Parliament convened on 23 March 2026, marking Shaheed Diwas, with proceedings in both Houses reflecting a combination of policy discussions, legislative business and strategic briefings. In the Lok Sabha, the Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi Ji’s address on the West Asia conflict set the tone for the day, outlining its implications for India’s energy security, evacuation efforts and broader economic stability. Alongside this, members engaged with issues relating to fiscal policy, education funding and corporate regulation, indicating a continued focus on governance and economic management.

I. Key Highlights of The Proceedings:

  1. The proceedings of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha commenced at 11:00 AM.

  2. In the Lok Sabha, Shri Om Birla Ji (Speaker, Lok Sabha; BJP, Kota, Rajasthan) paid tribute to freedom fighters Sardar Bhagat Singh Ji, Sukhdev Ji and Rajguru Ji on Martyrs’ Day (Shaheed Diwas) and then commenced the Question Hour.

    1. Shri Manickam Tagore B. (INC, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nadu) raised concern over central grants to Kerala falling sharply from ₹22,559 crore in 2021–22 to ₹3,332 crore in 2025–26, questioning whether conditions were deliberately restricting funds to opposition-ruled states. In response, Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman (Union Minister, Ministry of Finance; BJP, Karnataka) clarified that fund releases depend on states utilizing funds and submitting compliance certificates. She also highlighted that ₹311.95 crore was approved under the National Disaster Mitigation Fund (NDMF) for Kerala, but zero funds have been released because the state has not yet applied for the drawing of the amount by providing the necessary documentation.

    2. Dr. Kalanidhi Veeraswamy (DMK, Chennai North, Tamil Nadu) questioned the feasibility of the National Education Policy (NEP), noting that only 60% out of ₹47,310 crore under Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan has been released nationwide by March, with Tamil Nadu receiving just 30% of the funds allocated to the State. Shri Jayant Chaudhary (MoS, Ministry of Education; RLD, Uttar Pradesh) clarified that Tamil Nadu’s funding delays are due to the state not signing the PM-SHRI MoU, with ₹538 crore recently released and further funds dependent on compliance.

  3. Following the conclusion of question hour, papers and reports were laid on the table.

  4. Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman (Union Minister, Ministry of Finance; BJP, Karnataka) sought leave to introduce the Corporate Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026.

    1. Shri Manish Tewari (INC, Chandigarh, Chandigarh) opposed the introduction of the Bill, citing excessive delegation of powers to the executive. He argued that key aspects like Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) norms and penalties being left to rules weakens Parliament’s role and reduces accountability.

    2. Shri Sougata Roy (AITC, Dum Dum, West Bengal) also opposed the introduction of the Bill, raising concerns over broad discretionary powers to the Central Government and bodies like National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA). He said this could lead to arbitrariness and weaken parliamentary oversight.

    3. Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman (Union Minister, Ministry of Finance; BJP, Karnataka) defended the Bill, stating it is based on two years of consultation and expert recommendations. She clarified that rules are procedural and subject to parliamentary review, and highlighted reforms like raising CSR threshold to ₹10 crore and decriminalizing 21 offences will support ease of doing business and MSME growth.

  5. The House approved the Bill’s introduction, and Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman (Union Minister, Ministry of Finance; BJP, Karnataka) referred it to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) after the voice vote.

  6. Following this, matters raised with permission were taken up.

    1. Dr. Indra Hang Subba (SKM, Sikkim) expressed gratitude for improved connectivity, including Sikkim’s first airport and the Sevoke–Rangpo railway project. He also congratulated the Prime Minister for becoming the longest-serving elected leader and highlighted the Northeast’s transformation.

    2. Shri Gurjeet Singh Aujla (INC, Amritsar, Punjab) raised a law and order issue alleging that harassment of an Food Corporation of India (FCI) officer led to his suicide and sought a probe. Shri Amit Shah (Union Minister, Ministry of Home Affairs; BJP, Gandhinagar, Gujarat) replied that it is a state subject but can be transferred to the Central Bureau of India (CBI) upon request by the MPs.

    3. Shri Jagdambika Pal (BJP, Domariyaganj, Uttar Pradesh) raised concerns over the low honorarium of ₹6,000–₹10,000 for Anganwadi workers and demanded a uniform pay scale, job security, and 26 weeks paid maternity leave for their welfare.

  7. The proceedings of the House were adjourned at 01:40 PM to reconvene at 02:00 PM.

  8. The proceedings of the House were reconvened at 02:00 PM, with Shri Om Birla Ji (Speaker, Lok Sabha; BJP, Kota, Rajasthan) in the Chair.

  9. Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi Ji (BJP, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh) addressed the House on the West Asia conflict, highlighting its economic and security challenges and outlining steps to ensure energy security and citizen safety. He informed that over 3.75 lakh Indians have been evacuated, and India has expanded oil sourcing from 27 to 41 countries while maintaining close coordination with global partners.

    1. He stated that the Government is maintaining a Strategic Petroleum Reserve of 5.3 MMT, with plans to add 6.5 MMT, and clarified that these reserves are in addition to the stocks held by oil companies. He also emphasised reducing import dependence through renewable energy and ethanol blending.

    2. He further highlighted that India’s renewable energy capacity has crossed 250 GW, and called for an unanimous stance of the House for immediate cessation of hostilities. He also urged State Governments to strictly monitor supply chains to prevent black marketing and hoarding.

  10. Subsequently, Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman (Union Minister, Ministry of Finance; BJP, Karnataka) sought leave to introduce the Finance Bill, 2026–27 to give effect to the financial proposals of the Central Government.

    1. Dr. Nishikant Dubey (BJP, Godda, Jharkhand) praised Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi Ji’s leadership, stating that India has become the fourth largest economy. He highlighted stable fuel prices despite global conflicts through diversified oil sourcing and said the Finance Bill reflects a vision of a $50 trillion economy by 2047, supported by key corporate reforms.

