Parliament convened on 24 March 2026 with proceedings in both Houses reflecting a combination of legislative action and discussions shaped by evolving global developments. The Prime Minister’s address in the Rajya Sabha on the West Asia conflict set the broader context, outlining its implications for energy security, trade disruptions and India’s external engagements. Alongside this, the Lok Sabha engaged in Question Hour discussions on sectoral schemes and continued deliberations on the Finance Bill, 2026, indicating a sustained focus on fiscal policy and governance priorities.
I. Key Highlights of The Proceedings
The proceedings of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha commenced at 11:00 AM.
In the Lok Sabha, Shri Om Birla Ji (Speaker, Lok Sabha; BJP, Kota, Rajasthan) commenced the proceedings of the House with Question Hour.
Shri Dushyant Singh (BJP; Jhalawar-Baran, Rajasthan) inquired about the reduced allocation under the Gender Budget component for the livestock sector. In response, Shri Rajiv Ranjan Singh alias Lalan Singh (Union Minister, Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry & Dairying; JD(U), Munger, Bihar) clarified that the actual expenditure towards Gender Budgeting has been upwards of ₹ 5000 crore with additional release of funds in the pipeline.
Shri Manoj Tiwari (BJP; North-East Delhi, NCT of Delhi) inquired about additional steps being taken to enhance the positive impacts of the Rashtriya Gokul Mission, such as IVF for cattle. In response, Shri Rajiv Ranjan Singh alias Lalan Singh (Union Minister, Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry & Dairying; JD(U), Munger, Bihar) stated that IVF techniques are being introduced in 604 new districts, with the coverage being increased from 20% to 40% as of date.
In the Lok Sabha, Shri Krishna Prasad Tenneti (TDP, Bapatla (SC), Andhra Pradesh) took up discussion on the Finance Bill, 2026.
Shri Manish Tewari (INC, Chandigarh, Chandigarh) raised concerns about the impact from the Strait of Hormuz blockade on India by stating that the International Energy Agency (IEA) has classified the closure as the most impactful incident on the oil industry in the past two centuries..
Shri Naveen Jindal (BJP, Kurukshetra, Haryana) stated that the tax principles adopted in the Budget are inspired from Chanakya’s Arthshastra. He further stated the contribution of the private sector citing examples of increased IT and pharmaceutical exports while highlighting that Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) contributions from the sector impact every sphere of the society.
Shri Pushpendra Saroj (SP, Kaushambi, Uttar Pradesh) drew a contrast between low collections from corporate tax as opposed to income and indirect taxes, which places a direct burden on the common man.
In the Lok Sabha, Shri Kiren Rijiju (Union Minister, Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs; BJP, Arunachal West, Arunachal Pradesh) informed the House that the rest of the session could be dedicated towards discussion on tabled Bills, and proposed that the Government’s detailed reply to the discussion on the Finance Bill would be delivered tomorrow after the Question Hour.
In the Lok Sabha, Dr. Virendra Kumar (Union Minister, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment; BJP, Tikamgarh, Madhya Pradesh) moved the motion for consideration of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill, 2026. He emphasized that the Bill provides a precise definition of identity while criminalising the forced mutilation or exploitation of individuals into transgender identities. A key provision establishes a Medical Board chaired by health officials to evaluate cases and recommend the issuance of identity certificates by District Magistrates. He concluded by requesting the House’s cooperation in passing the Bill to strengthen social empowerment and administrative oversight.
Smt. S. Jothimani (INC, Karur, Tamil Nadu) argued that the Bill undermines the Supreme Court’s NALSA judgment by replacing the right to self-determination with a State-controlled approval process, fundamentally shifting the citizen-State relationship from rights to permission.
Shri Anand Bhadauria (SP, Dhaurahra, Uttar Pradesh) invoked the cultural dignity of the transgender community to argue that the Bill’s removal of self-identification violates constitutional rights to privacy. He expressed concern that the proposed Medical Board and District Magistrate oversight would create legal uncertainty for those who have already transitioned.
Smt. Supriya Sule (NCP-SP, Maharashtra) questioned the Bill’s timing during global supply shocks and requested it be referred to a Select Committee for further scrutiny. She criticized the proposed definition of transgender as arbitrary and narrow, arguing it excludes identities protected by the NALSA judgment and the 2019 Act. Also, she challenged the requirement for invasive medical reporting.
In response, Dr. Virendra Kumar (Union Minister, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment; BJP, Tikamgarh, Madhya Pradesh) defended the amendment as a necessary step to protect individuals facing severe social exclusion, emphasising that the Bill introduces strict new penalties, including life imprisonment, to criminalise the forced induction or exploitation of children and adults into transgender identities. He highlighted the government’s commitment to dignity and transparency, citing the symbolic inclusion of transgender persons in Republic Day celebrations as evidence of a mindset shift toward genuine social respect.
Following a voice vote, the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill, 2026 was passed in Lok Sabha.
In the Rajya Sabha, Shri C.P. Radhakrishnan Ji (Chairman, Rajya Sabha) took up matters raised with permission.
Smt. Priyanka Chaturvedi (SS-UBT, Maharashtra) raised the urgent need to revise the penalties for animal cruelty in the country under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 and demanded better execution.
Smt. Sumitra Balmik (BJP, Madhya Pradesh) raised the issue of noise pollution caused by DJ music systems during examination season, noting that such high decibel levels adversely affect students.
