I. Key Highlights of The Proceedings:
The proceedings of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha commenced at 11:00 AM.
In the Lok Sabha, Shri Om Birla Ji (Speaker, Lok Sabha; BJP, Kota, Rajasthan) commenced the Question Hour.
Shri Anand Bhadauria (SP, Uttar Pradesh) raised concerns over the lack of stadium infrastructure in constituencies and sought a nationwide plan for stadium construction. Smt. Raksha Nikhil Khadse (MoS, Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports; BJP, Raver, Maharastra) responded that the Government aims to identify and train approximately 4 lakh athletes through a structured district-to-national level pathway.
Shri Manoj Kumar (INC, Sasaram (SC), Bihar) asked whether the Government was considering introducing a customer data access alert system in banks, under which customers would receive SMS or email alerts whenever their personal data is accessed. In response, Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman (Union Minister, Ministry of Finance; BJP, Karnataka) stated that in addition to the several regulatory frameworks for protection of customer data in banks, under the KYC framework, the Reserve Bank of India has issued Master Directions related to secrecy of customer information and sharing of data. She added that banks are required to maintain strict confidentiality regarding customer information arising from their contractual relationship with customers.
In the Lok Sabha, Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman (Union Minister, Ministry of Finance; BJP, Karnataka) replied to the discussion on the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2025. She noted that 40 Members had participated in the debate. She stated that the amendments aim to strengthen the insolvency framework, improve value realisation, and incorporate global best practices.
She highlighted that IBC has played a critical role in improving the health of India’s banking sector, particularly through recovery of non-performing assets. She noted that scheduled commercial banks recovered ₹ 1.04 lakh crore through various channels, out of which 52.3% came through the IBC process.
She further explained that the credible threat of losing ownership under IBC has encouraged many promoters to settle their debts before formal admission, resulting in 32,179 cases worth ₹ 14.62 lakh crore being settled at the pre-admission stage
She also addressed concerns regarding distress among Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). She clarified that special provisions already exist for MSMEs under Section 240A, and that earlier amendments in 2018 and 2021 were also designed to support this sector.
In the Lok Sabha, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2025 was passed through voice vote.
In the Lok Sabha, Shri Om Birla Ji (Speaker, Lok Sabha; BJP, Kota, Rajasthan) commenced the discussion under Rule 193 on efforts to eliminate the country from Left-Wing Extremism.
Dr. Shrikant Eknath Shinde (SS, Kalyan, Maharashtra) highlighted that over 10,000 Naxalites have surrendered, with 317 neutralised, 862 arrested, and about 1,900 surrendering in 2025. He further noted that 28 major Maoist leaders were eliminated during 2024–25, including 6 central committee members, and that over 630 cadres surrendered in the first three months of 2026, indicating a declining trend in extremist activity.
Shri Sambit Patra (BJP, Puri, Odisha) described the transition from “Red Corridor” to “Growth Corridor” as a significant shift in addressing Left-Wing Extremism. He referred to past counter-insurgency efforts, including Operation Green Hunt, and cited the April 2010 Dantewada attack in which 76 CRPF personnel were killed..
Dr. Byreddy Shabari (TDP, Nandyal, Andhra Pradesh) referred to major Maoist attacks between 2004 and 2014 and stated that during this period there were around 17,000 Naxal-related incidents, resulting in over 1,800 security personnel and more than 5,000 civilian deaths. She contrasted this with recent improvements, highlighting infrastructure expansion including over 1,800 banks, 1,300 ATMs, 5,000 post offices, 8,000 mobile towers, about 14,000 km of roads, and basic amenities to around 15,000 villages.
Shri Amit Shah Ji (Union Minister, Ministry of Home Affairs; BJP, Gandhinagar, Gujarat) traced Naxalism’s roots to early 20th century communist movements in Russia and China. He linked these to India, noting the formation of the CPI in 1925, the CPI(M) split in 1964, and the emergence of CPI(ML) in 1969, which rejected parliamentary democracy in favor of armed revolution.
He detailed the Government’s investment in tribal welfare, noting that ₹ 2,212 crore has been spent on health camps, ₹ 3,000 crore under the Security Related Expenditure scheme, ₹ 5,000 crore for the Special Infrastructure Scheme and ₹ 2,000 crore for an extended SIS Scheme.
He explained that the Government has adopted “Whole of Government” and “Whole of Agency” approaches, ensuring alignment between the Centre and States, and fostering seamless coordination between the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF) and State Police.
He stated that 596 fortified police stations were constructed over the past 11 years. He further noted that Naxal-affected districts declined from 126 in 2014 to only 2 at present, while “most affected” districts reduced from 35 to 0.
He further alleged that Shri Rahul Gandhi had shared stages and interacted with individuals known for extremist ideologies, including during the Bharat Jodo Yatra. He contrasted the previous administration’s “lucrative” approach with his government’s comprehensive rehabilitation policy.
He concluded by paying tribute to the security personnel and innocent citizens who lost their lives to Naxal violence and reaffirmed the government’s goal to make India entirely Naxal-free.
In the Rajya Sabha, Shri C.P. Radhakrishnan Ji (Chairman, Rajya Sabha) proceeded with the matters raised with permission.