    2. Shri Ravindra Waikar (SS, Mumbai North West, Maharashtra) supported the Finance Bill 2026, highlighting fiscal discipline, increased expenditure of ₹ 53.5 lakh crore, tax relief, and major infrastructure push for Maharashtra, while urging a ₹5,000 crore national mission for a Slum-Free Mumbai by 2030.

    3. Smt. Supriya Sule (NCP(SP), Baramati, Maharashtra) raised concerns over India becoming a “debt-driven economy”, highlighting Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) shortages, rising costs for the middle class, and agricultural distress in Maharashtra. She questioned the Government’s fiscal transparency and criticized the Government’s reliance on a record dividend transfer of ₹ 3.16 trillion from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

    4. Shri Basavaraj Bommai (BJP, Haveri, Karnataka) supported the Finance Bill 2026 for maintaining fiscal discipline 4.3% deficit, sustaining 10% GDP growth, and ensuring economic resilience through strategic oil management and contingency planning amid global disruptions.

    5. Shri P.P. Chaudhary (BJP, Pali, Rajasthan) highlighted India’s strong fiscal position and stated that tax liability in India begins at a much higher level compared to the USA and UK. He noted that the ₹12 lakh threshold reflects a lower burden on citizens and emphasised increased Capital Expenditure (CapEx) as part of a long-term growth vision.

  11. In the Rajya Sabha, Shri C. P. Radhakrishnan Ji (Chairman, Rajya Sabha) paid tribute to freedom fighters Sardar Bhagat Singh Ji, Sukhdev Ji and Rajguru Ji on Martyrs’ Day (Shaheed Diwas).

  12. Papers and Reports were laid on the Table of the House, after which Shri C.P. Radhakrishnan Ji (Chairman, Rajya Sabha) took up Matters raised with Permission.

    1. Shri Dorjee Tshering Lepcha (BJP, Sikkim) congratulated the Prime Minister for becoming the longest-serving elected leader and highlighted improved connectivity and infrastructure in the Northeast.

    2. Shri Digvijay Singh (INC, Madhya Pradesh) raised concerns over rising railway costs and reduced accessibility, affecting common passengers and called for safer, affordable services.

    3. Dr. Dinesh Sharma (BJP, Uttar Pradesh) highlighted the growing water crisis, stressing groundwater depletion and the need for better conservation and management.

  13. Following this, the Hon’ble Chairman proceeded with the Question Hour.

    1. Dr. Bhim Singh (BJP, Bihar) raised concerns about unequal bus distribution under the PM e-Bus Sewa scheme, noting Bihar received only 400 buses. In response, Shri Manohar Lal (Union Minister, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs; BJP, Karnal, Haryana) replied that allocations were based on eligibility and proposals, and more cities could be included in the second phase of 35,000 buses.

    2. Dr. Sikander Kumar (BJP, Himachal Pradesh) asked about using treated sewage water in thermal power plants. Shri Shripad Yesso Naik (MoS, Ministry of Power; BJP, North Goa , Goa) replied that plants within 50 km of municipal sewage treatment plants are required to use treated water and said that the necessary infrastructure is being developed for reuse of treated sewage water.

    3. Shri Arun Singh (BJP, Uttar Pradesh) asked about coal usage and. Shri G. Kishan Reddy (Union Minister, Ministry of Coal; BJP, Secunderabad, Telangana) stated that about 80% of coal goes to the power sector and highlighted redevelopment of 143 abandoned mines for livelihoods and local development.

  14. The house reconvened at 2:00 PM with Shri Harivansh Ji (Deputy Chairman, Rajya Sabha) in the chair.

  15. Shri Pankaj Chaudhary (MoS, Ministry of Finance; BJP, Maharajganj, Uttar Pradesh) moved the motion on behalf of Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman (Union Minister, Ministry of Finance; BJP, Karnataka) for the Appropriation (No. 2) Bill, 2026, enabling withdrawal from the Consolidated Fund of India. The motion was accepted and discussion began.

    1. Shri Neeraj Dangi (INC, Rajasthan) raised concerns that ₹95,000 crore for MGNREGA is inadequate and said that the scheme needs an estimated amount of ₹2.3 lakh crore for proper implementation. He further highlighted under-utilisation of SC/ST scholarships and also highlighted rising fuel prices and disruption in LPG cylinders and fertiliser supply.

    2. Shri H. D. Deve Gowda (JD(S), Karnataka) reflected on similar economic challenges during the 1971 Bangladesh war. He highlighted current issues like LPG shortages, fuel supply, and black-market practices, and urged Members to avoid politicising essential commodity matters.

    3. Dr. John Brittas (CPI(M), Kerala) raised concerns over the Appropriation Bill’s failure to account for the economic fallout of the ongoing global conflict. He warned that rising oil prices could burden the Indian economy by ₹1.5 to 2 lakh crore and disrupt remittances worth ₹16 lakh crore.

    4. Shri Shambhu Sharan Patel (BJP, Bihar) strongly backed the Appropriation (No. 2) Bill, 2026, and noted that under the Modi Government, Bihar has decisively shed its “bimaru” tag with massive improvements in road and air connectivity. He also highlighted that railway expansion under the Modi Government has surpassed the cumulative progress of the previous 75 years

  16. In the Chair, Dr. Sasmit Patra (BJD, Odisha) adjourned the discussion on the Appropriation (No. 2) Bill, 2026 for the day and informed that it would resume on 24th March, 2026, following which Special Mentions were taken up.

    1. Dr. K. Laxman (BJP, Uttar Pradesh) highlighted the need to protect 2.89 crore domestic workers, noting lack of contracts and social security, and called for stronger welfare and grievance mechanisms.