Shri Mallikarjun Kharge (INC, Karnataka) enquired about the status of his notices for a short-duration discussion under Rule 176. In response, Shri C.P. Radhakrishnan Ji (Chairman, Rajya Sabha) stated that the matter was currently under process and that he would consult with the concerned individuals before providing a response.
In the Rajya Sabha, Shri Narendra Modi Ji (Prime Minister; BJP, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh) addressed the House on the ongoing West Asia conflict.
He acknowledged how the current global conflict has triggered a severe energy crisis and disrupted trade routes, directly impacting India’s supply of petrol, gas, and fertilizers.
He stated that the Government has prioritized diplomatic dialogue with leaders from Israel, Iran, and the U.S. to ensure regional peace, considering approximately one crore Indians living in the Gulf and many crew members stranded in the Strait of Hormuz.
He also asserted that in order to bolster domestic resilience, the Government has significantly diversified its energy sources from 27 to 41 countries and expanded strategic petroleum reserves and refining capacity to mitigate supply shocks.
He urged for the consistent delivery of food security benefits and called on states to protect migrant workers and crack down on hoarding or black marketing.
He concluded by emphasising on a “Team India” spirit of unity across authorities and citizens to ensure a robust resilience to global shocks such as during Covid times.
In the Rajya Sabha, Shri C.P. Radhakrishnan Ji (Chairman, Rajya Sabha) took up discussion on the Appropriation (No. 2) Bill, 2026.
Shri Dinesh Sharma (BJP, Uttar Pradesh) supported the Appropriation Bill as a transparent foundation for national development, credited the Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) mechanism for enhancing fiscal discipline, and highlighted the shift from historical corruption to strategic infrastructure and welfare spending.
Shri Haris Beeran (IUML, Kerala) criticized the Appropriation Bill for a 99.9% reduction in the means-based scholarship funds.. He also emphasised the urgent need for a rehabilitation package for expatriates whose return could threaten over ₹ 2 lakh crore in annual remittances.
Shri Raghav Chadha (AAP, Punjab) raised concerns over the ₹ 48 lakh crore loss in investor wealth during February 2024, emphasizing the disproportionate impact of West Asian volatility on 13.5 crore retail investors and the salaried class. To mitigate these external shocks, he proposed specific relief measures such as time-bound STT reductions, a one-time crisis tax relaxation, and extending the period for carrying forward capital losses from eight to fifteen years.
In the Rajya Sabha, Smt. S. Phangnon Konyak (BJP, Nagaland) took up Special Mentions.
Shri Akhilesh Prasad Singh (INC, Bihar) raised the issue of interlinking rivers in Bihar to address the state’s unique challenge of facing simultaneous floods and droughts, noting that that during the monsoon, approximately 70 to 80 billion cubic meters of water flows through Bihar and into the sea via the Ganga without being utilized.
Shri Raghav Chadha (AAP, Punjab) raised the issue of traffic congestion in major Indian metropolitan cities, resulting in substantial economic losses, fuel wastage, and increased environmental pollution. He urged the Government to establish a National Urban Decongestion Mission to tackle this issue.
The proceedings of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha were adjourned at 06:47 P.M. and 07:37 P.M. respectively to reconvene at 11:00 A.M on Wednesday, 25th March, 2026.
II. Lok Sabha Proceedings:
The proceedings of the Lok Sabha commenced at 11:00 AM.
Shri Om Birla Ji (Speaker, Lok Sabha; BJP, Kota, Rajasthan) presided over the proceedings of the House and commenced the proceedings of the House with Question Hour.
Shri Dushyant Singh (BJP; Jhalawar-Baran, Rajasthan) inquired about the reduced allocation under the Gender Budget component for the livestock sector, from estimated expenditure of ₹ 540 crore in BE 2025 to ₹ 242 crore in BE 2026, while actual expenditure was ₹ 129 crore in 2024-25, and the steps taken to improve this aspect.
In response, Shri Rajiv Ranjan Singh alias Lalan Singh (Union Minister, Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry & Dairying; JD(U), Munger, Bihar) clarified that the actual expenditure towards Gender Budgeting has been upwards of ₹ 5000 crore with additional release of funds in the pipeline. He added that reduction in expenditure in the past two years was primarily due to shortage of vaccines which resulted in less vaccination.
Shri Saugata Ray (AITC, Dum Dum, West Bengal) claimed that the Minister of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare is avoiding questions of doubling of farmers income and farmer suicide rates and asked to provide clear & definite timelines for the same.
In response, Shri Shivraj Singh Chouhan (Union Minister, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare; BJP, Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh ) stated that farmers’ incomes have doubled, and also tripled at certain places. He cited the example of Madhya Pradesh where three different crops are grown now as opposed to one in the past. He also pointed out the budgetary increase to ₹ 1.30 lakh crore while fertiliser subsidy has increased to ₹ 1.86 lakh crore..
Shri Neeraj Maurya (SP, Aonla, Uttar Pradesh) raised an issue regarding the closure of cooperative sugar mills in Uttar Pradesh. He questioned the Government’s inaction in reducing the losses faced by such mills and asked the Government to undertake modernisation measures to improve productivity.
In response, Shri Krishna Pal (MoS, Ministry of Cooperation; BJP, Faridabad, Haryana) stated that in our federal setup, cooperatives are independent in decision-making, while productivity depends immensely on the local climatic conditions. He added that the Government has undertaken modernisation measures by pledging ₹ 10,000 crore towards 56 sugar mills, and reassured that the Government is steadfast in securing the livelihood of citizens in the cooperative sector, by citing that ₹ 5 lakh crore has been dispersed towards the Cooperative sector.