Shri Sukhendu Sekhar Ray (AITC, West Bengal) raised concerns regarding freedom of speech and expression in universities, emphasising the need to preserve academic spaces for open debate.
Dr. K. Laxman (BJP, Uttar Pradesh) raised the issue of misuse of OBC reservation and contended that while the 27% reservation for OBCs was intended for genuinely backward communities, certain States were granting reservation to Muslims on purely religious grounds, thereby distorting the original purpose of the policy.
In the Rajya Sabha, Shri Jagat Prakash Nadda Ji (Leader of the House; BJP, Gujarat) stated that the opposition shows no respect for debate, democratic values, or parliamentary procedure, and accused them of appeasement politics by treating Muslims as a vote bank. Referring to the issue raised by Dr. K. Laxman, he mentioned that there is no constitutional provision for Muslim reservation under the OBC category.
In the Rajya Sabha, Shri C.P. Radhakrishnan Ji (Chairman, Rajya Sabha) commenced the Question Hour.
Dr. M. Thambidurai (AIADMK, Tamil Nadu) expressed concerns over passenger safety and airport management. In response, Shri Kinjarapu Rammohan Naidu (Union Minister, Ministry of Civil Aviation; TDP, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh) responded that during emergency landings, flights are definitely accorded priority at airports. He also emphasized that all safety-related procedures are governed by strict protocols, and that even in emergencies, decisions must be taken in compliance with established safety regulations. He added that on the issue of multiple runways, both runways cannot be used simultaneously for parallel operations unless they are separated by the required minimum distance.
Shri Neeraj Dangi (INC, Rajasthan) inquired regarding the steps taken by the Government to address the limited water testing capacity of laboratories in several States, especially their inability to test for major contaminants such as arsenic. In response, Shri C.R. Patil (Union Minister, Ministry of Jal Shakti; BJP, Navsari, Gujarat) stated that about 14,020 water sources across India were identified as contaminated with arsenic and fluoride. He noted that the number of affected sources has been reduced to 305, while fluoride-affected habitations have declined from 17,996 to 244.
In the Rajya Sabha, Shri Harivansh Ji (Deputy Chairman, Rajya Sabha; JD(U), Bihar) commenced the discussion on the Central Armed Police Forces (General Administration) Bill, 2026.
Shri Sanjay Singh (AAP, Delhi) opposed the Bill, raising concerns regarding lack of recognition of CAPF personnel as martyrs, delays in career progression, and disparities in service conditions. He highlighted casualties across forces and questioned the absence of official recognition for personnel killed in major attacks, urging the Government to address systemic inequities.
Shri Muzibulla Khan (BJD, Odisha) emphasised the need to strengthen CAPF through modern technologies such as drones and AI, questioned the necessity of the Bill in light of judicial observations, and stressed the need for recognition and entitlements for personnel.
Prof. Ram Gopal Yadav (SP, Uttar Pradesh) raised concerns regarding stagnation in promotions, disparities with IAS/IPS cadres, and taxation of disability pensions. He highlighted high voluntary retirement rates and urged referral of the Bill to a Select Committee for wider consultation.
In the Rajya Sabha, Dr. Dinesh Sharma (BJP, Uttar Pradesh) took up Special Mentions.
Dr. Bhim Singh (BJP, Bihar) highlighted the historical and cultural significance of Vipulachal, noting its association with ancient heritage and the Mahabharata era. He raised concerns regarding inadequate conservation despite ASI recognition and flagged delays in ongoing projects, resulting in deterioration of structures.
Shri Niranjan Bishi (BJD, Odisha) raised concerns regarding misuse of caste certificates, highlighting its adverse impact on genuine SC/ST beneficiaries. He emphasised the need for strict implementation of Supreme Court guidelines to prevent fraudulent claims and protect constitutional safeguards.
The proceedings of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha were adjourned at 7:29 PM and 6:00 PM respectively, to reconvene on Wednesday, 1st April, 2026 at 11:00 AM.
II. Lok Sabha Proceedings:
The proceedings of the Lok Sabha commenced at 11:00 AM with Shri Om Birla Ji (Speaker, Lok Sabha; BJP, Kota, Rajasthan) presiding over the House.
Shri Om Birla Ji (Speaker, Lok Sabha; BJP, Kota, Rajasthan) commenced the Question Hour.
Shri Anand Bhadauria (SP, Dhaurahra, Uttar Pradesh) raised the issue of lack of stadium facilities in many constituencies, particularly affecting rural sporting talent. He asked whether the Government was considering a proposal to construct at least one stadium in every Lok Sabha constituency across the country.
Smt. Raksha Nikhil Khadse (MoS, Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports; BJP, Raver, Maharastra) stated that the Government’s vision is to identify and train around four lakh athletes from rural areas through a structured pathway beginning at the district level, progressing to the State level and eventually to the national level, thereby providing grassroots talent with opportunities and proper platforms for advancement in sports.
Shri Manoj Kumar (INC, Sasaram (SC), Bihar) asked whether the Government is considering the implementation of a customer data access alert system in banks, under which customers would receive SMS or email alerts whenever their personal data is accessed.
Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman (Union Minister, Ministry of Finance; BJP, Karnataka) stated that several regulatory frameworks already exist to ensure protection of customer data in banks. She highlighted that under the KYC framework, the Reserve Bank of India has issued Master Directions related to secrecy of customer information and sharing of data. Banks are required to maintain strict confidentiality regarding customer information arising from their contractual relationship with customers. She also explained that banks and regulated entities must comply with multiple laws including the State Bank of India Act 1955, Banking Companies Act 1949, Regional Rural Banks Act 1976, Credit Information Companies Act 2005, and the Public Financial Institutions Act, 1983.
Shri Sudheer Gupta (BJP, Mandsour, Madhya Pradesh) highlighted several sites in the region, including the Chaturbhuj Rock Art, estimated to be 10,000–30,000 years old and included in UNESCO listings, Asia’s largest man-made lake, locations connected with the Buddhist Circuit and Swadesh Darshan Circuit,. He asked whether the Government would consider establishing a training centre in his parliamentary constituency.
Shri Gajendra Singh Shekhawat (Union Minister, Ministry of Tourism; BJP, Jodhpur, Rajasthan) stated that the announcement made in the Budget to upskill more than 10,000 tour guides in collaboration with IIMs was currently at an initial stage. He explained that the Ministry was working with the Indian Institute of Tourism and Travel Management (IITTM), Gwalior, along with IIMs, to develop a detailed action plan. He further noted that the Government had already upgraded tourism-related courses in 21 centrally run institutions and several state-run institutes, but clarified that there was currently no proposal under consideration to open separate training campuses in different locations.
Shri Shyamkumar Daulat Barve (INC, Ramtek (SC), Maharashtra) stated that in 2014 the average exchange rate was about ₹ 61.2 per US dollar, whereas it had increased to about ₹ 93.80 per dollar, indicating roughly a 49% depreciation of the rupee. He further noted that food prices had increased by about 72% between 2014 and 2026. He inquired regarding the Government’s claims about declining inflation.
Shri Pankaj Chaudhary (MoS, Ministry of Finance; BJP, Maharajganj, Uttar Pradesh) responded that the value of the rupee against foreign currencies is market-determined, influenced by both domestic and global economic conditions. He stated that India’s economic fundamentals remained strong, highlighting that inflation had fallen to about 1.9%, GDP growth exceeded 7%, and the current account deficit was below 1%. He also mentioned that the manufacturing and services sectors were balanced, domestic demand was supporting economic growth and foreign exchange reserves were sufficient to cover about 11 months of imports.
Following this, Papers and Reports were laid on the Table.
Shri Kiren Rijiju (Union Minister, Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs; BJP, Arunachal West, Arunachal Pradesh) urged all parties to work as one team during national crises without politicising issues. He further noted that concerned Ministers and the Prime Minister have addressed both Houses, an all-party meeting was held, and the Government remains open to further discussion on LPG and petrol prices.
Following this, the house was adjourned at 12:12 PM to reconvene at 12:30 PM.
Shri Om Birla Ji (Speaker, Lok Sabha; BJP, Kota, Rajasthan) took up the discussion for consideration and passing of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2025.
Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman (Union Minister, Ministry of Finance; BJP, Karnataka) replied to the discussion on the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2025, noting that 40 Members had participated in the debate.
She stated that the amendments aim to strengthen the insolvency framework created under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, by addressing practical challenges, incorporating global best practices, and drawing upon the experience gained since the law came into force. She emphasized that the objective is to maximize value for stakeholders and improve the governance process of insolvency resolution.
She highlighted that the IBC has played a critical role in improving the health of India’s banking sector, particularly through recovery of non-performing assets. Scheduled commercial banks have recovered ₹ 1.04 lakh crore through various channels, out of which ₹ 54,528 crore, about 52.3% came through the IBC process, demonstrating its effectiveness in value realization and resolution of stressed companies. She explained that the Bill replaces the under-utilised fast-track Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) with a creditor-initiated insolvency framework, which includes out-of-court settlements and combines the debtor-in-possession and creditor-in-control model.
She further explained that the credible threat of losing ownership under IBC has encouraged many promoters to settle their debts before formal admission, resulting in 32,179 cases worth ₹ 14.62 lakh crore being settled at the pre-admission stage. She added that a large number of companies that went into liquidation during the early years were legacy cases transferred from the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) and Corporate Debt Restructuring mechanisms, where the economic value of firms had already eroded. In 2017-18, the ratio was one company resolved for every five companies liquidated, but by 2024-25 the ratio had improved to 1:1, showing the increasing effectiveness of the resolution framework.
She then addressed concerns regarding distress among Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) and alleged regional disparities in the pre-packaged insolvency process. She clarified that special provisions already exist for MSMEs under Section 240A, and that earlier amendments in 2018 and 2021 were also designed to support this sector. MSMEs are exempted from disqualification under Sections 29A(c) and 29A(h), allowing existing promoters to participate in the resolution of their own businesses, something that is not permitted for large corporate defaulters.