    2. Shri P. Wilson (DMK, Tamil Nadu) raised concerns over the high ₹5.9 per unit tariff for Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant Units 3 and 4 and warned that this will impose financial burden on the State and urged the Government for rationalisation of nuclear power pricing.

    3. Shri Satnam Singh Sandhu (BJP, Nominated) stressed the need for a Metro network in Chandigarh Tricity, citing rising population and traffic. He noted a metro could serve 2.5 lakh daily passengers by 2031.

  17. The proceedings of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha were adjourned at 7:08 PM and 5:51 PM, on 23rd March, 2026, respectively, to reconvene at 11:00 A.M on Tuesday, 24th March, 2026.

II. Lok Sabha Proceedings:

  1. The proceedings of the Lok Sabha commenced at 11:00 AM with Shri Om Birla Ji (Speaker, Lok Sabha; BJP, Kota, Rajasthan) in the Chair.

  2. The Speaker paid tribute to freedom fighters Sardar Bhagat Singh Ji, Sukhdev Ji and Rajguru Ji on Martyrs’ Day (Shaheed Diwas) and then commenced the Question Hour.

    1. Shri Manickam Tagore B. (INC, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nadu) raised concern over the fall in central grants to Kerala from ₹22,559 crore (2021–22) to ₹3,332 crore (2025–26), with only ₹1,664 crore released. He said key sectors received little or no funds and asked if delays and conditions were restricting funds, noting similar issues in Tamil Nadu.

      1. Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman (Union Minister, Ministry of Finance; BJP, Karnataka) clarified that approval and release are different, and states must first use funds and submit certificates. She also highlighted that ₹311.95 crore was approved under the National Disaster Mitigation Fund (NDMF) for Kerala, but zero funds have been released because the state has not yet applied for the drawing of the amount by providing the necessary documentation.

    2. Shri Umeshbhai Babubhai Patel (Ind., Daman and Diu) raised concerns over severe pollution in Vapi, stating that industrial waste has turned the Kolak, Bilkhadi, and Damanganga rivers toxic, affecting health and livelihoods. He further asked about National Green Tribunal directions, compliance and investigation reports.

      1. Shri Kirti Vardhan Singh (MoS, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change; BJP, Gonda, Uttar Pradesh) replied that action plans are in place and monitoring is ongoing. He noted that in 2025–26, Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB) issued 196 notices, 36 directions, 36 closures, and collected ₹ 1.39 crore, while Pollution Control Committee (PCC) conducted 196 inspections.

      2. Smt. Hema Malini (BJP, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh) raised concerns over fragmented air pollution control across states and supported an “airshed management” approach. She noted pollution crosses borders and asked about steps taken to address rising pollution in Delhi-NCR, Mumbai, and the Ganga basin.

      3. Shri Kirti Vardhan Singh (MoS, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change; BJP, Gonda, Uttar Pradesh) replied that the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) guides state boards and pollution bodies under a coordinated system. He agreed pollution has no boundaries and highlighted continuous monitoring through stations. He added that corrective action is taken whenever pollution levels rise.

    3. Shri Chavan Ravindra Vashantrao (INC, Nanded, Maharashtra) raised concerns over stalled housing projects, forcing buyers to pay both EMIs and rent. He questioned delays under the Special Window for Affordable and Mid-Income Housing Fund (SWAMIH Fund) and lack of support to projects in Nanded. He sought review, relief for allottees, and more transparency in selection.

      1. Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman (Union Minister, Ministry of Finance; BJP, Karnataka) replied that SWAMIH Fund projects are selected based on fixed criteria like RERA status, stalled projects, affordability, and minimum completion. She noted the fund’s success and launch of a second phase. She added that eligible projects can be considered and specific issues can be raised with the Government.

    4. Shri Lavu Shri Krishna Devarayalu (TDP, Narasaraopet, Andhra Pradesh) highlighted low access to education loans, noting only 4% of students get institutional credit. He noted only 1 lakh beneficiaries are eligible every year under PM Vidya Lakshmi and just 3,428 slots are allocated for Andhra Pradesh against 14 lakh students in the state and sought expansion of the beneficiaries.

      1. Shri Dharmendra Pradhan (Union Minister, Ministry of Education; BJP, Sambalpur, Odisha) said there are no state-wise quotas and schemes are merit-based. He explained PM Vidya Lakshmi provides collateral free loans and covers all families earning less than ₹ 8 lakh. He urged greater awareness to improve access.

      2. Dr. Kalanidhi Veeraswamy (DMK, Chennai North, Tamil Nadu) questioned the feasibility of National Education Policy (NEP), stating teaching 22 languages across 40,000 schools would need 8.8 lakh teachers and huge funds. He highlighted that only 60% of ₹ 47,310 crore under Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan was released, with Tamil Nadu receiving a mere 30% of the funds allocated to the State.

      3. Shri Jayant Chaudhary (MoS, Ministry of Education; RLD, Uttar Pradesh) replied that NEP language policy is flexible and demand-driven. He noted that the delays in Tamil Nadu are due to Tamil Nadu not signing the Pradhan Mantri Schools for Rising India (PM-SHRI) MoU and added that ₹538 crore was recently released and further funds depend on compliance.

    5. Shri Manoj Tiwari (BJP, North East Delhi, Delhi) raised concerns over pollution and underuse of the 45 km Yamuna stretch. He asked about steps under Nagar Van Yojana to improve green cover and sought details of urban forests and gardens in Delhi.

      1. Shri Kirti Vardhan Singh (MoS, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change; BJP, Gonda, Uttar Pradesh) said the scheme is demand driven and depends on state proposals. He stated that projects get up to ₹2 crore funding, with ₹527 crore already released out of ₹666 crore and 627 projects already approved out of 1,000 projects that are planned.

  3. Following the conclusion of question hour, papers and reports were laid on the table.

  4. Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman (Union Minister, Ministry of Finance; BJP, Karnataka) sought leave to introduce the Corporate Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026.