Shri Manoj Tiwari (BJP; North-East Delhi, NCT Delhi) started by acknowledging that milk production has increased by 69%, thanked the Prime Minister for his efforts, and enquired about the additional steps being taken to enhance the positive impacts of the Rashtriya Gokul Mission, such as IVF.
In response, Shri Rajiv Ranjan Singh alias Lalan Singh (Union Minister, Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry & Dairying; JD(U), Munger, Bihar) stated that the income of 10 crore dairy farmers has consistently increased. He also noted that productivity per animal has increased by around 37%, while the profit per farmer has increased immensely as well. He stated that IVF techniques are being introduced in 604 new districts, with the coverage being increased from 20% to 40% now.
Following this, papers and reports were laid on the table.
In the Chair, Shri Krishna Prasad Tenneti (TDP, Bapatla (SC), Andhra Pradesh) resumed the discussion on the Finance Bill, 2026.
Shri Manish Tewari (INC, Chandigarh, Chandigarh) raised concerns about the impact from the Strait of Hormuz blockade on India by stating that the International Energy Agency (IEA) has classified the closure as the most impactful incident on the oil industry in the past two centuries. He further stated that the assumptions on which the Budget was prepared no longer hold ground and asked the Ministry to expand upon the impact of the war on our country in greater detail. He also cited data regarding a sharp increase in our debt-to-GDP ratio, which could be detrimental for the country. He also flagged issues of tax buoyancy across direct and indirect tax bases. He also expressed concern about the declining value of the Rupee and targeted the India-USA trade deal as being harmful for India’s strategic position.
Shri Naveen Jindal (BJP, Kurukshetra, Haryana) congratulated the Finance Minister on the Budget citing the success of the Credit Guarantee Scheme and the PM Awas Yojana, and that the tax principles adopted in the Budget are inspired from Chanakya’s Arthshastra. He further stated the contribution of the private sector citing examples of increased IT and pharmaceutical exports, and the success story of 100+ unicorns, while highlighting the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) contributions from the sector impacting every sphere of the society.
Shri Pushpendra Saroj (SP, Kaushambi, Uttar Pradesh) began by highlighting that in 2019, corporate tax was reduced from 30% to 22%, resulting in an estimated annual benefit of around ₹1.5 lakh crore to large companies. He contrasted this with the rising burden on the common public, stating that nearly 65% of Government revenue now comes from GST and income tax, while corporate contribution has declined from about 62% in 2015 to around 28%. He also highlighted the negligible wage growth rates and the steep rise in personal liabilities of citizens. Furthermore, he claimed a lack of transparency in schemes like Jal Jeevan Mission and Namami Gange. He emphasised on our economic dependency by citing the following import statistics: 85% of crude oil, 50% of natural gas, about 75% of electronic components, nearly 80% of solar cells (mostly from China), around 70% of edible oil, about 20% of pulse consumption, and 90% of key fertiliser components. Additionally, he also warned of the worrying brain and wealth drain, whereby the number of youth going abroad has doubled in the last ten years, and that 13,000 millionaires have left the country in the same time frame.
Shri Jagdambika Pal (BJP, Domariyaganj, Uttar Pradesh) supporting the Bill, stated that it reflects strong economic reforms, improved transparency, and sustained growth under the current Government. He highlighted the increase in Income Tax filers from 3.05 crore (FY 2014) to 6.97 crore (FY 2024), TDS collections from ₹ 2.5 lakh crore (2014) to ₹ 6.5 lakh crore (2024), direct tax-to-GDP ratio from 3.2% to 6.6%, among others. He also stated that India has moved from being among the “Fragile Five” economies to becoming the 4th largest economy globally, mentioning our FDI reserves of $709 billion. He also praised the Government for creating an Economic Stabilization Fund of about ₹ 1.04 lakh crore to handle global crises. He concluded that the Finance Bill promotes economic expansion, transparency, industrial growth, and global competitiveness.
Shri Sagar Eshwar Khandre (INC, Bider, Karnataka) evaluated the Finance Bill 2026, focusing on its impact on investors, workers, and pensioners, while raising concerns about policy consistency and fairness. He began by noting an increase in the Securities Transaction Tax (STT) on futures and options could discourage participation in stock markets at a time when more citizens are beginning to invest and trade, thereby acting as a deterrent to financial inclusion. He also highlighted the condition of Anganwadi workers, helpers, and ASHA workers, describing them as the backbone of India’s rural economy. Another concern he raised was policy inconsistency in taxation, particularly regarding Sovereign Gold Bonds (SGBs). He explained that earlier tax exemptions encouraged many investors to participate. However, the Government later restricted these benefits.
Smt. Iqra Choudhary (SP, Kairana, Uttar Pradesh) referred to the 2019 Corporate Tax cut and said the Government had justified the concession on the ground that reducing the tax burden on industrialists would increase investment and employment. However, she said that an RBI report had later shown that companies used the benefit of nearly ₹ 1.5 lakh crore to repay debt, accumulate cash and undertake share buybacks rather than create new investment or jobs. She argued that while the corporate tax-to-GDP ratio had fallen and profits had risen, jobs had disappeared, with automation and the gig economy replacing permanent employment. She also argued that similar relaxations in CSR would now affect basic development work in schools, roads and hospitals. She also commented on the trade agreement with the United States, claiming that India currently had a trade surplus of $ 40 billion with America, but that after the agreement it would have to import goods worth $ 100 billion every year, converting this surplus into a deficit.