Finally, she clarified that the “clean slate” principle under the IBC reaffirms that once a resolution plan is approved, all prior claims are extinguished, allowing new management to operate without legacy liabilities. Cases already settled by the Supreme Court will not be reopened. Government licences and approvals will remain valid to ensure smooth revival of the company. She added that no new claims can be raised after approval, as all claims must be submitted and settled during the resolution process.
Following this several amendments were moved by Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman (Union Minister, Ministry of Finance; BJP, Karnataka), which was adopted through voice vote. Subsequently, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2025 was passed in the Lok Sabha.
Shri Om Birla Ji (Speaker, Lok Sabha; BJP, Kota, Rajasthan) commenced the discussion under Rule 193 on efforts to eliminate the country from Left-Wing Extremism.
Dr. Shrikant Eknath Shinde (SS, Kalyan, Maharashtra) stated that the Congress Governments failed to provide development and welfare for tribal communities, which forced many marginalized citizens to take up arms. He further stated that the present Government had addressed several long-standing national security challenges. He added that more than 10,000 Naxalites surrendered and in 2025 alone 317 Naxalites neutralized, 862 arrested, and 1,900 surrendered. He further stated that in 2024 and 2025, 28 major Maoist leaders were eliminated, including 6 members of the central committee. He also highlighted that in the first 3 months of 2026 alone, more than 630 cadres abandoned violence and stated that these figures demonstrated that the vision of a “Naxal-free India” was becoming a reality.
Shri Sambit Patra (BJP, Puri, Odisha) stated that the journey from “Red Corridor” to “Growth Corridor” was historic and represented the achievement of a Naxal-free India. He stated that earlier Governments provided only “lip service” and cited Operation Green Hunt as an example of a failed effort. He recalled that 76 CRPF personnel were killed in April 2010 in Dantewara, Chhattisgarh. He cited a 2013 UPA Government’s counter-affidavit in Kishore Samrite vs Union of India, which acknowledged that CPI (Maoist) used human-rights NGOs as front organisations to avoid legal liability, effectively recognising urban Naxal networks despite the term being contested today.
Dr. Byreddy Shabari (TDP, Nandyal, Andhra Pradesh) highlighted several major Maoist attacks that occurred between 2004 and 2014. She stated that during the Congress period there were about 17,000 Naxal attacks, resulting in massive casualties. She further stated that over 1,800 security personnel were killed and more than 5,000 civilians lost their lives between 2004 and 2014. She further stated that the current transformation represented a miracle, with areas once echoing with gunfire and slogans of “Lal Salaam” now resonating with school bells and “Bharat Mata Ki Jai.” She highlighted development initiatives in previously affected areas, stating that these regions now have over 1,800 banks, more than 1,300 ATMs, over 5,000 post offices, and more than 8,000 mobile towers. She also stated that around 14,000 kilometers of roads had been constructed in affected areas and that about 15,000 villages received basic amenities.
Shri Zia Ur Rehman (SP, Sambhal, Uttar Pradesh) noted that the solution to extremism is not found in guns or jails but in addressing socio-economic issues. He identified poverty, unemployment, and the lack of education and healthcare as the primary drivers of the problem. He suggested that extremism also exists in thought and ideology, particularly when people are divided based on religion or caste. He specifically mentioned that open calls for violence and boycotts against the Muslim community on social media and public platforms constitute a form of extremism that threatens national unity and the PDA (Pichda, Dalit, Alpsankhyak) communities.
Shri Arun Bharti (LJSP (RV), Jamui (SC), Bihar) criticized the policy paralysis of the previous Congress-led Government and referred to former Prime Minister Shri Manmohan Singh’s 2009 admission that Naxalism posed the greatest internal security threat to India. Regarding the current situation in Jamui and Bihar, he stated that Left-wing extremism is on the verge of elimination. He contrasted past incidents, such as the attack on a BSF camp in Sasaram by 100 Naxals and the 2021 attack on the Dhanbad-Patna Intercity Express by 200 Naxals, with the current progress. He credited the Union Government for efforts to bring cadres into the mainstream. He cited data showing a decline in incidents from 342 to 13 in the 2024-25 period. He highlighted the restoration of democracy in formerly affected areas, noting 79% voter turnout in Chakarbanda hills and peaceful voting in Munger’s Bhim Bandh after 20 years.
Shri Nishikant Dubey (BJP, Godda, Jharkhand) stated that the Left-wing extremism movement is an ideological battle rather than one based on the rights of the poor or tribals. He claimed that the Congress Party supported the communist movement from 1967 to 1969 to win political contests, citing the election of Shri V.V. Giri and the defeat of Shri Neelam Sanjiva Reddy. He also criticized the Congress Government for removing tribal rights under Article 339 during the 1976 Emergency. In stark contrast to the congress, he credited schemes such as PM-JANMAN, the Dharti Aaba program, and the Aspirational Districts initiative for improving the conditions of naxal affected areas. He also highlighted the establishment of an AIIMS, an airport, and various technical colleges in his constituency and concluded by noting that currently Jharkhand has no Naxal-affected districts.