    1. Shri Manish Tewari (INC, Chandigarh, Chandigarh) opposed the introduction of the Bill under Rule 72(1), citing excessive delegation of powers to the executive. He argued that key matters like company classification, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) norms, and penalties are left to rules, weakening Parliament’s role. He warned this violates constitutional principles and reduces accountability.

    2. Shri Sougata Roy (AITC, Dum Dum, West Bengal) also opposed the Bill, citing excessive delegation and lack of clear legislative guidance. He criticized powers given to bodies like the National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) and the Central Government, including limited appeals and broad authority in “public interest.” He said this could lead to arbitrariness and weaken parliamentary oversight.

    3. Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman (Union Minister, Ministry of Finance; BJP, Karnataka) said the Bill is based on two years of consultation and expert recommendations. She clarified that rules are procedural and subject to parliamentary review, and highlighted reforms like raising CSR threshold to ₹10 crore and decriminalizing 21 offences. She said the Bill will support ease of doing business and MSME growth.

  5. The House approved the introduction of the Bill despite opposition from some members. Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman’s (Union Minister, Ministry of Finance; BJP, Karnataka) referred the Bill to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) after motion was accepted by voice vote.

  6. Following this, matters raised with permission were taken up.

    1. Dr. Indra Hang Subba (SKM, Sikkim) expressed gratitude for improved connectivity, highlighting Sikkim’s first airport and the ongoing Sevoke–Rangpo railway project. He also congratulated the Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi Ji for completing 8,931 days in office, becoming the longest serving elected leader in India. He added that under the Modi Government, Northeast has transformed into a growth engine.

    2. Shri Gurjeet Singh Aujla (INC, Amritsar, Punjab) raised a serious law and order issue in Punjab, alleging that a State minister of Punjab pressured and assaulted an Food Corporation of India (FCI) officer named Shri Gagandeep Singh Randhawa, leading to his suicide. He stated that threats, harassment, and delayed FIR reflected a breakdown of governance and demanded a central probe.

      1. Shri Amit Shah (Union Minister, Ministry of Home Affairs; BJP, Gandhinagar, Gujarat) replied that it is a state subject but assured that if Punjab MPs submit a formal request, the case will be transferred to the CBI to conduct an investigation.

    3. Dr. Angomcha Bimol Akoijam (INC, Inner Manipur, Manipur) highlighted the human crisis in Manipur, citing deaths, displacement, and lack of basic freedoms. He said people are still seeking justice and questioned delays in inquiry and accountability. He urged the Government to act and restore rights, calling for justice and constitutional protection.

    4. Shri Mallu Ravi (INC, Nagarkurnool, Telangana) raised concerns about exploitation of domestic workers lacking legal protection and basic rights. He said existing labour codes fail to address their conditions and access to justice. He urged a new law ensuring wages, safety, and welfare, calling it a matter of worker rights and dignity.

    5. Shri Bhartruhari Mahtab (BJP, Cuttack, Odisha) urged the Government to repatriate Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose’s remains from Japan, citing a 12thMarch, 2026, Supreme Court development involving Netaji’s daughter, Professor Anita Bose Pfaff. He called for official action to end Netaji’s “posthumous exile” noting that India has funded the upkeep of the remains since 1950 and that successive Prime Ministers have visited the site, acknowledging their significance.

    6. Shri Ganpathy Rajkumar P. (DMK, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu) raised concern over the ₹19,836 crore collected by Indian banks in minimum balance penalties between 2022 and 2025. He argued that these charges disproportionately burden the poor, including daily wage workers and students and urged the RBI to scrap minimum balance penalties for low-income accounts across all banks.

    7. Shri Jagdambika Pal (BJP, Domariyaganj, Uttar Pradesh) raised an urgent matter regarding the welfare of India’s 13 lakh Anganwadi workers and helpers. He said that while they are the backbone of grassroots nutrition, healthcare, and education services, they only receive monthly honorariums as low as ₹6,000 to ₹10,000. He urged the government to establish a uniform national pay scale for these workers and demanded that they be granted job security and the 26 weeks of paid maternity leave currently denied to them under the Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act 2017.

  7. The proceedings of the House were adjourned at 01:40 PM to reconvene at 02:00 PM.

  8. The proceedings of the House were reconvened at 02:00 PM, with Shri Om Birla Ji (Speaker, Lok Sabha; BJP, Kota, Rajasthan) in the Chair.

  9. Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi Ji (BJP, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh) addressed the House on the West Asia conflict, highlighting the unprecedented economic and security challenges it poses while outlining India’s robust strategic measures to ensure energy security, citizen safety, and national resilience through diversification and domestic self-reliance.

    1. He confirmed that over 3.75 lakh Indians have safely returned since the war began, including 700 medical students from Iran. He has held telephonic discussions with West Asian heads of state to ensure the continued safety of the 1 crore Indians living in the Gulf region and the crew members on commercial ships.

    2. He further said that India has expanded its energy procurement network from 27 to 41 countries to reduce dependency on any single region. The Government is maintaining a Strategic Petroleum Reserve of 5.3 Million Metric Tonnes (MMT), with plans to add 6.5 MMT more through new facilities in Odisha and Karnataka, while monitoring the Strait of Hormuz to ensure the steady supply of crude oil, gas, and fertilizers. He also clarified that these Government held strategic reserves are in addition to the stocks maintained by the oil companies.

    3. He informed that significant progress has been made in reducing import dependency through ethanol blending reaching 20% (E20) five years ahead of schedule. Additionally, the electrification of Railways and the expansion of the metro and electric bus networks are saving billions of liters of diesel annually.

    4. He stated that to protect farmers from global price shocks, the Government is providing urea at less than ₹300 despite international prices hitting ₹3,000. Domestic production has been bolstered by six new urea plants and the Pradhan Mantri Kisan Urja Suraksha evam Utthaan Mahabhiyan (PM-KUSUM) scheme, which has provided 22 lakh solar pumps to reduce diesel dependence.