Dr. K Sudhakar (BJP, Chikkballapur, Karnataka) stated that he saw the Bill not merely as a financial document but as a clear economic direction for the country. He argued that the Bill was structural in nature, aimed at simplifying taxation, strengthening compliance, expanding the tax base, reducing discretion and increasing transparency. He said that the rationalisation of income tax slabs and the surcharge structure reflected a balanced and thoughtful approach. He noted that the base exemption remained around ₹ 2.5 lakh, while surcharge was structured progressively, with 10 percent above ₹ 50 lakh, 15 per cent above ₹ 1 crore, and up to 37 per cent for ultra-high incomes.
Shri Deepender Singh Hooda (INC, Rohtak, Haryana) started by recalling that in the same House, the then Leader of the Opposition, the late Sushma Swaraj ji, had made a statement that as the rupee falls, the prestige of the country also falls, pointing towards the value of the Rupee currently. He then spoke about fuel and fertilizer prices. He also said that foreign direct investment had been declining and that overseas direct investment by Indian companies had increased, meaning Indian companies were investing more abroad. Finally, he spoke about public debt and said that if both central and state Government debt were combined, the total debt as a percentage of the economy was much higher than earlier years, which he described as another record.
Shri Kiren Rijiju (Union Minister, Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs; BJP, Arunachal West, Arunachal Pradesh) informed the House that the rest of the session could be dedicated towards discussion on tabled Bills, while the Government’s reply to the discussion on the Finance Bill, 2026 would be delivered tomorrow after the Question Hour.
With Smt. Kumari Selja (INC , Sirsa (SC), Haryana) in the Chair, Dr. Virendra Kumar (Union Minister, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment; BJP, Tikamgarh, Madhya Pradesh) moved the motion for consideration of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill, 2026.
He asserted that in order to ensure a proper and certain identity and protection for transgender persons so that they can receive the benefits of the Act, it was necessary to provide a precise definition, which the Bill does. He further stated that the abduction of adults and children to cause reversible or irreversible physical harm through mutilation, castration, hormone therapy, and other similar therapies or chemical changes, and forcing them to adopt a transgender identity, often for the purpose of begging or exploitation, has been recognized as a crime.
He added that a key decision has been to establish a Medical Board. In this board, the Chief Medical Officer or the Deputy Chief Medical Officer will be appointed on behalf of the States and Union Territories, and the board will make recommendations under their chairmanship. Following the board’s recommendation, identity certificates will be issued to transgender persons by the District Magistrate. He said that this step will strengthen and empower the administrative functioning. Through the Chair, he requested the House to consider the bill and extend its cooperation in passing it.
Smt. S. Jothimani (INC, Karur, Tamil Nadu) claimed that despite the Bill’s importance, it was being brought before Parliament without due consultation with transgender persons and other stakeholders. She referred to the landmark judgment of the Supreme Court, commonly known as NALSA, where gender identity was recognized as a matter of self-determination, deeply personal and deeply human. She also posited that the Bill removed the right of self-determination and made identity dependent on State approval. She said that this sequential approval layer for identification fundamentally changes the relationship between the citizen and the State from one of rights to one of permission. She further stated that the bill narrows the definition of transgender persons and excludes trans men and several gender-diverse identities that do not fit into rigid categories.
Shri Anand Bhadauria (SP, Dhaurahra, Uttar Pradesh) said that removing self-identification by amending Section 4(2) of the 2019 Act was effectively ending an individual’s right to identity, dignity, and personal decision-making, and that this weakens Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21 of the Constitution. He also claimed that provisions concerning the “Medical Board” were intrusive to privacy and gave excessive power to the District Magistrate. He further claimed that those who had transitioned and updated their official documents under the 2019 Act now faced the risk of being legally forced back to their birth-assigned gender, which would create deep concern and uncertainty regarding their identity, employment, and banking services. He then requested that the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill be withdrawn, and if it could not be withdrawn, it should be sent to a Select Committee.
Dr. T Sumathy Alias Thamizhadi Thangapandian (DMK, Chennai South, Tamil Nadu) she was rising not merely to oppose the bill, but to oppose the idea that the State can decide who a person is, an idea that identity must be verified before dignity is granted, and an idea that rights are conditional upon certification. She also raised concern that the National Council for Transgender Persons was not meaningfully consulted before bringing this bill.
Smt. Supriya Sule (NCP (SP), Baramati, Maharastra) questioned the urgency of the bill stating there was no pressing need to introduce it at this time of global supply shocks, and requested it be sent to a select committee. Secondly, she spoke about the definition of transgender in the bill, calling it arbitrary and narrow, while claiming that it excludes many identities recognized under the 2019 Act, including transgender men, transgender women, and non-binary persons, in accordance with the NALSA judgment by the Supreme Court. Lastly, she raised the issue of invasive medical reporting and questioned why, if an individual chooses a gender and undergoes medical procedures, a magistrate or collector should be involved.
In response, Dr. Virendra Kumar (Union Minister, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment; BJP, Tikamgarh, Madhya Pradesh) expressed his gratitude to all the members who participated in the debate. He noted that the present amendment seeks to address certain sensitive and complex provisions so that better protection can be provided to those who face severe social exclusion due to their biological conditions, for which they are not responsible.