Shri Asaduddin Owaisi (AIMIM, Hyderabad, Telangana) criticized the lack of civil administration and effective rehabilitation efforts by the Government. He noted that while the Ministry of Home Affairs accepted the 2025 Maoist Relief and Rehabilitation Policy for Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, there are still instances of advanced weaponry like Israeli Tavor assault rifle, being recovered. He argued that the situation in the “cutoff area” of the Andhra Pradesh-Odisha border requires the proper implementation of the Fifth Schedule, PESA, and the Forest Rights Act. Further, he urged the house to expand discussion beyond Left-wing extremism and focus on Right-wing extremism as well. He further alleged that institutionalized radicalism and extremism is being used against Muslims.
Shri Anurag Singh Thakur (BJP, Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh) stated that Naxalism has been one of the most painful wounds on the nation for decades and accused the Congress party of failing to address the issue while it spread across 126 districts. He highlighted that under the leadership of the Prime Minister and Home Minister, the Government has taken a firm resolution to eliminate Naxalism by 31st March 2026. Further, he paid tribute to the 1,851 security personnel and 7,000 citizens who lost their lives in the conflict.
Shri Amit Shah Ji (Union Minister, Ministry of Home Affairs; BJP, Gandhinagar, Gujarat) traced Naxalism’s roots to early 20th-century communist movements in Russia and China, highlighting events like the 1905 upheaval, Lenin’s rise, and Mao’s revolution. He linked these to India, noting the formation of the CPI in 1925, the CPI(M) split in 1964, and the emergence of CPI(ML) in 1969, which rejected parliamentary democracy in favor of armed revolution.
He detailed the consolidation of various extremist groups, such as the MCC (Maoist Communist Centre) in Bihar and Jharkhand and the PWG (People’s War Group) in Andhra Pradesh. He noted that in 2000, the PLGA (People’s Liberation Guerrilla Army) was formed as a specialized guerrilla force, and in 2004. He argued that the movement’s history proves its goal is to obtain power through “bullets” rather than “ballots.” He emphasized that Naxalism should not be glorified as a struggle against injustice, as its core ideology is rooted in the violent overthrow of the state.
He stated that unlike previous administrations, his Government chose to neutralize Maoists to pave the way for development. He listed the establishment of 259 Eklavya Model Residential Schools, 47 ITIs, 49 Skill Development Centers, and 16 Kaushal Vikas Kendra, involving an additional expenditure of ₹ 800 crore. In the health sector, he highlighted the construction of a 240-bed super-specialty hospital in Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh.
He detailed the Government’s investment in tribal welfare and regional infrastructure, noting that ₹ 2,212 crore has been spent on Civic Action Program, related to health camps and medicines. He highlighted significant financial allocations for security and development, including ₹ 3,000 crore over the last 10 years under the Security Related Expenditure (SRE) scheme, ₹ 5,000 crore for the Special Infrastructure Scheme and ₹ 2,000 crore for an extended SIS Scheme. He specified that ₹ 4,000 crore from central funds was utilized for critical public infrastructure.
He outlined the strategic shift since 2014, emphasizing a clear policy and strong political will under the leadership of Shri Narendra Modi Ji. He asserted that illegal activities, whether in Kashmir, the North-East, or regions affected by Left-Wing Extremism, would no longer be tolerated. He explained that the Government has adopted the “Whole of Government” and “Whole of Agency” approach, ensuring alignment between the Centre and States, and seamless coordination between the Central Armed Police Forces and State Police.
He reaffirmed the goal of making India Naxal-free by 31st March, 2026 and informed the House that Bihar, Odisha, and nearly all of Maharashtra and Jharkhand had been cleared of Naxal influence by 2024.
He stated that 596 fortified police stations were constructed over the past 11 years. Further, the number of Naxal-affected districts declined from 126 to 2, while “most affected” districts reduced from 35 to 0. He further specified that the number of police stations recording Naxal incidents has dropped from 350 to 7. He detailed the addition of 406 new CAPF camps, 68 night-landing helipads, and deployment of 400 bullet-proof and blast-proof vehicles for security personnel.
Furthermore, he added that between 2024-early 2026, 706 Naxalites were killed in encounters, 2,218 were arrested, and 4,839 surrendered. He also informed the House of the successful operations that helped reduce Naxalism like Operation Octopus, Operation Double Bull, Operation Thunderstorm and Operation Black.
He mentioned Congress party’s past affiliations, alleging that members of the National Advisory Council during the UPA Government had extremist sympathies. He further alleged that Shri Rahul Gandhi shared stages with individuals having extremist ideologies, even during the Bharat Jodo Yatra. He concluded by paying tribute to the security personnel and innocent citizens who lost their lives to Naxal violence.
The Lok Sabha was adjourned at 7:29 PM to reconvene at 11:00 AM on Wednesday, 1st April 2026.
III. Rajya Sabha Proceedings:
The proceedings of the Rajya Sabha commenced at 11:00 AM.
Papers and Reports were laid on the Table.
Shri C.P. Radhakrishnan Ji (Chairman, Rajya Sabha) proceeded with the matters raised with permission.
Dr. Ajeet Madhavrao Gopchade (BJP, Maharashtra) urged the Government to declare Nanded as a “Holy City”, which he described as the sacred land associated with Guru Gobind Singh and the Guru Granth Sahib, particularly the revered shrine of Takht Sachkhand Sri Hazur Abchalnagar Sahib.