    5. He also informed that India’s renewable energy capacity has crossed 250 Gigawatts (GW), with solar energy surging from 3 GW to 140 GW over 11 years. Initiatives like the Pradhan Mantri Surya Ghar Muft Bijli Yojana and the National Green Hydrogen Mission are being utilized as long-term buffers against global instability.

    6. He called for an unanimous stance of the house on immediate cessation of hostilities through dialogue while placing security agencies on high alert against internal exploitation. He further urged the State Governments to strictly monitor supply chains to prevent black marketing and hoarding during this period of international crisis.

  10. Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman, (Union Minister, Ministry of Finance, BJP, Karnataka) moved for leave to introduce the Finance Bill 2026-2027 to give effect to the financial proposals of the Central Government.

    1. Dr. Amar Singh (INC, Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab) criticized the Finance Bill for favoring large corporations with extended tax holidays while ignoring 27% graduate unemployment, declining FDI, and the absence of relief for individual taxpayers. He warned that fiscal centralization through the Agriculture Infrastructure Development Cess denies states their 40% revenue share and farmers facing Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS) duty hikes from 15% to 100%. He also highlighted Punjab’s ₹2 lakh crore in untransferred funds and requested international-level infrastructure for the Fatehgarh Sahib martyrdom site and the operationalization of the Halwara Airport and Doraha overbridge.

    2. Dr. Nishikant Dubey (BJP, Godda, Jharkhand) praised Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi ji’s leadership for India becoming the fourth largest economy in the world. He stated that despite global challenges because of the Middle East conflict, the Government ensured stable fuel prices through diversified oil sourcing from 41 countries. He highlighted the Finance Bill’s vision of a $50 trillion economy by 2047, backed by corporate reforms including reducing Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) from 18% to 14% and strengthening Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) provisions to directly benefit mineral-rich regions like Jharkhand.

    3. Shri Saugata Roy (AITC, Dum Dum, West Bengal) criticized the Finance Bill 2026 as a collection of incremental micro-reforms that fail to address everyday economic realities. He pointed to a policy contradiction between promoting domestic tourism while simultaneously reducing Tax Collected at Source (TCS) on foreign tour packages. He raised concerns over fiscal centralization through cesses and surcharges that bypass the divisible tax pool, alleging that funds for MGNREGA and PMAY have been withheld from West Bengal. He also warned that frequent changes in customs duties and the hike in Securities Transaction Tax (STT) on derivatives could discourage retail investors and hurt India’s export competitiveness.

    4. Shri Ravindra Waikar (SS, Mumbai North West, Maharashtra) supported the Finance Bill 2026 for its fiscal discipline and increased expenditure to ₹53.5 lakh crore. He praised tax relief measures and significant infrastructure allocations for Maharashtra, including metro projects and ₹6,000 crore for the Mumbai–Ahmedabad High Speed Rail. He also urged the Government to grant national mission status to Slum-Free Mumbai by 2030 with a dedicated ₹5,000 crore redevelopment fund.

    5. Smt. Supriya Sule (NCP(SP), Baramati, Maharashtra) raised concerns over India becoming a “debt-driven economy”, pointing to grassroots distress including LPG shortages, rising costs for the middle class and deep agricultural distress in Maharashtra’s soybean and cotton belts. She questioned the Government’s fiscal transparency by criticizing its reliance on record RBI dividends and urged that major structural reforms be scrutinized by a Joint Parliamentary Committee to ensure broader accountability and national consensus.

    6. Shri Basavaraj Bommai (BJP, Haveri, Karnataka) praised the Finance Bill 2026, stating that it reflects strong fiscal discipline and economic growth, with a 4.3% fiscal deficit and steady GDP growth of 10%. He specifically lauded India’s resilience during the Middle East conflict, noting that strategic oil reserves and diplomatic engagement prevented the fuel shortages seen in previous decades, while also mentioning a ₹1 lakh crore contingency assessment to manage potential global economic disruptions.

    7. Shri S. Sachithanantham (CPI(M), Dindigul, Tamil Nadu) criticized the Finance Bill 2026 for failing to address economic inequality and the employment crisis. He argued that the Government’s heavy reliance on cesses and surcharges has reduced states’ effective tax share to just 34%, fundamentally undermining fiscal federalism. He also raised serious concerns over the Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB-G RAM G), warning that its 40% state funding requirement dilutes the rights-based nature of MGNREGA and shifts the burden of implementation onto already fiscally stressed states.

    8. Shri P. P. Chaudhary (BJP, Pali, Rajasthan) highlighted that India’s tax-to-GDP ratio at 19.6% reflects strong fiscal performance. He argued that the tax burden on citizens is relatively lower compared to developed countries. He stated that tax liability begins at about 18% of per capita income in the United States and 28% in the United Kingdom, while in India, the income tax threshold has been increased to ₹ 12 lakh, which is significantly higher relative to the country’s per capita income, roughly around five times. He also highlighted the Government’s strong economic track record, pointing to CapEx doubling from 11% to 22% of the budget. He asserted that ongoing reforms reflect a clear vision of building a globally competitive Indian economy by 2047.

    9. Shri Neeraj Maurya (SP, Aonla, Uttar Pradesh) criticised the Government’s economic approach, describing it as “jobless growth” with rising burden on common people. He argued that the budget favours only large corporations by giving them tax benefits, while the common man shoulders 65% of the total tax revenue.

  11. The proceedings of the House were adjourned at 7:08 PM to reconvene at 11:00 AM on Tuesday, 24th March, 2026.

III. Rajya Sabha Proceedings:

  1. The proceedings of the Rajya Sabha commenced at 11:00 AM with Shri C.P. Radhakrishnan Ji (Chairman, Rajya Sabha) in the chair.