He then referred to an event on 26th January 2024, when around 60 transgender persons from 15 states were invited for the Republic Day celebrations, moving them to tears upon being shown such respect.
He clarified that the new provisions strengthen protection and address the sensitivity of the issue, whereby any inducement, force, deception, or incitement that compels a person or child to adopt or display a transgender identity would now be a punishable offence under Section 18 (A to E) of the Bill.
He also clarified that to deter harm to children, Clauses F and G have been added to Section 18 providing for strict punishment including life imprisonment and fines, as well as rigorous imprisonment ranging from 10 to 14 years.
He concluded by urging the House to uphold the spirit of the Act and ensure that social inclusion becomes a real solution to existing challenges. He said that with the passage of the amendment, transparency will increase, legal recognition will be strengthened, and rights will be protected. He requested all members to support and pass the bill with consensus.
Following a voice vote, the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026 was passed.
The Lok Sabha was adjourned at 06:47 PM to reconvene at 11:00 A.M on Wednesday, 25th March, 2026.
III. Rajya Sabha Proceedings:
The proceedings of the Rajya Sabha commenced at 11:00 AM.
Shri C.P. Radhakrishnan Ji (Chairman, Rajya Sabha) presided over the proceedings of the House.
Papers were laid on the table. Following this, matters raised with permission were taken up.
Smt. Priyanka Chaturvedi (SS-UBT, Maharashtra) raised the urgent need to revise the penalties for animal cruelty in the country under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 which sets maximum fines of ₹ 100, and highlighted the weak enforcement of the statute. She also lamented that the National Crime Records Bureau does not include animal cruelty in its annual report making the crime effectively invisible to policy-makers.
Smt. Phulo Devi Netam (INC, Chhattisgarh) raised an issue of personnel shortage at AIIMS Raipur highlighting that out of 305 sanctioned posts, only 190 are currently filled leading to immense hardship for patients in the region and requested the Government to expedite appointments.
Smt. Sumitra Balmik (BJP, Madhya Pradesh) raised the issue of noise pollution caused by DJ music systems during examination season, noting that such high decibel levels prevent students from getting necessary sleep before their examinations. She also referenced the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000, noting that while regulations exist for residential areas during the peak examination months, enforcement by district administrations remains inadequate despite occasional fines, and urged stricter implementation of the statute.
Smt. Medha Vishram Kulkarni (BJP, Maharashtra) raised the issue of the increasing number of missing women and minor girls, specifically in Maharashtra. Citing data from the State’s Home Department, she stated that, on average, 132 women go missing every day in Maharashtra. She also highlighted the role of organized networks involved in “Love Jihad,” forced conversions through fraudulent marriage, and the misuse of social media to entrap minors..
Shri Mallikarjun Kharge (INC, Karnataka) enquired about the status of his notices for a short-duration discussion under Rule 176. He stated that he had written to the Chair twice on the matter and emphasized that nearly fourteen days had passed since the initial notice was submitted. He questioned the delay in processing the request, noting the urgency of the issue which he claimed affects the entire country. Shri C.P. Radhakrishnan Ji (Chairman, Rajya Sabha) replied that the matter was currently under process and that he would consult with the concerned individuals before providing a response.
Following this, Shri C.P. Radhakrishnan Ji (Chairman, Rajya Sabha) commenced the Question Hour.
Shri Shambhu Sharan Patel (BJP, Bihar) raised the question regarding the One Nation One Ration Card (ONORC) scheme. While describing the initiative as highly useful and beneficial for the public, he requested the Minister to elaborate on the future measures being undertaken to further strengthen the scheme and enhance its overall effectiveness.
Smt. Nimuben Jayantibhai Bambhania (MoS, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution; BJP, Bhavnagar, Gujarat) replied that the Government is bolstering the One Nation One Ration Card scheme through the Smart PDS platform. She noted that this platform facilitates real-time data integration between various States and Union Territories. Additionally, she highlighted the Sarthak PDS initiative, which includes AI-based analytics and a more robust grievance redressal system. She informed that 81 crore citizens are currently able to procure their rations from any fair price shop in any state under this scheme.
Shri Mahendra Bhatt (BJP, Uttarakhand) inquired about the mandatory linkage of Aadhaar cards with ration cards, stating that beneficiaries in regions facing internet connectivity issues or biometric machine malfunctions encounter significant difficulties. He asked the Minister to clarify the alternative arrangements provided by the Government and sought information on whether reports of citizens being deprived of rations due to such technical failures have been addressed.
Shri Prahlad Joshi (Union Minister, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution; BJP, Dharwad, Karnataka) responded that all state Governments have been directed to provide rations even if biometric verification fails. He noted that an offline distribution mode remains available to prevent any exclusion. He further detailed a new pilot initiative involving Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) currently being tested in Gujarat and Puducherry. He explained that this system allows beneficiaries to use a digital wallet and currency backed by the Reserve Bank of India, which can be scanned at ration shops. He highlighted the impact of digitization over the last decade, specifically mentioning the AI-driven route optimization tool, Anna Chakra. He stated that this initiative has resulted in savings of ₹ 250 crores. Additionally, he referred to the Depot Darpan system, which tracks transit and storage losses, noting they have been reduced to approximately 0.18% and 0.7% respectively.
