijiju (Union Minister, Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs; BJP, Arunachal West, Arunachal Pradesh) defended his party’s record of maintaining long-standing alliances, citing instances of support extended to political leaders in the past. He contrasted this with what he described as inconsistencies in opposition alliances. Further, he urged the members to remain focused on the subject under discussion while reiterating the importance of constructive debate in the House.
Shri Sanjay Singh (AAP, NCT of Delhi) expressed support for the Bill. While praising Shri N. Chandrababu Naidu for his leadership, he advised TDP members to leverage their current political position to secure maximum central assistance for the capital’s development. He also cautioned against reliance on shifting political alliances, citing past instances, and urged them to act strategically to ensure long-term benefits for Andhra Pradesh.
Shri K. R. Suresh Reddy (BRS, Telangana) reflected on the significance of the 2015 foundation ceremony of Andhra Pradesh’s capital and emphasized the shared cultural unity between the two states, recalling Shri K. Chandrashekar Rao’s vision of them as “one body, two eyes.” While supporting the Bill, he raised concerns over unresolved issues, including amendments made without Telangana’s consent and alleged neglect of its commitments. Highlighting Telangana’s development, including the Kaleshwaram project, he urged the Centre to ensure a balanced approach and fulfil pending assurances to both states.
Smt. Priyanka Chaturvedi (SS-UBT, Maharashtra) expressed solidarity with the people of Andhra Pradesh, particularly the farmers and women of Amaravati, while supporting the Bill and describing it as a “belated reckoning” of post-2014 shortcomings. She highlighted concerns over the 34,000 acres of land surrendered by farmers and pointed out the absence of clear timelines and compensation frameworks. She also flagged the non-fulfilment of Special Category Status over the past decade, urging that the amendment should not mark a “full stop” on the state’s aspirations and that pending commitments be addressed.
Shri Nityanand Rai (MoS, Ministry of Home Affairs; BJP, Ujiarpur, Bihar), replying to the discussion, outlined the legislative intent of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2024, noting that Amaravati had been notified as the capital on 23rd April, 2015, and that a resolution dated 28th March, 2024, sought its statutory recognition.
He explained that the Bill amends Section 5(2) of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014, to formally designate Amaravati as the capital with retrospective effect from 2nd June, 2014, ensuring legal clarity post the expiry of Hyderabad’s status as a joint capital. He termed it a “historic occasion,” expressing hope for the state’s development.
The Bill was then taken up for detailed consideration clause by clause. Following this, the motion to pass the Bill was moved, adopted by the House, and the Bill was declared passed.
Shri Piyush Vedprakash Goyal (Union Minister, Ministry of Commerce and Industry; BJP, Mumbai North, Maharashtra) moved a motion for the consideration of the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Bill, 2026, and the house initiated discussion.
Shri Shaktisinh Gohil (INC, Gujarat) raised strong objections to the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Bill, 2026. He criticized the Bill’s substance and rushed introduction, noting that the 340-page legislation amending 79 laws was brought without adequate scrutiny, undermining proper legislative deliberation. While supporting decriminalization in principle, he warned that reduced penalties across key laws could weaken deterrence, harm vulnerable groups, and compromise public safety, thereby urging a more consultative approach to ensure citizens’ rights are protected.
Shri P. Wilson (DMK, Tamil Nadu) opposed the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Bill, 2026, calling it a “pay and escape” framework that weakens accountability. He criticized the decriminalization of 717 offenses across 80 Acts without scrutiny, warning that changes to laws like the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, National Highways Act, railway safety, and environmental provisions could endanger public safety. He also cautioned that shifting powers from the judiciary to the executive may lead to arbitrary decisions and unequal justice.
Shri Surendra Singh Nagar (BJP, Uttar Pradesh) supported the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Bill, describing it as a historic step amending 784 provisions across 42 ministries and decriminalising 717 offences. He noted that colonial-era laws treated citizens as subjects, whereas this bill restores dignity to ordinary citizens from fruit vendors and small factory owners to cattle-rearers by replacing criminal prosecution with warnings and penalties. Invoking Shri Mahatma Gandhi’s principles of minimal use of force, he argued that governance should rely on the moral agency of citizens rather than punitive measures, and lauded the Government for ensuring Ease of Living and protecting the dignity of every citizen.
Smt. Maya Naroliya (BJP, Madhya Pradesh) supported the Bill, emphasising that it would benefit 2.12 lakh startups and MSMEs by eliminating the fear of imprisonment for minor filing mistakes, alleviating the burden of 4.8 crore pending court cases, and reducing redundant compliances. She asserted the bill as a vital tool for Viksit Bharat, urging all Members to support it in the national interest.
Replying to the discussion, Shri Piyush Vedprakash Goyal (Union Minister, Ministry of Commerce and Industry; BJP, Mumbai North, Maharashtra) described the Bill as a remarkable shift toward trust-based governance. Invoking Chanakya’s concept of “Yatharth Dand,” he argued that excessive punishment does not foster a law-abiding society. He emphasized that citizens, particularly in the MSME sector, should not face criminal prosecution for minor inadvertent errors where no criminal intent exists, and that the bill empowers adjudicating officers to levy penalties for over 1,000 provisions, reducing judicial backlog.
He explained the rigorous litmus test applied to each provision, stating that decriminalisation was pursued only for purely procedural offences causing no significant harm, where deliberate intent to deceive existed, criminal provisions were strictly retained. He elaborated on a graded approach where first-time offenders receive “improvement notices” or warnings, while habitual offenders face strict criminal fines and imprisonment.