  2. The Chairman paid tribute to freedom fighters Sardar Bhagat Singh Ji, Sukhdev Ji and Rajguru Ji on the anniversary of their martyrdom.

  3. Papers and Reports were laid on the table of the house. Following which, Shri C.P. Radhakrishnan Ji (Chairman, Rajya Sabha) proceeded with the Matters raised with Permission.

    1. Shri Dorjee Tshering Lepcha (BJP, Sikkim) congratulated the Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi ji for surpassing 8,938 days in public office to become the longest-serving elected leader. He noted that the Northeast has seen major growth in connectivity and infrastructure under the Modi Government.

    2. Smt. Sudha Murthy (Nominated) spoke about the Buddha relics at Kila Rai Pithora, highlighting their historical and spiritual importance. She noted that the relics date back 2,500 years and also highlighted the efforts made by the Modi Government to bring the relics and related objects back for exhibition. She said such initiatives help preserve and showcase India’s heritage.

    3. Smt. Maya Naroliya (BJP, Madhya Pradesh) highlighted key outcomes of the India AI Impact Summit 2026 and the need for a clear roadmap. She pointed to gaps in data access, computing resources, safety standards, and coordination with states. She called for a time-bound AI governance framework and better support for state-level AI development.

    4. Shri Digvijay Singh (INC, Madhya Pradesh) raised concerns about rising railway costs and reduced access for common passengers. He said fewer general coaches and higher fares are affecting poor and middle-class travellers. He also highlighted delays and safety issues, and called for affordable and safe railway services.

    5. Dr. Dinesh Sharma (BJP, Uttar Pradesh) highlighted the growing water crisis in the country. He said groundwater is depleting and cities may face shortages and stressed the need for better water management and conservation. He called for sustainable use of water resources.

  4. Following this, the Hon’ble Chairman proceeded with the Question Hour.

    1. Dr. Bhim Singh (BJP, Bihar) asked about the unequal distribution of buses under the PM e-Bus Sewa scheme, noting that Bihar received only 400 buses and that few cities from the state were selected.

      1. Shri Manohar Lal (Union Minister, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs; BJP, Karnal, Haryana) replied that allocations were based on proposals, population, and eligibility, and assured that more cities from Bihar could be included in the second phase of 35,000 buses.

    2. Shri Ujjwal Deorao Nikam (BJP, Nominated) asked about steps taken to address untreated sewage, urban flooding, and water management, and requested data on outcomes.

      1. Shri Manohar Lal (Union Minister, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs; BJP, Karnal, Haryana) replied that the Government’s sanitation and water initiatives, including AMRUT and sewerage treatment projects, have improved health, saved 6.6 crore hours, and could prevent 4 lakh deaths. He highlighted the introduction of integrated measures like Sponge Cities, rainwater harvesting, groundwater recharge, and urban water body restoration to manage floods and ensure sustainable urban water management.

    3. Shri Rajeev Shukla (INC, Chhattisgarh) raised concerns about waterlogging and drainage in Mumbai and Delhi and questioned the effectiveness of Smart Cities Mission funds.

      1. Shri Manohar Lal (Union Minister, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs; BJP, Karnal, Haryana) replied that ₹ 1 lakh crore is provided to 100 cities and noted that projects where the cities chose to implement the scheme had already been completed. He also noted that the programme is not meant to solve all urban infrastructure challenges but to create exemplary development projects that could later be replicated by State Governments.

    4. Dr. Sikander Kumar (BJP, Himachal Pradesh) asked about the use of treated sewage water in thermal power plants and measures to reduce reliance on freshwater.

      1. Shri Shripad Yesso Naik (MoS, Ministry of Power; BJP, North Goa , Goa) replied that plants within 50 km of municipal sewage treatment plants are required to use treated water, and necessary pipelines and infrastructure are being developed to promote water reuse and conservation.

    5. Shri Arun Singh (BJP, Uttar Pradesh) asked what percentage of the coal produced in the country is supplied to the power sector versus other sectors, and also sought information on the new methods being adopted to increase coal production and diversify its use in other sectors.

      1. Shri G. Kishan Reddy (Union Minister, Ministry of Coal; BJP, Secunderabad, Telangana) replied that about 80% of coal goes to the power sector, with the rest used in steel, cement, fertilizers, and other industries. He also noted the scientific closure and redevelopment of 143 abandoned mines to provide livelihood opportunities, tourism activities and drinking water facilities for nearby villages.

  5. Following the Question Hour, Shri C.P. Radhakrishnan Ji (Chairman, Rajya Sabha) informed the House that notices from some Members opposing the Central Armed Police Forces (General Administration) Bill, 2026 would be addressed when the Bill is introduced by the concerned Minister. He said the House would first discuss the Appropriation (No. 2) Bill, 2026 and resume after lunch. Since the Finance Bill, 2026 is not yet received, he proposed three hours for the Appropriation Bill and four hours for the Finance Bill later.

  6. The house reconvened at 2:00 PM with Shri Harivansh Ji (Deputy Chairman, Rajya Sabha) in the chair.

  7. Shri Pankaj Chaudhary (MoS, Ministry of Finance; BJP, Maharajganj, Uttar Pradesh) moved the motion on behalf of Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman (Union Minister, Ministry of Finance; BJP, Karnataka) for the Appropriation (No. 2) Bill, 2026, allowing funds to be withdrawn from the Consolidated Fund of India for 2026–27. The motion was formally accepted, and the Chair invited Members to join the discussion.