Shri Sukhendu Sekhar Ray (AITC, West Bengal) raised the issue of freedom of speech and expression in universities and higher educational institutions, invoking Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. He stated that universities and higher educational institutions ought to function as dynamic spaces for vibrant intellectual debate, where diverse political perspectives and cultural ideas can be discussed openly.
Shri Pramod Tiwari (INC, Rajasthan) raised a matter concerning the dignity of Parliament and democratic accountability. He said that it had become a common experience where phone calls made by Members of Parliament often do not receive a callback, and letters written by MPs frequently go unanswered, despite clear instructions from the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT).
Dr. K. Laxman (BJP, Uttar Pradesh) raised the issue of misuse of OBC reservation, arguing that the benefits meant for socially and educationally backward classes were being extended on the basis of religion. He contended that while the 27% reservation for OBCs was intended for genuinely backward communities, certain States were granting reservation to Muslims on purely religious grounds, thereby distorting the original purpose of the policy.
Shri Jagat Prakash Nadda Ji (Leader of the House; BJP, Gujarat) interjected and stated that the opposition had no interest in debate, no respect for democratic values, and no regard for the parliamentary procedure. He further alleged that the opposition lacked faith in the Constitution, and claimed that these parties treat Muslim citizens as a vote bank and pursue appeasement politics. In the context of the issue raised by Dr. K. Laxman (BJP, Uttar Pradesh), stated that there was no constitutional provision for Muslim reservation within the OBC category, and referred to the Andhra Pradesh High Court as having struck down such a measure.
Following this, Shri C.P. Radhakrishnan Ji (Chairman, Rajya Sabha) commenced the Question Hour.
Dr. M. Thambidurai (AIADMK, Tamil Nadu) expressed concerns over passenger safety and airport management. He pointed out that Bengaluru airport has two runways, but alleged that they were not being properly utilised, with only one runway being used effectively despite heavy traffic. He asked how the Government intended to resolve such operational problems, particularly in situations involving fuel constraints.
Shri Kinjarapu Rammohan Naidu, (Union Minister, Ministry of Civil Aviation; TDP, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh) responded that whenever there is an emergency landing or a request for priority landing based on safety considerations, such flights are definitely accorded priority at airports. He also emphasized that all safety-related procedures are governed by strict protocols, and that even in emergencies, decisions must be taken in compliance with established safety regulations. He added that on the issue of multiple runways, both runways cannot be used simultaneously for parallel operations unless they are separated by the required minimum distance.
Shri Raghav Chadha (AAP, Punjab) raised the issue of flight delays and passenger compensation. He asked whether the Government was considering or had already introduced any provision under which passengers would receive compensation for delayed flights.
Shri Kinjarapu Rammohan Naidu, (Union Minister, Ministry of Civil Aviation; TDP, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh) stated that passenger rights in cases of flight delays are already covered under the Passenger Charter, which provides for assistance, meals for delays beyond 3 hours, and refund entitlements depending on the duration of delay or cancellation. He added that while some delays arise from factors such as weather or safety concerns, airlines are still required to comply with the Ministry’s charter, and the Government is working to increase passenger awareness of these rights.
Shri Neeraj Dangi (INC, Rajasthan) inquired regarding the steps taken by the Government to address the limited water testing capacity of laboratories in several States, especially their inability to test for major contaminants such as arsenic. He asked whether the Government had any preventive measures to stop the mixing of sewage water with drinking water in urban areas.
Shri C.R. Patil (Union Minister, Ministry of Jal Shakti; BJP, Navsari, Gujarat) stated that across the country there were around 14,020 water sources identified as being affected by arsenic and fluoride contamination. He said that such sources cannot simply be shut down, but that they are sealed with cement to prevent the contaminated water from seeping further into the ground. He added that of the 14,020 contaminated sources, the number had now been reduced to only 305 locations where arsenic- and fluoride-affected water remained a concern. He referred to fluoride-affected habitations, stating that their number had fallen from 17,996 to 244.
Shri Sana Sathish Babu (TDP, Andhra Pradesh) stated that the full implementation of the MSME-CDP scheme could generate 60,000 jobs in Andhra Pradesh, and urged the Government to consider setting up skill upgradation centres, learning facilities, and training infrastructure in both existing and upcoming clusters to support the young workforce through targeted training programmes.
Shri Jitan Ram Manjhi (Union Minister; Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises; HAM(S), Gaya (SC), Bihar) clarified that the scheme operates through Common Facility Centres (CFCs) and Infrastructure Development (ID) projects. He stated that in Andhra Pradesh, 47 projects had been approved, comprising 11 CFCs and 36 ID projects. Of these, 5 CFCs and 12 ID projects were operational/completed, generating 8,300 jobs through CFCs and 57,796 jobs through infrastructure projects.
The proceedings of the house were adjourned at 1:00 PM to reconvene at 2:00 PM.
Following the recommencement, Shri Harivansh Ji (Deputy Chairman, Rajya Sabha; JD(U), Bihar) commenced the discussion on the Central Armed Police Forces (General Administration) Bill, 2026.