Shri Shaktisinh Gohil (INC, Gujarat) inquired into the systemic failures that prevent Immunoglobulin and Anti-Rabies vaccines from reaching Government hospitals. He noted receiving frequent reports from districts in Gujarat where beneficiaries claim that vaccines are unavailable in public medical facilities. He asked if the Union Government would consider a mechanism to supply these vaccines directly to all state-run hospitals to ensure they are available to the poor.
Shri Jagat Prakash Nadda Ji (Union Minister, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; BJP, Gujarat) replied that health is a State subject under the constitutional framework. He explained that the Union Government provides the necessary technical and financial support, along with real-time tracking and alerts via a dedicated dashboard. However, he stated that the internal distribution of these vaccines to various district and local hospitals remains the administrative responsibility of the respective state Governments. He further mentioned that the Centre provides training to state officials to manage these processes effectively, but the execution of ground-level distribution rests with the state authorities.
Shri Brij Lal (BJP, Uttar Pradesh) expressed concern over the rising prevalence of lifestyle diseases in rural areas. He observed that conditions such as diabetes, cancer, kidney diseases, and high blood pressure, once primarily urban issues, are now increasingly common in villages, and whether the Government has made specific arrangements for providing medicines for these critical illnesses through the Jan Aushadhi Kendras.
Shri Jagat Prakash Nadda Ji (Union Minister, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; BJP, Gujarat) replied by highlighting the significant expansion of Jan Aushadhi Kendras from 80 to more than 14,000 centers to provide affordable healthcare to the common man. He stated that the current basket includes 2,110 medicines and 315 surgical medical consumables and devices. He elaborated that this range specifically includes cardiovascular, anti-cancer, anti-diabetic, anti-infective, anti-allergic, gastrointestinal, and nutraceutical products. He further noted that all medicines listed under the National List of Essential Medicines are included in the Jan Aushadhi scheme to ensure comprehensive coverage for life-threatening diseases.
The House was adjourned at 1:00 p.m to reconvene at 2:00 p.m.
The proceedings resumed with Shri C.P. Radhakrishnan Ji (Chairman, Rajya Sabha) in the Chair.
Shri Narendra Modi Ji (Prime Minister; BJP, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh) addressed the House on the ongoing West Asia conflict.
He observed that this war has triggered a severe global energy crisis and expressed concern over its direct impact on India, specifically regarding the disruption of trade routes. He stated that the supply of essential commodities, including petrol, diesel, gas, and fertilizers, is being affected by these developments. Highlighting the demographic stakes, he pointed out that approximately one crore Indians reside and work in Gulf countries, making their safety and livelihoods a matter of significant concern for the Government.
He further informed the House that numerous ships are currently stranded in the Strait of Hormuz, many of which carry a substantial number of Indian crew members. He emphasized the necessity for the Upper House to project a united voice advocating for peace and dialogue to the international community. Regarding diplomatic efforts, he stated that he has held telephonic conversations with the heads of state of most West Asian nations since the commencement of the conflict. He confirmed that India remains in continuous contact with Gulf nations, as well as Iran, Israel, and the United States, with the primary objective of restoring regional peace through dialogue and diplomacy.
He shared that over 3.75 lakh Indians have returned safely to India since the beginning of the conflict. He specified that more than 1,000 Indians have returned from Iran alone, including over 700 students pursuing medical studies. He remarked that the Government is working with full sensitivity and has received assurances from various countries regarding the safety of Indian nationals.
He also clarified that while India previously imported its energy requirements, including crude oil, LNG, and LPG, from 27 countries, it now sources them from 41 countries, heavily diversifying our sources. He further elaborated on the country’s strategic petroleum reserves, noting that over 53 lakh metric tons of capacity have been developed in the last 11 years, with ongoing projects to add another 65 lakh metric tons. He assured the House that oil companies maintain sufficient stocks of petrol and diesel to manage potential disruptions. He also pointed out the significant increase in India’s refining capacity over the past decade. Regarding domestic energy security, he explained that the Government is reducing over-reliance on any single fuel source by promoting Piped Natural Gas (PNG) alongside Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG).
He specifically urged for the timely delivery of benefits under the PM Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana to ensure food security. Furthermore, he requested that states take proactive measures to assist migrant workers at their places of employment and establish specialized monitoring systems to address their grievances effectively. Addressing market stability, he warned against the activities of hoarders and those engaged in black marketing, noting that such elements often become active during periods of global instability. He called upon state authorities to take stringent action against these practices to ensure the uninterrupted supply of essential commodities.
Finally, he noted that despite varying political leadership across states, a unified approach to testing, vaccination, and supply chains was successfully achieved during the Covid period. He advocated for the same collaborative spirit of “Team India” to tackle the current global situation. He urged the nation to face the rapidly changing circumstances with patience and a calm resolve.
Shri P.C. Mody (Secretary-General, Rajya Sabha) reported a message from the Lok Sabha regarding its sitting held on 23rd March 2026. He stated that the Lok Sabha had adopted a motion to refer the Corporate Laws Amendment Bill 2026 to a Joint Committee of the Houses consisting of 21 Members to be nominated by the Speaker, Lok Sabha, and 10 Members of Rajya Sabha to be nominated by Chairman, Rajya Sabha.
Shri C.P. Radhakrishnan Ji (Chairman, Rajya Sabha) then transitioned the proceedings to further the discussion on the Appropriation (No. 2) Bill, 2026.