    1. Shri Neeraj Dangi (INC, Rajasthan) raised concerns about the Appropriation Bill, highlighting that allocations for rural and welfare schemes, particularly MGNREGA, had increased to ₹ 95,000 crore but remained insufficient to cover 125 days of employment, which would require nearly ₹ 2.3 lakh crore. He pointed out under-utilisation of SC/ST scholarship funds, noting that post-matric scholarships spent ₹ 5,476 crore against an allocation of ₹ 6,359 crore in 2023–24, and pre-matric scholarships spent only ₹ 446 crore against ₹ 500 crore. He also mentioned rising fuel prices of LPG, petrol, and diesel and also highlighted challenges in LPG delivery, fertiliser supply, and the impact of geopolitical developments on energy.

    2. Shri H. D. Deve Gowda (JD(S), Karnataka) spoke on the Appropriation Bill, reflecting on his long political career and historical economic challenges, including high fuel and commodity prices following the 1971 Bangladesh war. He highlighted current issues like LPG shortages, fuel supply, and black-market practices, and urged Members to avoid politicising essential commodity matters while acknowledging the Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi ji’s active role in addressing economic and international concerns. He also called for attention to development in Karnataka, including industrial clusters and revival of Bhadravati Iron and Steel Works with ₹ 650 crore support.

    3. Shri Madan Rathore (BJP, Rajasthan) responded to Shri Neeraj Dangi, stating that claims of LPG shortages in Rajasthan were incorrect and created unnecessary public panic. He highlighted India’s economic growth under Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi ji, with GDP rising from ₹ 106.55 lakh crore in 2014 to ₹331.3 lakh crore in 2026, total exports rising from $468 billion to $825 billion. He noted progress in digital payments, renewable energy , railway electrification, and science and technology. He also highlighted social reforms like abolition of triple talaq, 33% reservation for women and labour reforms under the BJP Government.

    4. Shri Saket Gokhale (AITC, West Bengal) criticized the Government’s budget management, calling it a “glorious work of fiction,” citing a nearly ₹10 lakh crore gap between initial and revised estimates. He highlighted major cuts in schemes such as the Jal Jeevan Mission by 69%, Labour by 61%, Housing by 38%, and Tourism by 50% and noted that 40% of revenue goes to debt servicing. He also raised concerns about West Bengal’s outstanding dues of ₹ 2 lakh crore which is constraining the State Government and claimed that West Bengal is under undeclared emergency.

    5. Dr. John Brittas (CPI(M), Kerala) raised concerns over the Appropriation Bill’s failure to account for the economic fallout of the ongoing global conflict. He warned that rising oil prices could burden the Indian economy by ₹ 1.5–2 lakh crore and disrupt remittances worth ₹ 16 lakh crore nationally, with Kerala alone contributing ₹ 2.2 lakh crore. He challenged the Government’s “Atmanirbhar” narrative, pointing out that India’s oil and gas import dependence has grown from 70% to nearly 90% over two decades. He further demanded that Parliament condemn the assasination of Iran’s former Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

    6. Shri Harsh Vardhan Shringla (BJP, Nominated) commended the Government’s macroeconomic management and praised the ₹ 1 lakh crore Economic Stabilization Fund as a vital buffer against global shocks. He highlighted that India has surpassed its 2030 renewable energy target four years ahead of schedule, with 51.5% of installed capacity now from clean sources. He countered Shri Saket Gokhale (AITC, West Bengal) by noting that the Central Government remains the sole driver of development, citing Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi ji’s recent inauguration of ₹ 12,766 crore worth of infrastructure projects in West Bengal.

    7. Shri Shambhu Sharan Patel (BJP, Bihar) strongly backed the Appropriation (No. 2) Bill, 2026, and noted that under the Modi Government, Bihar has decisively shed its “bimaru” tag with massive improvements in road connectivity alongside the modernisation of Patna airport and new airports in Darbhanga, Purnia, and Bhagalpur. He drew attention to the historical neglect of the region under UPA Government and highlighted that railway expansion under the Modi Government has surpassed the cumulative progress of the previous 75 years, citing new Vande Bharat routes connecting Bihar, West Bengal, and Assam including Bhagalpur–Howrah, Gaya–Howrah, and Patna–Howrah.

    8. Dr. Parmar Jashvantsinh Salamsinh (BJP, Gujarat) highlighted that India’s health budget has grown by 194% from ₹36,180 crore in 2014–15 to ₹ 1,06,530 crore in 2026–27, with Ayushman Bharat covering 55 crore beneficiaries, 22 new All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) established, and MBBS seats growing by 151% to 1.28 lakh. He noted significant health outcome improvements with the Maternal Mortality Ratio dropping from 250 to 97 (per 1,00,000 live births)and Infant Mortality Rate falling from 58 to 28 (per 1,000 live births), alongside customs duty exemptions on 17 life-saving cancer drugs. He also championed the ₹ 10,000 crore “Biopharma Shakti” initiative to reduce import dependence and position India as a global biologics manufacturing hub.

  8. In the Chair, Dr. Sasmit Patra (BJD, Odisha) announced that the discussion on the Appropriation (No. 2) Bill, 2026 was adjourned for the day and informed that further discussion would resume on 24th March, 2026. Following this he commenced Special Mentions.

    1. Dr. K. Laxman (BJP, Uttar Pradesh) raised the urgent need to protect domestic workers, noting that despite 2.89 crore workers registered on the e-Shram portal, most lack written contracts, fixed wages, or social security. He urged the Government to strengthen welfare inclusion and establish grievance mechanisms to ensure dignity and fairness for this vulnerable workforce.

    2. Shri P. Wilson (DMK, Tamil Nadu) raised concern over the steep tariff of ₹ 5.9 per unit fixed for Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant Units 3 and 4, significantly higher than the ₹ 3–₹ 4.10 per unit charged for Units 1 and 2 and above current renewable energy benchmarks. He warned this would impose a heavy financial burden on Tamil Nadu and southern states, urging the Government to rationalize tariffs and bring nuclear power pricing under independent regulatory oversight.