Shri Sanjay Singh (AAP, National Capital Territory of Delhi) opposed the bill and stated that the Government was committing injustice against the personnel who risked their lives to protect the country. He noted that the total strength of officers and personnel was approximately 11 lakh with a combined 2,290 officers and jawans having died in service across various forces. He further questioned the Government whether martyr status would be granted to those who died in service. He further highlighted delays in CAPF officers reaching Second-in-Command and ADG levels, contrasting it with IPS timelines, to demonstrate systemic inequities. He concluded by urging the Government to not commit injustice against CAPF officers and personnel, stating that such treatment would not be forgiven by the nation.
Shri Muzibulla Khan (BJD, Odisha) noted that India faces complex internal security challenges and stressed strengthening forces through modern technologies like drones, AI, and data-driven systems. He questioned the need for the Bill despite Supreme Court rulings, emphasizing that CAPF personnel risk their lives and deserve justice, recognition, and rightful entitlements. He also highlighted that respecting security forces is a national duty, citing Biju Babu’s contributions during the freedom struggle and in securing Kashmir. He concluded by urging that CAPF personnel and historical figures like Biju Babu be given due honor and recognition for their service to the nation.
Prof. Ram Gopal Yadav (SP, Uttar Pradesh) questioned why CAPF personnel are forced to seek judicial intervention due to disparities in service conditions. He criticized the stagnant career progression of CAPF officers compared to their IAS and IPS counterparts, noting that many remain Assistant Commandants for decades. He warned that the resulting frustration and high rates of voluntary retirement pose a serious threat to national security. He also highlighted that the disability pensions for CAPF personnel are currently taxable. He further reminded the House that the NDA Government had discontinued their pensions in 2003. He argued that it was unjust to withhold these benefits. He concluded by demanding that the bill be referred to a Select Committee. He further insisted that all stakeholders must be consulted to ensure that the grievances of CAPF personnel are addressed.
Dr. Sudhanshu Trivedi (BJP, Uttar Pradesh) expressed strong support for the CAPF Bill, highlighting the vital role of these forces in both border defense and internal security. He highlighted the significant shift in the security landscape particularly in Bastar where the participation in “Bastar Olympics” grew from 1.65 lakh youth in 2024 to nearly 4 lakh in 2025. He also pointed out that the bill removes reserved quotas for IPS officers at the DIG level, opening these positions to cadre officers to ensure fairer career progression. He highlighted that compensation for deaths on duty has been set to ₹ 25 lakhs and ₹ 35 lakhs for deaths in action.
Shri Digvijay Singh (INC, Madhya Pradesh) asserted that the bill is not introduced out of Government initiative but is a defensive measure to avoid a contempt of court charge. He stated that the Government was acting only because it faced an April 1st deadline set by the judiciary, which ruled in favor of the CAPF’s demands for recognition as an Organized Group A Service (OGAS). He criticized the Government’s intelligence record, citing the Jhiram Ghati and Pulwama attacks as major lapses that occurred despite the Government’s claims of improved security. He further criticized the bill’s provision to reserve 50% of IG-level and 67% of ADG-level posts for IPS officers and stated that this is a legislative workaround to avoid implementing the Supreme Court’s mandate for fair promotional avenues for the CAPF cadre. He described the legislation as discriminatory, unjust, and demoralizing for the forces. Finally, he demanded that the Government either withdraw the bill or refer it to a Select Committee for further review.
Shri Sanjay Raut (SS-UBT, Maharashtra) expressed doubt that the proposed legislation would actually improve coordination between state and central authorities as claimed. He characterized the bill as an attempt to “capture” the command of the CAPF by external leadership. He argued that it is unjust to deny cadre officers the opportunity to lead their own organizations. He further highlighted the promotion delays faced by cadre officers, noting that it takes 15-16 years for an officer to move from Assistant Commandant to Deputy Commandant. He questioned why the highest position (Director General) is reserved exclusively for IPS officers, preventing internal cadre members from ever reaching the top. He urged the Government to refer the bill to a Select Committee as the legislation is not a general administrative matter and requires deeper scrutiny.
Shri Subhash Barala (BJP, Haryana) stated that the primary purpose of the bill is to bring all these major forces under “one umbrella.” He further highlighted that the bill seeks to establish a uniform structure for Group ‘A’ General Duty officers. He explained that this would create consistency in recruitment, service conditions, transfers, and promotions across all branches of the CAPF. Subsequently, he rejected the opposition’s claims that the bill was drafted in haste. He cited the Prime Minister’s decisive actions in Gujarat (such as the earthquake response) and at the national level (including the removal of Article 370 and the containment of Naxalism) as evidence of the Government’s commitment to effective crisis management and internal security.
Shri Shaktisinh Gohil (INC, Gujarat) stated that while the nation sleeps peacefully due to the vigilance of the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs), the proposed bill would severely undermine their morale. He highlighted the quotas proposed in the bill, noting that 50% of Inspector General (IG) posts and at least 67% of Additional Director General (ADG) posts were to be filled through deputation, primarily by IPS officers. He maintained that the legislature could not simply enact a law to override a judicial decision without addressing the substantive legal reasoning underlying that ruling. He further alleged that the bill had been introduced with mala fide intent, specifically to circumvent a Supreme Court judgment dated 23rd May 2025, delivered by Justices Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan.