Shri Dinesh Sharma (BJP, Uttar Pradesh) spoke in support of the Appropriation Bill, characterizing it as a significant foundation for the nation’s development, transparency, and accountability. He stated that the Government has prioritized financial discipline by reducing the fiscal deficit through the Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) mechanism. He addressed criticisms regarding increased expenditure, asserting that these funds are being utilized strategically for infrastructure, welfare programs, and nation-building. He emphasized the Government’s support for farmers through continuous increases in Minimum Support Price (MSP) and direct assistance via PM Kisan. He emphasized that India has emerged as a global leader in technology and digital payments, moving away from an era of corruption scandals such as 2G, CWG, and the Coal scam toward a period defined by transparent auctions.
Shri Haris Beeran (IUML, Kerala) raised concerns regarding the Government’s funding priorities in the Appropriation Bill, specifically highlighting a drastic reduction in the budget for minority welfare. He stated that the means-based scholarship fund had been reduced from ₹ 302.06 crore in 2024-25 to a mere ₹ 0.06 crore in the 2026-27 budget estimate, representing a 99.9% cut. Furthermore, he highlighted the absence of budgetary provisions for the West Asia crisis, noting the potential impact on annual remittances amounting to ₹2.16 lakh crore and the need for a rehabilitation package for returning expatriates.
Shri Lahar Singh Siroya (BJP, Karnataka) compared the Prime Minister’s leadership to that of historical wartime leaders, noting that India has successfully navigated multiple crises in the recent past. On the issue of energy security, he highlighted that the Government has maintained a strategic petroleum reserve of over 53 lakh metric tons. He further informed the House that efforts are underway to create an additional storage capacity of 65 million metric tons to protect the national economy from global energy fluctuations. Additionally, he lauded the focus on Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS), noting a proposed investment of ₹ 20,000 crore over the next five years to repurpose industrial carbon emissions
Shri Mahua Maji (JMM, Jharkhand) stated that approving expenditures without adequate discussion compromises democratic principles and highlighted that a lack of transparency and off-budget borrowings are serious issues that weaken public trust and fiscal discipline. Turning her focus to Jharkhand, she emphasized that while the state provides the nation with essential mineral resources such as coal, iron, and uranium, it does not receive its fair share of financial allocations. She pointed out the irony that a state strengthening the national economy continues to struggle for basic amenities and remains ranked among the lowest in development indices.
Shri Satnam Singh Sandhu (BJP, Nominated) supported the Appropriation Bill, characterizing it as a significant milestone in the journey toward a developed India and noting the budget’s growth from ₹ 16.65 lakh crore in 2013-14 to ₹ 53.5 lakh crore in 2026-2027. He paid tribute to martyrs Bhagat Singh ji, Rajguru ji, and Sukhdev ji, asserting that the current focus on self-reliance and the repeal of 1,600 colonial-era laws fulfills their vision for a sovereign nation. He commended the symbolic decolonization of the country through the renaming of landmarks like Rajpath and the reform of the Indian legal system to remove colonial influences.
Shri Sat Paul Sharma (BJP, Jammu & Kashmir) highlighted the nation’s robust economic trajectory, characterized by a GDP of ₹ 337.14 lakh crore and foreign exchange reserves reaching $ 686 billion. He further noted the strategic importance of the Fiscal Stabilization Fund, amounting to ₹ 57,381.84 crore, in protecting the domestic economy from the volatility of global energy prices. He commended the government’s fiscal discipline, noting that the fiscal deficit is projected to fall below 4.5% by 2025-26, with a target of reducing the debt-to-GDP ratio to 50% by 2031.
Shri Raghav Chadha (AAP, Punjab) expressed concern over the heightened volatility in Indian financial markets resulting from the escalating conflict in West Asia. He noted that despite India’s strong economic fundamentals, the market witnessed a loss of approximately ₹ 48 lakh crore in investor wealth during the month of February, with the burden of this external shock falling heavily on over 13.5 crore retail investors, including the salaried class and SIP participants, who are already subject to various taxes such as STT, GST, and capital gains tax. He proposed several targeted measures to protect domestic investors, including time-bound relief on the Securities Transaction Tax (STT) and extending the period for carrying forward capital losses from eight years to fifteen years. He further suggested a one-time special crisis-period tax relaxation and called for low-friction rebalancing for mutual fund investors.
Smt. Rekha Sharma (BJP, Haryana) highlighted that the total expenditure for the fiscal year is estimated at ₹ 53 lakh crore, with capital expenditure at ₹ 12 lakh crore and effective capital expenditure at ₹ 17 lakh crore. She pointed out the improvement in fiscal health, with the fiscal deficit estimated at 4.3% of GDP and a debt-to-GDP ratio of 55.6%, reflecting responsible and strategic spending. She contrasted the current administration’s “national management” with the “narrative management” of previous governments, asserting that the restoration of public faith in government delivery is a major democratic achievement.
Shri P.C. Mody (Secretary-General, Rajya Sabha) reported a message from the Lok Sabha informing the House that it had passed the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill, 2026, during its sitting today and laid a copy of the Bill on the Table of the House.
In the Chair, Smt. S. Phangnon Konyak (BJP, Nagaland) took up Special Mentions.
Shri Babubhai Jesangbhai Desai (BJP, Gujarat) raised questions regarding the growing concerns over the misuse of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on social media platforms and requested the Government to address these technological challenges by implementing stricter guidelines for AI usage.
Shri Akhilesh Prasad Singh (INC, Bihar) raised the issue of interlinking rivers in Bihar to address the state’s unique challenge of facing simultaneous floods and droughts, noting that that during the monsoon, approximately 70 to 80 billion cubic meters of water flows through Bihar and into the sea via the Ganga without being utilized.