    3. Shri Satnam Singh Sandhu (BJP, Nominated) urged the Government to prioritize a Metro Rail Network for the Chandigarh Tricity region, warning that vehicle speeds could fall below 15 km/h as the population already exceeds 40 lakh. He noted a metro could serve 2.5 lakh daily passengers by 2031 and called it essential for sustainable urban mobility in North India.

  9. The proceedings of the House were adjourned at 5:51 PM to reconvene at 11:00 AM on Tuesday, 24th March, 2026.

IV. Events Outside The Parliament:

  1. Shri Dinesh Sharma (BJP, Uttar Pradesh) praised Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi Ji on becoming the longest-serving head of Government, calling him a global leader. Responding to Smt. Mamata Banerjee’s disparaging remarks against Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi Ji, he said they reflect nervousness over her electoral prospects in West Bengal.

  2. Shri Amra Ram (CPI(M), Sikar, Rajasthan), responding to Shri K. C. Venugopal’s (INC, Alappuzha , Kerala) allegation of a CPI(M)–BJP nexus, alleged an implicit alignment between the BJP and the INC. He said CPI(M) has consistently opposed BJP’s politics and recalled supporting the UPA Government led by Former Prime Minister Shri Manmohan Singh to keep BJP out of power.

  3. Shri Manish Tewari (INC, Chandigarh) stressed giving diplomacy a chance amid escalating global tensions, noting disruptions to crude oil, natural gas, fertilisers, food, and pharmaceuticals are pushing global supply chains into a sensitive phase.

  4. Shri Ram Gopal Yadav (SP, Uttar Pradesh) said the war is negatively impacting the global economy, including India. He pointed to rising commercial gas prices, potential shortages hitting businesses and oil companies, and alleged that fuel price hikes may be deferred due to upcoming elections.

  5. Shri Nishikant Dubey (BJP, Godda, Jharkhand) referred to past India–Sri Lanka agreements and said that successive Congress-led Governments, from Shri Nehru to Smt. Indira Gandhi and later Shri Manmohan Singh and Smt. Sonia Gandhi, failed to address fishermen-related issues. He also criticized the role of regional parties in Tamil Nadu.

  6. Shri Saugata Roy (TMC, Dum Dum, West Bengal) termed AIMIM’s alliance with Humayun Kabir a “bad development”, stating that Shri Asaduddin Owaisi’s (AIMIM, Hyderabad, Telangana) party could end up benefiting the BJP and isolating sections of voters.

  7. Shri Ujjwal Raman Singh (INC, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh) on reports of a possible electricity tariff hike in Delhi, said it would lead to a broader rise in the cost of goods and services, alleging increased financial burden on the public while benefiting the BJP.

  8. Mian Altaf Ahmed Larvi (JKNC, Anantnag-Rajouri, Jammu and Kashmir) on the Jammu University committee’s recommendation to remove topics on Muhammad Ali Jinnah from the curriculum, said there is no justification for protests over the issue.

  9. Smt. Priyanka Gandhi Vadra (INC, Wayanad, Kerala) welcomed Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi Ji speaking in Parliament on the West Asia conflict, saying it is important to hear his views given its significant impact on India, while noting the discussion should have happened earlier. On reports of fast-tracking the Women’s Reservation Act, 2023, she said the Government should first clarify its position on the matter.

  10. Smt. Aparajita Sarangi (BJP, Bhubaneswar, Odisha) expressed confidence in BJP improving its performance in the Kerala Legislative Assembly elections, highlighting groundwork by party workers and coordination with NDA partners. She credited the leadership of Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi Ji for the party’s optimism.

  11. Ms. Praniti Sushilkumar Shinde (INC, Solapur (SC), Maharashtra) criticized the Government’s statement on the West Asia crisis, calling it “hollow and shallow”. She said the ruling side is disconnected from ground realities, pointing to power shortages in Maharashtra, concerns of farmers, and inadequate preparedness.

  12. Shri Ravneet Singh Bittu (MoS, Railways; BJP, Rajasthan) said that in the Punjab Warehousing Corporation (PWC) official suicide case, minister Shri Laljit Singh Bhullar exerted pressure on officials regarding an FCI tender, holding him responsible for driving the official to suicide.

  13. Ms. Swati Maliwal (AAP, NCT of Delhi) said that three days after Gagandeep Singh Randhawa’s suicide, the Punjab Government moved to protect minister Shri Laljit Singh Bhullar, who was initially only made to resign and not arrested. She noted that following the intervention of Shri Amit Shah Ji (Union Minister, Ministry of Home Affairs; BJP, Gandhinagar, Gujarat) to transfer the case to the CBI, Bhullar was arrested within half an hour. She demanded full transfer of the case to the CBI.

  14. Shri Dharamvira Gandhi (INC, Patiala, Punjab) said that the arrest of Punjab’s former minister Shri Laljit Singh Bhullar came late, but called it the right action.

The day’s proceedings underscored Parliament’s role in responding to both global developments and domestic policy priorities. While the Lok Sabha advanced key legislative business, including the introduction of the Corporate Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026 and the Finance Bill, 2026–27, discussions in the Rajya Sabha addressed infrastructure, resource management and expenditure concerns through deliberations on the Appropriation (No. 2) Bill, 2026. Together, the debates reflected a continued emphasis on economic resilience, institutional processes and policy responsiveness in a changing global context.

Annexure I - Matters Raised Under Rule 377 In The Lok Sabha

Annexure II - Reports And Statements Presented In The Lok Sabha

Annexure III - Members Who Participated In Discussion On The Finance Bill, 2026 In The Lok Sabha

Annexure IV - Bills Introduced In The Lok Sabha

Annexure V - Reports And Statements Presented In The Rajya Sabha

Annexure VI - Matters Raised With Permission In The Rajya Sabha

Annexure VI - Members Who Participated In The Discussion On The Appropriation (No.2) Bill, 2026 In The Rajya Sabha

Annexure VII - Special Mentions In The Rajya Sabha