In the chair, Dr. Dinesh Sharma (BJP, Uttar Pradesh) took up Special Mentions.
Dr. Bhim Singh (BJP, Bihar) stated that Vipulachal is a significant centre of India’s ancient heritage, particularly as the seat of power of Jarasandh during the era of the Mahabharata. He pointed out that although the Archaeological Survey of India has formally recognized the mountain’s historical significance, meaningful conservation efforts have yet to be undertaken. He added that projects initiated in 2009 remain incomplete, leaving several ancient structures in a dilapidated condition.
Shri Ramji lal Suman (SP, Uttar Pradesh) urged the inclusion of the Banjara community of Uttar Pradesh in the Scheduled Tribe (ST) category. He stated that the Banjara community, with a population exceeding 2 million, resides across nearly 26 parliamentary constituencies. In addition, he mentioned that detailed ethnographic surveys have also been submitted multiple times in support of this demand, yet the matter remains pending.
Shri Niranjan Bishi (BJD, Odisha) addressed the House regarding the urgent need for the strict implementation of Supreme Court guidelines on the cancellation of fraudulent caste certificates. He emphasized the severe injustice faced by genuine Scheduled Caste (SC) and Scheduled Tribe (ST) communities due to the misuse of such certificates by ineligible individuals.
The Rajya Sabha was adjourned at 6:00 PM to reconvene at 11:00 AM on Wednesday, 1st April 2026.
IV. Events Outside The Parliament
Shri Damodar Agarwal (BJP, Bhilwara, Rajasthan) praised Shri Nitish Kumar, calling him a tall leader and noting that NDA respected his wish to serve in the Rajya Sabha. He dismissed Sushree Mamata Banerjee’s remarks about a potential ban on fish and meat as an attempt to polarise voters, reflecting political desperation.
Shri E.T. Muhammed Basheer (IUML, Malappuram, Kerala) stated that the Modi Government is actively working against the interests of minorities, based on clear evidence and past experience. He also asserted that the CPM consistently acts against the interests of the people.
Responding to Shri Hussain Dalwai’s remarks regarding India’s foreign policy, Shri Dinesh Sharma (BJP, Uttar Pradesh) said Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi Ji has already made statements in both Houses of Parliament, and accused the INC of repeatedly questioning the Government to defame it.
Prof. Manoj Kumar Jha (RJD, Bihar) accused the Government of neither understanding the Constitution nor the Backward Classes Commission. He warned that such actions amount to setting the Constitution on fire and are aimed at dismantling the Mandal Commission framework.
Smt. Priyanka Gandhi Vadra (INC, Wayanad, Kerala) stated that all of Kerala knows the truth about the alliance, regardless of what Hon’ble Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi Ji says. She demanded a debate on the West Asia conflict, citing rising gas cylinder prices, and called for a united solution with the Government clearly outlining its preparedness.
Shri Ramdas Athawale (RPI(ATWL), Maharastra) clarified that reservation is not granted on the basis of religion, noting that 80% of Muslims already benefit from reservation and children receive 10% under the EWS category.
Shri Rajiv Shukla (INC, Chhattisgarh) stated the Government is playing politics by blaming INC, asserting that during the INC regime, ships never stopped, there was no crisis, and no queues were seen outside gas agencies or petrol pumps.
Shri Manish Tewari (INC, Chandigarh, Chandigarh) stated that the Opposition had submitted notices under Rule 193 on 9th and 13th March demanding a discussion on the West Asia situation. He added that a Government assurance was conveyed through the Business Advisory Committee. However, as global conditions deteriorated over the following month, the Opposition raised the issue in the House.
Smt. Dimple Yadav (SP, Mainpuri, Uttar Pradesh) said that while the Government promotes ethanol-mixed fuel, it can potentially damage vehicle engines. She asked who would compensate for such damage and urged the Government to frame a systematic policy to protect people.
Shri Pramod Tiwari (INC, Rajasthan) said that the issue raised by Dr. K. Laxman (BJP, Uttar Pradesh) in Zero Hour regarding misuse of OBC reservation in opposition-led states, violated the spirit of the Mandal Commission and the Constitution by denying reservations to minorities within Backward Classes, breaching the principle of non-discrimination under Article 14. This led the Opposition, after the LoP’s intervention, to boycott and walk out of Rajya Sabha.
Annexure I - Matters Raised Under Rule 377 In The Lok Sabha
Annexure II - Reports And Statements Presented In The Lok Sabha
Annexure III - Bills Passed In The Lok Sabha
Annexure IV - Members Who Participated in Discussion on Efforts To Free The Country From Left-Wing Extremism in Lok Sabha
Annexure V - Reports And Statements Presented In Rajya Sabha
Annexure VI - Matters Raised With Permission In The Rajya Sabha
Annexure VII - Members Who Took Part in Discussion on The Central Armed Police Forces (General Administration) Bill, 2026 in Rajya Sabha