Shri Raghav Chadha (AAP, Punjab) regarding the severe impact of traffic congestion in major Indian metropolitan cities, results in substantial economic losses, fuel wastage, and increased environmental pollution, while also causing mental stress and reducing the quality of life for citizens. He urged the Government to establish a National Urban Decongestion Mission to tackle this issue.
Dr. Sasmit Patra (BJD, Odisha) raised a matter of urgent concern regarding the disappearance of Indian seafarers in international waters. He noted that official records indicate nearly 100 Indian seafarers have been reported missing or dead under unclear conditions, with many investigations remaining pending for several years.
The proceedings of Rajya Sabha were adjourned at 7:37 PM to reconvene at 11:00 A.M on Wednesday, 25th March, 2026.
IV. Events Outside The Parliament :
Shri Dharmendra Pradhan (BJP, Sambalpur, Odisha) said that MPs from Odisha met the Railway Minister to raise concerns about Odiya-speaking populations in the Kharagpur railway division. He added that they sought support for these communities, and the Railway Minister has assured that their concerns will be considered appropriately.
Smt. Kamaljeet Sehrawat (BJP, West Delhi, Delhi) criticized the excise policy, alleging that while such policies are generally intended to benefit Government revenue, in this case it failed and instead enabled doorstep delivery of alcohol. She accused the AAP-led Delhi Government of misusing the policy for facilitating wider alcohol distribution.
Smt. Sagarika Ghose (AITC, West Bengal) criticized the Central Government over the alleged LPG crisis, calling it unresponsive and dismissive. She accused the Government of being in denial and deliberately avoiding a discussion in Parliament on rising fuel costs and the difficulties faced by ordinary citizens due to increasing prices.
Smt. Rajani Ashokrao Patil (INC, Maharashtra) welcomed the move related to Women reservation, crediting former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi for his contributions to advancing reservation policies. She stated that the Congress party would continue to uphold and carry forward his legacy in promoting social justice and inclusive representation.
Shri Madan Rathore (BJP, Rajasthan) criticized Rahul Gandhi, stating that if he wanted to raise issues, he should do so through established parliamentary mechanisms such as the Business Advisory Committee. He argued that bypassing institutional procedures undermines the functioning and discipline of Parliament.
Shri Giriraj Singh (BJP, Begusarai, Bihar) criticized Rahul Gandhi, stating that he has previously had to apologize for his remarks and accused him of spreading misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic. He also praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi Ji’s leadership, highlighting the Government’s handling of the crisis and its response measures.
Shri Pramod Tiwari (INC, Uttar Pradesh) commented on Jharkhand Mukti Morcha announcing candidates in Assam, stating that such developments are common in politics. He noted that political parties may choose to contest together or separately depending on circumstances, and emphasized that there is nothing unusual about such electoral decisions.
Shri Narhari Amin (BJP, Gujarat) responded to Arvind Kejriwal’s remarks about the Prime Minister by dismissing them as politically insignificant. He stated that AAP lacks substantial presence in Gujarat and asserted that the BJP will continue to dominate electorally, including in upcoming elections in states such as Bihar.
Shri Ravi Kishan (BJP, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh) welcomed the Women’s Reservation Bill, describing it as a historic step toward empowering women in politics. He credited Prime Minister Narendra Modi for prioritizing women’s welfare and said the legislation would significantly enhance women’s representation in Parliament and state legislatures.
Smt. Mahua Maji (JMM, Jharkhand) welcomed the Women’s Reservation Bill, stating that women are prepared to take on greater leadership roles in Parliament and state assemblies. She added that the INDI Alliance would deliberate internally and extend support to the Bill with certain conditions after discussions among alliance partners.
Shri Anurag Thakur (BJP, Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh) criticized the Congress Government in Himachal Pradesh, targeting Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra. He alleged that their pre-election promises have resulted in increased VAT and additional cess on diesel, thereby placing a significant financial burden on the common people.
Shri Naresh Mhaske (SHS, Thane, Maharashtra) supported the Women’s Reservation Bill, stating that the Government is fulfilling its commitment to prioritizing women’s empowerment. He urged the Opposition to support the initiative and also criticized Rahul Gandhi, calling on him to act responsibly and avoid statements that could undermine the country.
The day’s proceedings reflected Parliament’s dual role in addressing immediate global challenges and advancing domestic legislative business. While the Lok Sabha concluded deliberations with the passage of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill, 2026, discussions in the Rajya Sabha covered governance concerns and fiscal priorities through debate on the Appropriation (No. 2) Bill, 2026. Together, the debates underscored a continued emphasis on economic resilience, institutional processes and policy responsiveness in a complex global environment.
Annexure I - Matters Raised Under Rule 377 In The Lok Sabha
Annexure II - Reports And Statements Presented In The Lok Sabha
Annexure III - Members Who Participated In Discussion On The Finance Bill, 2026 in The Lok Sabha
Annexure IV - Members Who Participated In Discussion on the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill, 2026 In The Lok Sabha
Annexure V - Bills Passed In The Lok Sabha
Annexure VI - Statements Presented In The Rajya Sabha
Annexure VII - Matters Raised With Permission In The Rajya Sabha
Annexure VIII - Members Who Participated In The Discussion On The Appropriation (No.2) Bill, 2026 In The Rajya Sabha
Annexure IX - Special Mentions In The Rajya Sabha