Addressing concerns on women’s safety, the Minister stated that unauthorized entry into ladies’ railway compartments now carries an instant ₹2,500 penalty recoverable on the spot, replacing the earlier ₹500 fine that required a lengthy judicial process, thereby sparing women repeated court appearances. On public order, he clarified that false fire alarm offences are now covered under the BNS.
He rejected allegations that the bill favours powerful interest groups, asserting that it empowers farmers, weavers, MSMEs, and small entrepreneurs by freeing them from the burden of courts and lawyers. He emphasised that genuine criminal misconduct remains firmly dealt with under the BNS, while honest citizens are protected from bureaucratic harassment. He framed the Jan Vishwas Bill as a vital step toward Viksit Bharat 2047.
The Bill was then taken up for detailed consideration clause by clause. Following this, the motion to pass the Bill was moved, adopted by the House, and the Bill was declared passed.
Following which, special mentions were taken up which have been covered in Annexure-X.
The proceedings of the Rajya Sabha were adjourned at 06:33 PM to reconvene at 11:00 A.M on 16thApril, 2026, Thursday.
IV. Events Outside The Parliament:
Shri Ram Gopal Yadav (SP, Uttar Pradesh) strongly criticized the 2026 CAPF Bill as an abuse of the Government’s majority, warning of negative public consequences. Regarding the West Bengal assembly elections, he dismissed the impact of central opposition and NIA investigations, expressing absolute confidence that Kum. Mamata Banerjee will secure a thumping majority despite any political challenges directed from Delhi.
Shri Manish Tewari (INC, Chandigarh, Chandigarh) criticized the Government’s “band-aid approach” to the Strait of Hormuz crisis, questioning the long-term efficacy of duty cuts. He demanded stronger diplomatic efforts to address the blockade and restore global supply, noting that temporary relief cannot substitute for a strategic resolution to the West Asia conflict.
Smt. Priyanka Chaturvedi (SS-UBT, Maharashtra) dismissed official claims of energy stability as disconnected from reality, citing severe LPG shortages and delivery delays. She accused the Government of “jumlebaazi” instead of strategic planning, urging ministers to move beyond Question Hour assurances and engage with citizens facing immense hardships due to the ongoing West Asia crisis.
Shri Nishikant Dubey (BJP, Godda, Jharkhand) took to ‘X’ to urge the younger generation to independently research his historical and political claims. Expressing absolute confidence in their analytical abilities, he stated that an objective study of declassified records and past national policies would lead the youth to understand his perspective and the evidence supporting his stance on governance.
Shri Ravneet Singh Bittu (BJP, Ludhiana, Punjab) condemned the 1st April, 2026, blast outside the BJP office in Chandigarh as a clear sign of Punjab’s collapsing law and order. Alleging the involvement of Khalistani elements following a terror group’s claim of responsibility, he criticized the state leadership for failing to secure a sensitive border region and demanded immediate accountability.
Shri Karti P. Chidambaram (INC, Sivaganga) expressed surprise and disappointment at Defence Minister Shri Rajnath Singh’s remarks, stating they reflected a fundamental lack of understanding of Kerala’s spiritual traditions. He criticized the statement for misinterpreting the state’s cultural fabric, suggesting that the Union Minister’s perspective failed to grasp the unique social and religious harmony inherent to the region.
Shri P. P. Chaudhary (BJP, Pali, Rajasthan) backed the Supreme Court’s observations on West Bengal, alleging a total breakdown of law and order and systematic obstruction of the electoral process. He advocated for the deployment of central forces and asserted that imposing President’s rule would be a justified measure if conditions for free and fair elections are not maintained.
Shri Rajiv Ranjan Singh (Union Minister; JDU, Munger, Bihar) accused Mamata Banerjee of disregarding India’s laws, democratic principles, and traditions to maintain power. He alleged she is actively dismantling the system for political survival and urged her to recall her own past struggles against the CPI(M) Government’s authoritarianism, suggesting she has now adopted the very tactics she once opposed.
Shri Sanjay Singh (AAP, National Capital Territory of Delhi) confirmed that the party has formally notified the Rajya Sabha Secretariat regarding the leadership transition. He stated that the decision involves replacing Shri Raghav Chadha with Shri Ashok Kumar Mittal as the Deputy Leader of the Aam Aadmi Party in the Upper House, framing the move as a standard administrative update for the party.
Shri Ravi Kishan (BJP, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh) thanked the Supreme Court for taking cognizance of the Malda incident, where judicial officers were allegedly held hostage. He highlighted a severe lack of security for BJP Karyakartas during the 2026 election campaign and asserted that Mamata Banerjee is losing ground as the public prepares to reject the TMC’s “culture of violence.”
Shri Dinesh Sharma (BJP, Uttar Pradesh) raised concerns over demographic imbalances, advocating for a uniform population policy and strict action against illegal infiltration and proselytisation. He further urged the Government to extend minority benefits to Hindus in districts where their population has declined, framing these measures as essential for maintaining social equilibrium and national security.
Annexure I - Matters Raised Under Rule 377 In The Lok Sabha
Annexure II - Reports And Statements Presented In The Lok Sabha
Annexure III - Members Who Participated In Debate on The Central Armed Police Forces (General Administration) Bill, 2026, in the Lok Sabha
Annexure IV - Bills Passed In The Lok Sabha
Annexure V - Members Who Participated In Debate on The Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2026 in Rajya Sabha
Annexure VI - Members Who Participated in the Debate on the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Bill, 2026 in Rajya Sabha
Annexure VII - Reports And Statements Presented In The Rajya Sabha
Annexure IX - Bills Passed In The Rajya Sabha
Annexure X - Special Mentions In The Rajya Sabha